And keep in mind that the Pfizer trial showed this might save 10,000 lives (best case). So we are killing 15 people to maybe save 1 death from COVID. And they are mandating we take it.
Considering the bias in VAERS reporting, claiming the left skew of deaths sampled in VAERS is a valid and accurate representation of the underlying population is really stupid. It's interesting you ignore the number of deaths reported within 3 days is about 2500 out of 200+ million vaccinated persons. That makes the VAERS raw risk of death, from ABSOLUTELY ANY (Yeah, that's how VAERS works...obviously) physiological cause within 3 days of vaccination, a whopping 0.1%. I thought a 99.9% survival rate is what anti-vaxxers used to argue we didn't need COVID lockdowns, but if it's related to vaccines, suddenly it's an outrage that we need to huddle in fear from. The ironic hypocrisy is hilarious.
Frankly, out of 200 million people, the number that die due to sheer bad luck within a few days of the shot should be in the thousands. And doctors/family of decedents will clearly be more biased to reporting entirely random deaths within 5 days of the shot than those within 30 days, due to temporal contiguity bias (the bias you're falling for now). Temporal contiguity bias in reporting decisions is enough to make that skew wholly artificial. Your analysis on the meaning of the left skew is entirely bunk and is closer to anti-vax wet-dreaming than rigorous statistics.
Perhaps it's much more simple. Forget all these calculations. If Pfizer's data indicates that over 20k people need to be vaxed to save one life, then shouldn't that be the end of the discussion? 900k people in the US supposedly died "from" covid. Let's assume that's true and they didn't just die "with" covid. So in order to save those 900k people, we would have had to vaccinate 900k x 20k = 18 billion. Uh... there are only 7.5B on the planet. If we vaxed everyone with Pfizer, we save 375k people. And this is for a virus with an IFR of ~0.4%. So not only does almost everyone who gets it survive, but we're going to vax everyone to get almost no benefit, whether there are adverse reactions or not. What am I missing?
People keep calling it a "vaccine". I don't believe they know the meaning of that word... It IS NOT a vaccine, by any level of definition.
As you know, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CHANGED its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website. Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce IMMUNITY to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce IMMUNITY to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” This is what's known as BULLSHITE!
Immunity doesn't mean you're invulnerable. The reason the definition was changed is that ignorant hacks assumed immunity to mean invulnerability. In fact 100% protection hasn't been achieved by most vaccines. Polio needed 4 rounds to get 99%-100%. They settled with 2 shots for near 100% protection on purpose: it's good enough. Have you ever received a single day of formal medical training?
Can you also explain why you chose to use the VAERS reported deaths as of Jan 5 2021, which is 9623 or (D) in your equation. As of 2022, the VAERS reported deaths is over 21,000. Assuming other variables in your equation don't change much, wouldn't your equation suggest that over 800K people have died from the vaccine, which is almost as many as those who died from COVID in the US? Or maybe its not a linear relationship? Or maybe your equation is fucking bullshit?
The JAMA study that you cited used a cohort where 31% of the recipients of the vaccine had allergy histories and have had prior anaphylaxis. That 31% is much larger than the 5% of the general population who have severe food allergies and 1% of the population with severe drug allergies (also cited by the study). The JAMA study also stated that no one in the study actually died. So my criticisms are that
1) you have not properly established that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy for the rate of death in covid vaccines
2) even if we accepted the premise that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy, you have not used a study with a representative population to establish the baseline from which you derive your URF
Either way, I can't accept your conclusion that the covid vaccine has killed over 150,000 people based on your methodology.
Steve. I agree the vax seems marginally helpful at best and there are way too many deaths from the vaccine, particularly in younger ages where they would have no problem with COVID. However, looking at excess deaths each year doesn't seem to allow the huge numbers you are projecting. small errors become huge when projecting from smaller samples. Vaccines only became available in January so timeline doesn't match up well either.
Yes, it is a vaccine. People who claim vaccines need to be 100% effective after 1 shot are 100% idiots that have spent 0 days receiving accredited medical education.
The moron is the high-school educated overnight internet medical "expert" beating his chest and telling at scientists that they don't know what a vaccine is. As an ape, you don't even know what a college degree looks like and probably push brooms/do manual labor for a living. Stay in your lane, stop lying about your education, and stop pretending you have the ability to intelligently tell people what a vaccine is.
One can become quite emotional when dealing with what one considers to be an intellectual inferior. One used to be when young. Now being so much older and wiser, one blissfuly transcends all challenges to one's blood pressure and permits other lesser entities to cling to their opinions, no matter how absurd. One tentatively suggests one does the same.
The intellectual inferior refuses to acknowledge that no vaccine has ever provided a 100% level of immunity. The intellectual inferior also fails to understand that a 1% boost to immunity does count as providing immunity. Prior to the irrelevant CDC definition change the intellectual inferiors like to stupidly point at, the WHO stated "NO SINGLE VACCINE PROVIDES 100% PROTECTION" (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-do-vaccines-work - Dec 2020). By the intellectual inferior's own logic, no vaccine has ever been a vaccine. One wonders why and when the intellectual inferiors deemed themselves the arbiters of whether vaccines have ever existed, and when/if they will use their authority to strike the term vaccine from our vocabulary.
1.3million people have long covid now! Wonder whether that started before or after being vaccinated or whether these are just the unvaccinated after being infected. 🤔🤫
The result... Doctors are purposefully ignorant killers which cannot be trusted, and are too risky to use beyond life and death emergencies. 2021 will be remembered as moment self doctoring took over.
Absolutely! Before 2021, I was seeing doctors and specialists several times a month, and was on numerous prescription medications. After having neck surgery in December 2020- when they started talking about these death jabs and all the "doctors" were forcing me to wear a mask- I decided that the best decision for my child and myself would be to stop going to the doctors all together and use homeopathic remedies for any ailments my family contracted. And I did just that. I quit all meds cold turkey just 2 weeks after major neck surgery. Never went for a follow up after neck surgery. I treat my pain and anxiety with herbs and teas. I keep my daughter's and my immune systems strong with vitamins, healthy fresh foods, and exercise & sunshine/fresh air. My daughter's father got the China flu in February 2021 and I took care of him. He was better in about 10 days, I had to force him to take the vitamins and drink water and go outside. He doesn't generally take vitamins or eat healthy;He also has no diagnosed illnesses. I cought the China flu from him and felt a little worse than usual for about 2 days. I have several diagnosed ailments (RA, OA, Fibro, Spondylitis) which I now treat with natural remedies. And as aforementioned- I eat healthy and take plenty of vitamins. My life is so much better without the doctors and the prescription medications. I am nicer/less agitated. And the tea that I drink for my pain works better than any of those strong pain meds they had me on. And I have more money to spend on my Princess since I'm not paying for doctor visits and medications.
That kind of attitude doesn't do too much harm either. Unfortunately as we age, our bodies are less able to resist the onslaught of simply living. The cells become clogged, defects occur in reproduction of new cells and no matter what natural materials are employed, we cannot escape the inevitable. I would wish to expire in my sleep still in reasonable health but will probably go kicking and screaming!
I am a nurse and submitted a VAERS report and taught a PA in my ER how to use the system as well. Easier to use the PDF download method so your session doesn't timeout, if anyone would like to know. I don't know any doctors that use it (but I know many that blindly blame the unvaccinated for our hospital being overwhelmed, never mind the nursing shortage and vaccine injuries)
If the actual # of US vaccine deaths is 300,000, and 230mil have been vaccinated, it's killing approx 1/750 people....and that's just within 30 days I believe. We need different data sources to see additional adverse events and deaths over a 1-year, 2-year period, etc
There is a typo in your link in the section starting with: “Why the huge spike in adverse events including death? Is it just overreporting? Now let’s look at the numbers from Openvars.com ”
Injury doesn't look "rare" to me;-) Their "safe" slogan is supported only by their false "rare" slogan. But we can trust their slogan-science...we don't need accurate NUMBERS.
Unless a man is BORN AGAIN he canNOT see the kingdom of God--(John 3.3, 33-34-)--
Considering the bias in VAERS reporting, claiming the left skew of deaths sampled in VAERS is a valid and accurate representation of the underlying population is really stupid. It's interesting you ignore the number of deaths reported within 3 days is about 2500 out of 200+ million vaccinated persons. That makes the VAERS raw risk of death, from ABSOLUTELY ANY (Yeah, that's how VAERS works...obviously) physiological cause within 3 days of vaccination, a whopping 0.1%. I thought a 99.9% survival rate is what anti-vaxxers used to argue we didn't need COVID lockdowns, but if it's related to vaccines, suddenly it's an outrage that we need to huddle in fear from. The ironic hypocrisy is hilarious.
Frankly, out of 200 million people, the number that die due to sheer bad luck within a few days of the shot should be in the thousands. And doctors/family of decedents will clearly be more biased to reporting entirely random deaths within 5 days of the shot than those within 30 days, due to temporal contiguity bias (the bias you're falling for now). Temporal contiguity bias in reporting decisions is enough to make that skew wholly artificial. Your analysis on the meaning of the left skew is entirely bunk and is closer to anti-vax wet-dreaming than rigorous statistics.
Unless a man is BORN AGAIN he cannot see the kingdom of God. (John 3.3, 33-34-)--
Perhaps it's much more simple. Forget all these calculations. If Pfizer's data indicates that over 20k people need to be vaxed to save one life, then shouldn't that be the end of the discussion? 900k people in the US supposedly died "from" covid. Let's assume that's true and they didn't just die "with" covid. So in order to save those 900k people, we would have had to vaccinate 900k x 20k = 18 billion. Uh... there are only 7.5B on the planet. If we vaxed everyone with Pfizer, we save 375k people. And this is for a virus with an IFR of ~0.4%. So not only does almost everyone who gets it survive, but we're going to vax everyone to get almost no benefit, whether there are adverse reactions or not. What am I missing?
People keep calling it a "vaccine". I don't believe they know the meaning of that word... It IS NOT a vaccine, by any level of definition.
As you know, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CHANGED its definition of the words “vaccine” and “vaccination” on its website. Before the change, the definition for “vaccination” read, “the act of introducing a vaccine into the body to produce IMMUNITY to a specific disease.” Now, the word “immunity” has been switched to “protection.” The term “vaccine” also got a makeover. The CDC’s definition changed from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce IMMUNITY to a specific disease” to the current “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” This is what's known as BULLSHITE!
Immunity doesn't mean you're invulnerable. The reason the definition was changed is that ignorant hacks assumed immunity to mean invulnerability. In fact 100% protection hasn't been achieved by most vaccines. Polio needed 4 rounds to get 99%-100%. They settled with 2 shots for near 100% protection on purpose: it's good enough. Have you ever received a single day of formal medical training?
Can you also explain why you chose to use the VAERS reported deaths as of Jan 5 2021, which is 9623 or (D) in your equation. As of 2022, the VAERS reported deaths is over 21,000. Assuming other variables in your equation don't change much, wouldn't your equation suggest that over 800K people have died from the vaccine, which is almost as many as those who died from COVID in the US? Or maybe its not a linear relationship? Or maybe your equation is fucking bullshit?
The JAMA study that you cited used a cohort where 31% of the recipients of the vaccine had allergy histories and have had prior anaphylaxis. That 31% is much larger than the 5% of the general population who have severe food allergies and 1% of the population with severe drug allergies (also cited by the study). The JAMA study also stated that no one in the study actually died. So my criticisms are that
1) you have not properly established that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy for the rate of death in covid vaccines
2) even if we accepted the premise that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy, you have not used a study with a representative population to establish the baseline from which you derive your URF
Either way, I can't accept your conclusion that the covid vaccine has killed over 150,000 people based on your methodology.
Looking forward to reading the part Ii!
Steve. I agree the vax seems marginally helpful at best and there are way too many deaths from the vaccine, particularly in younger ages where they would have no problem with COVID. However, looking at excess deaths each year doesn't seem to allow the huge numbers you are projecting. small errors become huge when projecting from smaller samples. Vaccines only became available in January so timeline doesn't match up well either.
You keep calling it a "vaccine". It IS NOT a vaccine, by any level of definition
Yes, it is a vaccine. People who claim vaccines need to be 100% effective after 1 shot are 100% idiots that have spent 0 days receiving accredited medical education.
You're a moron... Keep proving it. it's amusing.
The moron is the high-school educated overnight internet medical "expert" beating his chest and telling at scientists that they don't know what a vaccine is. As an ape, you don't even know what a college degree looks like and probably push brooms/do manual labor for a living. Stay in your lane, stop lying about your education, and stop pretending you have the ability to intelligently tell people what a vaccine is.
One can become quite emotional when dealing with what one considers to be an intellectual inferior. One used to be when young. Now being so much older and wiser, one blissfuly transcends all challenges to one's blood pressure and permits other lesser entities to cling to their opinions, no matter how absurd. One tentatively suggests one does the same.
Like I said:😂🤣😂
The intellectual inferior refuses to acknowledge that no vaccine has ever provided a 100% level of immunity. The intellectual inferior also fails to understand that a 1% boost to immunity does count as providing immunity. Prior to the irrelevant CDC definition change the intellectual inferiors like to stupidly point at, the WHO stated "NO SINGLE VACCINE PROVIDES 100% PROTECTION" (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-do-vaccines-work - Dec 2020). By the intellectual inferior's own logic, no vaccine has ever been a vaccine. One wonders why and when the intellectual inferiors deemed themselves the arbiters of whether vaccines have ever existed, and when/if they will use their authority to strike the term vaccine from our vocabulary.
Thank you!
https://rumble.com/vrxlt4-govt.-data-reveals-over-946k-people-suffered-injuries-or-death-from-covid-1.html
New spin being banded in UK !
1.3million people have long covid now! Wonder whether that started before or after being vaccinated or whether these are just the unvaccinated after being infected. 🤔🤫
The result... Doctors are purposefully ignorant killers which cannot be trusted, and are too risky to use beyond life and death emergencies. 2021 will be remembered as moment self doctoring took over.
Absolutely! Before 2021, I was seeing doctors and specialists several times a month, and was on numerous prescription medications. After having neck surgery in December 2020- when they started talking about these death jabs and all the "doctors" were forcing me to wear a mask- I decided that the best decision for my child and myself would be to stop going to the doctors all together and use homeopathic remedies for any ailments my family contracted. And I did just that. I quit all meds cold turkey just 2 weeks after major neck surgery. Never went for a follow up after neck surgery. I treat my pain and anxiety with herbs and teas. I keep my daughter's and my immune systems strong with vitamins, healthy fresh foods, and exercise & sunshine/fresh air. My daughter's father got the China flu in February 2021 and I took care of him. He was better in about 10 days, I had to force him to take the vitamins and drink water and go outside. He doesn't generally take vitamins or eat healthy;He also has no diagnosed illnesses. I cought the China flu from him and felt a little worse than usual for about 2 days. I have several diagnosed ailments (RA, OA, Fibro, Spondylitis) which I now treat with natural remedies. And as aforementioned- I eat healthy and take plenty of vitamins. My life is so much better without the doctors and the prescription medications. I am nicer/less agitated. And the tea that I drink for my pain works better than any of those strong pain meds they had me on. And I have more money to spend on my Princess since I'm not paying for doctor visits and medications.
That kind of attitude doesn't do too much harm either. Unfortunately as we age, our bodies are less able to resist the onslaught of simply living. The cells become clogged, defects occur in reproduction of new cells and no matter what natural materials are employed, we cannot escape the inevitable. I would wish to expire in my sleep still in reasonable health but will probably go kicking and screaming!
I am a nurse and submitted a VAERS report and taught a PA in my ER how to use the system as well. Easier to use the PDF download method so your session doesn't timeout, if anyone would like to know. I don't know any doctors that use it (but I know many that blindly blame the unvaccinated for our hospital being overwhelmed, never mind the nursing shortage and vaccine injuries)
If the actual # of US vaccine deaths is 300,000, and 230mil have been vaccinated, it's killing approx 1/750 people....and that's just within 30 days I believe. We need different data sources to see additional adverse events and deaths over a 1-year, 2-year period, etc
There is a typo in your link in the section starting with: “Why the huge spike in adverse events including death? Is it just overreporting? Now let’s look at the numbers from Openvars.com ”
Should be Openvaers.com
Injury doesn't look "rare" to me;-) Their "safe" slogan is supported only by their false "rare" slogan. But we can trust their slogan-science...we don't need accurate NUMBERS.
I think number 4 needs to be Jan 5, 2022, not 2021.