You're naive... The nano-tech developed in secret (DARPA et al.) is probably a hundred years more advanced that what's seen in the public sector. Microscopic analysis of these vial components are showing materials that clearly don't belong in "vaccines". Karen's done some fine work digging into the patents and raising important questions which the powers-that-be refuse to answer.
You're naive... The nano-tech developed in secret (DARPA et al.) is probably a hundred years more advanced that what's seen in the public sector. Microscopic analysis of these vial components are showing materials that clearly don't belong in "vaccines". Karen's done some fine work digging into the patents and raising important questions which the powers-that-be refuse to answer.
Her fine work? Everything she said was wrong. Look at the documents and patent she was referring to. None of the documents or patent supported her claims, they disproved them.
You're naive... The nano-tech developed in secret (DARPA et al.) is probably a hundred years more advanced that what's seen in the public sector. Microscopic analysis of these vial components are showing materials that clearly don't belong in "vaccines". Karen's done some fine work digging into the patents and raising important questions which the powers-that-be refuse to answer.
Her fine work? Everything she said was wrong. Look at the documents and patent she was referring to. None of the documents or patent supported her claims, they disproved them.