Daniel Wilson aka "Debunk the Funk" claims to be a scientific truth-teller. In my opinion, he's a master of misdirection. I'm going to show you why I think that including a video.
R Marcucio is not a subscriber and seems to have differing views. He is UCSF Professor Ralph S Marcucio who has a h-index of 51. I've emailed him and invited him to a live civil discussion, but Wayne did that earlier and he REFUSED.
Dr. Marcurio, with a h-index of 51 from publishing orthopedic surgery papers, would not waste his time speaking with COVID-19 grifters. Kirsch has not corrected his logical fallacies about statistics after discussing p-values with Dr. Ian Copeland.
How pathetic. Steve as a pioneer in Silicon Valley has made a world class fortune from the companies he created and has proven his intelligence and drive in the marketplace. He, unlike you, does not need piddly squat from writing on the internet. What a lonely life you must have shilling for criminal organizations.
This Carlos thing never will end. It amazes me that people keep engaging it. But it foments anger and division, and hostility and people fall for it. As many posters have said. In the rare occasion he is a real human. We want him triple masked, and five times injected. He won't last very long. Carlos is an enigma but people smarter than me have pointed out syntax errors and caught it in logistical traps, so I think it's an AI bot.
Yes, but Steve's "analysis" has far more errors than a missing p-value, which could be 0.05 or 0.01 depending on the confidence interval. Unvaccinated status is associated with greater COVID-19 hospitalization risk compared to fully boosted status. Many studies with correct statistical analysis have found vaccines reduce severity of COVID-19 symptoms:
MRNA exists naturally in animal and plant cells. COVID-19 vaccines are saving lives by reducing severity of disease by causing memory B and T cell responses against viral antigens. Wikipedia and Bitchute are not primary sources of science.
I hope your faith in the jabs has you fully up-to-date with every last booster.
I am re-reading for the 3rd time, Geert Vanden Bossche's book, "The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic." He is a primary source for science. Here is a quote from page 152.
"As viral infectiousness of newly emerging (more virulent) immune escape variants does no longer increase, trained Cell Based Innate Immunity in the unvaccinated can catch up with new emerging variants to protect the unvaccinated from symptomatic infection. Sterilizing immunity in the unvaccinated combined with a HIGH MORTALITY IN THE VACCINATED will eventually lead to natural extinction of the pandemic in highly vaccinated populations."
Well good. End of the pandemic. Geert Vanden Bossche says it will be hard on the jabbed.
Vanden Bossche ignores the fact that natural immunity wanes over time and is less robust than hybrid immunity. Mortality rate per capita is lower in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated in every country.
"Vanden Bossche claimed that mass COVID-19 vaccination would precipitate immune escape, allowing the spread of “vaccine-resistant” variants of the virus. While resistance to vaccines has emerged before, this occurs only rarely[6]. Contrast this with the current variants of concern that researchers have observed, which all evolved naturally from infected individuals. Vanden Bossche provided no evidence indicating that COVID-19 vaccines pose a greater risk of immune escape than that mediated by uncontrolled viral spread and natural infection. And as mentioned previously, earlier mass vaccination campaigns against childhood diseases like measles effectively curbed disease outbreaks and didn’t result in worse outbreaks occurring. This observation contradicts his implication that this risk of COVID-19 vaccination outweighs its benefit."
The MRNA used in the subpar vaccines is synthetic not natural. It doesn’t invoke memory T cells & if it did you wouldn’t require repeated doses especially over months.
Pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines is an abundant modified nucleoside in non-coding RNAs across many species. Natural immunity wanes within months and does not prevent reinfection from Omicron subvariants.
We next developed an expanded antigen probe panel to better quantify memory B cell specificities to different regions of the spike protein and test how RBD binding by memory B cells may be affected by the mutations found in emerging VOCs. Specifically, we designed B cell tetramers for eight SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including full-length spike, N-terminal domain (NTD), multiple variant RBDs (WT, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and B.1.617.2), and the S2 domain (Fig. 3, A and B). Spike-specific memory B cells were defined on the basis of a multiple-discrimination approach, with binding to full-length spike plus one or more additional probes. This strategy also allowed us to identify memory B cells that cross-bind all variant RBDs (all variant+). SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was used as a vaccine-irrelevant antigen (but one for which SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects had detectable preexisting immunity; fig. S4, A and B). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S1B. We also leveraged a separate cohort of health care workers (HCWs) (table S1) who had mild COVID-19 and were sampled longitudinally after a positive serology test to compare vaccine-induced responses with infection alone (40)."
"Memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines:
In addition to antibodies and memory B cells, memory T cells can contribute to protection upon reexposure to virus. Memory T cell responses have also been shown to be less affected by VOCs than humoral immune responses (21, 50). To determine whether mRNA vaccination induced durable antigen-specific memory T cell responses, we performed a flow cytometric analysis using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. PBMCs were stimulated with peptide megapools containing optimized spike epitopes (51, 52). Antigen-specific responses were quantified as the frequency of AIM+ non-naïve T cells in stimulated samples with background subtraction from paired unstimulated controls (Fig. 5, A and B) (19). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S6. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells were defined on the basis of coexpression of CD40L and CD200. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells were defined on the basis of expression of four of five total activation markers, as described previously (19)."
45 Times as Many Deaths After COVID Shots in Just 2 Years Compared With All Flu Vaccine-Related Deaths Since 1990, Data Show
“Our meta-analysis of both national and international vaccine adverse events emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating public health policies that promote universal mass injection and multiple boosters for all demographic groups,” said the authors of a peer-reviewed study published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Eliana Romero, Ph.D., director of clinical research at the Neurodiversity Foundation, Shawn Fry, founder and chief science officer of the Neurodiversity Foundation and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense and associate professor of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California, authored the paper.
The researchers looked at adverse events specifically related to cardiovascular and fertility health — such as myocarditis and menstrual abnormalities — that went overlooked during the “expedited safety analyses” that took place in the “accelerated approval process that allowed the manufacturers to fast-track their products,” they said.
the paper is a dumpster dive into self-reporting databases used to identify potential safety signals. the reports are not documentation of things caused by vaccines...
So if it's a dumpster then explain where the 4000 pregnant females that Pfizer promised in a study in Feb 2021as they called it safe and pushed it on pregnant females. Number dwindle to 347 and where is the promised report in 7 to 10 months which is now 18 months overdue. I hear it's bad news. If it was good news it would have been trumpeted on every news station. You have heard of the polio vaccine by Cutter which had a live polio virus and killed kids and gave them polio in 1955 and guess what happened. The courts found them guilty for calling it safe. NIH people got fired or resigned. So a lesson for these so called safe vaccines.
You're a piece of garbage. I watched my Father die from THREE separate forms of rapidly accelerating "turbo" cancers that had NOT previously been there, that burst out of nowhere after his rapid ill health following the buster 💉 shot, two of which leapt from having been undetectable in the scans that determined the presence of the first to being STAGE FOUR when found in a follow up scan only
EIGHT weeks LATER. FIVE of my neighbours DIED inside a WEEK of receiving the FIRST 💉 shot & scores of schoolchildren and adolescents have routinely adorned
the pages of the local press with headlines such as "Eleven year old schoolboy dies during lunch hour at
local school", or 17yr olds, or 14yr olds, etc. There were even articles about the likes of a married couple in their 30's & mother in law in her 50's all getting jabbed on the same occasion & the mother in law and husband dying within 48hrs & the wife becoming seriously ill and being hospitalised, of kids returning home from school and finding BOTH
parents (in their 30's) DEAD, & of EVERY school now HAVING to have a DEFIBRILLATOR installed. History is NOT going to shine favourably upon lying propagandists like YOU. These rising & waning (but always generally climbing) deaths & disabilities can even be chronologically tabulated and shown to have vastly increased around the timescale of EVERY jab roll out, or buster drive, too. It's always the same with you self appointed "experts" and your false equivalences- it's "highly significant
data gleaned via scientific methodology" when it SUPPORTS your claims, but, when it DOESN'T, the goalposts are moved, & identical modalities & methodologies become "dumpster dives" of irrelevant, merely "anecdotal" 'tales', and the well worn "correlation DOESN'T equal causation!", except when YOU liars decide that it DOES, eh? It is a criminal offence to input false reports and data into the VAERS mechanism, & necessitates the input & attendant reports of the individual clinicians who had dealt with the victims, therefore, it's hardly credible to suggest that the figures therein are the result of paranoid, hysterical hypochondriacs, conflating OTHER issues with vaccine damage, in error, yet, as HAS been captured, footage in REAL TIME & screenshot,
BOTH VAERS and the UK's MHRA Yellow Card system have BOTH been caught REMOVING several THOUSAND fatalities in one fell swoop from the total amount of recorded fatalities, quite APART from the fact that the intentional "throttling" and resultant massive BACKLOG of as yet UNCOUNTED REPORTS has ALSO been exposed time and again. I honestly believe that you, and everyone LIKE you, better get on your damn KNEES, face pressed to the floor, and BEG God to forgive you for the wilful, conscious part that you & your pseudo-"scientific" accomplices have played in the installation and perpetuation of this still ongoing atrocity, but honestly, I really hope you DON'T...........
You may not agree to debate Steve Kirsch, but how about me?
Biochemistry and Toxicology joint honours, 1st class degree. PhD in respiratory pharmacology with focus on opiates and respiration. 30+ years leadership of pharmaceutical R&D to vice president at Pfizer and CEO of a biotech I founded. Consultant to 30 biotech companies (before they fired me in 2020). Earnings from commenting on covid & vaccines: $ zero.
I don't care about your credentials if your medical claims are proven wrong by scientific data. You were wrong about the COVID-19 pandemic ending in 2020 in the UK.
It was endemic at end of 2020 in Britain and it's a coronavirus and the next influenza season brings new ones Including endemic covid and that scary variant that Matt Hancock said when should I deploy to scare people in Dec 2020 was to usher in 2021 bring restrictions and push the vaccine. So fraud on the people crime against humanity using fear. Care to comment on fraud Carlos as fraud is intentional deceptive actions to steal one's rights. Those covid testing sites in Britain were empty. Wonder how they pumped out so many tests in one day with no one at the sites.
I think the use of both together is always inappropriate in so-called covid.
I do not believe there was a novel respiratory virus & the most likely scenario is simply misattribution of flu and other acute respiratory illnesses to “covid”.
How often do we use midazolam and morphine together in a flu patient?
For common sense. If it's a novel coronavirus we need to run and hide from then why run and get a novel vaccine for a novel coronavirus that you know nothing about and you yourself stated the Emergency rushed a vaccine. So run and hide from said scary novel coronzvurus we know nothing about but wait we found the perfect novel never tested never approved MRNA candidate and we don't know we picked the right or optimal or favorable one.
I read the article you reference. They discuss and approve of the method of proportionality analysis (which is a comparison technique) and do not consider it irrelevant as you say. From your paper: "Although underreporting is a limitation, VAERS is capable of detecting possible safety problems through disproportionality analyses and the other methods described above." When the CDC finally did the proportionality analysis, the results were literally hundreds of red flags according to their own thresholds yet they ignore them.
Steve forgot to ask the most important question: Who is funding this guy?
Not too long ago Debunker dude had this guy on- birds of a feather?
Folta, Kevin (22 May 2022). "Episode 293:Debunking the Disinformation Dozen". Talking biotech with Dr. Kevin Folta (Podcast). Colabra. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
OMG, the editorial board is a who's who of antivaxxers...the journal is an anti-vaccine journal. the paper is a dumpster dive into VAERS and similar databases.
Masks were only ever there to keep up the illusion of a pandemic.
The "gold standard" of journals, the Cochraine review concluded that after 3 years of this nonsense that there was little to o evidence of masks being effective.
Now thousands of studies show what my research team (epidemiologist, naturopathic physician, microbiologist) showed in 2020-2021 on the hazards of mask-wearing, and were censored for doing so. - Colleen Huber NMD
I couldn't respond to the poll since it didn't give "none of the above" as an option. I have absolutely no respect whatsoever for any of these, only deep, abiding contempt. Possibly I could have answered if the choice had been "whom do you despise the least (or most)?"
Susan Oliver now blocks people from her own channel and admits she can't even remember why. I know why! When she can't answer hard questions it's all she has left.....silence them!
Be nice and thankful for Daniel! He is at least debating, and if he's taught in scientific method, he will eventually admit being wrong, and celebrate it.
I appreciate all the good work that you are doing.
Closer to home, we have been fighting lots of local battles, including a new one with Lowell High School in San Francisco. I think we need to mobilize our forces against this (but it is a challenge with battles on so many fronts).
This is from Cole Turner-Dear San Francisco Medical Freedom Activists and Allies:
Yesterday, Lowell High School in SF began practicing school lock down, a social credit system, and in part, digital IDs. Scroll further down for more details from a Lowell parent.
I think we all know where this is going -- getting our children accustomed to having restrictions in their movements, having to scan their IDs to get in and out of non-optional locations, and having their movements restricted based on a "merit system". Which school, workplace, library, hospital, or courthouse is next?
We need all-hands-on-deck to shut this down immediately. Whether you're a Lowell student, parent, or alumni, a San Francisco resident, a taxpayer in California, or NOT -- please, please, please take immediate action to let the powers-that-be know: We will resist this.
Lockdowns, social credit systems, and digital IDs such as what have recently been used to control and punish populations in Communist China will NOT STAND in the United States.
Tweet to the City of San Francisco at:
@sfgov
Tweet to the Mayor's Office at:
@SFMayorsOffice
Tweet to London Breed at:
@LondonBreed
Tweet to Lowell HS Alumni at:
@lowellalumni
Tweet to the Friends of Lowell HS at:
@FriendsofLowell
Summary, from a Lowell parent in our SF group:
On April 6th, Lowell's new Principal sent a letter to families informing of a new "Closed Campus Protocol" to be implemented starting on April 10th, yesterday.
The reasoning behind this new policy is to improve safety and security in the school, but no information was given as to what prompted this sudden change. Rumors have it that a few weeks ago there were fights taking place at Stonestown Mall, where many students go for lunch or after school. Rumors also say that no Lowell kids were directly involved in the fights, and that this happened after school hours anyway.
The closed campus policy means that students and staff alike are not allowed to leave campus between the hours of 8:30 and 3:40 (with rare exceptions) and need to identify themselves with an ID on a lanyard (with a QR code) or with their cellphone app.
A very troubling part of the letter is the introduction of the conditions for the reopening of the school in a "tiered-basis", were students with good grades, low truancy rates, few tardies and a clean record will recover their freedom while others won't. Welcome to the social credit system!
I am attaching the link to the communication from the Principal:
And you’ll need to understand PCR to fully comprehend the content in the links. It is entirely based upon the fraudulent use of PCR, which should be obvious to everyone by now. When you can understand that, you will agree that there are no Covid deaths, cases, or viruses.
Ok for those who think a single death is actually attributable to Covid, here are some documents for your consideration. (Aside from the fact that “viruses” don’t exist). You can see there is nothing at all specific that can implicate “Covid” over any other possible cause of death. Do we need to remind everyone again of the 4.1 “comorbidities” in 94% of deaths marked uo7.1 (covid death code). Do we need to remind everyone here of the fact that 95% of “uo7.1” was in 65+ age groups? Amazingly, yes these are apparently necessary reminders. Can we teach sheeple to remember and to think? I hope so.
I just discovered these recently and the 600,000 figure agrees from what I computed using 20 percent excess mortality in the US, which someone reported. I haven't been able to find total excess mortality figures for 2021 and 2022 for the US though. By the way trolls and pro vaxxers are everywhere and trying to cause trouble in every possible way.
It is odd that pro-vaxxers would be so motivated and zealous about defending the COVID vaxx on, say places like this SubStack?
It cant be because they want to defend their choice, because they would only defend it among their social circle. And there is no need to defend the shots among professional circles which are completelly in sync with the establisment narrative. It cant be political, because anti-vaxxers are from both sides of the political divide.
Also, they seem to be wellprepared with talking points and "studies" and "papers" to "support" the narative, as if they dont know that these are corrupted as well.
These so-called "masters of misdirection" aka bald-faced liars will continue to lie ad infinitum. The people who pay for their lies are those who gulp them down; hookline and sinker.
To be honest I wouldn't respect anybody who suggests that vaccines are any good. It may well be there are flaws with the data as presented by those who say the current vaccines are harming and killing people and we shouldn't present flawed analysis.
But even if the vaccines did not harm (and they do and always have depending on various factors), they would still be an awful scam.
The key thing upon which the scam hangs is the supposed training of the immune system to 'recognise' a virus. As virology is fundamentally flawed, and the virus is not as supposed, such a vain idea of training the immune system is plain silly.
Those who ignore the truth of this are evil 'sad brats' (reorganise for another useful word). They are judged accordingly.
R Marcucio is not a subscriber and seems to have differing views. He is UCSF Professor Ralph S Marcucio who has a h-index of 51. I've emailed him and invited him to a live civil discussion, but Wayne did that earlier and he REFUSED.
R Mercriano is an arrogant prick.
He’s a troll
Dr. Marcurio, with a h-index of 51 from publishing orthopedic surgery papers, would not waste his time speaking with COVID-19 grifters. Kirsch has not corrected his logical fallacies about statistics after discussing p-values with Dr. Ian Copeland.
How pathetic. Steve as a pioneer in Silicon Valley has made a world class fortune from the companies he created and has proven his intelligence and drive in the marketplace. He, unlike you, does not need piddly squat from writing on the internet. What a lonely life you must have shilling for criminal organizations.
Carlos is troll or AI bot just ignore it.
What proof do you have that anyone is "grifting?" That is a common trick of trolls - to throw out such a ridiculous charge with no evidence.
We don't know if you are being paid to troll, if so THAT would be grifting.
This Carlos thing never will end. It amazes me that people keep engaging it. But it foments anger and division, and hostility and people fall for it. As many posters have said. In the rare occasion he is a real human. We want him triple masked, and five times injected. He won't last very long. Carlos is an enigma but people smarter than me have pointed out syntax errors and caught it in logistical traps, so I think it's an AI bot.
Steve Kirsch has paid Substack subscribers who are charged $50 annually.
Sounds like marcurio ought to understand “the science” well enough. But he cannot understand virology is the study of nothing.
The article was updated with P-value immediately, I guess you didn't know that.
Yes, but Steve's "analysis" has far more errors than a missing p-value, which could be 0.05 or 0.01 depending on the confidence interval. Unvaccinated status is associated with greater COVID-19 hospitalization risk compared to fully boosted status. Many studies with correct statistical analysis have found vaccines reduce severity of COVID-19 symptoms:
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2796235
MRNA exists naturally in animal and plant cells. COVID-19 vaccines are saving lives by reducing severity of disease by causing memory B and T cell responses against viral antigens. Wikipedia and Bitchute are not primary sources of science.
I hope your faith in the jabs has you fully up-to-date with every last booster.
I am re-reading for the 3rd time, Geert Vanden Bossche's book, "The Inescapable Immune Escape Pandemic." He is a primary source for science. Here is a quote from page 152.
"As viral infectiousness of newly emerging (more virulent) immune escape variants does no longer increase, trained Cell Based Innate Immunity in the unvaccinated can catch up with new emerging variants to protect the unvaccinated from symptomatic infection. Sterilizing immunity in the unvaccinated combined with a HIGH MORTALITY IN THE VACCINATED will eventually lead to natural extinction of the pandemic in highly vaccinated populations."
Well good. End of the pandemic. Geert Vanden Bossche says it will be hard on the jabbed.
Vanden Bossche ignores the fact that natural immunity wanes over time and is less robust than hybrid immunity. Mortality rate per capita is lower in the vaccinated versus unvaccinated in every country.
"Vanden Bossche claimed that mass COVID-19 vaccination would precipitate immune escape, allowing the spread of “vaccine-resistant” variants of the virus. While resistance to vaccines has emerged before, this occurs only rarely[6]. Contrast this with the current variants of concern that researchers have observed, which all evolved naturally from infected individuals. Vanden Bossche provided no evidence indicating that COVID-19 vaccines pose a greater risk of immune escape than that mediated by uncontrolled viral spread and natural infection. And as mentioned previously, earlier mass vaccination campaigns against childhood diseases like measles effectively curbed disease outbreaks and didn’t result in worse outbreaks occurring. This observation contradicts his implication that this risk of COVID-19 vaccination outweighs its benefit."
https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/covid-19-vaccines-are-critical-for-controlling-the-pandemic-vaccines-still-offer-partial-protection-against-new-variants-of-the-virus/
The MRNA used in the subpar vaccines is synthetic not natural. It doesn’t invoke memory T cells & if it did you wouldn’t require repeated doses especially over months.
Pseudouridine in mRNA vaccines is an abundant modified nucleoside in non-coding RNAs across many species. Natural immunity wanes within months and does not prevent reinfection from Omicron subvariants.
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abm0829
"Memory B cell responses to major VOCs:
We next developed an expanded antigen probe panel to better quantify memory B cell specificities to different regions of the spike protein and test how RBD binding by memory B cells may be affected by the mutations found in emerging VOCs. Specifically, we designed B cell tetramers for eight SARS-CoV-2 antigens, including full-length spike, N-terminal domain (NTD), multiple variant RBDs (WT, B.1.1.7, B.1.351, and B.1.617.2), and the S2 domain (Fig. 3, A and B). Spike-specific memory B cells were defined on the basis of a multiple-discrimination approach, with binding to full-length spike plus one or more additional probes. This strategy also allowed us to identify memory B cells that cross-bind all variant RBDs (all variant+). SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid was used as a vaccine-irrelevant antigen (but one for which SARS-CoV-2–infected subjects had detectable preexisting immunity; fig. S4, A and B). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S1B. We also leveraged a separate cohort of health care workers (HCWs) (table S1) who had mild COVID-19 and were sampled longitudinally after a positive serology test to compare vaccine-induced responses with infection alone (40)."
"Memory CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines:
In addition to antibodies and memory B cells, memory T cells can contribute to protection upon reexposure to virus. Memory T cell responses have also been shown to be less affected by VOCs than humoral immune responses (21, 50). To determine whether mRNA vaccination induced durable antigen-specific memory T cell responses, we performed a flow cytometric analysis using an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay. PBMCs were stimulated with peptide megapools containing optimized spike epitopes (51, 52). Antigen-specific responses were quantified as the frequency of AIM+ non-naïve T cells in stimulated samples with background subtraction from paired unstimulated controls (Fig. 5, A and B) (19). Full gating strategies are provided in fig. S6. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells were defined on the basis of coexpression of CD40L and CD200. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells were defined on the basis of expression of four of five total activation markers, as described previously (19)."
45 Times as Many Deaths After COVID Shots in Just 2 Years Compared With All Flu Vaccine-Related Deaths Since 1990, Data Show
“Our meta-analysis of both national and international vaccine adverse events emphasizes the importance of re-evaluating public health policies that promote universal mass injection and multiple boosters for all demographic groups,” said the authors of a peer-reviewed study published this month in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research.
Eliana Romero, Ph.D., director of clinical research at the Neurodiversity Foundation, Shawn Fry, founder and chief science officer of the Neurodiversity Foundation and Brian Hooker, Ph.D., P.E., chief scientific officer of Children’s Health Defense and associate professor of biology at Simpson University in Redding, California, authored the paper.
The researchers looked at adverse events specifically related to cardiovascular and fertility health — such as myocarditis and menstrual abnormalities — that went overlooked during the “expedited safety analyses” that took place in the “accelerated approval process that allowed the manufacturers to fast-track their products,” they said.
Thanks! I didn't see this post had been pinned until now. It's an interesting article.
the paper is a dumpster dive into self-reporting databases used to identify potential safety signals. the reports are not documentation of things caused by vaccines...
By tge way doctors refusing to report vaccine injuries is a medical ethics breach and violates the SEC filing
So if it's a dumpster then explain where the 4000 pregnant females that Pfizer promised in a study in Feb 2021as they called it safe and pushed it on pregnant females. Number dwindle to 347 and where is the promised report in 7 to 10 months which is now 18 months overdue. I hear it's bad news. If it was good news it would have been trumpeted on every news station. You have heard of the polio vaccine by Cutter which had a live polio virus and killed kids and gave them polio in 1955 and guess what happened. The courts found them guilty for calling it safe. NIH people got fired or resigned. So a lesson for these so called safe vaccines.
You're a piece of garbage. I watched my Father die from THREE separate forms of rapidly accelerating "turbo" cancers that had NOT previously been there, that burst out of nowhere after his rapid ill health following the buster 💉 shot, two of which leapt from having been undetectable in the scans that determined the presence of the first to being STAGE FOUR when found in a follow up scan only
EIGHT weeks LATER. FIVE of my neighbours DIED inside a WEEK of receiving the FIRST 💉 shot & scores of schoolchildren and adolescents have routinely adorned
the pages of the local press with headlines such as "Eleven year old schoolboy dies during lunch hour at
local school", or 17yr olds, or 14yr olds, etc. There were even articles about the likes of a married couple in their 30's & mother in law in her 50's all getting jabbed on the same occasion & the mother in law and husband dying within 48hrs & the wife becoming seriously ill and being hospitalised, of kids returning home from school and finding BOTH
parents (in their 30's) DEAD, & of EVERY school now HAVING to have a DEFIBRILLATOR installed. History is NOT going to shine favourably upon lying propagandists like YOU. These rising & waning (but always generally climbing) deaths & disabilities can even be chronologically tabulated and shown to have vastly increased around the timescale of EVERY jab roll out, or buster drive, too. It's always the same with you self appointed "experts" and your false equivalences- it's "highly significant
data gleaned via scientific methodology" when it SUPPORTS your claims, but, when it DOESN'T, the goalposts are moved, & identical modalities & methodologies become "dumpster dives" of irrelevant, merely "anecdotal" 'tales', and the well worn "correlation DOESN'T equal causation!", except when YOU liars decide that it DOES, eh? It is a criminal offence to input false reports and data into the VAERS mechanism, & necessitates the input & attendant reports of the individual clinicians who had dealt with the victims, therefore, it's hardly credible to suggest that the figures therein are the result of paranoid, hysterical hypochondriacs, conflating OTHER issues with vaccine damage, in error, yet, as HAS been captured, footage in REAL TIME & screenshot,
BOTH VAERS and the UK's MHRA Yellow Card system have BOTH been caught REMOVING several THOUSAND fatalities in one fell swoop from the total amount of recorded fatalities, quite APART from the fact that the intentional "throttling" and resultant massive BACKLOG of as yet UNCOUNTED REPORTS has ALSO been exposed time and again. I honestly believe that you, and everyone LIKE you, better get on your damn KNEES, face pressed to the floor, and BEG God to forgive you for the wilful, conscious part that you & your pseudo-"scientific" accomplices have played in the installation and perpetuation of this still ongoing atrocity, but honestly, I really hope you DON'T...........
You may not agree to debate Steve Kirsch, but how about me?
Biochemistry and Toxicology joint honours, 1st class degree. PhD in respiratory pharmacology with focus on opiates and respiration. 30+ years leadership of pharmaceutical R&D to vice president at Pfizer and CEO of a biotech I founded. Consultant to 30 biotech companies (before they fired me in 2020). Earnings from commenting on covid & vaccines: $ zero.
Great to see you on here commenting to those who try to cover up vaccine injuries.
I don't care about your credentials if your medical claims are proven wrong by scientific data. You were wrong about the COVID-19 pandemic ending in 2020 in the UK.
https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=former-scientific-advisor-to-pfizer-michael-yeadon-claims-that-the-pandemic-is-fundamentally-over-in-the-u-k-and-we-now-know-loads-of-people-had-prior-immunity-to-covid-19
There never was a pandemic.
There are dozens of papers demonstrating this.
The heart of the fraud is PCR.
If you seriously think those paid by the perpetrators are suitable judges, all I can say is run & get your booster as you’re doomed.
I no longer care what you think. I’ve done all I can. So you’ll see, won’t you?
It was endemic at end of 2020 in Britain and it's a coronavirus and the next influenza season brings new ones Including endemic covid and that scary variant that Matt Hancock said when should I deploy to scare people in Dec 2020 was to usher in 2021 bring restrictions and push the vaccine. So fraud on the people crime against humanity using fear. Care to comment on fraud Carlos as fraud is intentional deceptive actions to steal one's rights. Those covid testing sites in Britain were empty. Wonder how they pumped out so many tests in one day with no one at the sites.
There never was a COVID-19 pandemic.
What are your thoughts on the use of morphine and midazolam in treatment protocols?
I think the use of both together is always inappropriate in so-called covid.
I do not believe there was a novel respiratory virus & the most likely scenario is simply misattribution of flu and other acute respiratory illnesses to “covid”.
How often do we use midazolam and morphine together in a flu patient?
Not often, I’d estimate.
What say you, clinical experts?
and one of the most wrong ppl during the pandemic!
For common sense. If it's a novel coronavirus we need to run and hide from then why run and get a novel vaccine for a novel coronavirus that you know nothing about and you yourself stated the Emergency rushed a vaccine. So run and hide from said scary novel coronzvurus we know nothing about but wait we found the perfect novel never tested never approved MRNA candidate and we don't know we picked the right or optimal or favorable one.
Proof?
How does this fit in with refusal to debate because someone is not a medical authority? Was that true?
So, they should just be ignored? Surely a lot of people thought they had some value when they were first authorized.
no, they should not be ignored. they should be analyzed correctly, not by comparing them to other vaccines. that is irrelevant.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209838/
But many of the safety aspects were skipped because they are considered vaccines. Do you think they should have gone under more rigorous testing?
True.
Compare the COVID Vax Substances to other bioweapons.
I read the article you reference. They discuss and approve of the method of proportionality analysis (which is a comparison technique) and do not consider it irrelevant as you say. From your paper: "Although underreporting is a limitation, VAERS is capable of detecting possible safety problems through disproportionality analyses and the other methods described above." When the CDC finally did the proportionality analysis, the results were literally hundreds of red flags according to their own thresholds yet they ignore them.
Steve forgot to ask the most important question: Who is funding this guy?
Not too long ago Debunker dude had this guy on- birds of a feather?
Folta, Kevin (22 May 2022). "Episode 293:Debunking the Disinformation Dozen". Talking biotech with Dr. Kevin Folta (Podcast). Colabra. Archived from the original on 26 December 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2023.
https://theecologist.org/2015/sep/08/monsantos-scientist-shill-exposed
https://usrtk.org/industry-pr/kevin-folta/
https://www.ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/70
OMG, the editorial board is a who's who of antivaxxers...the journal is an anti-vaccine journal. the paper is a dumpster dive into VAERS and similar databases.
Does he still think the masks work? the Pharma grifters are pushing the masks again.
https://twitter.com/ScottyGoesAgain/status/1646790830449995776?s=20
masks do work. they reduce transmission of the virus.
Masks were only ever there to keep up the illusion of a pandemic.
The "gold standard" of journals, the Cochraine review concluded that after 3 years of this nonsense that there was little to o evidence of masks being effective.
https://www.cochrane.org/news/featured-review-physical-interventions-interrupt-or-reduce-spread-respiratory-viruses
No doubt you have some modelling study showing that they work tremendously.
Masks do work
As a symbol of fear to all.
To demonstrate there is grave danger .
We need a Messiah.
The VACCINES.
If they work why
Did COVID deaths in the USA reach 1.2 million
After they mandated them
Masks work similar to
A car can fly
Only in your mind
They do.
ha ha ha ha it really is a bot. I think I saw this knuckle head bot operating on another substack under the initials RL.
Rediscovery of Low-Oxygen Mask Injury
Now thousands of studies show what my research team (epidemiologist, naturopathic physician, microbiologist) showed in 2020-2021 on the hazards of mask-wearing, and were censored for doing so. - Colleen Huber NMD
https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/rediscovery-of-low-oxygen-mask-injury
Not really, I’m a teacher and the Masked-Vaxxers keep getting covid, while us Purebloods don’t.
This debunk guy is a virus maniac! He is one of the top frauds defending germ theory and virology to his ego death!
There is no virus folks…the theory is bogus.
Where I come from we call a person like this "Debunk the Funk" a bullshitter.
I couldn't respond to the poll since it didn't give "none of the above" as an option. I have absolutely no respect whatsoever for any of these, only deep, abiding contempt. Possibly I could have answered if the choice had been "whom do you despise the least (or most)?"
Susan Oliver now blocks people from her own channel and admits she can't even remember why. I know why! When she can't answer hard questions it's all she has left.....silence them!
There's also the contention that 2x💉jabbed are often counted AS "unvaccinated", incredibly, as the authorities of many countries regard
the status of being "vaccinated" as being at LEAST 2x💉+ one BOOSTER too. The UK are known to
employ these kinda deceitful, evasive semantics in some metrics.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/australia/
In AUSTRALIA dec 2020 no vaccines 976 covid deaths
Dec 2022 after 2 years of vaccines, masks, LOCKDOWNS 17000 covid deaths .
Also all cause MORTALITY down in 2020 up in 2021 ,2022 33%
Be nice and thankful for Daniel! He is at least debating, and if he's taught in scientific method, he will eventually admit being wrong, and celebrate it.
I appreciate all the good work that you are doing.
Closer to home, we have been fighting lots of local battles, including a new one with Lowell High School in San Francisco. I think we need to mobilize our forces against this (but it is a challenge with battles on so many fronts).
This is from Cole Turner-Dear San Francisco Medical Freedom Activists and Allies:
Yesterday, Lowell High School in SF began practicing school lock down, a social credit system, and in part, digital IDs. Scroll further down for more details from a Lowell parent.
I think we all know where this is going -- getting our children accustomed to having restrictions in their movements, having to scan their IDs to get in and out of non-optional locations, and having their movements restricted based on a "merit system". Which school, workplace, library, hospital, or courthouse is next?
We need all-hands-on-deck to shut this down immediately. Whether you're a Lowell student, parent, or alumni, a San Francisco resident, a taxpayer in California, or NOT -- please, please, please take immediate action to let the powers-that-be know: We will resist this.
Send an email to Principal, Dr Michael O. Jones:
jonesm@sfusd.edu
Call him at: 415/759-2730, extension 3167 (principal's office)
Send an email to Superintendent Dr Matt Wayne:
waynem@sfusd.edu
tweet him at: @SFUSD_Supe
Contact all members of the San Francisco Board of Education:
Kevine Boggess - kevineboggess@sfusd.edu
Lisa Weissman-Ward - lisaweissman-ward@sfusd.edu
Matt Alexander - MattAlexander@sfusd.edu
Jenny Lam - JennyLam@sfusd.edu
Lainie Motamedi - lainiemotamedi@sfusd.edu
Mark Sanchez - MarkSanchez@sfusd.edu
Please let them know, politely and firmly:
Lockdowns, social credit systems, and digital IDs such as what have recently been used to control and punish populations in Communist China will NOT STAND in the United States.
Tweet to the City of San Francisco at:
@sfgov
Tweet to the Mayor's Office at:
@SFMayorsOffice
Tweet to London Breed at:
@LondonBreed
Tweet to Lowell HS Alumni at:
@lowellalumni
Tweet to the Friends of Lowell HS at:
@FriendsofLowell
Summary, from a Lowell parent in our SF group:
On April 6th, Lowell's new Principal sent a letter to families informing of a new "Closed Campus Protocol" to be implemented starting on April 10th, yesterday.
The reasoning behind this new policy is to improve safety and security in the school, but no information was given as to what prompted this sudden change. Rumors have it that a few weeks ago there were fights taking place at Stonestown Mall, where many students go for lunch or after school. Rumors also say that no Lowell kids were directly involved in the fights, and that this happened after school hours anyway.
The closed campus policy means that students and staff alike are not allowed to leave campus between the hours of 8:30 and 3:40 (with rare exceptions) and need to identify themselves with an ID on a lanyard (with a QR code) or with their cellphone app.
A very troubling part of the letter is the introduction of the conditions for the reopening of the school in a "tiered-basis", were students with good grades, low truancy rates, few tardies and a clean record will recover their freedom while others won't. Welcome to the social credit system!
I am attaching the link to the communication from the Principal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QNERcIQYg0dJCc5k2PqQDfgZcqdgOFSzPweDkMP-4qQ/edit
--
In gratitude,
Cole Turner
At the risk of redundancy, because my very recent post seems to be missing…
There will always be zero “Covid deaths”.
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/international-guidelines-for-certification-and-classification-(coding)-of-covid-19-as-cause-of-death
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/ps/positionstatement2020/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19_NO.pdf
And you’ll need to understand PCR to fully comprehend the content in the links. It is entirely based upon the fraudulent use of PCR, which should be obvious to everyone by now. When you can understand that, you will agree that there are no Covid deaths, cases, or viruses.
CSTE = CDC
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/pdfs/Letter_to_CSTE_on_Interim-20.pdf
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.28-BRW-Letter-to-CSTE-Re.-CDC-School-Guidance-.pdf
“Deaths from Covid”
Ok for those who think a single death is actually attributable to Covid, here are some documents for your consideration. (Aside from the fact that “viruses” don’t exist). You can see there is nothing at all specific that can implicate “Covid” over any other possible cause of death. Do we need to remind everyone again of the 4.1 “comorbidities” in 94% of deaths marked uo7.1 (covid death code). Do we need to remind everyone here of the fact that 95% of “uo7.1” was in 65+ age groups? Amazingly, yes these are apparently necessary reminders. Can we teach sheeple to remember and to think? I hope so.
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/ps/positionstatement2020/Interim-20-ID-01_COVID-19_NO.pdf
Oh, who do you think the CSTE is? This will help those who don’t know:
https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/pdfs/Letter_to_CSTE_on_Interim-20.pdf
Related news:
https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023.03.28-BRW-Letter-to-CSTE-Re.-CDC-School-Guidance-.pdf
Guidelines u07.1
https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/international-guidelines-for-certification-and-classification-(coding)-of-covid-19-as-cause-of-death
…and so it’s necessary to understand PCR. …And so it’s necessary to understand PCR, primers, and “isolates”, and sequencing.
People, there’s no virus!
Excellent stats on the number killed by the Covid 19 vaccines: https://www.theflstandard.com/top-insurance-analyst-600-000-americans-per-year-are-dying-from-covid-shots/
I just discovered these recently and the 600,000 figure agrees from what I computed using 20 percent excess mortality in the US, which someone reported. I haven't been able to find total excess mortality figures for 2021 and 2022 for the US though. By the way trolls and pro vaxxers are everywhere and trying to cause trouble in every possible way.
It is odd that pro-vaxxers would be so motivated and zealous about defending the COVID vaxx on, say places like this SubStack?
It cant be because they want to defend their choice, because they would only defend it among their social circle. And there is no need to defend the shots among professional circles which are completelly in sync with the establisment narrative. It cant be political, because anti-vaxxers are from both sides of the political divide.
Also, they seem to be wellprepared with talking points and "studies" and "papers" to "support" the narative, as if they dont know that these are corrupted as well.
They are paid actors.
Seems like they have a religious fervor. Or else they really feel that the vax is the solution and we are obstacles to it.
That is the most charitable explaination.. I am not so charitable.
These so-called "masters of misdirection" aka bald-faced liars will continue to lie ad infinitum. The people who pay for their lies are those who gulp them down; hookline and sinker.
To be honest I wouldn't respect anybody who suggests that vaccines are any good. It may well be there are flaws with the data as presented by those who say the current vaccines are harming and killing people and we shouldn't present flawed analysis.
But even if the vaccines did not harm (and they do and always have depending on various factors), they would still be an awful scam.
The key thing upon which the scam hangs is the supposed training of the immune system to 'recognise' a virus. As virology is fundamentally flawed, and the virus is not as supposed, such a vain idea of training the immune system is plain silly.
Those who ignore the truth of this are evil 'sad brats' (reorganise for another useful word). They are judged accordingly.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/
He has to be a shill. No true scientist would act this way.
Indeed, a bot, troll, shill, whatever. Another distractor to distract us whilst other evils go on.