The JAMA study that you cited used a cohort where 31% of the recipients of the vaccine had allergy histories and have had prior anaphylaxis. That 31% is much larger than the 5% of the general population who have severe food allergies and 1% of the population with severe drug allergies (also cited by the study). The JAMA study also stated…
The JAMA study that you cited used a cohort where 31% of the recipients of the vaccine had allergy histories and have had prior anaphylaxis. That 31% is much larger than the 5% of the general population who have severe food allergies and 1% of the population with severe drug allergies (also cited by the study). The JAMA study also stated that no one in the study actually died. So my criticisms are that
1) you have not properly established that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy for the rate of death in covid vaccines
2) even if we accepted the premise that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy, you have not used a study with a representative population to establish the baseline from which you derive your URF
Either way, I can't accept your conclusion that the covid vaccine has killed over 150,000 people based on your methodology.
The JAMA study that you cited used a cohort where 31% of the recipients of the vaccine had allergy histories and have had prior anaphylaxis. That 31% is much larger than the 5% of the general population who have severe food allergies and 1% of the population with severe drug allergies (also cited by the study). The JAMA study also stated that no one in the study actually died. So my criticisms are that
1) you have not properly established that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy for the rate of death in covid vaccines
2) even if we accepted the premise that the rate of anaphylaxis is a relevant proxy, you have not used a study with a representative population to establish the baseline from which you derive your URF
Either way, I can't accept your conclusion that the covid vaccine has killed over 150,000 people based on your methodology.