A later point on Dr. Huber's mask article is that she is referencing a recent study which analyzed over 2,000 mask studies.
She also references her own study from years ago analyzing over 200 studies. FYI, Dr. Huber's books and articles are always packed with studies.
Since this post and response you've stated how important peer-reviewed studies are to you. Did you at least glance at any of the thousands of studies analyzed in the recent mask report referenced in the article or the several hundred from years ago that have similar results and can you explain why a particular study is wrong?
A later point on Dr. Huber's mask article is that she is referencing a recent study which analyzed over 2,000 mask studies.
She also references her own study from years ago analyzing over 200 studies. FYI, Dr. Huber's books and articles are always packed with studies.
Since this post and response you've stated how important peer-reviewed studies are to you. Did you at least glance at any of the thousands of studies analyzed in the recent mask report referenced in the article or the several hundred from years ago that have similar results and can you explain why a particular study is wrong?