VSRF LIVE: Episode 135 - Canada's Privacy Warriors!
Thursday, July 18th: 7pm Eastern | 4pm Pacific
This week on VSRF LIVE I’ll be speaking with Canadian physician Dr. Sonja Kustka, whose license is currently in jeopardy under Canada’s oppressive public health regulator, The Canadian College of Physicians and Surgeons. Dr. Kustka has been accused of engaging in “disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional” conduct after simply acting in the best interest of her patient and her individual circumstances during the pandemic; treating her with well-known and repurposed drugs.
During the course of her ordeal with the Canadian College of Physicians and Surgeons, the College engaged in several personal health privacy violations, breaching the sacred patient-physician relationship and acting with impunity in order to remove Dr. Kustka from the practice of medicine.
Joining Dr. Kustka are her attorney, Paul Slansky and the former patient, now turned patient-advocate, Leslie Peel. Additionally, Attorney Umar Sheikh, who is currently trying the tragic Sean Hartman case (@Answers4Sean) among other notable Covid19 vaccine deaths, will also weigh in on the tragic state of affairs. Together, the guests will tell their unique harrowing tales as they fight to maintain their basic human rights in Canada’s ever growing, oppressive healthcare regime.
Join us for this fascinating discussion and as always, share the Rumble link and bring some friends!
PLEASE support VSRF today. VSRF LIVE depends solely on underwriters and public donations to bring you the weekly show and NEEDS YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT! Please consider donating to VSRF on a monthly basis. Your contributions are tax deductible and VITAL to sustain our efforts each week. We cannot do what we do without your help.
For those willing to contribute, you can make a direct donation here. NO DONATION IS TOO SMALL! Together, we can preserve health freedom for generations to come.
Thank you for your support!
Please share the following links widely, as we are still being shadow banned on social media, including X (Twitter).
A mask exemption should not warrant an investigation without alleged harm.
If harm is alleged, the board is obligated to declare the finding they intend to support with an investigation. That is, if the board disagrees with a mask exemption, it needs to state the grounds upon which an exemption would not be valid; the investigation then substantiates or clears the allegation. Since the board has no grounds for cleaving a patient's mask exemption from a doctor, it has no place in the matter.
Regarding the Czech data, they /we need to ask for ongoing All Cause Mortality numbers. I am seeing ongoing more and more friends dying early and cancer in the group of friends that got the inoculations. We won’t see the true picture until maybe by 5 years but more likely by 15 years from the roll out.
We won’t know the implications for our children’s children until they are born. I have three family members who got the inoculations and have had babies since and thank God they seem fine.
If I submit a formal request for record level data from my country, please state all of the variable you would like me to include. I know to ask for year born and not date born.