You lose any credibility when you mention Karen Kingston. Karen was a sales rep for 2 years and left Pfizer in 1998. 24 years ago. She had no inside knowledge. It was fake info she found online. The documents she provided didn't mention graphene (she even said that). The patent she linked was for a future Chinese vac that had no connecti…
You lose any credibility when you mention Karen Kingston. Karen was a sales rep for 2 years and left Pfizer in 1998. 24 years ago. She had no inside knowledge. It was fake info she found online. The documents she provided didn't mention graphene (she even said that). The patent she linked was for a future Chinese vac that had no connection to any current vaccine. If you believe the bluetooth story then there's no hope for you. There can be no bluetooth signal without a chip and a battery. The worlds smallest bluetooth chip is about 5mm long and then it still requires a battery. The bluetooth signals are coming from other devices.
Scientist Charles Lieber (arrested 2020) was working at Harvard on fibre-optic nanowire tech for the past 22 years, and with nanotech and nanoscale structures in general for even longer than that. All of his publications are still online:
In this video, this electrical engineer thinks the vaccine ingredients under his microscope look like they formed into integrated circuits, and they disassembled when they were no longer exposed to wireless radiation. https://www.brighteon.com/8cd390d6-1f05-4da0-be04-dbe54b77f6a3
They have no connection or relevance to any vaccine. Any connection that a few people are trying to make, linking these story to the vaccine, is purely fiction.
The ‘covid vaccination’ is not a vaccination. The novel virus was a fiction so the ‘vaccination’ is a fraud. The entire covid narrative is fiction. Thank you for clarifying that the entire narrative was and is fiction and has nothing to do with health at all.
And that's just public sector tech development. What's been produced in secret (e.g DARPA et al.) or shared by off-world races through underground military or intelligence channels would probably blow all of our minds.
I’ve read through some of the patents Karen Kingston talks about. I’m not sure how you can base what you think from “the patent she linked”. There are literally thousands of patents, she is combing through a LOT of info. I’ve looked up (my own research) and found some of them. These are nano structures (quantum computing) and there is a ton of research/patents/info. It’s not difficult to research, just takes time. And the DOD is light years beyond “chips”
The non-fact checkers (paid for by pharma-pushers, eg: BMGF) have predictably allegedly 'debunked' Karen Kingston. She could have cleaned the carpets at Pfizer for all I care - she knows her stuff and is a former analyst.
She wasn't an analyst. She was a sales rep. Karen said that.
She left the company 24 years ago. She had no access to anything from pfizer. She didn't know her stuff. When she was talking she didn't understand some simple terms and made many mistakes. She only got her info from the same easily accessible data from the internet. There were no documents that anybody couldn't download or read.
And you are conflating multiple things. Lipid (yes, fats) nano (yes, small)
particles (which could be anything) . And no, I’m not going to list thousands of patent numbers and their connections to shady companies, quantum dots, and pharma. Patents only tell part of the story anyway, there are millions of patents filed that go nowhere. You have to dig deeper than that, cross reference, and follow the trail
How about you show me that they 100% aren't quantum dots? See, the problem with people like you is that you are stuck on debating each crumb, instead of acknowledging the existence of a whole cake. There are multiple facets to this whole mess, by design, meant to sow chaos/confusion. There are multiple agendas going on, with multiple issues (Pfizer has 50% leeway for "vaccine" content, and there is seemingly multiple formulations at any given time, even under the same lot number, which is illegal, btw) so anyone focusing on one crumb gets pulled apart and destroyed.
No. I am not going to waste time providing "just one patent", because "just one patent" will not prove or disprove anything, as I stated before. It's a compilation of THOUSANDS of patents, $ trails, FOIA'ed emails between government officials, military documents, following the $ between shady corporations, and the psychopaths IN THEIR OWN WORDS...and so on. Nope, I decided long ago that the only way people would know it is to seek it, research it, and follow the rabbit holes, like I did. I have no interest in debating the crumbs. It's lazy. And boring.
You originally stated that citing Karen Kingston loses all credibility based on one patent she held up. That's like saying one document from the 80,000 pages of Pfizer data that was forced to be released is "wrong" because, blah blah blah (meaning: "I didn't bother to read the other pages, I'm just going to focus on how you're wrong"). It's useless and time wasting.
IF you want to find the truth, you can use what Karen Kingston has to springboard off of, to find other documents. Is she perfect? No. Her research however, will lead you to other people, who also have crumbs. Each person out there has crumbs, that fit into the cake. Or not. That's your job to research and determine, along with the rest of us.
There are thousands. Karen referred to one. We are talking about karen the sales reps, information.
The vaccine patents are available. They are very easy to find on the moderna site.
If you are referring to other patents not used with the vaccines, then they are not relevant.
If you want to post any of the patents you found with the nano quantum computing, I am keen to see them (but they are not associated with the vaccines).
Karen Kingston, admittedly, is all over the place when she speaks, but she’s done a huge amount of digging. Don’t agree with everything she says, but she has a LOT of info that you can jump off of and find stuff yourself. I’ve decided I won’t do other people’s research, it’s a waste of my time and just turns into “yeah but”.
Do your own digging, then you actually learn it.
Quantum dot tattoos, surveillance under the skin and the internet of bodies. How else would you “get them under the skin”. Psychopaths have moved on from tracking what you purchase thru bar codes, they want biometric data…and openly state it.
All her info came from websites. She had no inside knowledge. She also had no understanding of what she was claiming as you could tell by her simple errors.
I have been through everything she claimed. I have done my research. There is nothing that links the vaccine to any nano technology (apart from the nano lipids) or graphene. Every thing she claimed was wrong.
Nobody has been able to show any ingredient lists or patents from the vaccine that links the vaccines with any of this nano computing technology or graphene.
There are no links or documents, patents or proof that links to quantum dots. It's just someones story made up from fear of the vaccine and government.
There are no quantum dots under the skin and no tracking. I have been through everything I can find since karen and all the crazy claims since. There is nothing. You are imagining links that don't exist.
Show me one patent/document. You must remember at least one?
You clearly haven't been through everything she's claimed, or you would have found the quantum dot , nano tech, AND graphene connections, which could lead you down the same rabbit hole I followed. You're just more interested in debating the micro and not interested in the macro.
Steve Kirsch doesn't believe that this is intentional, or that it's a depopulation agenda, even though the psychopaths involved literally tell the world that's what it is. And every $ trail, shady corporation, patents and communication eventually lead right back to all of them. People like that operate in darkness, they don't put everything in one place/document/account. It's going to take some work on your part, and you clearly don't want to do it.
The body is a battery of sorts. We have positive and negative charges within us. That's how we have energy to move around. I haven't been able to verify with my own observations anything to the bluetooth transmitter claim. Seems far out there. You'd expect to see massive numbers of bluetooth signals inside of a grocery store, Target, Costco, the train station. Internet of Things means that many electronics items are tagged with identifying markers to track their distribution. But I have indeed verified that the magnet stuck on a recently injected person. And it only stuck one way. The poles had to be properly aligned. As far as Karen Kingston is concerned, she is reading through the patents. They are all readily available on the Moderna website and I paused the film to go to the page that she was referring to a couple of times. She is not lying about what she's reading in the patents. Whether they are actually using all in the patents has yet to be verified, but you can find a lot on it if you trouble to look and read for yourself. The globalists have not been shy about their dream of creating a hive mind and an Internet of Bodies. Check out rand.org if you haven't gone down that rabbit hole.
You're naive... The nano-tech developed in secret (DARPA et al.) is probably a hundred years more advanced that what's seen in the public sector. Microscopic analysis of these vial components are showing materials that clearly don't belong in "vaccines". Karen's done some fine work digging into the patents and raising important questions which the powers-that-be refuse to answer.
Her fine work? Everything she said was wrong. Look at the documents and patent she was referring to. None of the documents or patent supported her claims, they disproved them.
"If you believe the Bluetooth story then there's no hope for you"..Really?
Try this genius.. On a Android phone, go to Developer options, enable "Show Bluetooth devices without names".. now go to a public setting with lots of people like Walmart and run a Bluetooth scan.. explain those results...
Ok genius why don't you bother to learn anything about bluetooth devices and mac addresses.
To stop tracking via mac address, Apple started using random mac addresses in iOS devices. Mac address randomization was also added in Android, Windows, and Linux and others. That’s why a search may not find anything and there are no names. Stop believing these con men and do some actual research.
Tell me everything you know about wireless protocols and nano devices.. I'll wait..
But you will refuse to try what I outlined.. And tell us about why in 2021 Android and IoS updates blocked the ability to see unnamed Bluetooth "devices" without using developer tools? Coincidence? Typical "Fully Injected" lefty resorting to name calling.. Time for a "Booster"?
I could but you wouldn't believe anything. So, why don't you bother to do some reading for yourself? It's because you don't want to know the truth.
'Without using developer tools'. That's funny. Who told you that?
Maybe you didn't understand that the developer tools are in the settings under developer options. It hasn't changed. The developer tools are still built into android. Every android has them. The 'Show bluetooth devices without names' is still in the same place.
Lefty, you are so funny. I'm way more to the right than you will ever be. I just know how to think for myself unlike you. So brainwashed that anyone that doesn't follow your mantra must be left. You are just blindly following the vac is evil conspiracy. You don't even bother to check any of their claims.
Sure.. sure ignoring what I posted and trying to project.. I'll pray for you. Please ask God for help instead of trusting man "Pharma" aka Pharmakeia <- research that... God Bless
What did i ignore? I answered every question you asked.. I answered your question about hidden mac addresses with no name. I answered your question about the developer tools that are built into android phones. It hasn't changed. The developer tools are still built into android. Every android has them. The 'Show bluetooth devices without names' is still in the latest androids and in the same place.
So I answered every thing you asked. Didn't you bother to read them?
I never asked you any questions.. not a one.. I challenged you to scan a public place yourself.. You replied "I could.. but.." now you reply hours later hoping to steer a narrative away from the original subject matter.. I would suggest you get right with GOD, but I suspect you play for the other team..
Ok, so I explained the ideas you were inquiring about. I answered you inquiry about the hidden mac addresses without names.
You asked me to about the 'show bluetooth devices without names setting.
That was a question.
Your 'Tell me everything' and I said you need to learn it for yourself. Why don't want to do any research for yourself?
So I actually covered everything you wanted to know.
Maybe it hours later because I live on the other side of the globe! (It isn't flat) and we're not all american. I covered ALL your subject matter. So obviously still haven't read it.
My 1828 Webster's Dictionary of the English Language defines "pharmaceutical" as medicine, poison, sorcery, witchcraft... Gee, that doesn't sound good, does it?
But what did we expect? The Nazi scientists and chemical/pharmaceutical interests were brought into the US under Operation Paperclip after WWII. They've had 75 years to work their "magic"...
In 1828 people still believed in witchcraft. Maybe you still do. You can't judge anyone by what was written nearly 200 years ago. Barbers use to do the surgeries.
People believed in witchcraft 200 years ago and still do today because... wait for it... it's ACTUALLY been practiced for as long as humans have walked this earth. If such occult "crafts" hadn't been useful for those who practiced them, they would not have persisted for so long.
The real question is this: Why would BigPharma hold onto the word "pharmaceutical" as a descriptor for their products for so long, knowing full well what sort of sordid history that word connotes?
The answer may shock you... but it is what it is, and you can make of it what you wish.
The "evil-doers" follow a warped moral code which requires them to flaunt their symbols, plans, and calling cards in our faces. If We the People, who are being subjugated and abused and controlled, fail to resist, then the evil-doers consider that failure as a form of tacit approval and acceptance.
In the 21st century anybody that believes in witchcraft must have something deficient in their brain. I've seen more than you would ever believe. I work in probably the only country in the world where witchcraft is still in the law books. I have seen mother and baby burnt to death for witchcraft, but still nobody goes around doing or practicing any occult practices. It's all out of fear of the unknown.
Witchcraft only started after religion deluded everyone. The church people started it to scare people so they'd follow their god.
People who practice the occult now mainly do it for fun and to be part of a group but they don't believe it. You should ask one, i have. The ones who actually believe it are deluded with their brains are stuck in the dark ages.
Nothing has ever happened, or been useful, by practicing the occult because it's all just fairy tales made to scare people in the dark ages.
All the talk of witches, satan, gods and the mark of the beast should be lost to the dark ages. Anyone that still believes needs to grow up.
massive proportion of modern scientific discovery is pure fraud. the research that launched the Alzheimer industry & pharmaceuticals for the last 16 years has been exposed as faked. by a journalist. someone with integrity who knew how to read the science. the last 3 years has seen a huge number of folk come out of the woodwork doing just that. they dont always need 50 yrs in the industry- indeed indoctrination is NOT a good thing. these people have proven to be vastly more intelligent than the 'experts' who parrot bad science- & vastly more moral than those who fake it. give me kingston over daszak any day. sir.
Wow. You must be so smart to regard karen, the sales rep, as an expert. She knows nothing about what she was talking about. Karen incorrectly claims that PEGylated Lipid was graphene, when it is not and does not contain graphene. The documents she provided did not show graphene and she admitted this. The Chinese patent CN112220919A, she was talking about, is a Chinese vaccine. It is NOT Pfizer or Moderna. It is for a Chinese vaccine by a Chinese company. So she got everything wrong. That's the sort of person you and others get their information from. Any one should be able to find the truth but most of you just blindly believe your 'experts', like karen, that are usually spreading lies that can be proven wrong with a bit of research. You fall for these lies because it conveniently fit into your preconceived ideology.
Must be hitting the target with Karen Kingston as you seem so desperate to debunk her. Always good to see where feathers get ruffled, 'fact checkers' wade in and accounts get blocked. Karen was not a sales rep. She was a biotech analyst, not that it really matters. Plenty of highly qualified people (Fraudster Fauci for instance) lie about everything and talk nonsense while there are plenty of people with no qualifications who can see through the corona lies. All lies from beginning to end. The only requirement to see throught the lies is a functioning brain - something that the criminals behind the crime are determined to destroy in population, it would seem. https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/anything-goes/karen-kingston-ex-pfizer-employee-whistleblower
No question... Just one example: The fluoridation of our water supplies dulls the mind, calcifies the pineal gland (i.e. the direct physical connection to the Divine), and creates a docile population which is more far more vulnerable to subjugation and ritualistic abuse.
Karen Kingston gets passionate and admittedly, is all over the place; however, you can (and should) look at the information on your own.
And if you did just a little MORE research, you would find that BioNtech (pfizer) is a German Chinese company…that’s building manufacturing plants in the US. Dig thru the $ trails long enuf, you find them all in bed together
I trust the fact that the bodies are piling up all around us and the hospitals are filling with very ill, predominantly jabbed, patients. Ed Dowd and others are clearly showing a huge increase in premature deaths and serious progressive health problems, including highly aggressive cancers... POST-vax rollout These vaccines literally amount to VAIDS - vaccine-acquired immune depression syndrome.
The points about Kingston are good to consider. However, you're making assumptions about Bluetooth and hardware limitations that are not necessarily true. We don't know the minimum chip size, and DOD always gets first crack at new technologies. It surprises people, but batteries are NOT needed; incoming RF can be used for power -- or maybe they have figured out how to harness biological electrochemistry. Back in the 60's, the Russians bugged a plaque gifted to U.S. diplomats, that used nothing but a resonant cavity and a tiny antenna. A microwave carrier was beamed in externally and modulated by the device. While bluetooth activity seems hard to believe, I would be reluctant to completely write it off.
For bluetooth power is needed. Lots of development is into nano-batteries but they cant do yet.
Even if you use logic only, you would surmise that if they developed a top secret nano tracking device, they would also use a top secret tracking signal. They wouldn't use a bluetooth signal that everyone could detect. Does that make sense? The mac addresses are all from personal devices like phones. Absolutely no intelligent person would use bluetooth for a secret device.
That's a perfectly reasonable argument -- but never underestimate hubris (success makes you stupid/overconfident), and being rational has never been a DOD strong point. Bluetooth may be convenient for them, and who says they need to keep it secret, anyway? Denial has worked just fine for 9-11 as well as for massive vaxxx injuries and deaths.
to me anyone loses credibility who is calling gene modification treatments applied on billions, 'vaccines'.... It is very disturbing to see that Stew's documentary which I 100% believe in, is NOT opening a truthful discussion on THIS page!
I find it incredible that anyone would use typos as a measure of another's credibility.
I worked with brilliant researchers for over 23 years and was shocked at how many of them were such sloppy proofreaders of their own text. I had to rewrite everything that one of my bosses (MD + PhD) wanted to submit for publication. In fact, he came to insist upon it.
You lose any credibility when you mention Karen Kingston. Karen was a sales rep for 2 years and left Pfizer in 1998. 24 years ago. She had no inside knowledge. It was fake info she found online. The documents she provided didn't mention graphene (she even said that). The patent she linked was for a future Chinese vac that had no connection to any current vaccine. If you believe the bluetooth story then there's no hope for you. There can be no bluetooth signal without a chip and a battery. The worlds smallest bluetooth chip is about 5mm long and then it still requires a battery. The bluetooth signals are coming from other devices.
Scientist Charles Lieber (arrested 2020) was working at Harvard on fibre-optic nanowire tech for the past 22 years, and with nanotech and nanoscale structures in general for even longer than that. All of his publications are still online:
http://cml.harvard.edu/publications
Many of his papers describe using silicon nanowires as the basis of BCIs, or brain-computer interfaces.
http://cml.harvard.edu/assets/5Sep19_Precision-electronic-medicine-in-the-brain.pdf
https://rumble.com/v1uu0lk-update-by-former-barrister-julian-gillespie.html
Here are some interesting videos that might possibly be showing some of this tech in action:
This first video is titled WORLD FIRST: ROBOTIC ARMS Assembled Via Nanotech Inside COVID-19 "Vaccines" - Recorded in Real Time:
https://www.brighteon.com/6be2e0da-f357-4887-b7da-7f60963b7495
This link is to a doctor finding bluetooth signals in a graveyard: https://www.brighteon.com/9c2346e0-d9a7-4532-aaf3-bb0807e4588a.
This one is of a lady visiting a shrine in Japan, and her 2 mac addresses: https://www.brighteon.com/903b435b-a821-485e-b5aa-9010c41b961e.
This one is called FIREMEDIC8 CAPTURES BLUETOOTH & RF PHENOMENON https://www.brighteon.com/1a4f88d9-7034-4a62-9f54-b94916788cdb
Next, this video shows microscopy photos of electronic looking items: https://www.brighteon.com/3f9bd035-dc93-4638-8552-f789136f934f
In this video, this electrical engineer thinks the vaccine ingredients under his microscope look like they formed into integrated circuits, and they disassembled when they were no longer exposed to wireless radiation. https://www.brighteon.com/8cd390d6-1f05-4da0-be04-dbe54b77f6a3
Here is a link to a search I did of similarly themed videos, most of which I haven't seen, in case anyone is interested: https://www.brighteon.com/new-search?query=japan%20shrine%20woman%20vaccine%20bluetooth%20mac%20address&page=1&uploaded=all&duration=all&sort=best_result&type=all&quality=all&channelPage=1
Yes, I have read those before.
They have no connection or relevance to any vaccine. Any connection that a few people are trying to make, linking these story to the vaccine, is purely fiction.
The ‘covid vaccination’ is not a vaccination. The novel virus was a fiction so the ‘vaccination’ is a fraud. The entire covid narrative is fiction. Thank you for clarifying that the entire narrative was and is fiction and has nothing to do with health at all.
That's not a connection to any vaccine. That's just your speculation with no link, proof, documents or evidence.
Show me something that links this story to the vaccine.
And that's just public sector tech development. What's been produced in secret (e.g DARPA et al.) or shared by off-world races through underground military or intelligence channels would probably blow all of our minds.
I’ve read through some of the patents Karen Kingston talks about. I’m not sure how you can base what you think from “the patent she linked”. There are literally thousands of patents, she is combing through a LOT of info. I’ve looked up (my own research) and found some of them. These are nano structures (quantum computing) and there is a ton of research/patents/info. It’s not difficult to research, just takes time. And the DOD is light years beyond “chips”
The non-fact checkers (paid for by pharma-pushers, eg: BMGF) have predictably allegedly 'debunked' Karen Kingston. She could have cleaned the carpets at Pfizer for all I care - she knows her stuff and is a former analyst.
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/pharmaceutical-industrial-complex/pfizer-whistleblower-karen-kingston-shots-are-conspiracy
She wasn't an analyst. She was a sales rep. Karen said that.
She left the company 24 years ago. She had no access to anything from pfizer. She didn't know her stuff. When she was talking she didn't understand some simple terms and made many mistakes. She only got her info from the same easily accessible data from the internet. There were no documents that anybody couldn't download or read.
She gave the number of the patent she was referring to CN112220919A. Her other docs were list of ingredients and similar.
You are looking at non related patents (nothing to do with the vaccines).
There are no nano structures (quantum computing) in any of the vaccine patents or even the chinese one.
Nano simply refers to a size. It has nothing to do with computing or electronics.
The Nano particles in the vaccine are lipids which are particles of fat. Fats are not computer or technology.
If you think I'm wrong (definitely not) then post the patent numbers you are referring to.
And you are conflating multiple things. Lipid (yes, fats) nano (yes, small)
particles (which could be anything) . And no, I’m not going to list thousands of patent numbers and their connections to shady companies, quantum dots, and pharma. Patents only tell part of the story anyway, there are millions of patents filed that go nowhere. You have to dig deeper than that, cross reference, and follow the trail
Please just one patent that's linked to the vaccine.
modernatx.com/en-US/patents
You haven't even listed one.
All the patents that are used in a vaccine are listed on the companies websites.
If a patent is used it is listed. Random patents that were not used are not listed (of course).
There are no other nano particles in the vaccine apart from the nano lipids.
Please link just one patent of your claims.
Many are quantum dots…or quantum dot tattoos
Show us the patents or evidence about the quantum dots or tattoos. The are no quantum dots involved with the vaccine.
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/qr-codes-quantum-dot-it-all-comes-together-perfectly
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/tattoo-technology-based-quantum-dots-be-developed-australia
How about you show me that they 100% aren't quantum dots? See, the problem with people like you is that you are stuck on debating each crumb, instead of acknowledging the existence of a whole cake. There are multiple facets to this whole mess, by design, meant to sow chaos/confusion. There are multiple agendas going on, with multiple issues (Pfizer has 50% leeway for "vaccine" content, and there is seemingly multiple formulations at any given time, even under the same lot number, which is illegal, btw) so anyone focusing on one crumb gets pulled apart and destroyed.
No. I am not going to waste time providing "just one patent", because "just one patent" will not prove or disprove anything, as I stated before. It's a compilation of THOUSANDS of patents, $ trails, FOIA'ed emails between government officials, military documents, following the $ between shady corporations, and the psychopaths IN THEIR OWN WORDS...and so on. Nope, I decided long ago that the only way people would know it is to seek it, research it, and follow the rabbit holes, like I did. I have no interest in debating the crumbs. It's lazy. And boring.
You originally stated that citing Karen Kingston loses all credibility based on one patent she held up. That's like saying one document from the 80,000 pages of Pfizer data that was forced to be released is "wrong" because, blah blah blah (meaning: "I didn't bother to read the other pages, I'm just going to focus on how you're wrong"). It's useless and time wasting.
IF you want to find the truth, you can use what Karen Kingston has to springboard off of, to find other documents. Is she perfect? No. Her research however, will lead you to other people, who also have crumbs. Each person out there has crumbs, that fit into the cake. Or not. That's your job to research and determine, along with the rest of us.
You’re citing one patent. There are thousands
There are thousands. Karen referred to one. We are talking about karen the sales reps, information.
The vaccine patents are available. They are very easy to find on the moderna site.
If you are referring to other patents not used with the vaccines, then they are not relevant.
If you want to post any of the patents you found with the nano quantum computing, I am keen to see them (but they are not associated with the vaccines).
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/intra-body-nano-networks
Karen Kingston, admittedly, is all over the place when she speaks, but she’s done a huge amount of digging. Don’t agree with everything she says, but she has a LOT of info that you can jump off of and find stuff yourself. I’ve decided I won’t do other people’s research, it’s a waste of my time and just turns into “yeah but”.
Do your own digging, then you actually learn it.
Quantum dot tattoos, surveillance under the skin and the internet of bodies. How else would you “get them under the skin”. Psychopaths have moved on from tracking what you purchase thru bar codes, they want biometric data…and openly state it.
All her info came from websites. She had no inside knowledge. She also had no understanding of what she was claiming as you could tell by her simple errors.
I have been through everything she claimed. I have done my research. There is nothing that links the vaccine to any nano technology (apart from the nano lipids) or graphene. Every thing she claimed was wrong.
Nobody has been able to show any ingredient lists or patents from the vaccine that links the vaccines with any of this nano computing technology or graphene.
There are no links or documents, patents or proof that links to quantum dots. It's just someones story made up from fear of the vaccine and government.
There are no quantum dots under the skin and no tracking. I have been through everything I can find since karen and all the crazy claims since. There is nothing. You are imagining links that don't exist.
Show me one patent/document. You must remember at least one?
You clearly haven't been through everything she's claimed, or you would have found the quantum dot , nano tech, AND graphene connections, which could lead you down the same rabbit hole I followed. You're just more interested in debating the micro and not interested in the macro.
Steve Kirsch doesn't believe that this is intentional, or that it's a depopulation agenda, even though the psychopaths involved literally tell the world that's what it is. And every $ trail, shady corporation, patents and communication eventually lead right back to all of them. People like that operate in darkness, they don't put everything in one place/document/account. It's going to take some work on your part, and you clearly don't want to do it.
The body is a battery of sorts. We have positive and negative charges within us. That's how we have energy to move around. I haven't been able to verify with my own observations anything to the bluetooth transmitter claim. Seems far out there. You'd expect to see massive numbers of bluetooth signals inside of a grocery store, Target, Costco, the train station. Internet of Things means that many electronics items are tagged with identifying markers to track their distribution. But I have indeed verified that the magnet stuck on a recently injected person. And it only stuck one way. The poles had to be properly aligned. As far as Karen Kingston is concerned, she is reading through the patents. They are all readily available on the Moderna website and I paused the film to go to the page that she was referring to a couple of times. She is not lying about what she's reading in the patents. Whether they are actually using all in the patents has yet to be verified, but you can find a lot on it if you trouble to look and read for yourself. The globalists have not been shy about their dream of creating a hive mind and an Internet of Bodies. Check out rand.org if you haven't gone down that rabbit hole.
https://www.modernatx.com/en-US/patents
You're naive... The nano-tech developed in secret (DARPA et al.) is probably a hundred years more advanced that what's seen in the public sector. Microscopic analysis of these vial components are showing materials that clearly don't belong in "vaccines". Karen's done some fine work digging into the patents and raising important questions which the powers-that-be refuse to answer.
Her fine work? Everything she said was wrong. Look at the documents and patent she was referring to. None of the documents or patent supported her claims, they disproved them.
"If you believe the Bluetooth story then there's no hope for you"..Really?
Try this genius.. On a Android phone, go to Developer options, enable "Show Bluetooth devices without names".. now go to a public setting with lots of people like Walmart and run a Bluetooth scan.. explain those results...
Ok genius why don't you bother to learn anything about bluetooth devices and mac addresses.
To stop tracking via mac address, Apple started using random mac addresses in iOS devices. Mac address randomization was also added in Android, Windows, and Linux and others. That’s why a search may not find anything and there are no names. Stop believing these con men and do some actual research.
Similar to DHCP, I get it.
Random MAC addresses will screw up a DHCP server if there are duplicates. It is an extremely stupid idea.
Tell me everything you know about wireless protocols and nano devices.. I'll wait..
But you will refuse to try what I outlined.. And tell us about why in 2021 Android and IoS updates blocked the ability to see unnamed Bluetooth "devices" without using developer tools? Coincidence? Typical "Fully Injected" lefty resorting to name calling.. Time for a "Booster"?
I could but you wouldn't believe anything. So, why don't you bother to do some reading for yourself? It's because you don't want to know the truth.
'Without using developer tools'. That's funny. Who told you that?
Maybe you didn't understand that the developer tools are in the settings under developer options. It hasn't changed. The developer tools are still built into android. Every android has them. The 'Show bluetooth devices without names' is still in the same place.
Lefty, you are so funny. I'm way more to the right than you will ever be. I just know how to think for myself unlike you. So brainwashed that anyone that doesn't follow your mantra must be left. You are just blindly following the vac is evil conspiracy. You don't even bother to check any of their claims.
Sure.. sure ignoring what I posted and trying to project.. I'll pray for you. Please ask God for help instead of trusting man "Pharma" aka Pharmakeia <- research that... God Bless
What did i ignore? I answered every question you asked.. I answered your question about hidden mac addresses with no name. I answered your question about the developer tools that are built into android phones. It hasn't changed. The developer tools are still built into android. Every android has them. The 'Show bluetooth devices without names' is still in the latest androids and in the same place.
So I answered every thing you asked. Didn't you bother to read them?
I never asked you any questions.. not a one.. I challenged you to scan a public place yourself.. You replied "I could.. but.." now you reply hours later hoping to steer a narrative away from the original subject matter.. I would suggest you get right with GOD, but I suspect you play for the other team..
Here's everything you need to know about your god.
https://qr.ae/pv0ic2
Ok, so I explained the ideas you were inquiring about. I answered you inquiry about the hidden mac addresses without names.
You asked me to about the 'show bluetooth devices without names setting.
That was a question.
Your 'Tell me everything' and I said you need to learn it for yourself. Why don't want to do any research for yourself?
So I actually covered everything you wanted to know.
Maybe it hours later because I live on the other side of the globe! (It isn't flat) and we're not all american. I covered ALL your subject matter. So obviously still haven't read it.
My 1828 Webster's Dictionary of the English Language defines "pharmaceutical" as medicine, poison, sorcery, witchcraft... Gee, that doesn't sound good, does it?
But what did we expect? The Nazi scientists and chemical/pharmaceutical interests were brought into the US under Operation Paperclip after WWII. They've had 75 years to work their "magic"...
In 1828 people still believed in witchcraft. Maybe you still do. You can't judge anyone by what was written nearly 200 years ago. Barbers use to do the surgeries.
People believed in witchcraft 200 years ago and still do today because... wait for it... it's ACTUALLY been practiced for as long as humans have walked this earth. If such occult "crafts" hadn't been useful for those who practiced them, they would not have persisted for so long.
The real question is this: Why would BigPharma hold onto the word "pharmaceutical" as a descriptor for their products for so long, knowing full well what sort of sordid history that word connotes?
The answer may shock you... but it is what it is, and you can make of it what you wish.
The "evil-doers" follow a warped moral code which requires them to flaunt their symbols, plans, and calling cards in our faces. If We the People, who are being subjugated and abused and controlled, fail to resist, then the evil-doers consider that failure as a form of tacit approval and acceptance.
Frankly, it's hard to argue otherwise...
https://qr.ae/pv0ic2
In the 21st century anybody that believes in witchcraft must have something deficient in their brain. I've seen more than you would ever believe. I work in probably the only country in the world where witchcraft is still in the law books. I have seen mother and baby burnt to death for witchcraft, but still nobody goes around doing or practicing any occult practices. It's all out of fear of the unknown.
Witchcraft only started after religion deluded everyone. The church people started it to scare people so they'd follow their god.
People who practice the occult now mainly do it for fun and to be part of a group but they don't believe it. You should ask one, i have. The ones who actually believe it are deluded with their brains are stuck in the dark ages.
Nothing has ever happened, or been useful, by practicing the occult because it's all just fairy tales made to scare people in the dark ages.
All the talk of witches, satan, gods and the mark of the beast should be lost to the dark ages. Anyone that still believes needs to grow up.
Evidently "Barbers" still do..
No, barbers cut your hair in the pretty style that you keep asking for..
Pharmaceutical derived from Pharmakeia. But.. but nothing to see here. :)
massive proportion of modern scientific discovery is pure fraud. the research that launched the Alzheimer industry & pharmaceuticals for the last 16 years has been exposed as faked. by a journalist. someone with integrity who knew how to read the science. the last 3 years has seen a huge number of folk come out of the woodwork doing just that. they dont always need 50 yrs in the industry- indeed indoctrination is NOT a good thing. these people have proven to be vastly more intelligent than the 'experts' who parrot bad science- & vastly more moral than those who fake it. give me kingston over daszak any day. sir.
work on your own credibility methink.
Wow. You must be so smart to regard karen, the sales rep, as an expert. She knows nothing about what she was talking about. Karen incorrectly claims that PEGylated Lipid was graphene, when it is not and does not contain graphene. The documents she provided did not show graphene and she admitted this. The Chinese patent CN112220919A, she was talking about, is a Chinese vaccine. It is NOT Pfizer or Moderna. It is for a Chinese vaccine by a Chinese company. So she got everything wrong. That's the sort of person you and others get their information from. Any one should be able to find the truth but most of you just blindly believe your 'experts', like karen, that are usually spreading lies that can be proven wrong with a bit of research. You fall for these lies because it conveniently fit into your preconceived ideology.
Must be hitting the target with Karen Kingston as you seem so desperate to debunk her. Always good to see where feathers get ruffled, 'fact checkers' wade in and accounts get blocked. Karen was not a sales rep. She was a biotech analyst, not that it really matters. Plenty of highly qualified people (Fraudster Fauci for instance) lie about everything and talk nonsense while there are plenty of people with no qualifications who can see through the corona lies. All lies from beginning to end. The only requirement to see throught the lies is a functioning brain - something that the criminals behind the crime are determined to destroy in population, it would seem. https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/anything-goes/karen-kingston-ex-pfizer-employee-whistleblower
No question... Just one example: The fluoridation of our water supplies dulls the mind, calcifies the pineal gland (i.e. the direct physical connection to the Divine), and creates a docile population which is more far more vulnerable to subjugation and ritualistic abuse.
Karen Kingston gets passionate and admittedly, is all over the place; however, you can (and should) look at the information on your own.
And if you did just a little MORE research, you would find that BioNtech (pfizer) is a German Chinese company…that’s building manufacturing plants in the US. Dig thru the $ trails long enuf, you find them all in bed together
I trust the fact that the bodies are piling up all around us and the hospitals are filling with very ill, predominantly jabbed, patients. Ed Dowd and others are clearly showing a huge increase in premature deaths and serious progressive health problems, including highly aggressive cancers... POST-vax rollout These vaccines literally amount to VAIDS - vaccine-acquired immune depression syndrome.
https://everydayconcerned.net/2021/12/01/damning-evidence-of-self-assembling-wireless-nanosensor-networks-using-graphene-quantum-dots-nanorouters-nanoantennas-found-by-dr-pablo-campra-in-4-covid-vaccines-revealed-by-researcher-mik-anderso/
Sounds like an interesting substack article that you could write!
The points about Kingston are good to consider. However, you're making assumptions about Bluetooth and hardware limitations that are not necessarily true. We don't know the minimum chip size, and DOD always gets first crack at new technologies. It surprises people, but batteries are NOT needed; incoming RF can be used for power -- or maybe they have figured out how to harness biological electrochemistry. Back in the 60's, the Russians bugged a plaque gifted to U.S. diplomats, that used nothing but a resonant cavity and a tiny antenna. A microwave carrier was beamed in externally and modulated by the device. While bluetooth activity seems hard to believe, I would be reluctant to completely write it off.
For bluetooth power is needed. Lots of development is into nano-batteries but they cant do yet.
Even if you use logic only, you would surmise that if they developed a top secret nano tracking device, they would also use a top secret tracking signal. They wouldn't use a bluetooth signal that everyone could detect. Does that make sense? The mac addresses are all from personal devices like phones. Absolutely no intelligent person would use bluetooth for a secret device.
That's a perfectly reasonable argument -- but never underestimate hubris (success makes you stupid/overconfident), and being rational has never been a DOD strong point. Bluetooth may be convenient for them, and who says they need to keep it secret, anyway? Denial has worked just fine for 9-11 as well as for massive vaxxx injuries and deaths.
to me anyone loses credibility who is calling gene modification treatments applied on billions, 'vaccines'.... It is very disturbing to see that Stew's documentary which I 100% believe in, is NOT opening a truthful discussion on THIS page!
To me anyone who writes "looses" credibility loses credibility.
I find it incredible that anyone would use typos as a measure of another's credibility.
I worked with brilliant researchers for over 23 years and was shocked at how many of them were such sloppy proofreaders of their own text. I had to rewrite everything that one of my bosses (MD + PhD) wanted to submit for publication. In fact, he came to insist upon it.