95 Comments
тна Return to thread

the paper is a dumpster dive into self-reporting databases used to identify potential safety signals. the reports are not documentation of things caused by vaccines...

Expand full comment

By tge way doctors refusing to report vaccine injuries is a medical ethics breach and violates the SEC filing

Expand full comment

So if it's a dumpster then explain where the 4000 pregnant females that Pfizer promised in a study in Feb 2021as they called it safe and pushed it on pregnant females. Number dwindle to 347 and where is the promised report in 7 to 10 months which is now 18 months overdue. I hear it's bad news. If it was good news it would have been trumpeted on every news station. You have heard of the polio vaccine by Cutter which had a live polio virus and killed kids and gave them polio in 1955 and guess what happened. The courts found them guilty for calling it safe. NIH people got fired or resigned. So a lesson for these so called safe vaccines.

Expand full comment

You're a piece of garbage. I watched my Father die from THREE separate forms of rapidly accelerating "turbo" cancers that had NOT previously been there, that burst out of nowhere after his rapid ill health following the buster ЁЯТЙ shot, two of which leapt from having been undetectable in the scans that determined the presence of the first to being STAGE FOUR when found in a follow up scan only

EIGHT weeks LATER. FIVE of my neighbours DIED inside a WEEK of receiving the FIRST ЁЯТЙ shot & scores of schoolchildren and adolescents have routinely adorned

the pages of the local press with headlines such as "Eleven year old schoolboy dies during lunch hour at

local school", or 17yr olds, or 14yr olds, etc. There were even articles about the likes of a married couple in their 30's & mother in law in her 50's all getting jabbed on the same occasion & the mother in law and husband dying within 48hrs & the wife becoming seriously ill and being hospitalised, of kids returning home from school and finding BOTH

parents (in their 30's) DEAD, & of EVERY school now HAVING to have a DEFIBRILLATOR installed. History is NOT going to shine favourably upon lying propagandists like YOU. These rising & waning (but always generally climbing) deaths & disabilities can even be chronologically tabulated and shown to have vastly increased around the timescale of EVERY jab roll out, or buster drive, too. It's always the same with you self appointed "experts" and your false equivalences- it's "highly significant

data gleaned via scientific methodology" when it SUPPORTS your claims, but, when it DOESN'T, the goalposts are moved, & identical modalities & methodologies become "dumpster dives" of irrelevant, merely "anecdotal" 'tales', and the well worn "correlation DOESN'T equal causation!", except when YOU liars decide that it DOES, eh? It is a criminal offence to input false reports and data into the VAERS mechanism, & necessitates the input & attendant reports of the individual clinicians who had dealt with the victims, therefore, it's hardly credible to suggest that the figures therein are the result of paranoid, hysterical hypochondriacs, conflating OTHER issues with vaccine damage, in error, yet, as HAS been captured, footage in REAL TIME & screenshot,

BOTH VAERS and the UK's MHRA Yellow Card system have BOTH been caught REMOVING several THOUSAND fatalities in one fell swoop from the total amount of recorded fatalities, quite APART from the fact that the intentional "throttling" and resultant massive BACKLOG of as yet UNCOUNTED REPORTS has ALSO been exposed time and again. I honestly believe that you, and everyone LIKE you, better get on your damn KNEES, face pressed to the floor, and BEG God to forgive you for the wilful, conscious part that you & your pseudo-"scientific" accomplices have played in the installation and perpetuation of this still ongoing atrocity, but honestly, I really hope you DON'T...........

Expand full comment

You may not agree to debate Steve Kirsch, but how about me?

Biochemistry and Toxicology joint honours, 1st class degree. PhD in respiratory pharmacology with focus on opiates and respiration. 30+ years leadership of pharmaceutical R&D to vice president at Pfizer and CEO of a biotech I founded. Consultant to 30 biotech companies (before they fired me in 2020). Earnings from commenting on covid & vaccines: $ zero.

Expand full comment

Great to see you on here commenting to those who try to cover up vaccine injuries.

Expand full comment

I don't care about your credentials if your medical claims are proven wrong by scientific data. You were wrong about the COVID-19 pandemic ending in 2020 in the UK.

https://www.poynter.org/?ifcn_misinformation=former-scientific-advisor-to-pfizer-michael-yeadon-claims-that-the-pandemic-is-fundamentally-over-in-the-u-k-and-we-now-know-loads-of-people-had-prior-immunity-to-covid-19

Expand full comment

There never was a pandemic.

There are dozens of papers demonstrating this.

The heart of the fraud is PCR.

If you seriously think those paid by the perpetrators are suitable judges, all I can say is run & get your booster as youтАЩre doomed.

I no longer care what you think. IтАЩve done all I can. So youтАЩll see, wonтАЩt you?

Expand full comment

When I looked at the 'pandemic' data of daily cases as things happened, Australia's pandemic flatlined already by August 2020 and Sweden similarly... following the exact timeline suggested by one of UK's senior virologist, a professor at one of the universities if I recall, from when COVID was announced and before we knew anything what was going on. I can't remember his name, but kind of a bland looking man, and he was interviewed by TV many times and then he disappeared from media and they never approached him again.

He never recommended lockdowns, masks or anything - he actually opposed it and said it would only delay immunity from developing and harm the economy. He said natural immunity would develop in 8-10 months, and people should simply go on as usual but observe more cleanliness and improve lifestyle and vitamin intake to boost their own immunity.

COVID was basically over by August 2020. But they - whoever is the running force behind this (which seem to be tied in with the military and the CIA, according to Robert Kennedy) had to ride the wave and create something out of nothing. Made them billions though and allowed them to rob us off our freedom to install surveillance units all across each country, and test how far they could go to install a dictatorial policy. And this year, 2023, is the launch year for government controlled digital currency which decides what you can buy, when you can buy it, from whom you can buy - and if you're not compliant, you can get cut off from all access to be able to sustain yourself. That's where we're heading if people don't object.

Expand full comment

You're perfectly correct in your statements:this HAS all been an exercise in advancing a verrrrrry sinister totalitarian agenda. There are FAR too many "synchronicities" that all TOO conveniently dovetail towards a seemingly central theme- CONTROL. Event 201, ID/2020, Operation Lockstep, SPARS, combined with so many of the precedents to them, U.N. Agenda 21/2030, the so called "great" reset/4th industrial revolution, the many "sustainability" goals of the climate catastrophizing propagandists and the utter folly of the pseudo-science that purports to support it. Even the "6uild 6ack 6etter" song & dance, so curiously trumpeted simultaneously & with identical phrasing predates the scam/sham/flim- flamdemic/ damn- panic, plandemic, having previously appeared on "king" Charlie's site (the duchy of Cornwall, I think?) a few years prior. Much, if not ALL of this, can be traced back to, at LEAST 2013, according to the statements made by the whistle blowing ex contracts lawyer for some of the pharmaceutical complex cartels, who, on Redacted news-channel & elsewhere, states that there are a many headed hydra of "twisty-turny" collaborations between big pharma, defence contractors, the many "alphabet" agencies of the intelligence apparatus

& the D.o.D., a large number of said contracts being to do with cross confidentialities, and one of the central, salient motivations for both the installation of the E.U.A.'s & their continued use is that these pseudo-vaccines are NOT inherently regulated applied therapeutic medications, but instead have the designation of "military prototypes" !!

There ARE NO positive therapeutic curative, medicinal, beneficial qualities nor properties within the jab, NONE, & it's quite amazing to watch the likes of Mercurio (Mercury, God of tricksters and liars) & Gonzales continue to utterly ignore the likes of La Quinta Columna's research into the jab via electron microscopy (& that of many others now) SHOWING the clear & irrefutable presence of graphene oxide structures, highly sinister self-assembling nano-matrices & biotechnologies & the

terrifying lil' critters swimming around in there thought to be, or synthetically derive from the Hydra Vulgaris parasite, ЁЯк▒,

or the synthetic Hydra Lineaus. One need only GO to the sites of La Quinta Columna or holistichealthonline.com or the documentaries/site/ channel & guests of the likes of Stew Peters, Maria Zee & others. I challenge not merely тШЭя╕Пthose two jokers, but ANY of the jab-happy pharma reps, pro jab policy pushing politicians, or scumbag propagandizing presstitutes in their scumbag propagandizing ooze-papers to even ADDRESS the issue of this now growing body of footage and proofs. Why ARE the jabbed emitting outgoing MAC address Bluetooth signals with seemingly individual identification registration numbers or codes, or even the GRAVES of DEAD jab victims STILL pumpin'

out the signals!!?? Pah! MORE "dumpster dives" of "merely anecdotal" ornamentation, eh fellas? I can't HEAR you? It all just becomes more and MORE horrifying with every passing day now, & according to a growing number of reports, presumably the second that the W.H.O.'s tyrannical alterations to the I.H.R.'s come into place, we should be anticipating the imminent announcement of the NEXT plandemic (hmmm ЁЯдФ, something of the 'avian' persuasion, I think? Or....no, wait! Swine! Or.....or.....?).

Expand full comment

The epidemiological evidence of all causes mortality shows there was no pandemic.

The entire event is fake.

Expand full comment

A common winter flu.

Expand full comment

Hello, Dr, an honor to "speak" with you in this forum. If you have a moment, could flesh out your point (above) about their being no pandemic? Is it because the PCR test was so unreliable, and/or are you just looking at the covid mortality numbers for 2020?

Expand full comment

Which peer-reviewed papers demonstrated your claim about COVID-19 not being a pandemic?

What scientific data shows PCR is "fraud"? The rebuttal to the Corman-Drosten paper is wrong. The principle of RT-PCR is to amplify short segments of reverse transcribed cDNA in real-time using primer-probe sets.

RT-qPCR is the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in diagnostic tests. Forward and reverse primers flank specific target regions of the viral sequence, working in tandem to initiate amplification of cDNA. Internal, positive, and negative controls have validated specifications. Cycle thresholds (Ct = 45) have specifications based on cut-off values from limit of detection (LOD). N1 has an individual Ct threshold for cut-off of background fluorescence and true signal.

Expand full comment

You mean you never read any of the complaints about the constant large percentage of false positives in the COVID tests, including the PCR tests, nor the inventor Kary Mullins complaint that PCR was being misused to detect COVID? Mullims said PCR was only developed for FORENSIC analysis and cannot determine if an infection is active and infectous, or if it's simply dead residues from a past infection years prior? He also said the settings of the test was being misused and making the test excessively sensitive, which was why it would detect past residues that you may have from a cold in your childhood, but that doesn't mean you are spreading any infections.

Are you implying that Mullins was lying about his own invention?

Expand full comment

Kary Mullis invented traditional PCR that requires SDS-PAGE gel for visualization. He did not invent real-time RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics tests. False positive rates are near 0.005 because of optimized primer-probe sets.

Kary Mullis published papers on PCR detecting HIV in 1987: Identification of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Sequences by UsingIn Vitro Enzymatic Amplification

Expand full comment

It was endemic at end of 2020 in Britain and it's a coronavirus and the next influenza season brings new ones Including endemic covid and that scary variant that Matt Hancock said when should I deploy to scare people in Dec 2020 was to usher in 2021 bring restrictions and push the vaccine. So fraud on the people crime against humanity using fear. Care to comment on fraud Carlos as fraud is intentional deceptive actions to steal one's rights. Those covid testing sites in Britain were empty. Wonder how they pumped out so many tests in one day with no one at the sites.

Expand full comment

There never was a COVID-19 pandemic.

Expand full comment

Excess mortality data since mid-2020 shows that deaths were elevated by over 20%. If not COVID-19, then what is causing excess mortality?

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8912932/

Expand full comment

What excess mortality? You witnessed not a singe cough or sniffle for 3 years after November 2019.

Expand full comment

What are your thoughts on the use of morphine and midazolam in treatment protocols?

Expand full comment

I think the use of both together is always inappropriate in so-called covid.

I do not believe there was a novel respiratory virus & the most likely scenario is simply misattribution of flu and other acute respiratory illnesses to тАЬcovidтАЭ.

How often do we use midazolam and morphine together in a flu patient?

Not often, IтАЩd estimate.

What say you, clinical experts?

Expand full comment

Thanks for saying that, Mike. But it is more than likely scenario, it is certain. The seasonal 'flu was weaponised, re-branded to make more money for big pharma etc. This has been going on for decades.

https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/08/17/what-is-the-flu-a-k-a-covid-19-and-why-vaccines-are-pointless-at-best/

Misunderstanding what the 'flu is, the toxicosis of the body, the in-flowing of poisons, has lead us to this current 'crisis'.

Midazolam and morphine are neuro-toxic so merely add to the neuro-toxicity already present in someone with the 'flu.

Expand full comment

I agree. I didnтАЩt until some way into this.

Like Peter McCullough, I took for granted what I was told about areas off piste from my own.

ItтАЩs impossible to know everything about oneтАЩs own area. ThereтАЩs never time to check others assertions and assumptions.

When I did look I recall feeling unmoored. Flu vaccines reproducibly do not reduce hospitalization or death.

So what the dickens have we been doing for decades?

Committing fraud, thatтАЩs what.

TheyтАЩre clearly not effective at protecting people from whatever caused acute respiratory illnesses in winter.

Why on earth would you expect something claimed to be a тАЬcovid19 vaccineтАЭ to fare differently?

And it doesnтАЩt. No protection from anything & extraordinarily harmful effects in its stead.

Clearly not bad luck. You quickly reach the inescapable conclusion that their intentions are to injure, maim and kill.

One or two further logic steps tell you this entire episode is fraud, modern civilization is being dismantled and the end game can only be depopulation.

Hold you family close. Ignore propaganda entirely. TV & movies to zero. Now.

Expand full comment

Well, that's the thing. The medical associations and regulatory authorities are supposed to monitor accurate and verifiable claims so that medical professionals and scientist can trust what information they are being fed. But they feed scams which are repeated ad nauseam. The entire system is rotten to the core and can't be trusted anymore. Everything needs to be questioned and monitored now.

Expand full comment

It was influenza B in Florida and no doubt US and Canada beginning of Jan 2020 and people describe everything they said covid did. Felt like a bus ran over them. It circulated at Disney world in Dec by people's accounts and no fear until March when they called it a Pandemic. Amazing everyone traveling going to sporting events school working with that covid like influenza B circulating and funny it becomes a covid name after the Pandemic is called.

Expand full comment

Thanks for info. The appearance of circulation is due to people going ill with similar poisoning quite possibly from what was called the 'flu vax given I gather in the autumn.

Expand full comment

and one of the most wrong ppl during the pandemic!

Expand full comment

For common sense. If it's a novel coronavirus we need to run and hide from then why run and get a novel vaccine for a novel coronavirus that you know nothing about and you yourself stated the Emergency rushed a vaccine. So run and hide from said scary novel coronzvurus we know nothing about but wait we found the perfect novel never tested never approved MRNA candidate and we don't know we picked the right or optimal or favorable one.

Expand full comment

How does this fit in with refusal to debate because someone is not a medical authority? Was that true?

Expand full comment

he is also not a vaccine expert.

Expand full comment

A vaccime expert stated in mass vaccination they can have bacteria such as e coli .They lied the vaccine stays in the Arm. Biontek makers in a slide show said it doesn't. Must go to the lymph nodes. One lie after another for these vaccines that still had to go under as gene therapy., experimental all the way. Pfizer couldn't predict if they used the favorable variant candidate. It's like having 4 keys and not knowing which one works. You could try 3 that fail and the 4th works or you could have 4 fail. You were using people's bodies with a new platform of vaccines where the medical trials had deaths and harms and lots covered up.

Expand full comment

Oh, this is rich. You troll without a single credential and then call Dr. Yeadon unqualified? I suppose Dr. Malone is unqualified as well.

We don't need you to point us to the product of a billion dollar marketing war chest brought to you by the most criminally fined industry on the planet. Be gone troll.

Expand full comment

IтАЩm an pharmacologist, immunologist & toxicologist.

My entire life has been spent around drug discovery and development.

You wonтАЩt listen, but I can easily prove the entire vaccine story here is an utter fraud.

ItтАЩs completely impossible to conduct the necessary manufacturing R&D steps required to make consistent product is less than 4-5 years, probably closer to 8 years.

There is no magic or money than can bypass the minimum linear steps.

Also, vaccination even if done properly could never have been an appropriate or effective response to an outbreak such as they lied to us about.

Reason is immunosenescence. Elderly immune responses attenuate and is one of the main reasons why the elderly are so vulnerable in the first place. Instead eariy treatment was the correct response.

Flu vaccines donтАЩt work either.

Same reason.

PCR is utterly useless as a clinical diagnostic. They also refused EVER to disclose operational false positive rate. Uncorrected data is completely useless. ItтАЩs fraud.

Finally, ALL mRNA based products will induce autoimmune toxicity. ItтАЩs axiomatic and unfixable. ThatтАЩs because once your cells are making non self proteins, your immune system attacks & kills all such cells. Hence a very wide range of adverse events.

You do you. Enjoy your boosters.

Ps: IтАЩve lost hundreds of thousands of pounds in foregone income and received not one cent in income or donations after three years + pro bono work.

IтАЩm arguably the most qualified scientist in the world speaking out against these injections.

Expand full comment

They said it takes 2 weeks for an immune response so were they not making immuno compromised people be in a precarious position with toxins in their bodies from these vaccines as they awaited sn immune response. We need to find out how many immuno compromised people died within 14 days after the shot.

Expand full comment

They didnтАЩt produce immunity.

There was no new pathogen.

So they arenтАЩt vaccines but biological toxins.

Expand full comment

The mRNA vaccine technology has been safety tested in human clinical trial since 2013 on the following viruses: rabies, influenza, and Zika. For SARS-CoV-2, animal and human clinical trials were done currently during a public health emergency. Manufacturing capacity was expanded before phase III clinical trials ended during accelerated development.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8940982/

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2768155

RT-qPCR is actually the gold standard for SARS-CoV-2 testing because of optimized primer-probe sets. Internal controls, including reference genes, allow normalization of SARS-CoV-2 genes. False positive rate depends on RT-qPCR assay, but it is generally 0.01 to 0.12%.

https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/JCM.01080-21

Where is your evidence of autoimmune responses from mRNA vaccines?

Expand full comment

Didn't Pfizer state antibodies wasn't enough . But that's all governments harped on. What about lipid nanoparticles. Moderna stated the more you dose the worse the adverse effects can be. The lipid nanoparticle can cause many adverse events just like were seeing now in VAERS and live accounts. Didn't you need animal ethics permission to test on animals but oh look governments stole ethics and ethics scholars were hypocrites on vaccine mandates. But based on what Moderna stated ethics for humans very important. So where are the trials you list and outcomes. How big were the groups. Care to share as we know cancer gene therapy with MRNA was very sick people and small groups. That's odd as we researched that vaccines only became recent after Moderna failed on gene therapy. So they moved to vaccines . Pfizer had 4 vaccine candidate variants to use based on 3 distinct MRNA formats .. They chose BNT 162 they stated in SEC FILINGS they weren't sure if they used the right or favorable one. They started the first human trials April 2020. It was experimental. They can't say it's the optimal one. They did this with shanghai fosum pharmaceuticsls from China a communist country .

Expand full comment

Your misleading as Pfizer never got anything approved. So just because you do small human tests that doesn't mean they were approved. Biontek Pfizer in SEC filings admit this and they admit it's an experiment and they are not sure if they picked the right variant candidate. Considering the fraud in the vaccine medical trials and the pregnant female it's a bad experiment and cover up

Expand full comment

Would you like to confirm why genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies weren't done for these MRNA vaccines and why they stated they didn't have to. It's gene therapy.

Expand full comment

Would you like to dispute a paper that stated MRNA not ready in 2019 as not studied on enough non human primates?

Expand full comment

And yet no product was ever licensed for human use. Why was that if they were so well tested?

As for PCR, labeling something gold standard doesn't make it so. I know the sequencing center here was running them at a 35 cycle threshold.

Expand full comment

Wrong, Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 received FDA approval for BLAs.

RT-qPCR used for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics tests is nearly a gold standard. Cycle thresholds at 35 to 45 are validated because cut-off values are based on the limit of detection (LOD), so background fluorescence is distinguished from positive amplification.

Expand full comment

Emergency use authorization you mean. With no refunds.

And PCR should be ran at 27 CT to detect active infection. 45 gives massive amounts of false positives (which is probably a feature rather than a bug).

Shouldn't the stage 3 trials have ended by now? In which case the manufacturers won't have their legal immunity. I guess that will happen when Biden declares the "emergency" over next month and everything will be memory holed.

Expand full comment

Actually FDa said it's not a gold standard

Expand full comment

Academic journals cite RT-qPCR as the gold standard for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in diagnostic tests.

Expand full comment

Dr. Yeadon, I too thank you for speaking out. I'm unvaxxed but of course I have many family and friends who took the jab. I know some things are unfixable as you say but I'm thrilled that some doctors are working hard to find and write about treatments for vaccine injuries. I pray that even vaccine pushers are able to get some relief.

Dr. Huber has now come out with a summery of treatments for vaccine injuries on the heels of her excellent mask article.

https://colleenhuber.substack.com/p/rediscovery-of-low-oxygen-mask-injury

Expand full comment

And you were one of the first to speak out. You and Sucharit Bhakdi did more than anyone else to warn us of the dangers. Thank you for keeping me safe, Dr. Mike Yeadon.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

IтАЩm astonished that not 1 in 10 retired former colleagues said anything.

I contacted many in 2020 & the two most common responses were utter silence and тАЬDonтАЩt contact me againтАЭ.

Expand full comment

Why do you think your former colleagues went quiet? Fear would be my guess, but if they were retired and had solid knowledge and experience in the field, I would have thought they would be relatively immune to criticism or a fear of being ostracized . . . especially when so many millions were being hurt. Very hard to fathom the utter lack of courage to speak the truth for the last 3 years.

Expand full comment

That is truly sad and an indictment of the profession. Thank you for not falling in line Dr. Yeadon.

Expand full comment

Are you a vaccine expert?

Expand full comment

He's a published medical expert; his papers on bone healing look very interesting and well done according to the abstracts. He gets into healing, growing and grafting bone, stem cell treatment and immune response after traumatic brain injury among other things.

I would love to see him get into the science of masks and vaccines during a discussion with other experts who are dissenters. However, his Theory of Legitimization appears to be that if he has a public discussion on video that would somehow legitimize dissenting views.

But if he discusses it in a comment forum the dissenters are not legitimized (according to his theory.)

Expand full comment

To DENY the dissenters legitimises their views: ANYTHING that cannot support itself & position ably within the spotlight of reasonable, objective debate can NOT be regarded as wholly verifiable. It very apparently seems to have a fat roll of pharma-cartel banknotes wedged up there in its anal canal.

Expand full comment

Science of masks? There appears to be no such thing. Just a load of shitty models that prove they work and real world data that shows no noticeable difference.

Expand full comment

I suspect he's more of a troll than anything. Anyway we relied on so called 'experts' and look where that got us?

Expand full comment

You don't need to be one to see the devastation

these rapidly developed products have caused.

Anthony Fauci appeared Milken institute Future of Health Summit (October 29, 2019) discussing how a future outbreak could give them the excuse to throw off the shackles of 7 to 10 years vaccine testing

and rapidly develop new vaccines quickly

https://twitter.com/i/status/1445340463377039367

Full video here https://www.c-span.org/video/?465845-1/universal-flu-vaccine.

The RAC removed?, RAC that's recombinant genetic products

advisory committee on biosafety and protecting people from harm when it comes to genetic products and pharmaceuticals in 2019 right before 2020.Anthony Fauci made a decision with his team to eliminate the RAC biosafety committee on genetic recombinant products and absorb it into the NIH saying we'll take it from here and then the NIH partnered with Moderna., and then what a surprise the covid hits and they get their excuse to rapidly deploy a ultra rapidly developed set of vaccines.

Mr Gates and his foundation is mentioned at the Milken event by the panel, and he becomes the Medias go to guy to sell these rushed jabs to the public and he states "We can have a vaccine in 2 years or we could make one in say a year with less safety" and he was right wasn't he?

less safety indeed..

Family members who took the jabs conveniently now have a weakened immune system and are getting sicker with each booster a bad reactions to each new one,they continue to get sick where as family members not jabbed have not had anything more then a cold since 2019.

And now we are told they are going to make mRNA jabs

for everything from cattle to cancer in 100 days from lab to jab

oh the joy given all the injuries and deaths from these ones

speeding things up even more is only going to make things worse.

None of us want them putting this stuff into our food.

The German health Minister has confirmed the risks are high

on national TV stating a severe reaction rate of nearly 1 in every 10.000 doses causes a severe reaction or disablement https://imgur.com/fDhd2nC.png but that increases with each dose

so if someone has had 4 or 5 jabs that could be 1 in 400 doses,

and what is his solution? they want to work with Big Pharma to

develop new drugs to treat those severely injured and severely disabled.

by these vaccines.

Chur Ching Big Pharma makes billions on treatments

for the injuries they caused, Germany is just one Country that has admitted the scale of the issue but Doctors in other countries have

been saying the same thing but are silenced if they go public, how many

people have they severely injured and severely disabled

by these vaccines Worldwide?.

its going to end up being billions of people. You might be in denial and parroting the media line of "safe and effective" but they are not safe and they don't work well at all so they not effective and no amount of Pharma funded stooges study papers are going to convince folk you are not lying and pointing us towards dishonest data.

We may never find out the true number of deaths they have caused.

Expand full comment

the vaccines have not caused problems. the vaccines have reduced death from covid.

Expand full comment

Yea, you can't die from covid after you die from stroke, heart attack, turbo cancer from the mnra lethal injection, Marcucio is a holocaust denier.

Worse this creature is a propagandist for the fourth Reich fascists helping them administer the modern zyklon B.... you might as well be shoving them into the gas chambers...

Expand full comment

Explain this R Marcucio

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/australia/

In AUSTRALIA dec 2020 no vaccines 976 covid deaths

Dec 2022 after 2 years of vaccines, masks, LOCKDOWNS 17000 covid deaths .

Also all cause MORTALITY down in 2020 up in 2021 ,2022 33%

Expand full comment

Aww.....don't show it REAL, unambiguous data, you'll scare it away!! (& I was having such fun watching the truth-tellers dogpile it,

& eviscerate it's arrogant follies!).

Expand full comment

This is proof you are using a CHATgp type AI bot as your pathetic short response was 1 minute after I posted all that text nobody could read all that and make such a dismissive robot comment.

You should be blocked And I will not tolerate this nonsense

you should be booted of here for Botting.

Expand full comment

Yep as "insightful" and personally reciprocative and specific as "no comment", or a "one size fits all" blanket response.

Expand full comment

An anagram of R Marcucio is 'U rr a comic', which sounds like 'You are a comic'. R Marcucio is trying to be funny. Trying and not very funny.

Another anagram is 'I cur Marco'. A cur is a dog and so a beast. A Marco of the Beast perhaps? :)

Expand full comment

because the vaccines not causing issues...

Expand full comment

YouтАЩre a bot or an idiot.

Expand full comment

Yep ЁЯСН, an "idibot" , to be sure.

Expand full comment

Bots are great today. They can impersonate not just human to human interaction, but even individual humans (if given sufficient amount of data).

It is unlikely that actual Dr. R Marcucio would respond in such a manner, more befitting of a Reddit bot, so more than likely this is only AI impersonation of a cheaper kind.

However it would be interesting, if the real Dr R Marcucio was interested to interact in an open way.

The only way to resolve "bad" speech, or misinformation is with reasoned argument in an open debate. We can only wish for it, but eventually it will start like the debate between Del and Neil the other day.

Expand full comment

I admit he sounds a lot like a bot or troll but I've confirmed he's a Professor at UCSF.

Expand full comment

Or an idiotic bot.

Expand full comment

I would advise that we refrain from even acknowledging the presence of shill-bot clownshow ЁЯдбЁЯСЖ above.

It's clearly using every transparent, bargain basement deception in the book ЁЯУЦ in its attempts to bolster the last dying vestiges of...ahem... "legitimacy" & efficacy, (& more odious still- safety!!?) of the heinous graphene oxide structures, self assembling nano-matrice ridden mRNA depop-shots ЁЯТЙ: relying on the technical ignorance of most people concerning the exclusively medical/scientific terminology of its cut & paste fallacious "data", and the usual tedious attendant false equivalences and evasive semantics: it's claims alone about the validity of stratospheric mag-cycling rates, in direct contradiction to the statements of Dr.Kary Mullis- the INVENTOR of the Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction tests and the rock-solid "reliability" of numbers as high as x40-45 only highlights it's status as a lying, conniving, biopharmaceutical industrial complex cartel BOT, or perhaps an intelligence apparatus "cut-out" BOT, but most likely, an attention seeking troll ЁЯзМ, absolutely desperate to dredge up attention via the modality of its hostile, inflammatory, rubbish-ridden rhetoric. It is representative of the type of malicious, jingoistic sloganeering and propaganda employed by the presstitutes in their ooze-papers, and their attempts to gaslight people with the most ludicrously fallacious narratives like- eg:- exponentially GROWING numbers of (ALL age groups, but especially-) children, adolescents and young adults are dropping down dead in record because-(A) "cold showers", (B)"falling asleep in front of the TV",

(C) "playing computer games"

(D)"the 'shock' of opening an energy bill in recent times" and

(E) "owning a family DOG ЁЯР╢!!",

ALL of which the mainstream media

HAS, somewhat incredibly, tried to convince people of in the previous 2+years!! Should we REALLY be giving complete cretins likeЁЯСЖIT the ardently craved oxygen of ANY kind of response WHATSOEVER?? I think

not. Let us ignore this frankly ridiculous cut and paste crusader, with its visibly brandished false equivalences, blatant evasive semantics, misdirections, & pharma-cartel propaganda, not forgetting it's outright lies. With a lil'

luck, it'll HUFF, it'll PUFF, & then fall down dead from myocarditis.

Expand full comment

He could save time by just copy pasting " nuh uh" repeatedly on every thread. His 12 year old " style" of argument reminds me of why I stopped even looking at Reddit , lol.

Expand full comment

You realize we can all see Dr. Yeadon's comment?

Expand full comment

Its a pest assisted by AI that's how they have been able to rapidly

spam all the comments so fast.

Expand full comment

yes, he is not a vaccine expert. he has been consistently wrong throughout the pandemic. he is part of HART anti-vax group.

I also note he did not respond to my comment with any substance.

Expand full comment

no truthful substance in your comment makes it the proper response

Expand full comment

And you are part of the FART pro-vax group.

What substances are you on?

Expand full comment

WeтАЩre going to have fun with you.

Expand full comment

Ignore this nonsense they are a AI assisted Bot user.

Expand full comment

So, they should just be ignored? Surely a lot of people thought they had some value when they were first authorized.

Expand full comment

no, they should not be ignored. they should be analyzed correctly, not by comparing them to other vaccines. that is irrelevant.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26209838/

Expand full comment

But many of the safety aspects were skipped because they are considered vaccines. Do you think they should have gone under more rigorous testing?

Expand full comment

True.

Compare the COVID Vax Substances to other bioweapons.

Expand full comment

I read the article you reference. They discuss and approve of the method of proportionality analysis (which is a comparison technique) and do not consider it irrelevant as you say. From your paper: "Although underreporting is a limitation, VAERS is capable of detecting possible safety problems through disproportionality analyses and the other methods described above." When the CDC finally did the proportionality analysis, the results were literally hundreds of red flags according to their own thresholds yet they ignore them.

Expand full comment

yes disprortionality analysis, not direct comparisons of the numbers of reports. also, choosing vaccines is important. the paper chose thre pertussis vaccine...which one? and why? the military data is ecological...the paper is near meaningless.

Expand full comment

Are you aware that the majority of vaccine safety studies are no against inert placebos but against existing vaccines. Those in turn against existing vaccines. Back top the point where clinical trials were not really a thing.

Expand full comment

Well I'm done working on my truck for the day and relooked at the Hooker paper. It did NOT only compare the rate of reports for the different shots (which at 45X death is significant). Figure 1B does the disproportionality analysis you like and shows (compared to influenza vaccines) 40X menstrual irregularities, 4X myocarditis, and 3X cerebrovascular events!

Expand full comment

no it didn't use a disproportionate analysis....it compared reports among vaccines....it also used a t-test which is incorrect.

Expand full comment