How to contact me
Here's how you can respond to a request I made, bet me, debate me (or my colleagues), have a media request, purchase a zoom call with me, etc.
Contact requests
There are two ways to contact me:
Use this form if you are responding to a specific request I’ve made in my Substack or Twitter post such as a debate challenge or help that I’ve expressly requested.
If you want to book my time and ask me anything (including whether viruses exist) and get instant answers in an interactive Zoom call, use this link. You can purchase anywhere from 15 minutes to 2 hours by changing the quantity. After your purchase, you’ll be able to immediately book a mutually agreeable time slot by following the instructions. You control how the time is used so you can interrupt me at any time.
The paid link is meant for serious discussions.
You will need to be respectful at all times; I reserve the right to terminate the call if you are not. The point of this is to show that I’m not hiding from questions from anyone. If you’re willing to compensate me for my time, I’m perfectly happy to answer any questions. Now wouldn’t it be great if people on the pro-vax side of the debate were open to doing the same thing I am? But they aren’t and that’s the problem.
My consulting rate is currently set at $500 for 15 minutes. The price is set high enough to discourage people from using this method to waste my time and high enough that I don’t spend all day long in these calls.
And I’d be absolutely delighted to pay the exact same rate to any prominent “pro narrative” people to buy their time to defend the narrative.
I challenge any of them to make a similar offer as I am making here.
Debunk me
See this article for how to debunk anything I’ve written about.
Debate me 1:1
See this article if you’d like to challenge me in a live 1-1 debate for how to post your challenge.
Simple rules.
To qualify, you must have a real name, an h-index of 7 or higher, at least 1,000 followers, and a topic you want to challenge me on.
I meet the requirements.
You can see the people who challenged me here.
It was first posted on Jun 11 and as of July 3, 2023, there have been no takers.
Debate us (request a formal group debate)
See this article if you’d like to challenge us in a formal debate.
You can see the acceptances here.
The article was posted May 12, 2023 and as of July 3, 2023, there have been no takers.
Bet against me (side-bet form)
Use this form to bet against me ($25,000 or more). You can make big money quickly by proving I’m wrong.
You can also see a list of all of the people who are willing to wager against me here.
Hey Steve, a subscriber and fan here.
I know you support artists like Five Times August, I'm certain you'd appreciate my music, very similar (in theme), I'd love to know what you think (and here's a secret link and password for anybody who comes across this, you can hear my latest collection, 20 original tunes, here:
https://www.BradBorch.com/superspreader — password:superspreader
"You Make Me Sick"
You lie about this big infection
With censorship and misdirection
Now you're pushing this injection
A dirty trick
You make me sick
Dear Steve,
I very much appreciate all your work! Thanks a lot!
Like you, my husband and I wonder what it was when we got sick. I notice that it seems that now it is almost forbidden to just get sick. As soon as something happens, people get tested, put masks on, etc. When I was a teacher, I was obliged to work when I was sick. No question asked. What a change…
I live in Switzerland, speak German and French, and I am therefore able to get information from other sources. I read for instance “Le débat interdit” (= the forbidden debate) by Ariane Bilerhan and Vincent Pavan, and I follow on Telegram the chanel “Corona-Fakten”, as well as the one of Philippe Kruse, a Swiss layer. They both advocate for the non-existence of viruses, at least the Covid one.
Obviously, the virus was never isolated, it was officially admitted in a rather strange way by our Swiss health authorities, as it is now also by the FDA. The official answers are available on both channels I mentioned. And not only the Swiss ones, but the ansers from an incredible number of countries around the world, which all say “no, we have not isolated the virus”.
We, rather rational people, especially my husband, followed very carefully an interview with Dr Tom Cowan, and intrigued, also read his book” Breaking the spell”. I understood that the result of the hypothesis he defends changes the way one understands “health”, say in a way that has NOTHING to do with what the “modern” rational world of medicine “offers”. Humans are seen now as pure “biological entities” with no spirit.
I never questioned what my doctors told me, for instance to take a flu shot and a pneumovax shot because I lost my spleen, I was never confronted with any form of real consent, I never got any form of explanation about the efficiency (maximum 17% for the flu, and 8% for the pneumovax) and the benefit/risk of the shots. I learnt recently that there has been no such analysis although even professors think there were studies and mention the supposed benefit/risk in interviews. I also learned in this terrible period that the history of the “modern" medicine is in fact, since the beginning, full of fraud and corruption. The Flexner report (1910) concluded that “modern” medicine is far superior to what existed before. Who paid Flexner? The Rockefellers whose interests were to sell the new products.
Vincent Pavan, a brilliant mathematician who is researcher in France, demonstrates that the concept of “herd immunity” is mathematically wrong. Nobody except him has ever checked the concept. He also shows how the Institut Pasteur itself has published on its site a study full of basic mathematical errors which was used by the French government to justify the lockdowns. Among the authors: a student of Ferguson.
Ariane Bilerhan, a brilliant clinical psychologist, and doctor in psychopathology, specialized in paranoia, perversion, harassment, and manipulations, explains how paranoia delusion is extremely contagious, and therefore very dangerous. She points out how the perpetual incantations we got since the beginning of the “plandemic” work to sow fear. However, fear can make people sick.
As my husband and I were more and more intrigued and tried to understand more about how without a virus a contagion could happen, and of course also what we had when we were supposed to have Covid (tested by the infamous PCR test…), my husband found a very interesting article from 1985, which mentions cases of contaminations which were pure products of a fantasy. Such fantasies were necessary though. People worked for instance in a socially toxic environment where they were harassed and needed to escape, as well as a scapegoat (escape / scape!). A supposed virus was perfect for this purpose.
https://virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/csfantasy.htm
I further came across Dr Hamer (Germany) who gives also interesting explanations about why people get sick. They are based on how our minds work (he gives examples).
As one can also operate people’s hart without an anesthetic, only under hypnosis (it does not work for everyone), I think one can be sure that our minds have a life which has not yet been understood fully. Mathias Desmet explains mass hypnosis very convincingly, even if his book has recently been criticized, in my opinion not rightly.
I had the chance to follow people treated in an ethnopsychiatric clinic. What was said there in the sessions I followed was astonishing: spirits, djinns from the underworld were mentioned. They were addressed to help patients to recover, and it worked. In many places around the world, one asks when somebody is sick or dies, if something wrong had been done. This is in relation with social links which are damaged.
Fraud seems to be as old as the „modern“medicine. Of course, it only went worse from one year to the other. The book by Peter C. Gøtzsche “Deadly Medicine and Organized Crime. How big pharma has corrupted healthcare - 2013) shows a disastrous situation which dates from far before Covid.
Why should the theory of the existence of a virus be more solid than all the other fraudulent studies and affirmations we discover openly since the start of the “plandemic”? The thing is: nobody usually questions former studies once they have been approved by an official procedure/journal. One knows how this works… It is like the attribution of a work of art newly discovered: a panel of specialists must give their benediction to attribute it to a certain artist. A lot of strange things happen there too.
Studies are based one on the other and so on. If the first one is a fraud, then the rest too goes wrong.
For the virology, if one assumes that something similar happened, then one faces a big problem! What will virologists and doctors become? Already doctors cannot recognize that their injections went against their oat “primum non nocere”. An excellent article by Xavier Bazin, who owns France Soir, and has invited very quickly all the good people, you included, to inform the population (he belongs of course to the “complotistes”), shows that already in the middle of the 19th Century it was impossible for doctors to recognize they were wrong, even when all the proves were shown and everyone agreed. The nonexistence of a virus is certainly purely unthinkable as so much has been studied with the certitude that a virus exists. As by the way it is unthinkable for a Swiss to admit that the Swiss government has cheated on its citizens. Most of the Swiss say that the government has done rather well… not even seeing that the Who, Gavi, the WEF are based in Switzerland and have necessarily an influence of the government… Just because Switzerland has done well up to now and that the Swiss have always had a very good opinion about themselves…
https://www.covidhub.ch/pourquoi-les-medecins-ont-tant-de-mal-a-voir-et-signaler-les-accidents-vaccinaux/
Therefore, my hypothesis is that the scientists who avoid the debate know that such a debate is impossible because the nonexistence of the virus is unthinkable. It seems that even at the Corona Ausschuss, a favorable environment for open debates, where you also were invited to expose your findings, these people seem to have encountered difficulties to debate, although Dr Reiner Füllmich seems to think it is very much possible that a virus does not exist. I have not seen the session and may be such a hypothesis is so unthinkable for doctors that it created some sort of nervosity which was then interpreted by the debaters in the wrong way.
Questions I have: what is the history of virology? What is its function, when did it start, how, and what purpose does it serve in “modern” medicine? What is the history of bioethics? The people here in Switzerland who speak from this point of view are just the opposite of what they claim to be. Is it used as a cover, like philanthropy can be? Was it introduced for this purpose? The WEF is full of people who want only the best for the planet, all their discourses and videos sound very fine…
As we now live in a world not far from what 1984 describes, I am inclined to follow the most bizarre affirmations and wait to see where they lead. Some very strange ones already have proven to be correct. Moreover, one should never forget that some things can be so unthinkable that it is not even possible to have a normal debate about them.