The intellectual inferior refuses to acknowledge that no vaccine has ever provided a 100% level of immunity. The intellectual inferior also fails to understand that a 1% boost to immunity does count as providing immunity. Prior to the irrelevant CDC definition change the intellectual inferiors like to stupidly point at, the WHO stated "N…
The intellectual inferior refuses to acknowledge that no vaccine has ever provided a 100% level of immunity. The intellectual inferior also fails to understand that a 1% boost to immunity does count as providing immunity. Prior to the irrelevant CDC definition change the intellectual inferiors like to stupidly point at, the WHO stated "NO SINGLE VACCINE PROVIDES 100% PROTECTION" (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-do-vaccines-work - Dec 2020). By the intellectual inferior's own logic, no vaccine has ever been a vaccine. One wonders why and when the intellectual inferiors deemed themselves the arbiters of whether vaccines have ever existed, and when/if they will use their authority to strike the term vaccine from our vocabulary.
The intellectual inferior refuses to acknowledge that no vaccine has ever provided a 100% level of immunity. The intellectual inferior also fails to understand that a 1% boost to immunity does count as providing immunity. Prior to the irrelevant CDC definition change the intellectual inferiors like to stupidly point at, the WHO stated "NO SINGLE VACCINE PROVIDES 100% PROTECTION" (https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/how-do-vaccines-work - Dec 2020). By the intellectual inferior's own logic, no vaccine has ever been a vaccine. One wonders why and when the intellectual inferiors deemed themselves the arbiters of whether vaccines have ever existed, and when/if they will use their authority to strike the term vaccine from our vocabulary.