For bluetooth power is needed. Lots of development is into nano-batteries but they cant do yet.
Even if you use logic only, you would surmise that if they developed a top secret nano tracking device, they would also use a top secret tracking signal. They wouldn't use a bluetooth signal that everyone could detect. Does that make sense? Th…
For bluetooth power is needed. Lots of development is into nano-batteries but they cant do yet.
Even if you use logic only, you would surmise that if they developed a top secret nano tracking device, they would also use a top secret tracking signal. They wouldn't use a bluetooth signal that everyone could detect. Does that make sense? The mac addresses are all from personal devices like phones. Absolutely no intelligent person would use bluetooth for a secret device.
That's a perfectly reasonable argument -- but never underestimate hubris (success makes you stupid/overconfident), and being rational has never been a DOD strong point. Bluetooth may be convenient for them, and who says they need to keep it secret, anyway? Denial has worked just fine for 9-11 as well as for massive vaxxx injuries and deaths.
For bluetooth power is needed. Lots of development is into nano-batteries but they cant do yet.
Even if you use logic only, you would surmise that if they developed a top secret nano tracking device, they would also use a top secret tracking signal. They wouldn't use a bluetooth signal that everyone could detect. Does that make sense? The mac addresses are all from personal devices like phones. Absolutely no intelligent person would use bluetooth for a secret device.
That's a perfectly reasonable argument -- but never underestimate hubris (success makes you stupid/overconfident), and being rational has never been a DOD strong point. Bluetooth may be convenient for them, and who says they need to keep it secret, anyway? Denial has worked just fine for 9-11 as well as for massive vaxxx injuries and deaths.