Didn't Pfizer state antibodies wasn't enough . But that's all governments harped on. What about lipid nanoparticles. Moderna stated the more you dose the worse the adverse effects can be. The lipid nanoparticle can cause many adverse events just like were seeing now in VAERS and live accounts. Didn't you need animal ethics permission to …
Didn't Pfizer state antibodies wasn't enough . But that's all governments harped on. What about lipid nanoparticles. Moderna stated the more you dose the worse the adverse effects can be. The lipid nanoparticle can cause many adverse events just like were seeing now in VAERS and live accounts. Didn't you need animal ethics permission to test on animals but oh look governments stole ethics and ethics scholars were hypocrites on vaccine mandates. But based on what Moderna stated ethics for humans very important. So where are the trials you list and outcomes. How big were the groups. Care to share as we know cancer gene therapy with MRNA was very sick people and small groups. That's odd as we researched that vaccines only became recent after Moderna failed on gene therapy. So they moved to vaccines . Pfizer had 4 vaccine candidate variants to use based on 3 distinct MRNA formats .. They chose BNT 162 they stated in SEC FILINGS they weren't sure if they used the right or favorable one. They started the first human trials April 2020. It was experimental. They can't say it's the optimal one. They did this with shanghai fosum pharmaceuticsls from China a communist country .
Your misleading as Pfizer never got anything approved. So just because you do small human tests that doesn't mean they were approved. Biontek Pfizer in SEC filings admit this and they admit it's an experiment and they are not sure if they picked the right variant candidate. Considering the fraud in the vaccine medical trials and the pregnant female it's a bad experiment and cover up
Didn't Pfizer state antibodies wasn't enough . But that's all governments harped on. What about lipid nanoparticles. Moderna stated the more you dose the worse the adverse effects can be. The lipid nanoparticle can cause many adverse events just like were seeing now in VAERS and live accounts. Didn't you need animal ethics permission to test on animals but oh look governments stole ethics and ethics scholars were hypocrites on vaccine mandates. But based on what Moderna stated ethics for humans very important. So where are the trials you list and outcomes. How big were the groups. Care to share as we know cancer gene therapy with MRNA was very sick people and small groups. That's odd as we researched that vaccines only became recent after Moderna failed on gene therapy. So they moved to vaccines . Pfizer had 4 vaccine candidate variants to use based on 3 distinct MRNA formats .. They chose BNT 162 they stated in SEC FILINGS they weren't sure if they used the right or favorable one. They started the first human trials April 2020. It was experimental. They can't say it's the optimal one. They did this with shanghai fosum pharmaceuticsls from China a communist country .
Your misleading as Pfizer never got anything approved. So just because you do small human tests that doesn't mean they were approved. Biontek Pfizer in SEC filings admit this and they admit it's an experiment and they are not sure if they picked the right variant candidate. Considering the fraud in the vaccine medical trials and the pregnant female it's a bad experiment and cover up