"Name your price" offer to qualified vaccine proponents
If you are an infectious disease professor, county public health officer, COVID fact checker for a mainstream social media company, or a vaccine expert at the CDC, FDA, NIH, Pfizer, or Moderna, ...
… and you are interested in making a lot of money just for answering some questions we had, please fill out the form and name your price for a 3 hour session where we get to ask questions.
You see, we really don’t want to spread misinformation about COVID vaccines and masking, but when we look at the evidence, it just doesn’t support the popular narrative.
If you are willing to answer all our questions in a recorded 3-hour video call and you are selected, we’ll pay your asking price for helping set us on the right path. Note that if there are equally qualified candidates, we’ll likely go with the lowest price bidder so you want to keep your ask reasonable.
So not only will you make a lot of money for 3 hours of work, but you’ll help reduce vaccine hesitancy. So win-win.
You can name your price for the 3-hour session.
To qualify you must be based in the US and be:
A professor of infectious disease at a US university
A county health official
A COVID fact-checker for mainstream media, independent fact checking organization, or a social network company (like Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc)
An expert on vaccine safety at the FDA, CDC, NIH, Pfizer, or Moderna or any authorized spokesperson for any of those entities
Someone who appears regularly in the mainstream media in the role of a vaccine and/or masking expert or in claiming that my colleagues spread misinformation
A “vaccine expert” on social media with at least 100,000 followers
A White House authorized spokesperson
A member of Congress
Anyone appointed by a US university to represent the university for this effort
If you qualify, apply here.
For full transparency, you are welcome also to note in the comments that you qualify and what your offer was.
Update on the med school loan repayment offer
For the med school loan repayment offer, there were only 5 applicants. I’m using just four super easy questions to find out if we have someone who can set us on the right path. Here they are:
1. We estimated that over 150,000 Americans were killed by the vaccine. Tell us what the correct ESTIMATE is and how you calculated it.
2. What is the VAERS underreporting factor for 2021 and the COVID vaccines and how did you calculate it?
3. The rates for pulmonary embolism and other symptoms were elevated by over 1000X vs. baseline rates in VAERS. If the vaccines are perfectly safe and effective, how do you explain this dramatic increase?
4. In the first 2 months of 2021, there were just 3 cases of myocarditis reported for all vaccines combined (except for COVID). For COVID vaccines, there were 445 reported cases. We can't figure out how the CDC could possibly have missed this safety signal since it was there since January. How did they miss it?
i would participate, but, alas. do not qualify. I consider myself a vaccine expert after spending 24/7 for 2 years reading only malone McCullough, kirsch, kory, marik,, etc etc etc more, every single one, for 2 years. just kidding about competing , i am not competitive type although some who have read me on twitter might think that.
I'm not a medical student, but here's my crack at the questions
1. We estimated that over 150,000 Americans were killed by the vaccine. Tell us what the correct ESTIMATE is and how you calculated it.
**********************************************************************
based on the vaccine fatality rate VFR that is used in the Stefanie Seneff paper https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Seneff_costBenefit.pdf . For 65+ the VFR starts at .026% and goes up. The VFR for 30+ starts at around .01% and goes up but I'll use that for everyone under 65. vaccination amongst 65+ is almost 100% , so I'm just going to assume everyone 65+ (~52 million ) received their full vax. then I'll subtract that from the estimated 220 million vax to get the number for <65.
vaccine caused deaths 65+ = 52 million * .026 % =135,200
vaccine caused deaths <65 = 220 -52 million * .01% = 16,800
Oh ya I guess that's around 150,000. Wow, I thought maybe you were using a crazy URF with the VAERS to get the 150,000. The only thing is it seemed like there was less certainty with the VFR for the 65+ group.
********************************************************************
2. What is the VAERS underreporting factor for 2021 and the COVID vaccines and how did you calculate it?
****************************************************
I like Matthew Crawford's estimate of about 30
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-underreported-are-post-vaccination?s=r
"In fact, judging by the original Pfizer trial report (5.2.6 page 33) in which 0.7% of vaccine recipients suffered SAEs, we should now expect there to be around 2.4 million SAEs among American vaccine recipients. However, as of today, there are only around 78,000 in the VAERS database, suggesting a 30:1 underreporting rate for SAEs."
3. The rates for pulmonary embolism and other symptoms were elevated by over 1000X vs. baseline rates in VAERS. If the vaccines are perfectly safe and effective, how do you explain this dramatic increase?
****************************************************
here I think it would be really interesting to do a study on a kaiser permanente 2020-2021 database and do a similar calculation that was done for determining Vaccine Fatality Rate (COVID vaccination and age-stratified all-cause mortality risk. By Pantazatos and Seligmann), but instead look for Vaccine Pulmonary Embolism Rate. They did some regression to predict the vaccine fatality rate based on the previous and current years monthly deaths, monthly vaccinations, previous months cases etc..
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Spiro-Pantazatos/publication/355581860_COVID_vaccination_and_age-stratified_all-cause_mortality_risk/
4. In the first 2 months of 2021, there were just 3 cases of myocarditis reported for all vaccines combined (except for COVID). For COVID vaccines, there were 445 reported cases. We can't figure out how the CDC could possibly have missed this safety signal since it was there since January. How did they miss it?
******************************************************
This one I'm stumped by , but I've been assured by pro vaccine groups that our safety systems
are working because they caught the myocarditis issue right away. Hmm, seems like there was a big signal early in January, but we only heard about it when no one could rationalize 16 year olds being in the hospital with myocarditis?