Daniel Wilson aka "Debunk the Funk" claims to be a scientific truth-teller. In my opinion, he's a master of misdirection. I'm going to show you why I think that including a video.
R Marcucio is not a subscriber and seems to have differing views. He is UCSF Professor Ralph S Marcucio who has a h-index of 51. I've emailed him and invited him to a live civil discussion, but Wayne did that earlier and he REFUSED.
Dr. Marcurio, with a h-index of 51 from publishing orthopedic surgery papers, would not waste his time speaking with COVID-19 grifters. Kirsch has not corrected his logical fallacies about statistics after discussing p-values with Dr. Ian Copeland.
How pathetic. Steve as a pioneer in Silicon Valley has made a world class fortune from the companies he created and has proven his intelligence and drive in the marketplace. He, unlike you, does not need piddly squat from writing on the internet. What a lonely life you must have shilling for criminal organizations.
This Carlos thing never will end. It amazes me that people keep engaging it. But it foments anger and division, and hostility and people fall for it. As many posters have said. In the rare occasion he is a real human. We want him triple masked, and five times injected. He won't last very long. Carlos is an enigma but people smarter than me have pointed out syntax errors and caught it in logistical traps, so I think it's an AI bot.
2. Knowing that you are part of the solution. I donate every cent I get in subscription income into activities and organizations that are focused on getting the truth out about these vaccines.
My goal is to get to 100,000 paid subscribers enabling me to donate $500,000 a month to getting word out and saving lives.
Although I do not know which organizations receive Substack subscriber fees, I would conjecture that the organizations are anti-vaccine propaganda groups (i.e. Children's Health Defense, ICAN) that do not state the truth about vaccines or follow the scientific method. Logical fallacies are prevalent in anti-vaccine propaganda: post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, base rate fallacy, survivorship bias, etc.
I volunteer to state the truth about COVID-19 vaccines.
Well, that's a new word I have not heard of before. "grifter" 1 year ago I did not know of the word clown world, controlled opposition, paid troll and AI bot. Now I have to investigate the term "grifter"? One thing seems certain from chatting with the regulars on these stacks is whatever "Carlos" is it is evil and nefarious.
Yes, but Steve's "analysis" has far more errors than a missing p-value, which could be 0.05 or 0.01 depending on the confidence interval. Unvaccinated status is associated with greater COVID-19 hospitalization risk compared to fully boosted status. Many studies with correct statistical analysis have found vaccines reduce severity of COVID-19 symptoms:
You would deny early treatment and then brag about how many unvaccinated Covid patients are hospitalized - but can that study even be trusted? Anyone can use internet search to find numerous articles about how big pharma influences AMA, the publisher of JAMA.
The book "Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients," by Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. George Fareed and Mathew Crawford is about two doctors who used a treatment protocol early in the pandemic and early in treatment when the conventional wisdom issued was not to provide any treatment to patients and send them home until they got sick and then go to the hospital where they were then often put on breathing machines – many of whom died.
To the contrary, every one of the patients Dr. Tyson and Dr. Fareed treated early in the illness recovered and there were no deaths. They also treated those who were severely sick and only lost a few.
The book is pseudoscientific by omitting control groups, making incorrect exclusion criteria to omit COVID-19 deaths, and criticizes legitimate biostatisticians. Why did the studies not undergo assessment in peer-reviewed journals for publication to other physicians and scientists?
MRNA exists naturally in animal and plant cells. COVID-19 vaccines are saving lives by reducing severity of disease by causing memory B and T cell responses against viral antigens. Wikipedia and Bitchute are not primary sources of science.
I hope your faith in the jabs has you fully up-to-date with every last booster.
I am re-reading for the 3rd time, Geert Vanden Bossche's book, "The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic." He is a primary source for science. Here is a quote from page 152.
"As viral infectiousness of newly emerging (more virulent) immune escape variants does no longer increase, trained Cell Based Innate Immunity in the unvaccinated can catch up with new emerging variants to protect the unvaccinated from symptomatic infection. Sterilizing immunity in the unvaccinated combined with a HIGH MORTALITY IN THE VACCINATED will eventually lead to natural extinction of the pandemic in highly vaccinated populations."
Well good. End of the pandemic. Geert Vanden Bossche says it will be hard on the jabbed.
Vanden Bossche ignores the fact that natural immunity wanes over time and is less robust than hybrid immunity. Mortality rate per capita is lower in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated in every country.
"Vanden Bossche claimed that mass COVID-19 vaccination would precipitate immune escape, allowing the spread of “vaccine-resistant” variants of the virus. While resistance to vaccines has emerged before, this occurs only rarely[6]. Contrast this with the current variants of concern that researchers have observed, which all evolved naturally from infected individuals. Vanden Bossche provided no evidence indicating that COVID-19 vaccines pose a greater risk of immune escape than that mediated by uncontrolled viral spread and natural infection. And as mentioned previously, earlier mass vaccination campaigns against childhood diseases like measles effectively curbed disease outbreaks and didn’t result in worse outbreaks occurring. This observation contradicts his implication that this risk of COVID-19 vaccination outweighs its benefit."
The covid shots are pure poison as has been documented over and over again. Only those trying to protect the government and drug industry from their culpability in these historic Crimes Against Humanity would try to counter the truth with lies, obfuscations and misdirection.
Read "Turtles all the way Down" to get some enlightenment on the criminal enterprises you shill for. You know, the book that the medical complex pretends does not exist because it is the unholy truth about our medical government complex.
It was known early on in the scamdemic that patients infected with the original SARS from 2003 showed an immune response to COVID-19 17 years later. So it doesn't wane that much. Also patients suffering from the Spanish Flu are showing immunity a century later.
There is no evidence of SARS-CoV-1 providing long-term immunity against other coronaviruses 17 years later. SARS-COV-2 is a different type of coronavirus from SARS-CoV-1.
The MRNA used in the subpar vaccines is synthetic not natural. It doesn’t invoke memory T cells & if it did you wouldn’t require repeated doses especially over months.
Pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines is an abundant modified nucleoside in non-coding RNAs across many species. Natural immunity wanes within months and does not prevent reinfection from Omicron subvariants.
We next developed an expanded antigen probe panel to better quantify memory B cell specificities to different regions of the spike protein and test how RBD binding by memory B cells may be affected by the mutations found in emerging VOCs. Specifically, we designed B cell tetramers for eight SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including full-length spike, N-terminal domain (NTD), multiple variant RBDs (WT, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and B.1.617.2), and the S2 domain (Fig. 3, A and B). Spike-specific memory B cells were defined on the basis of a multiple-discrimination approach, with binding to full-length spike plus one or more additional probes. This strategy also allowed us to identify memory B cells that cross-bind all variant RBDs (all variant+). SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was used as a vaccine-irrelevant antigen (but one for which SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects had detectable preexisting immunity; fig. S4, A and B). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S1B. We also leveraged a separate cohort of health care workers (HCWs) (table S1) who had mild COVID-19 and were sampled longitudinally after a positive serology test to compare vaccine-induced responses with infection alone (40)."
"Memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines:
In addition to antibodies and memory B cells, memory T cells can contribute to protection upon reexposure to virus. Memory T cell responses have also been shown to be less affected by VOCs than humoral immune responses (21, 50). To determine whether mRNA vaccination induced durable antigen-specific memory T cell responses, we performed a flow cytometric analysis using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. PBMCs were stimulated with peptide megapools containing optimized spike epitopes (51, 52). Antigen-specific responses were quantified as the frequency of AIM+ non-naïve T cells in stimulated samples with background subtraction from paired unstimulated controls (Fig. 5, A and B) (19). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S6. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells were defined on the basis of coexpression of CD40L and CD200. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells were defined on the basis of expression of four of five total activation markers, as described previously (19)."
45 Times as Many Deaths After COVID Shots in Just 2 Years Compared With All Flu Vaccine-Related Deaths Since 1990, Data Show
“Our meta-analysis of both national and international vaccine adverse events emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating public health policies that promote universal mass injection and multiple boosters for all demographic groups,” said the authors of a peer-reviewed study published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Eliana Romero, Ph.D., director of clinical research at the Neurodiversity Foundation, Shawn Fry, founder and chief science officer of the Neurodiversity Foundation and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense and associate professor of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California, authored the paper.
The researchers looked at adverse events specifically related to cardiovascular and fertility health — such as myocarditis and menstrual abnormalities — that went overlooked during the “expedited safety analyses” that took place in the “accelerated approval process that allowed the manufacturers to fast-track their products,” they said.
the paper is a dumpster dive into self-reporting databases used to identify potential safety signals. the reports are not documentation of things caused by vaccines...
So if it's a dumpster then explain where the 4000 pregnant females that Pfizer promised in a study in Feb 2021as they called it safe and pushed it on pregnant females. Number dwindle to 347 and where is the promised report in 7 to 10 months which is now 18 months overdue. I hear it's bad news. If it was good news it would have been trumpeted on every news station. You have heard of the polio vaccine by Cutter which had a live polio virus and killed kids and gave them polio in 1955 and guess what happened. The courts found them guilty for calling it safe. NIH people got fired or resigned. So a lesson for these so called safe vaccines.
You're a piece of garbage. I watched my Father die from THREE separate forms of rapidly accelerating "turbo" cancers that had NOT previously been there, that burst out of nowhere after his rapid ill health following the buster 💉 shot, two of which leapt from having been undetectable in the scans that determined the presence of the first to being STAGE FOUR when found in a follow up scan only
EIGHT weeks LATER. FIVE of my neighbours DIED inside a WEEK of receiving the FIRST 💉 shot & scores of schoolchildren and adolescents have routinely adorned
the pages of the local press with headlines such as "Eleven year old schoolboy dies during lunch hour at
local school", or 17yr olds, or 14yr olds, etc. There were even articles about the likes of a married couple in their 30's & mother in law in her 50's all getting jabbed on the same occasion & the mother in law and husband dying within 48hrs & the wife becoming seriously ill and being hospitalised, of kids returning home from school and finding BOTH
parents (in their 30's) DEAD, & of EVERY school now HAVING to have a DEFIBRILLATOR installed. History is NOT going to shine favourably upon lying propagandists like YOU. These rising & waning (but always generally climbing) deaths & disabilities can even be chronologically tabulated and shown to have vastly increased around the timescale of EVERY jab roll out, or buster drive, too. It's always the same with you self appointed "experts" and your false equivalences- it's "highly significant
data gleaned via scientific methodology" when it SUPPORTS your claims, but, when it DOESN'T, the goalposts are moved, & identical modalities & methodologies become "dumpster dives" of irrelevant, merely "anecdotal" 'tales', and the well worn "correlation DOESN'T equal causation!", except when YOU liars decide that it DOES, eh? It is a criminal offence to input false reports and data into the VAERS mechanism, & necessitates the input & attendant reports of the individual clinicians who had dealt with the victims, therefore, it's hardly credible to suggest that the figures therein are the result of paranoid, hysterical hypochondriacs, conflating OTHER issues with vaccine damage, in error, yet, as HAS been captured, footage in REAL TIME & screenshot,
BOTH VAERS and the UK's MHRA Yellow Card system have BOTH been caught REMOVING several THOUSAND fatalities in one fell swoop from the total amount of recorded fatalities, quite APART from the fact that the intentional "throttling" and resultant massive BACKLOG of as yet UNCOUNTED REPORTS has ALSO been exposed time and again. I honestly believe that you, and everyone LIKE you, better get on your damn KNEES, face pressed to the floor, and BEG God to forgive you for the wilful, conscious part that you & your pseudo-"scientific" accomplices have played in the installation and perpetuation of this still ongoing atrocity, but honestly, I really hope you DON'T...........
You may not agree to debate Steve Kirsch, but how about me?
Biochemistry and Toxicology joint honours, 1st class degree. PhD in respiratory pharmacology with focus on opiates and respiration. 30+ years leadership of pharmaceutical R&D to vice president at Pfizer and CEO of a biotech I founded. Consultant to 30 biotech companies (before they fired me in 2020). Earnings from commenting on covid & vaccines: $ zero.
I don't care about your credentials if your medical claims are proven wrong by scientific data. You were wrong about the COVID-19 pandemic ending in 2020 in the UK.
When I looked at the 'pandemic' data of daily cases as things happened, Australia's pandemic flatlined already by August 2020 and Sweden similarly... following the exact timeline suggested by one of UK's senior virologist, a professor at one of the universities if I recall, from when COVID was announced and before we knew anything what was going on. I can't remember his name, but kind of a bland looking man, and he was interviewed by TV many times and then he disappeared from media and they never approached him again.
He never recommended lockdowns, masks or anything - he actually opposed it and said it would only delay immunity from developing and harm the economy. He said natural immunity would develop in 8-10 months, and people should simply go on as usual but observe more cleanliness and improve lifestyle and vitamin intake to boost their own immunity.
COVID was basically over by August 2020. But they - whoever is the running force behind this (which seem to be tied in with the military and the CIA, according to Robert Kennedy) had to ride the wave and create something out of nothing. Made them billions though and allowed them to rob us off our freedom to install surveillance units all across each country, and test how far they could go to install a dictatorial policy. And this year, 2023, is the launch year for government controlled digital currency which decides what you can buy, when you can buy it, from whom you can buy - and if you're not compliant, you can get cut off from all access to be able to sustain yourself. That's where we're heading if people don't object.
You're perfectly correct in your statements:this HAS all been an exercise in advancing a verrrrrry sinister totalitarian agenda. There are FAR too many "synchronicities" that all TOO conveniently dovetail towards a seemingly central theme- CONTROL. Event 201, ID/2020, Operation Lockstep, SPARS, combined with so many of the precedents to them, U.N. Agenda 21/2030, the so called "great" reset/4th industrial revolution, the many "sustainability" goals of the climate catastrophizing propagandists and the utter folly of the pseudo-science that purports to support it. Even the "6uild 6ack 6etter" song & dance, so curiously trumpeted simultaneously & with identical phrasing predates the scam/sham/flim- flamdemic/ damn- panic, plandemic, having previously appeared on "king" Charlie's site (the duchy of Cornwall, I think?) a few years prior. Much, if not ALL of this, can be traced back to, at LEAST 2013, according to the statements made by the whistle blowing ex contracts lawyer for some of the pharmaceutical complex cartels, who, on Redacted news-channel & elsewhere, states that there are a many headed hydra of "twisty-turny" collaborations between big pharma, defence contractors, the many "alphabet" agencies of the intelligence apparatus
& the D.o.D., a large number of said contracts being to do with cross confidentialities, and one of the central, salient motivations for both the installation of the E.U.A.'s & their continued use is that these pseudo-vaccines are NOT inherently regulated applied therapeutic medications, but instead have the designation of "military prototypes" !!
There ARE NO positive therapeutic curative, medicinal, beneficial qualities nor properties within the jab, NONE, & it's quite amazing to watch the likes of Mercurio (Mercury, God of tricksters and liars) & Gonzales continue to utterly ignore the likes of La Quinta Columna's research into the jab via electron microscopy (& that of many others now) SHOWING the clear & irrefutable presence of graphene oxide structures, highly sinister self-assembling nano-matrices & biotechnologies & the
terrifying lil' critters swimming around in there thought to be, or synthetically derive from the Hydra Vulgaris parasite, 🪱,
or the synthetic Hydra Lineaus. One need only GO to the sites of La Quinta Columna or holistichealthonline.com or the documentaries/site/ channel & guests of the likes of Stew Peters, Maria Zee & others. I challenge not merely ☝️those two jokers, but ANY of the jab-happy pharma reps, pro jab policy pushing politicians, or scumbag propagandizing presstitutes in their scumbag propagandizing ooze-papers to even ADDRESS the issue of this now growing body of footage and proofs. Why ARE the jabbed emitting outgoing MAC address Bluetooth signals with seemingly individual identification registration numbers or codes, or even the GRAVES of DEAD jab victims STILL pumpin'
out the signals!!?? Pah! MORE "dumpster dives" of "merely anecdotal" ornamentation, eh fellas? I can't HEAR you? It all just becomes more and MORE horrifying with every passing day now, & according to a growing number of reports, presumably the second that the W.H.O.'s tyrannical alterations to the I.H.R.'s come into place, we should be anticipating the imminent announcement of the NEXT plandemic (hmmm 🤔, something of the 'avian' persuasion, I think? Or....no, wait! Swine! Or.....or.....?).
Which peer-reviewed papers demonstrated your claim about COVID-19 not being a pandemic?
What scientific data shows PCR is "fraud"? The rebuttal to the Corman-Drosten paper is wrong. The principle of RT-PCR is to amplify short segments of reverse transcribed cDNA in real-time using primer-probe sets.
RT-qPCR is the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in diagnostic tests. Forward and reverse primers flank specific target regions of the viral sequence, working in tandem to initiate amplification of cDNA. Internal, positive, and negative controls have validated specifications. Cycle thresholds (Ct = 45) have specifications based on cut-off values from limit of detection (LOD). N1 has an individual Ct threshold for cut-off of background fluorescence and true signal.
You mean you never read any of the complaints about the constant large percentage of false positives in the COVID tests, including the PCR tests, nor the inventor Kary Mullins complaint that PCR was being misused to detect COVID? Mullims said PCR was only developed for FORENSIC analysis and cannot determine if an infection is active and infectous, or if it's simply dead residues from a past infection years prior? He also said the settings of the test was being misused and making the test excessively sensitive, which was why it would detect past residues that you may have from a cold in your childhood, but that doesn't mean you are spreading any infections.
Are you implying that Mullins was lying about his own invention?
It was endemic at end of 2020 in Britain and it's a coronavirus and the next influenza season brings new ones Including endemic covid and that scary variant that Matt Hancock said when should I deploy to scare people in Dec 2020 was to usher in 2021 bring restrictions and push the vaccine. So fraud on the people crime against humanity using fear. Care to comment on fraud Carlos as fraud is intentional deceptive actions to steal one's rights. Those covid testing sites in Britain were empty. Wonder how they pumped out so many tests in one day with no one at the sites.
I think the use of both together is always inappropriate in so-called covid.
I do not believe there was a novel respiratory virus & the most likely scenario is simply misattribution of flu and other acute respiratory illnesses to “covid”.
How often do we use midazolam and morphine together in a flu patient?
Thanks for saying that, Mike. But it is more than likely scenario, it is certain. The seasonal 'flu was weaponised, re-branded to make more money for big pharma etc. This has been going on for decades.
Like Peter McCullough, I took for granted what I was told about areas off piste from my own.
It’s impossible to know everything about one’s own area. There’s never time to check others assertions and assumptions.
When I did look I recall feeling unmoored. Flu vaccines reproducibly do not reduce hospitalization or death.
So what the dickens have we been doing for decades?
Committing fraud, that’s what.
They’re clearly not effective at protecting people from whatever caused acute respiratory illnesses in winter.
Why on earth would you expect something claimed to be a “covid19 vaccine” to fare differently?
And it doesn’t. No protection from anything & extraordinarily harmful effects in its stead.
Clearly not bad luck. You quickly reach the inescapable conclusion that their intentions are to injure, maim and kill.
One or two further logic steps tell you this entire episode is fraud, modern civilization is being dismantled and the end game can only be depopulation.
Hold you family close. Ignore propaganda entirely. TV & movies to zero. Now.
It was influenza B in Florida and no doubt US and Canada beginning of Jan 2020 and people describe everything they said covid did. Felt like a bus ran over them. It circulated at Disney world in Dec by people's accounts and no fear until March when they called it a Pandemic. Amazing everyone traveling going to sporting events school working with that covid like influenza B circulating and funny it becomes a covid name after the Pandemic is called.
For common sense. If it's a novel coronavirus we need to run and hide from then why run and get a novel vaccine for a novel coronavirus that you know nothing about and you yourself stated the Emergency rushed a vaccine. So run and hide from said scary novel coronzvurus we know nothing about but wait we found the perfect novel never tested never approved MRNA candidate and we don't know we picked the right or optimal or favorable one.
A vaccime expert stated in mass vaccination they can have bacteria such as e coli .They lied the vaccine stays in the Arm. Biontek makers in a slide show said it doesn't. Must go to the lymph nodes. One lie after another for these vaccines that still had to go under as gene therapy., experimental all the way. Pfizer couldn't predict if they used the favorable variant candidate. It's like having 4 keys and not knowing which one works. You could try 3 that fail and the 4th works or you could have 4 fail. You were using people's bodies with a new platform of vaccines where the medical trials had deaths and harms and lots covered up.
Oh, this is rich. You troll without a single credential and then call Dr. Yeadon unqualified? I suppose Dr. Malone is unqualified as well.
We don't need you to point us to the product of a billion dollar marketing war chest brought to you by the most criminally fined industry on the planet. Be gone troll.
I’m an pharmacologist, immunologist & toxicologist.
My entire life has been spent around drug discovery and development.
You won’t listen, but I can easily prove the entire vaccine story here is an utter fraud.
It’s completely impossible to conduct the necessary manufacturing R&D steps required to make consistent product is less than 4-5 years, probably closer to 8 years.
There is no magic or money than can bypass the minimum linear steps.
Also, vaccination even if done properly could never have been an appropriate or effective response to an outbreak such as they lied to us about.
Reason is immunosenescence. Elderly immune responses attenuate and is one of the main reasons why the elderly are so vulnerable in the first place. Instead eariy treatment was the correct response.
Flu vaccines don’t work either.
Same reason.
PCR is utterly useless as a clinical diagnostic. They also refused EVER to disclose operational false positive rate. Uncorrected data is completely useless. It’s fraud.
Finally, ALL mRNA based products will induce autoimmune toxicity. It’s axiomatic and unfixable. That’s because once your cells are making non self proteins, your immune system attacks & kills all such cells. Hence a very wide range of adverse events.
You do you. Enjoy your boosters.
Ps: I’ve lost hundreds of thousands of pounds in foregone income and received not one cent in income or donations after three years + pro bono work.
I’m arguably the most qualified scientist in the world speaking out against these injections.
Anthony Fauci appeared Milken institute Future of Health Summit (October 29, 2019) discussing how a future outbreak could give them the excuse to throw off the shackles of 7 to 10 years vaccine testing
The RAC removed?, RAC that's recombinant genetic products
advisory committee on biosafety and protecting people from harm when it comes to genetic products and pharmaceuticals in 2019 right before 2020.Anthony Fauci made a decision with his team to eliminate the RAC biosafety committee on genetic recombinant products and absorb it into the NIH saying we'll take it from here and then the NIH partnered with Moderna., and then what a surprise the covid hits and they get their excuse to rapidly deploy a ultra rapidly developed set of vaccines.
Mr Gates and his foundation is mentioned at the Milken event by the panel, and he becomes the Medias go to guy to sell these rushed jabs to the public and he states "We can have a vaccine in 2 years or we could make one in say a year with less safety" and he was right wasn't he?
less safety indeed..
Family members who took the jabs conveniently now have a weakened immune system and are getting sicker with each booster a bad reactions to each new one,they continue to get sick where as family members not jabbed have not had anything more then a cold since 2019.
And now we are told they are going to make mRNA jabs
for everything from cattle to cancer in 100 days from lab to jab
oh the joy given all the injuries and deaths from these ones
speeding things up even more is only going to make things worse.
None of us want them putting this stuff into our food.
The German health Minister has confirmed the risks are high
on national TV stating a severe reaction rate of nearly 1 in every 10.000 doses causes a severe reaction or disablement https://imgur.com/fDhd2nC.png but that increases with each dose
so if someone has had 4 or 5 jabs that could be 1 in 400 doses,
and what is his solution? they want to work with Big Pharma to
develop new drugs to treat those severely injured and severely disabled.
by these vaccines.
Chur Ching Big Pharma makes billions on treatments
for the injuries they caused, Germany is just one Country that has admitted the scale of the issue but Doctors in other countries have
been saying the same thing but are silenced if they go public, how many
people have they severely injured and severely disabled
by these vaccines Worldwide?.
its going to end up being billions of people. You might be in denial and parroting the media line of "safe and effective" but they are not safe and they don't work well at all so they not effective and no amount of Pharma funded stooges study papers are going to convince folk you are not lying and pointing us towards dishonest data.
We may never find out the true number of deaths they have caused.
I read the article you reference. They discuss and approve of the method of proportionality analysis (which is a comparison technique) and do not consider it irrelevant as you say. From your paper: "Although underreporting is a limitation, VAERS is capable of detecting possible safety problems through disproportionality analyses and the other methods described above." When the CDC finally did the proportionality analysis, the results were literally hundreds of red flags according to their own thresholds yet they ignore them.
yes disprortionality analysis, not direct comparisons of the numbers of reports. also, choosing vaccines is important. the paper chose thre pertussis vaccine...which one? and why? the military data is ecological...the paper is near meaningless.
Are you aware that the majority of vaccine safety studies are no against inert placebos but against existing vaccines. Those in turn against existing vaccines. Back top the point where clinical trials were not really a thing.
Well I'm done working on my truck for the day and relooked at the Hooker paper. It did NOT only compare the rate of reports for the different shots (which at 45X death is significant). Figure 1B does the disproportionality analysis you like and shows (compared to influenza vaccines) 40X menstrual irregularities, 4X myocarditis, and 3X cerebrovascular events!
Steve forgot to ask the most important question: Who is funding this guy?
Not too long ago Debunker dude had this guy on- birds of a feather?
Folta, Kevin (22 May 2022). "Episode 293:Debunking the Disinformation Dozen". Talking biotech with Dr. Kevin Folta (Podcast). Colabra. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
OMG, the editorial board is a who's who of antivaxxers...the journal is an anti-vaccine journal. the paper is a dumpster dive into VAERS and similar databases.
Masks were only ever there to keep up the illusion of a pandemic.
The "gold standard" of journals, the Cochraine review concluded that after 3 years of this nonsense that there was little to o evidence of masks being effective.
Now thousands of studies show what my research team (epidemiologist, naturopathic physician, microbiologist) showed in 2020-2021 on the hazards of mask-wearing, and were censored for doing so. - Colleen Huber NMD
How do masks prevent transmission? Does the virus get stuck in the mask fibers? Does the virus bounce off the mask and fall to the ground? If someone is wearing a mask and has Covid does the virus bounce off the mask and go back into their nose and mouth?
A later point on Dr. Huber's mask article is that she is referencing a recent study which analyzed over 2,000 mask studies.
She also references her own study from years ago analyzing over 200 studies. FYI, Dr. Huber's books and articles are always packed with studies.
Since this post and response you've stated how important peer-reviewed studies are to you. Did you at least glance at any of the thousands of studies analyzed in the recent mask report referenced in the article or the several hundred from years ago that have similar results and can you explain why a particular study is wrong?
Edit: Oh, are you the UCSF R Marcucio? That must be some big bonus pay.
You must know, then that doctors only wear masks for a short time during surgery, not all through a work shift like people are forced to with mandates.
If you read what I wrote, the teachers who got Vaxxed are the ones getting the virus, and there are a bunch of young female teachers, who cannot get pregnant from the Vaxx.
Well it's a stretch to reach that conclusion because it's not even based on real world experimenting. We've seen how poorly models have worked as "science" lately. But hey, if it's consensus it's now science, am I right? I've yet to understand how a healthy person who exhibits no symptoms, isn't coughing or sneezing and is driving alone in a car is protecting me from a disease because they have a cloth covering their respiratory system? This is the "science consensus" you'd like me to believe. The Cochrane study debunks this modelling theory. Do you have any real world experiments you'd like to post that price healthy, non coughing people benefit from breathing in recycled air?
You cannot use that paper to show that masks reduce transmission of the virus. What that paper clearly states is that randomized controlled trials (the gold standard) have shown mixed results. That paper doesn’t describe an “experiment” in any way, shape, or form. That paper described what they found using modeling. The problem with using modeling is that especially with an emerging disease there simply isn’t enough known information for the modeling information to be complete. We don’t even know what we don’t know we cannot possibly program an effective model. That’s why initial models showed an absurdly high death rate for Covid when actual death rate is well below 2% for most of the developed world (that’s including all the deaths that were listed as from Covid which were actually with Covid and the less than optimal treatment procedures and protocols).
Modeling simply does not prove anything because we don’t live in the Matrix and there are far too many variables in the real world to account for and that’s without dealing with a novel virus. All modeling gives is a strong hypothesis, according to this paper masks should stop the virus is the strongest conclusion one could possibly come to based on that paper. Frankly that is pushing it. The appropriate conclusion is that masks could prevent spread. But that is much weaker evidence than multiple RCTs, ignoring RCTs in favor of modeling is ludicrous.
Also practically speaking if those masks prevented spread nosocomial infections should have been zero given universal masking policies. Some studies have shown >30% NSI rates. On top of that NSI studies generally only take into account patients that are hospitalized, it doesn’t even look at the transmission rate among the staff or the rate at which hospital staff spread the infections throughout the community (when my workplace got hit with Covid it was due to a public health nurse ironically enough).
I couldn't respond to the poll since it didn't give "none of the above" as an option. I have absolutely no respect whatsoever for any of these, only deep, abiding contempt. Possibly I could have answered if the choice had been "whom do you despise the least (or most)?"
Susan Oliver now blocks people from her own channel and admits she can't even remember why. I know why! When she can't answer hard questions it's all she has left.....silence them!
Be nice and thankful for Daniel! He is at least debating, and if he's taught in scientific method, he will eventually admit being wrong, and celebrate it.
I appreciate all the good work that you are doing.
Closer to home, we have been fighting lots of local battles, including a new one with Lowell High School in San Francisco. I think we need to mobilize our forces against this (but it is a challenge with battles on so many fronts).
This is from Cole Turner-Dear San Francisco Medical Freedom Activists and Allies:
Yesterday, Lowell High School in SF began practicing school lock down, a social credit system, and in part, digital IDs. Scroll further down for more details from a Lowell parent.
I think we all know where this is going -- getting our children accustomed to having restrictions in their movements, having to scan their IDs to get in and out of non-optional locations, and having their movements restricted based on a "merit system". Which school, workplace, library, hospital, or courthouse is next?
We need all-hands-on-deck to shut this down immediately. Whether you're a Lowell student, parent, or alumni, a San Francisco resident, a taxpayer in California, or NOT -- please, please, please take immediate action to let the powers-that-be know: We will resist this.
Lockdowns, social credit systems, and digital IDs such as what have recently been used to control and punish populations in Communist China will NOT STAND in the United States.
Tweet to the City of San Francisco at:
@sfgov
Tweet to the Mayor's Office at:
@SFMayorsOffice
Tweet to London Breed at:
@LondonBreed
Tweet to Lowell HS Alumni at:
@lowellalumni
Tweet to the Friends of Lowell HS at:
@FriendsofLowell
Summary, from a Lowell parent in our SF group:
On April 6th, Lowell's new Principal sent a letter to families informing of a new "Closed Campus Protocol" to be implemented starting on April 10th, yesterday.
The reasoning behind this new policy is to improve safety and security in the school, but no information was given as to what prompted this sudden change. Rumors have it that a few weeks ago there were fights taking place at Stonestown Mall, where many students go for lunch or after school. Rumors also say that no Lowell kids were directly involved in the fights, and that this happened after school hours anyway.
The closed campus policy means that students and staff alike are not allowed to leave campus between the hours of 8:30 and 3:40 (with rare exceptions) and need to identify themselves with an ID on a lanyard (with a QR code) or with their cellphone app.
A very troubling part of the letter is the introduction of the conditions for the reopening of the school in a "tiered-basis", were students with good grades, low truancy rates, few tardies and a clean record will recover their freedom while others won't. Welcome to the social credit system!
I am attaching the link to the communication from the Principal:
And you’ll need to understand PCR to fully comprehend the content in the links. It is entirely based upon the fraudulent use of PCR, which should be obvious to everyone by now. When you can understand that, you will agree that there are no Covid deaths, cases, or viruses.
Ok for those who think a single death is actually attributable to Covid, here are some documents for your consideration. (Aside from the fact that “viruses” don’t exist). You can see there is nothing at all specific that can implicate “Covid” over any other possible cause of death. Do we need to remind everyone again of the 4.1 “comorbidities” in 94% of deaths marked uo7.1 (covid death code). Do we need to remind everyone here of the fact that 95% of “uo7.1” was in 65+ age groups? Amazingly, yes these are apparently necessary reminders. Can we teach sheeple to remember and to think? I hope so.
I just discovered these recently and the 600,000 figure agrees from what I computed using 20 percent excess mortality in the US, which someone reported. I haven't been able to find total excess mortality figures for 2021 and 2022 for the US though. By the way trolls and pro vaxxers are everywhere and trying to cause trouble in every possible way.
It is odd that pro-vaxxers would be so motivated and zealous about defending the COVID vaxx on, say places like this SubStack?
It cant be because they want to defend their choice, because they would only defend it among their social circle. And there is no need to defend the shots among professional circles which are completelly in sync with the establisment narrative. It cant be political, because anti-vaxxers are from both sides of the political divide.
Also, they seem to be wellprepared with talking points and "studies" and "papers" to "support" the narative, as if they dont know that these are corrupted as well.
These so-called "masters of misdirection" aka bald-faced liars will continue to lie ad infinitum. The people who pay for their lies are those who gulp them down; hookline and sinker.
To be honest I wouldn't respect anybody who suggests that vaccines are any good. It may well be there are flaws with the data as presented by those who say the current vaccines are harming and killing people and we shouldn't present flawed analysis.
But even if the vaccines did not harm (and they do and always have depending on various factors), they would still be an awful scam.
The key thing upon which the scam hangs is the supposed training of the immune system to 'recognise' a virus. As virology is fundamentally flawed, and the virus is not as supposed, such a vain idea of training the immune system is plain silly.
Those who ignore the truth of this are evil 'sad brats' (reorganise for another useful word). They are judged accordingly.
R Marcucio is not a subscriber and seems to have differing views. He is UCSF Professor Ralph S Marcucio who has a h-index of 51. I've emailed him and invited him to a live civil discussion, but Wayne did that earlier and he REFUSED.
R Mercriano is an arrogant prick.
He’s a troll
Dr. Marcurio, with a h-index of 51 from publishing orthopedic surgery papers, would not waste his time speaking with COVID-19 grifters. Kirsch has not corrected his logical fallacies about statistics after discussing p-values with Dr. Ian Copeland.
How pathetic. Steve as a pioneer in Silicon Valley has made a world class fortune from the companies he created and has proven his intelligence and drive in the marketplace. He, unlike you, does not need piddly squat from writing on the internet. What a lonely life you must have shilling for criminal organizations.
Carlos is troll or AI bot just ignore it.
What proof do you have that anyone is "grifting?" That is a common trick of trolls - to throw out such a ridiculous charge with no evidence.
We don't know if you are being paid to troll, if so THAT would be grifting.
This Carlos thing never will end. It amazes me that people keep engaging it. But it foments anger and division, and hostility and people fall for it. As many posters have said. In the rare occasion he is a real human. We want him triple masked, and five times injected. He won't last very long. Carlos is an enigma but people smarter than me have pointed out syntax errors and caught it in logistical traps, so I think it's an AI bot.
Steve Kirsch has paid Substack subscribers who are charged $50 annually.
Your grifter accusation is a lie. From the About section of this substack:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Knowing that you are part of the solution. I donate every cent I get in subscription income into activities and organizations that are focused on getting the truth out about these vaccines.
My goal is to get to 100,000 paid subscribers enabling me to donate $500,000 a month to getting word out and saving lives.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lying is what paid trolls do - further evidence that you are a grifter.
Although I do not know which organizations receive Substack subscriber fees, I would conjecture that the organizations are anti-vaccine propaganda groups (i.e. Children's Health Defense, ICAN) that do not state the truth about vaccines or follow the scientific method. Logical fallacies are prevalent in anti-vaccine propaganda: post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, base rate fallacy, survivorship bias, etc.
I volunteer to state the truth about COVID-19 vaccines.
Well, that's a new word I have not heard of before. "grifter" 1 year ago I did not know of the word clown world, controlled opposition, paid troll and AI bot. Now I have to investigate the term "grifter"? One thing seems certain from chatting with the regulars on these stacks is whatever "Carlos" is it is evil and nefarious.
Sounds like marcurio ought to understand “the science” well enough. But he cannot understand virology is the study of nothing.
The article was updated with P-value immediately, I guess you didn't know that.
Yes, but Steve's "analysis" has far more errors than a missing p-value, which could be 0.05 or 0.01 depending on the confidence interval. Unvaccinated status is associated with greater COVID-19 hospitalization risk compared to fully boosted status. Many studies with correct statistical analysis have found vaccines reduce severity of COVID-19 symptoms:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235
You would deny early treatment and then brag about how many unvaccinated Covid patients are hospitalized - but can that study even be trusted? Anyone can use internet search to find numerous articles about how big pharma influences AMA, the publisher of JAMA.
The book "Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients," by Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. George Fareed and Mathew Crawford is about two doctors who used a treatment protocol early in the pandemic and early in treatment when the conventional wisdom issued was not to provide any treatment to patients and send them home until they got sick and then go to the hospital where they were then often put on breathing machines – many of whom died.
To the contrary, every one of the patients Dr. Tyson and Dr. Fareed treated early in the illness recovered and there were no deaths. They also treated those who were severely sick and only lost a few.
The book is pseudoscientific by omitting control groups, making incorrect exclusion criteria to omit COVID-19 deaths, and criticizes legitimate biostatisticians. Why did the studies not undergo assessment in peer-reviewed journals for publication to other physicians and scientists?
MRNA exists naturally in animal and plant cells. COVID-19 vaccines are saving lives by reducing severity of disease by causing memory B and T cell responses against viral antigens. Wikipedia and Bitchute are not primary sources of science.
I hope your faith in the jabs has you fully up-to-date with every last booster.
I am re-reading for the 3rd time, Geert Vanden Bossche's book, "The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic." He is a primary source for science. Here is a quote from page 152.
"As viral infectiousness of newly emerging (more virulent) immune escape variants does no longer increase, trained Cell Based Innate Immunity in the unvaccinated can catch up with new emerging variants to protect the unvaccinated from symptomatic infection. Sterilizing immunity in the unvaccinated combined with a HIGH MORTALITY IN THE VACCINATED will eventually lead to natural extinction of the pandemic in highly vaccinated populations."
Well good. End of the pandemic. Geert Vanden Bossche says it will be hard on the jabbed.
Vanden Bossche ignores the fact that natural immunity wanes over time and is less robust than hybrid immunity. Mortality rate per capita is lower in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated in every country.
"Vanden Bossche claimed that mass COVID-19 vaccination would precipitate immune escape, allowing the spread of “vaccine-resistant” variants of the virus. While resistance to vaccines has emerged before, this occurs only rarely[6]. Contrast this with the current variants of concern that researchers have observed, which all evolved naturally from infected individuals. Vanden Bossche provided no evidence indicating that COVID-19 vaccines pose a greater risk of immune escape than that mediated by uncontrolled viral spread and natural infection. And as mentioned previously, earlier mass vaccination campaigns against childhood diseases like measles effectively curbed disease outbreaks and didn’t result in worse outbreaks occurring. This observation contradicts his implication that this risk of COVID-19 vaccination outweighs its benefit."
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/covid-19-vaccines-are-critical-for-controlling-the-pandemic-vaccines-still-offer-partial-protection-against-new-variants-of-the-virus/
The covid shots are pure poison as has been documented over and over again. Only those trying to protect the government and drug industry from their culpability in these historic Crimes Against Humanity would try to counter the truth with lies, obfuscations and misdirection.
Read "Turtles all the way Down" to get some enlightenment on the criminal enterprises you shill for. You know, the book that the medical complex pretends does not exist because it is the unholy truth about our medical government complex.
It was known early on in the scamdemic that patients infected with the original SARS from 2003 showed an immune response to COVID-19 17 years later. So it doesn't wane that much. Also patients suffering from the Spanish Flu are showing immunity a century later.
There is no evidence of SARS-CoV-1 providing long-term immunity against other coronaviruses 17 years later. SARS-COV-2 is a different type of coronavirus from SARS-CoV-1.
The MRNA used in the subpar vaccines is synthetic not natural. It doesn’t invoke memory T cells & if it did you wouldn’t require repeated doses especially over months.
Pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines is an abundant modified nucleoside in non-coding RNAs across many species. Natural immunity wanes within months and does not prevent reinfection from Omicron subvariants.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm0829
"Memory B cell responses to major VOCs:
We next developed an expanded antigen probe panel to better quantify memory B cell specificities to different regions of the spike protein and test how RBD binding by memory B cells may be affected by the mutations found in emerging VOCs. Specifically, we designed B cell tetramers for eight SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including full-length spike, N-terminal domain (NTD), multiple variant RBDs (WT, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and B.1.617.2), and the S2 domain (Fig. 3, A and B). Spike-specific memory B cells were defined on the basis of a multiple-discrimination approach, with binding to full-length spike plus one or more additional probes. This strategy also allowed us to identify memory B cells that cross-bind all variant RBDs (all variant+). SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was used as a vaccine-irrelevant antigen (but one for which SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects had detectable preexisting immunity; fig. S4, A and B). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S1B. We also leveraged a separate cohort of health care workers (HCWs) (table S1) who had mild COVID-19 and were sampled longitudinally after a positive serology test to compare vaccine-induced responses with infection alone (40)."
"Memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines:
In addition to antibodies and memory B cells, memory T cells can contribute to protection upon reexposure to virus. Memory T cell responses have also been shown to be less affected by VOCs than humoral immune responses (21, 50). To determine whether mRNA vaccination induced durable antigen-specific memory T cell responses, we performed a flow cytometric analysis using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. PBMCs were stimulated with peptide megapools containing optimized spike epitopes (51, 52). Antigen-specific responses were quantified as the frequency of AIM+ non-naïve T cells in stimulated samples with background subtraction from paired unstimulated controls (Fig. 5, A and B) (19). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S6. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells were defined on the basis of coexpression of CD40L and CD200. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells were defined on the basis of expression of four of five total activation markers, as described previously (19)."
Pfizer documents expose they knew these mrna vaccine wanes and becomes zero.
Where is the evidence for mRNA vaccine efficacy becoming zero? https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00122-6/fulltext
Wanes with time? Nah the "vaccines" were shit.
45 Times as Many Deaths After COVID Shots in Just 2 Years Compared With All Flu Vaccine-Related Deaths Since 1990, Data Show
“Our meta-analysis of both national and international vaccine adverse events emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating public health policies that promote universal mass injection and multiple boosters for all demographic groups,” said the authors of a peer-reviewed study published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Eliana Romero, Ph.D., director of clinical research at the Neurodiversity Foundation, Shawn Fry, founder and chief science officer of the Neurodiversity Foundation and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense and associate professor of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California, authored the paper.
The researchers looked at adverse events specifically related to cardiovascular and fertility health — such as myocarditis and menstrual abnormalities — that went overlooked during the “expedited safety analyses” that took place in the “accelerated approval process that allowed the manufacturers to fast-track their products,” they said.
Thanks! I didn't see this post had been pinned until now. It's an interesting article.
the paper is a dumpster dive into self-reporting databases used to identify potential safety signals. the reports are not documentation of things caused by vaccines...
By tge way doctors refusing to report vaccine injuries is a medical ethics breach and violates the SEC filing
So if it's a dumpster then explain where the 4000 pregnant females that Pfizer promised in a study in Feb 2021as they called it safe and pushed it on pregnant females. Number dwindle to 347 and where is the promised report in 7 to 10 months which is now 18 months overdue. I hear it's bad news. If it was good news it would have been trumpeted on every news station. You have heard of the polio vaccine by Cutter which had a live polio virus and killed kids and gave them polio in 1955 and guess what happened. The courts found them guilty for calling it safe. NIH people got fired or resigned. So a lesson for these so called safe vaccines.
You're a piece of garbage. I watched my Father die from THREE separate forms of rapidly accelerating "turbo" cancers that had NOT previously been there, that burst out of nowhere after his rapid ill health following the buster 💉 shot, two of which leapt from having been undetectable in the scans that determined the presence of the first to being STAGE FOUR when found in a follow up scan only
EIGHT weeks LATER. FIVE of my neighbours DIED inside a WEEK of receiving the FIRST 💉 shot & scores of schoolchildren and adolescents have routinely adorned
the pages of the local press with headlines such as "Eleven year old schoolboy dies during lunch hour at
local school", or 17yr olds, or 14yr olds, etc. There were even articles about the likes of a married couple in their 30's & mother in law in her 50's all getting jabbed on the same occasion & the mother in law and husband dying within 48hrs & the wife becoming seriously ill and being hospitalised, of kids returning home from school and finding BOTH
parents (in their 30's) DEAD, & of EVERY school now HAVING to have a DEFIBRILLATOR installed. History is NOT going to shine favourably upon lying propagandists like YOU. These rising & waning (but always generally climbing) deaths & disabilities can even be chronologically tabulated and shown to have vastly increased around the timescale of EVERY jab roll out, or buster drive, too. It's always the same with you self appointed "experts" and your false equivalences- it's "highly significant
data gleaned via scientific methodology" when it SUPPORTS your claims, but, when it DOESN'T, the goalposts are moved, & identical modalities & methodologies become "dumpster dives" of irrelevant, merely "anecdotal" 'tales', and the well worn "correlation DOESN'T equal causation!", except when YOU liars decide that it DOES, eh? It is a criminal offence to input false reports and data into the VAERS mechanism, & necessitates the input & attendant reports of the individual clinicians who had dealt with the victims, therefore, it's hardly credible to suggest that the figures therein are the result of paranoid, hysterical hypochondriacs, conflating OTHER issues with vaccine damage, in error, yet, as HAS been captured, footage in REAL TIME & screenshot,
BOTH VAERS and the UK's MHRA Yellow Card system have BOTH been caught REMOVING several THOUSAND fatalities in one fell swoop from the total amount of recorded fatalities, quite APART from the fact that the intentional "throttling" and resultant massive BACKLOG of as yet UNCOUNTED REPORTS has ALSO been exposed time and again. I honestly believe that you, and everyone LIKE you, better get on your damn KNEES, face pressed to the floor, and BEG God to forgive you for the wilful, conscious part that you & your pseudo-"scientific" accomplices have played in the installation and perpetuation of this still ongoing atrocity, but honestly, I really hope you DON'T...........
You may not agree to debate Steve Kirsch, but how about me?
Biochemistry and Toxicology joint honours, 1st class degree. PhD in respiratory pharmacology with focus on opiates and respiration. 30+ years leadership of pharmaceutical R&D to vice president at Pfizer and CEO of a biotech I founded. Consultant to 30 biotech companies (before they fired me in 2020). Earnings from commenting on covid & vaccines: $ zero.
Great to see you on here commenting to those who try to cover up vaccine injuries.
I don't care about your credentials if your medical claims are proven wrong by scientific data. You were wrong about the COVID-19 pandemic ending in 2020 in the UK.
https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=former-scientific-advisor-to-pfizer-michael-yeadon-claims-that-the-pandemic-is-fundamentally-over-in-the-u-k-and-we-now-know-loads-of-people-had-prior-immunity-to-covid-19
There never was a pandemic.
There are dozens of papers demonstrating this.
The heart of the fraud is PCR.
If you seriously think those paid by the perpetrators are suitable judges, all I can say is run & get your booster as you’re doomed.
I no longer care what you think. I’ve done all I can. So you’ll see, won’t you?
When I looked at the 'pandemic' data of daily cases as things happened, Australia's pandemic flatlined already by August 2020 and Sweden similarly... following the exact timeline suggested by one of UK's senior virologist, a professor at one of the universities if I recall, from when COVID was announced and before we knew anything what was going on. I can't remember his name, but kind of a bland looking man, and he was interviewed by TV many times and then he disappeared from media and they never approached him again.
He never recommended lockdowns, masks or anything - he actually opposed it and said it would only delay immunity from developing and harm the economy. He said natural immunity would develop in 8-10 months, and people should simply go on as usual but observe more cleanliness and improve lifestyle and vitamin intake to boost their own immunity.
COVID was basically over by August 2020. But they - whoever is the running force behind this (which seem to be tied in with the military and the CIA, according to Robert Kennedy) had to ride the wave and create something out of nothing. Made them billions though and allowed them to rob us off our freedom to install surveillance units all across each country, and test how far they could go to install a dictatorial policy. And this year, 2023, is the launch year for government controlled digital currency which decides what you can buy, when you can buy it, from whom you can buy - and if you're not compliant, you can get cut off from all access to be able to sustain yourself. That's where we're heading if people don't object.
You're perfectly correct in your statements:this HAS all been an exercise in advancing a verrrrrry sinister totalitarian agenda. There are FAR too many "synchronicities" that all TOO conveniently dovetail towards a seemingly central theme- CONTROL. Event 201, ID/2020, Operation Lockstep, SPARS, combined with so many of the precedents to them, U.N. Agenda 21/2030, the so called "great" reset/4th industrial revolution, the many "sustainability" goals of the climate catastrophizing propagandists and the utter folly of the pseudo-science that purports to support it. Even the "6uild 6ack 6etter" song & dance, so curiously trumpeted simultaneously & with identical phrasing predates the scam/sham/flim- flamdemic/ damn- panic, plandemic, having previously appeared on "king" Charlie's site (the duchy of Cornwall, I think?) a few years prior. Much, if not ALL of this, can be traced back to, at LEAST 2013, according to the statements made by the whistle blowing ex contracts lawyer for some of the pharmaceutical complex cartels, who, on Redacted news-channel & elsewhere, states that there are a many headed hydra of "twisty-turny" collaborations between big pharma, defence contractors, the many "alphabet" agencies of the intelligence apparatus
& the D.o.D., a large number of said contracts being to do with cross confidentialities, and one of the central, salient motivations for both the installation of the E.U.A.'s & their continued use is that these pseudo-vaccines are NOT inherently regulated applied therapeutic medications, but instead have the designation of "military prototypes" !!
There ARE NO positive therapeutic curative, medicinal, beneficial qualities nor properties within the jab, NONE, & it's quite amazing to watch the likes of Mercurio (Mercury, God of tricksters and liars) & Gonzales continue to utterly ignore the likes of La Quinta Columna's research into the jab via electron microscopy (& that of many others now) SHOWING the clear & irrefutable presence of graphene oxide structures, highly sinister self-assembling nano-matrices & biotechnologies & the
terrifying lil' critters swimming around in there thought to be, or synthetically derive from the Hydra Vulgaris parasite, 🪱,
or the synthetic Hydra Lineaus. One need only GO to the sites of La Quinta Columna or holistichealthonline.com or the documentaries/site/ channel & guests of the likes of Stew Peters, Maria Zee & others. I challenge not merely ☝️those two jokers, but ANY of the jab-happy pharma reps, pro jab policy pushing politicians, or scumbag propagandizing presstitutes in their scumbag propagandizing ooze-papers to even ADDRESS the issue of this now growing body of footage and proofs. Why ARE the jabbed emitting outgoing MAC address Bluetooth signals with seemingly individual identification registration numbers or codes, or even the GRAVES of DEAD jab victims STILL pumpin'
out the signals!!?? Pah! MORE "dumpster dives" of "merely anecdotal" ornamentation, eh fellas? I can't HEAR you? It all just becomes more and MORE horrifying with every passing day now, & according to a growing number of reports, presumably the second that the W.H.O.'s tyrannical alterations to the I.H.R.'s come into place, we should be anticipating the imminent announcement of the NEXT plandemic (hmmm 🤔, something of the 'avian' persuasion, I think? Or....no, wait! Swine! Or.....or.....?).
The epidemiological evidence of all causes mortality shows there was no pandemic.
The entire event is fake.
Which peer-reviewed papers demonstrated your claim about COVID-19 not being a pandemic?
What scientific data shows PCR is "fraud"? The rebuttal to the Corman-Drosten paper is wrong. The principle of RT-PCR is to amplify short segments of reverse transcribed cDNA in real-time using primer-probe sets.
RT-qPCR is the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in diagnostic tests. Forward and reverse primers flank specific target regions of the viral sequence, working in tandem to initiate amplification of cDNA. Internal, positive, and negative controls have validated specifications. Cycle thresholds (Ct = 45) have specifications based on cut-off values from limit of detection (LOD). N1 has an individual Ct threshold for cut-off of background fluorescence and true signal.
You mean you never read any of the complaints about the constant large percentage of false positives in the COVID tests, including the PCR tests, nor the inventor Kary Mullins complaint that PCR was being misused to detect COVID? Mullims said PCR was only developed for FORENSIC analysis and cannot determine if an infection is active and infectous, or if it's simply dead residues from a past infection years prior? He also said the settings of the test was being misused and making the test excessively sensitive, which was why it would detect past residues that you may have from a cold in your childhood, but that doesn't mean you are spreading any infections.
Are you implying that Mullins was lying about his own invention?
It was endemic at end of 2020 in Britain and it's a coronavirus and the next influenza season brings new ones Including endemic covid and that scary variant that Matt Hancock said when should I deploy to scare people in Dec 2020 was to usher in 2021 bring restrictions and push the vaccine. So fraud on the people crime against humanity using fear. Care to comment on fraud Carlos as fraud is intentional deceptive actions to steal one's rights. Those covid testing sites in Britain were empty. Wonder how they pumped out so many tests in one day with no one at the sites.
There never was a COVID-19 pandemic.
Excess mortality data since mid-2020 shows that deaths were elevated by over 20%. If not COVID-19, then what is causing excess mortality?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912932/
What excess mortality? You witnessed not a singe cough or sniffle for 3 years after November 2019.
What are your thoughts on the use of morphine and midazolam in treatment protocols?
I think the use of both together is always inappropriate in so-called covid.
I do not believe there was a novel respiratory virus & the most likely scenario is simply misattribution of flu and other acute respiratory illnesses to “covid”.
How often do we use midazolam and morphine together in a flu patient?
Not often, I’d estimate.
What say you, clinical experts?
Thanks for saying that, Mike. But it is more than likely scenario, it is certain. The seasonal 'flu was weaponised, re-branded to make more money for big pharma etc. This has been going on for decades.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
Misunderstanding what the 'flu is, the toxicosis of the body, the in-flowing of poisons, has lead us to this current 'crisis'.
Midazolam and morphine are neuro-toxic so merely add to the neuro-toxicity already present in someone with the 'flu.
I agree. I didn’t until some way into this.
Like Peter McCullough, I took for granted what I was told about areas off piste from my own.
It’s impossible to know everything about one’s own area. There’s never time to check others assertions and assumptions.
When I did look I recall feeling unmoored. Flu vaccines reproducibly do not reduce hospitalization or death.
So what the dickens have we been doing for decades?
Committing fraud, that’s what.
They’re clearly not effective at protecting people from whatever caused acute respiratory illnesses in winter.
Why on earth would you expect something claimed to be a “covid19 vaccine” to fare differently?
And it doesn’t. No protection from anything & extraordinarily harmful effects in its stead.
Clearly not bad luck. You quickly reach the inescapable conclusion that their intentions are to injure, maim and kill.
One or two further logic steps tell you this entire episode is fraud, modern civilization is being dismantled and the end game can only be depopulation.
Hold you family close. Ignore propaganda entirely. TV & movies to zero. Now.
It was influenza B in Florida and no doubt US and Canada beginning of Jan 2020 and people describe everything they said covid did. Felt like a bus ran over them. It circulated at Disney world in Dec by people's accounts and no fear until March when they called it a Pandemic. Amazing everyone traveling going to sporting events school working with that covid like influenza B circulating and funny it becomes a covid name after the Pandemic is called.
and one of the most wrong ppl during the pandemic!
For common sense. If it's a novel coronavirus we need to run and hide from then why run and get a novel vaccine for a novel coronavirus that you know nothing about and you yourself stated the Emergency rushed a vaccine. So run and hide from said scary novel coronzvurus we know nothing about but wait we found the perfect novel never tested never approved MRNA candidate and we don't know we picked the right or optimal or favorable one.
Proof?
How does this fit in with refusal to debate because someone is not a medical authority? Was that true?
he is also not a vaccine expert.
A vaccime expert stated in mass vaccination they can have bacteria such as e coli .They lied the vaccine stays in the Arm. Biontek makers in a slide show said it doesn't. Must go to the lymph nodes. One lie after another for these vaccines that still had to go under as gene therapy., experimental all the way. Pfizer couldn't predict if they used the favorable variant candidate. It's like having 4 keys and not knowing which one works. You could try 3 that fail and the 4th works or you could have 4 fail. You were using people's bodies with a new platform of vaccines where the medical trials had deaths and harms and lots covered up.
Oh, this is rich. You troll without a single credential and then call Dr. Yeadon unqualified? I suppose Dr. Malone is unqualified as well.
We don't need you to point us to the product of a billion dollar marketing war chest brought to you by the most criminally fined industry on the planet. Be gone troll.
I’m an pharmacologist, immunologist & toxicologist.
My entire life has been spent around drug discovery and development.
You won’t listen, but I can easily prove the entire vaccine story here is an utter fraud.
It’s completely impossible to conduct the necessary manufacturing R&D steps required to make consistent product is less than 4-5 years, probably closer to 8 years.
There is no magic or money than can bypass the minimum linear steps.
Also, vaccination even if done properly could never have been an appropriate or effective response to an outbreak such as they lied to us about.
Reason is immunosenescence. Elderly immune responses attenuate and is one of the main reasons why the elderly are so vulnerable in the first place. Instead eariy treatment was the correct response.
Flu vaccines don’t work either.
Same reason.
PCR is utterly useless as a clinical diagnostic. They also refused EVER to disclose operational false positive rate. Uncorrected data is completely useless. It’s fraud.
Finally, ALL mRNA based products will induce autoimmune toxicity. It’s axiomatic and unfixable. That’s because once your cells are making non self proteins, your immune system attacks & kills all such cells. Hence a very wide range of adverse events.
You do you. Enjoy your boosters.
Ps: I’ve lost hundreds of thousands of pounds in foregone income and received not one cent in income or donations after three years + pro bono work.
I’m arguably the most qualified scientist in the world speaking out against these injections.
Are you a vaccine expert?
You don't need to be one to see the devastation
these rapidly developed products have caused.
Anthony Fauci appeared Milken institute Future of Health Summit (October 29, 2019) discussing how a future outbreak could give them the excuse to throw off the shackles of 7 to 10 years vaccine testing
and rapidly develop new vaccines quickly
https://twitter.com/i/status/1445340463377039367
Full video here https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine.
The RAC removed?, RAC that's recombinant genetic products
advisory committee on biosafety and protecting people from harm when it comes to genetic products and pharmaceuticals in 2019 right before 2020.Anthony Fauci made a decision with his team to eliminate the RAC biosafety committee on genetic recombinant products and absorb it into the NIH saying we'll take it from here and then the NIH partnered with Moderna., and then what a surprise the covid hits and they get their excuse to rapidly deploy a ultra rapidly developed set of vaccines.
Mr Gates and his foundation is mentioned at the Milken event by the panel, and he becomes the Medias go to guy to sell these rushed jabs to the public and he states "We can have a vaccine in 2 years or we could make one in say a year with less safety" and he was right wasn't he?
less safety indeed..
Family members who took the jabs conveniently now have a weakened immune system and are getting sicker with each booster a bad reactions to each new one,they continue to get sick where as family members not jabbed have not had anything more then a cold since 2019.
And now we are told they are going to make mRNA jabs
for everything from cattle to cancer in 100 days from lab to jab
oh the joy given all the injuries and deaths from these ones
speeding things up even more is only going to make things worse.
None of us want them putting this stuff into our food.
The German health Minister has confirmed the risks are high
on national TV stating a severe reaction rate of nearly 1 in every 10.000 doses causes a severe reaction or disablement https://imgur.com/fDhd2nC.png but that increases with each dose
so if someone has had 4 or 5 jabs that could be 1 in 400 doses,
and what is his solution? they want to work with Big Pharma to
develop new drugs to treat those severely injured and severely disabled.
by these vaccines.
Chur Ching Big Pharma makes billions on treatments
for the injuries they caused, Germany is just one Country that has admitted the scale of the issue but Doctors in other countries have
been saying the same thing but are silenced if they go public, how many
people have they severely injured and severely disabled
by these vaccines Worldwide?.
its going to end up being billions of people. You might be in denial and parroting the media line of "safe and effective" but they are not safe and they don't work well at all so they not effective and no amount of Pharma funded stooges study papers are going to convince folk you are not lying and pointing us towards dishonest data.
We may never find out the true number of deaths they have caused.
You realize we can all see Dr. Yeadon's comment?
So, they should just be ignored? Surely a lot of people thought they had some value when they were first authorized.
no, they should not be ignored. they should be analyzed correctly, not by comparing them to other vaccines. that is irrelevant.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209838/
But many of the safety aspects were skipped because they are considered vaccines. Do you think they should have gone under more rigorous testing?
True.
Compare the COVID Vax Substances to other bioweapons.
I read the article you reference. They discuss and approve of the method of proportionality analysis (which is a comparison technique) and do not consider it irrelevant as you say. From your paper: "Although underreporting is a limitation, VAERS is capable of detecting possible safety problems through disproportionality analyses and the other methods described above." When the CDC finally did the proportionality analysis, the results were literally hundreds of red flags according to their own thresholds yet they ignore them.
yes disprortionality analysis, not direct comparisons of the numbers of reports. also, choosing vaccines is important. the paper chose thre pertussis vaccine...which one? and why? the military data is ecological...the paper is near meaningless.
Are you aware that the majority of vaccine safety studies are no against inert placebos but against existing vaccines. Those in turn against existing vaccines. Back top the point where clinical trials were not really a thing.
Well I'm done working on my truck for the day and relooked at the Hooker paper. It did NOT only compare the rate of reports for the different shots (which at 45X death is significant). Figure 1B does the disproportionality analysis you like and shows (compared to influenza vaccines) 40X menstrual irregularities, 4X myocarditis, and 3X cerebrovascular events!
Steve forgot to ask the most important question: Who is funding this guy?
Not too long ago Debunker dude had this guy on- birds of a feather?
Folta, Kevin (22 May 2022). "Episode 293:Debunking the Disinformation Dozen". Talking biotech with Dr. Kevin Folta (Podcast). Colabra. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
https://theecologist.org/2015/sep/08/monsantos-scientist-shill-exposed
https://usrtk.org/industry-pr/kevin-folta/
https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/70
OMG, the editorial board is a who's who of antivaxxers...the journal is an anti-vaccine journal. the paper is a dumpster dive into VAERS and similar databases.
Does he still think the masks work? the Pharma grifters are pushing the masks again.
https://twitter.com/ScottyGoesAgain/status/1646790830449995776?s=20
masks do work. they reduce transmission of the virus.
Masks were only ever there to keep up the illusion of a pandemic.
The "gold standard" of journals, the Cochraine review concluded that after 3 years of this nonsense that there was little to o evidence of masks being effective.
https://www.cochrane.org/news/featured-review-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses
No doubt you have some modelling study showing that they work tremendously.
Masks do work
As a symbol of fear to all.
To demonstrate there is grave danger .
We need a Messiah.
The VACCINES.
If they work why
Did COVID deaths in the USA reach 1.2 million
After they mandated them
Masks work similar to
A car can fly
Only in your mind
They do.
ha ha ha ha it really is a bot. I think I saw this knuckle head bot operating on another substack under the initials RL.
Rediscovery of Low-Oxygen Mask Injury
Now thousands of studies show what my research team (epidemiologist, naturopathic physician, microbiologist) showed in 2020-2021 on the hazards of mask-wearing, and were censored for doing so. - Colleen Huber NMD
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/rediscovery-of-low-oxygen-mask-injury
so masks reduce gas exchange but not viruses? and physicians have been wearing masks--with no ill effects--for ages. huber is nonsensical.
How do masks prevent transmission? Does the virus get stuck in the mask fibers? Does the virus bounce off the mask and fall to the ground? If someone is wearing a mask and has Covid does the virus bounce off the mask and go back into their nose and mouth?
A later point on Dr. Huber's mask article is that she is referencing a recent study which analyzed over 2,000 mask studies.
She also references her own study from years ago analyzing over 200 studies. FYI, Dr. Huber's books and articles are always packed with studies.
Since this post and response you've stated how important peer-reviewed studies are to you. Did you at least glance at any of the thousands of studies analyzed in the recent mask report referenced in the article or the several hundred from years ago that have similar results and can you explain why a particular study is wrong?
Let's make it simple listen to the top EXPERT in USA on masks .
https://rumble.com/vzzof1-industrial-hygienist-testifies-why-face-masks-provide-no-protection-against.html..
Also masks worn by doctors and nurses in CLINICAL settings only.
TO PREVENT BACTERIAL INFECTION ON OPEN WOUNDS.
BACTERIA ARE THOUSANDS OF TIMES LARGER THAN VIRUS NANOPARTICLES.
Who hired you to come here and troll?
Edit: Oh, are you the UCSF R Marcucio? That must be some big bonus pay.
You must know, then that doctors only wear masks for a short time during surgery, not all through a work shift like people are forced to with mandates.
Not really, I’m a teacher and the Masked-Vaxxers keep getting covid, while us Purebloods don’t.
Really, masks reduce transmission of the virus
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abg6296
If you read what I wrote, the teachers who got Vaxxed are the ones getting the virus, and there are a bunch of young female teachers, who cannot get pregnant from the Vaxx.
Well it's a stretch to reach that conclusion because it's not even based on real world experimenting. We've seen how poorly models have worked as "science" lately. But hey, if it's consensus it's now science, am I right? I've yet to understand how a healthy person who exhibits no symptoms, isn't coughing or sneezing and is driving alone in a car is protecting me from a disease because they have a cloth covering their respiratory system? This is the "science consensus" you'd like me to believe. The Cochrane study debunks this modelling theory. Do you have any real world experiments you'd like to post that price healthy, non coughing people benefit from breathing in recycled air?
You cannot use that paper to show that masks reduce transmission of the virus. What that paper clearly states is that randomized controlled trials (the gold standard) have shown mixed results. That paper doesn’t describe an “experiment” in any way, shape, or form. That paper described what they found using modeling. The problem with using modeling is that especially with an emerging disease there simply isn’t enough known information for the modeling information to be complete. We don’t even know what we don’t know we cannot possibly program an effective model. That’s why initial models showed an absurdly high death rate for Covid when actual death rate is well below 2% for most of the developed world (that’s including all the deaths that were listed as from Covid which were actually with Covid and the less than optimal treatment procedures and protocols).
Modeling simply does not prove anything because we don’t live in the Matrix and there are far too many variables in the real world to account for and that’s without dealing with a novel virus. All modeling gives is a strong hypothesis, according to this paper masks should stop the virus is the strongest conclusion one could possibly come to based on that paper. Frankly that is pushing it. The appropriate conclusion is that masks could prevent spread. But that is much weaker evidence than multiple RCTs, ignoring RCTs in favor of modeling is ludicrous.
Also practically speaking if those masks prevented spread nosocomial infections should have been zero given universal masking policies. Some studies have shown >30% NSI rates. On top of that NSI studies generally only take into account patients that are hospitalized, it doesn’t even look at the transmission rate among the staff or the rate at which hospital staff spread the infections throughout the community (when my workplace got hit with Covid it was due to a public health nurse ironically enough).
The study states PROBABILITY.
DONT MAKE ME LAUGH .
SCIENCE IS NOT MAYBE
Will masks protect the hospitalized from getting a phony "Covid" diagnosis and then getting killed by ventilators and remdesivir/propofol?
They are not waterproof and they have gaps.
Maskers walk around with dirty masks full of
bacteria and those old things are falling apart.
I don't wear one and I never get ill.
Sure the ppe industry pays for junk science studies
but they are dust masks and crap at that to.
If I am exposed to dust indoors like hardwoods fibreglass
silica and potential asbestos I wear a proper fitted respirator.
This debunk guy is a virus maniac! He is one of the top frauds defending germ theory and virology to his ego death!
There is no virus folks…the theory is bogus.
Where I come from we call a person like this "Debunk the Funk" a bullshitter.
I couldn't respond to the poll since it didn't give "none of the above" as an option. I have absolutely no respect whatsoever for any of these, only deep, abiding contempt. Possibly I could have answered if the choice had been "whom do you despise the least (or most)?"
Susan Oliver now blocks people from her own channel and admits she can't even remember why. I know why! When she can't answer hard questions it's all she has left.....silence them!
There's also the contention that 2x💉jabbed are often counted AS "unvaccinated", incredibly, as the authorities of many countries regard
the status of being "vaccinated" as being at LEAST 2x💉+ one BOOSTER too. The UK are known to
employ these kinda deceitful, evasive semantics in some metrics.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/australia/
In AUSTRALIA dec 2020 no vaccines 976 covid deaths
Dec 2022 after 2 years of vaccines, masks, LOCKDOWNS 17000 covid deaths .
Also all cause MORTALITY down in 2020 up in 2021 ,2022 33%
Be nice and thankful for Daniel! He is at least debating, and if he's taught in scientific method, he will eventually admit being wrong, and celebrate it.
I appreciate all the good work that you are doing.
Closer to home, we have been fighting lots of local battles, including a new one with Lowell High School in San Francisco. I think we need to mobilize our forces against this (but it is a challenge with battles on so many fronts).
This is from Cole Turner-Dear San Francisco Medical Freedom Activists and Allies:
Yesterday, Lowell High School in SF began practicing school lock down, a social credit system, and in part, digital IDs. Scroll further down for more details from a Lowell parent.
I think we all know where this is going -- getting our children accustomed to having restrictions in their movements, having to scan their IDs to get in and out of non-optional locations, and having their movements restricted based on a "merit system". Which school, workplace, library, hospital, or courthouse is next?
We need all-hands-on-deck to shut this down immediately. Whether you're a Lowell student, parent, or alumni, a San Francisco resident, a taxpayer in California, or NOT -- please, please, please take immediate action to let the powers-that-be know: We will resist this.
Send an email to Principal, Dr Michael O. Jones:
jonesm@sfusd.edu
Call him at: 415/759-2730, extension 3167 (principal's office)
Send an email to Superintendent Dr Matt Wayne:
waynem@sfusd.edu
tweet him at: @SFUSD_Supe
Contact all members of the San Francisco Board of Education:
Kevine Boggess - kevineboggess@sfusd.edu
Lisa Weissman-Ward - lisaweissman-ward@sfusd.edu
Matt Alexander - MattAlexander@sfusd.edu
Jenny Lam - JennyLam@sfusd.edu
Lainie Motamedi - lainiemotamedi@sfusd.edu
Mark Sanchez - MarkSanchez@sfusd.edu
Please let them know, politely and firmly:
Lockdowns, social credit systems, and digital IDs such as what have recently been used to control and punish populations in Communist China will NOT STAND in the United States.
Tweet to the City of San Francisco at:
@sfgov
Tweet to the Mayor's Office at:
@SFMayorsOffice
Tweet to London Breed at:
@LondonBreed
Tweet to Lowell HS Alumni at:
@lowellalumni
Tweet to the Friends of Lowell HS at:
@FriendsofLowell
Summary, from a Lowell parent in our SF group:
On April 6th, Lowell's new Principal sent a letter to families informing of a new "Closed Campus Protocol" to be implemented starting on April 10th, yesterday.
The reasoning behind this new policy is to improve safety and security in the school, but no information was given as to what prompted this sudden change. Rumors have it that a few weeks ago there were fights taking place at Stonestown Mall, where many students go for lunch or after school. Rumors also say that no Lowell kids were directly involved in the fights, and that this happened after school hours anyway.
The closed campus policy means that students and staff alike are not allowed to leave campus between the hours of 8:30 and 3:40 (with rare exceptions) and need to identify themselves with an ID on a lanyard (with a QR code) or with their cellphone app.
A very troubling part of the letter is the introduction of the conditions for the reopening of the school in a "tiered-basis", were students with good grades, low truancy rates, few tardies and a clean record will recover their freedom while others won't. Welcome to the social credit system!
I am attaching the link to the communication from the Principal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QNERcIQYg0dJCc5k2PqQDfgZcqdgOFSzPweDkMP-4qQ/edit
--
In gratitude,
Cole Turner
At the risk of redundancy, because my very recent post seems to be missing…
There will always be zero “Covid deaths”.
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/international-guidelines-for-certification-and-classification-(coding)-of-covid-19-as-cause-of-death
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/ps/positionstatement2020/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19_NO.pdf
And you’ll need to understand PCR to fully comprehend the content in the links. It is entirely based upon the fraudulent use of PCR, which should be obvious to everyone by now. When you can understand that, you will agree that there are no Covid deaths, cases, or viruses.
CSTE = CDC
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/pdfs/Letter_to_CSTE_on_Interim-20.pdf
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.28-BRW-Letter-to-CSTE-Re.-CDC-School-Guidance-.pdf
“Deaths from Covid”
Ok for those who think a single death is actually attributable to Covid, here are some documents for your consideration. (Aside from the fact that “viruses” don’t exist). You can see there is nothing at all specific that can implicate “Covid” over any other possible cause of death. Do we need to remind everyone again of the 4.1 “comorbidities” in 94% of deaths marked uo7.1 (covid death code). Do we need to remind everyone here of the fact that 95% of “uo7.1” was in 65+ age groups? Amazingly, yes these are apparently necessary reminders. Can we teach sheeple to remember and to think? I hope so.
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/ps/positionstatement2020/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19_NO.pdf
Oh, who do you think the CSTE is? This will help those who don’t know:
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/pdfs/Letter_to_CSTE_on_Interim-20.pdf
Related news:
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.28-BRW-Letter-to-CSTE-Re.-CDC-School-Guidance-.pdf
Guidelines u07.1
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/international-guidelines-for-certification-and-classification-(coding)-of-covid-19-as-cause-of-death
…and so it’s necessary to understand PCR. …And so it’s necessary to understand PCR, primers, and “isolates”, and sequencing.
People, there’s no virus!
Excellent stats on the number killed by the Covid 19 vaccines: https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
I just discovered these recently and the 600,000 figure agrees from what I computed using 20 percent excess mortality in the US, which someone reported. I haven't been able to find total excess mortality figures for 2021 and 2022 for the US though. By the way trolls and pro vaxxers are everywhere and trying to cause trouble in every possible way.
It is odd that pro-vaxxers would be so motivated and zealous about defending the COVID vaxx on, say places like this SubStack?
It cant be because they want to defend their choice, because they would only defend it among their social circle. And there is no need to defend the shots among professional circles which are completelly in sync with the establisment narrative. It cant be political, because anti-vaxxers are from both sides of the political divide.
Also, they seem to be wellprepared with talking points and "studies" and "papers" to "support" the narative, as if they dont know that these are corrupted as well.
They are paid actors.
Seems like they have a religious fervor. Or else they really feel that the vax is the solution and we are obstacles to it.
That is the most charitable explaination.. I am not so charitable.
These so-called "masters of misdirection" aka bald-faced liars will continue to lie ad infinitum. The people who pay for their lies are those who gulp them down; hookline and sinker.
To be honest I wouldn't respect anybody who suggests that vaccines are any good. It may well be there are flaws with the data as presented by those who say the current vaccines are harming and killing people and we shouldn't present flawed analysis.
But even if the vaccines did not harm (and they do and always have depending on various factors), they would still be an awful scam.
The key thing upon which the scam hangs is the supposed training of the immune system to 'recognise' a virus. As virology is fundamentally flawed, and the virus is not as supposed, such a vain idea of training the immune system is plain silly.
Those who ignore the truth of this are evil 'sad brats' (reorganise for another useful word). They are judged accordingly.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
He has to be a shill. No true scientist would act this way.
Indeed, a bot, troll, shill, whatever. Another distractor to distract us whilst other evils go on.