You would deny early treatment and then brag about how many unvaccinated Covid patients are hospitalized - but can that study even be trusted? Anyone can use internet search to find numerous articles about how big pharma influences AMA, the publisher of JAMA.
The book "Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated…
You would deny early treatment and then brag about how many unvaccinated Covid patients are hospitalized - but can that study even be trusted? Anyone can use internet search to find numerous articles about how big pharma influences AMA, the publisher of JAMA.
The book "Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients," by Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. George Fareed and Mathew Crawford is about two doctors who used a treatment protocol early in the pandemic and early in treatment when the conventional wisdom issued was not to provide any treatment to patients and send them home until they got sick and then go to the hospital where they were then often put on breathing machines – many of whom died.
To the contrary, every one of the patients Dr. Tyson and Dr. Fareed treated early in the illness recovered and there were no deaths. They also treated those who were severely sick and only lost a few.
The book is pseudoscientific by omitting control groups, making incorrect exclusion criteria to omit COVID-19 deaths, and criticizes legitimate biostatisticians. Why did the studies not undergo assessment in peer-reviewed journals for publication to other physicians and scientists?
You would deny early treatment and then brag about how many unvaccinated Covid patients are hospitalized - but can that study even be trusted? Anyone can use internet search to find numerous articles about how big pharma influences AMA, the publisher of JAMA.
The book "Overcoming the COVID-19 Darkness: How Two Doctors Successfully Treated 7000 Patients," by Dr. Brian Tyson, Dr. George Fareed and Mathew Crawford is about two doctors who used a treatment protocol early in the pandemic and early in treatment when the conventional wisdom issued was not to provide any treatment to patients and send them home until they got sick and then go to the hospital where they were then often put on breathing machines – many of whom died.
To the contrary, every one of the patients Dr. Tyson and Dr. Fareed treated early in the illness recovered and there were no deaths. They also treated those who were severely sick and only lost a few.
The book is pseudoscientific by omitting control groups, making incorrect exclusion criteria to omit COVID-19 deaths, and criticizes legitimate biostatisticians. Why did the studies not undergo assessment in peer-reviewed journals for publication to other physicians and scientists?