I’ve read through some of the patents Karen Kingston talks about. I’m not sure how you can base what you think from “the patent she linked”. There are literally thousands of patents, she is combing through a LOT of info. I’ve looked up (my own research) and found some of them. These are nano structures (quantum computing) and there is a …
I’ve read through some of the patents Karen Kingston talks about. I’m not sure how you can base what you think from “the patent she linked”. There are literally thousands of patents, she is combing through a LOT of info. I’ve looked up (my own research) and found some of them. These are nano structures (quantum computing) and there is a ton of research/patents/info. It’s not difficult to research, just takes time. And the DOD is light years beyond “chips”
The non-fact checkers (paid for by pharma-pushers, eg: BMGF) have predictably allegedly 'debunked' Karen Kingston. She could have cleaned the carpets at Pfizer for all I care - she knows her stuff and is a former analyst.
She wasn't an analyst. She was a sales rep. Karen said that.
She left the company 24 years ago. She had no access to anything from pfizer. She didn't know her stuff. When she was talking she didn't understand some simple terms and made many mistakes. She only got her info from the same easily accessible data from the internet. There were no documents that anybody couldn't download or read.
And you are conflating multiple things. Lipid (yes, fats) nano (yes, small)
particles (which could be anything) . And no, I’m not going to list thousands of patent numbers and their connections to shady companies, quantum dots, and pharma. Patents only tell part of the story anyway, there are millions of patents filed that go nowhere. You have to dig deeper than that, cross reference, and follow the trail
How about you show me that they 100% aren't quantum dots? See, the problem with people like you is that you are stuck on debating each crumb, instead of acknowledging the existence of a whole cake. There are multiple facets to this whole mess, by design, meant to sow chaos/confusion. There are multiple agendas going on, with multiple issues (Pfizer has 50% leeway for "vaccine" content, and there is seemingly multiple formulations at any given time, even under the same lot number, which is illegal, btw) so anyone focusing on one crumb gets pulled apart and destroyed.
No. I am not going to waste time providing "just one patent", because "just one patent" will not prove or disprove anything, as I stated before. It's a compilation of THOUSANDS of patents, $ trails, FOIA'ed emails between government officials, military documents, following the $ between shady corporations, and the psychopaths IN THEIR OWN WORDS...and so on. Nope, I decided long ago that the only way people would know it is to seek it, research it, and follow the rabbit holes, like I did. I have no interest in debating the crumbs. It's lazy. And boring.
You originally stated that citing Karen Kingston loses all credibility based on one patent she held up. That's like saying one document from the 80,000 pages of Pfizer data that was forced to be released is "wrong" because, blah blah blah (meaning: "I didn't bother to read the other pages, I'm just going to focus on how you're wrong"). It's useless and time wasting.
IF you want to find the truth, you can use what Karen Kingston has to springboard off of, to find other documents. Is she perfect? No. Her research however, will lead you to other people, who also have crumbs. Each person out there has crumbs, that fit into the cake. Or not. That's your job to research and determine, along with the rest of us.
There are thousands. Karen referred to one. We are talking about karen the sales reps, information.
The vaccine patents are available. They are very easy to find on the moderna site.
If you are referring to other patents not used with the vaccines, then they are not relevant.
If you want to post any of the patents you found with the nano quantum computing, I am keen to see them (but they are not associated with the vaccines).
Karen Kingston, admittedly, is all over the place when she speaks, but she’s done a huge amount of digging. Don’t agree with everything she says, but she has a LOT of info that you can jump off of and find stuff yourself. I’ve decided I won’t do other people’s research, it’s a waste of my time and just turns into “yeah but”.
Do your own digging, then you actually learn it.
Quantum dot tattoos, surveillance under the skin and the internet of bodies. How else would you “get them under the skin”. Psychopaths have moved on from tracking what you purchase thru bar codes, they want biometric data…and openly state it.
All her info came from websites. She had no inside knowledge. She also had no understanding of what she was claiming as you could tell by her simple errors.
I have been through everything she claimed. I have done my research. There is nothing that links the vaccine to any nano technology (apart from the nano lipids) or graphene. Every thing she claimed was wrong.
Nobody has been able to show any ingredient lists or patents from the vaccine that links the vaccines with any of this nano computing technology or graphene.
There are no links or documents, patents or proof that links to quantum dots. It's just someones story made up from fear of the vaccine and government.
There are no quantum dots under the skin and no tracking. I have been through everything I can find since karen and all the crazy claims since. There is nothing. You are imagining links that don't exist.
Show me one patent/document. You must remember at least one?
You clearly haven't been through everything she's claimed, or you would have found the quantum dot , nano tech, AND graphene connections, which could lead you down the same rabbit hole I followed. You're just more interested in debating the micro and not interested in the macro.
Steve Kirsch doesn't believe that this is intentional, or that it's a depopulation agenda, even though the psychopaths involved literally tell the world that's what it is. And every $ trail, shady corporation, patents and communication eventually lead right back to all of them. People like that operate in darkness, they don't put everything in one place/document/account. It's going to take some work on your part, and you clearly don't want to do it.
I’ve read through some of the patents Karen Kingston talks about. I’m not sure how you can base what you think from “the patent she linked”. There are literally thousands of patents, she is combing through a LOT of info. I’ve looked up (my own research) and found some of them. These are nano structures (quantum computing) and there is a ton of research/patents/info. It’s not difficult to research, just takes time. And the DOD is light years beyond “chips”
The non-fact checkers (paid for by pharma-pushers, eg: BMGF) have predictably allegedly 'debunked' Karen Kingston. She could have cleaned the carpets at Pfizer for all I care - she knows her stuff and is a former analyst.
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/pharmaceutical-industrial-complex/pfizer-whistleblower-karen-kingston-shots-are-conspiracy
She wasn't an analyst. She was a sales rep. Karen said that.
She left the company 24 years ago. She had no access to anything from pfizer. She didn't know her stuff. When she was talking she didn't understand some simple terms and made many mistakes. She only got her info from the same easily accessible data from the internet. There were no documents that anybody couldn't download or read.
She gave the number of the patent she was referring to CN112220919A. Her other docs were list of ingredients and similar.
You are looking at non related patents (nothing to do with the vaccines).
There are no nano structures (quantum computing) in any of the vaccine patents or even the chinese one.
Nano simply refers to a size. It has nothing to do with computing or electronics.
The Nano particles in the vaccine are lipids which are particles of fat. Fats are not computer or technology.
If you think I'm wrong (definitely not) then post the patent numbers you are referring to.
And you are conflating multiple things. Lipid (yes, fats) nano (yes, small)
particles (which could be anything) . And no, I’m not going to list thousands of patent numbers and their connections to shady companies, quantum dots, and pharma. Patents only tell part of the story anyway, there are millions of patents filed that go nowhere. You have to dig deeper than that, cross reference, and follow the trail
Please just one patent that's linked to the vaccine.
modernatx.com/en-US/patents
You haven't even listed one.
All the patents that are used in a vaccine are listed on the companies websites.
If a patent is used it is listed. Random patents that were not used are not listed (of course).
There are no other nano particles in the vaccine apart from the nano lipids.
Please link just one patent of your claims.
Many are quantum dots…or quantum dot tattoos
Show us the patents or evidence about the quantum dots or tattoos. The are no quantum dots involved with the vaccine.
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/qr-codes-quantum-dot-it-all-comes-together-perfectly
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/tattoo-technology-based-quantum-dots-be-developed-australia
How about you show me that they 100% aren't quantum dots? See, the problem with people like you is that you are stuck on debating each crumb, instead of acknowledging the existence of a whole cake. There are multiple facets to this whole mess, by design, meant to sow chaos/confusion. There are multiple agendas going on, with multiple issues (Pfizer has 50% leeway for "vaccine" content, and there is seemingly multiple formulations at any given time, even under the same lot number, which is illegal, btw) so anyone focusing on one crumb gets pulled apart and destroyed.
No. I am not going to waste time providing "just one patent", because "just one patent" will not prove or disprove anything, as I stated before. It's a compilation of THOUSANDS of patents, $ trails, FOIA'ed emails between government officials, military documents, following the $ between shady corporations, and the psychopaths IN THEIR OWN WORDS...and so on. Nope, I decided long ago that the only way people would know it is to seek it, research it, and follow the rabbit holes, like I did. I have no interest in debating the crumbs. It's lazy. And boring.
You originally stated that citing Karen Kingston loses all credibility based on one patent she held up. That's like saying one document from the 80,000 pages of Pfizer data that was forced to be released is "wrong" because, blah blah blah (meaning: "I didn't bother to read the other pages, I'm just going to focus on how you're wrong"). It's useless and time wasting.
IF you want to find the truth, you can use what Karen Kingston has to springboard off of, to find other documents. Is she perfect? No. Her research however, will lead you to other people, who also have crumbs. Each person out there has crumbs, that fit into the cake. Or not. That's your job to research and determine, along with the rest of us.
You’re citing one patent. There are thousands
There are thousands. Karen referred to one. We are talking about karen the sales reps, information.
The vaccine patents are available. They are very easy to find on the moderna site.
If you are referring to other patents not used with the vaccines, then they are not relevant.
If you want to post any of the patents you found with the nano quantum computing, I am keen to see them (but they are not associated with the vaccines).
https://community.ukcolumn.org/forums/parmaceutical-industrial-complex/intra-body-nano-networks
Karen Kingston, admittedly, is all over the place when she speaks, but she’s done a huge amount of digging. Don’t agree with everything she says, but she has a LOT of info that you can jump off of and find stuff yourself. I’ve decided I won’t do other people’s research, it’s a waste of my time and just turns into “yeah but”.
Do your own digging, then you actually learn it.
Quantum dot tattoos, surveillance under the skin and the internet of bodies. How else would you “get them under the skin”. Psychopaths have moved on from tracking what you purchase thru bar codes, they want biometric data…and openly state it.
All her info came from websites. She had no inside knowledge. She also had no understanding of what she was claiming as you could tell by her simple errors.
I have been through everything she claimed. I have done my research. There is nothing that links the vaccine to any nano technology (apart from the nano lipids) or graphene. Every thing she claimed was wrong.
Nobody has been able to show any ingredient lists or patents from the vaccine that links the vaccines with any of this nano computing technology or graphene.
There are no links or documents, patents or proof that links to quantum dots. It's just someones story made up from fear of the vaccine and government.
There are no quantum dots under the skin and no tracking. I have been through everything I can find since karen and all the crazy claims since. There is nothing. You are imagining links that don't exist.
Show me one patent/document. You must remember at least one?
You clearly haven't been through everything she's claimed, or you would have found the quantum dot , nano tech, AND graphene connections, which could lead you down the same rabbit hole I followed. You're just more interested in debating the micro and not interested in the macro.
Steve Kirsch doesn't believe that this is intentional, or that it's a depopulation agenda, even though the psychopaths involved literally tell the world that's what it is. And every $ trail, shady corporation, patents and communication eventually lead right back to all of them. People like that operate in darkness, they don't put everything in one place/document/account. It's going to take some work on your part, and you clearly don't want to do it.