Dr. Byram Bridle's lawsuit is now public. Notice of arrest issued for Professor Glen Pyle.
It's a great read on how scientific discourse should be done in 2021 and beyond. A model for all other institutions to follow about how to properly respond to those whose views you disagree with.
Dr. Byram Bridle’s lawsuit is now in the public domain for all to see.
The complaint is 73 pages long. This updated link is searchable.
Glen Pyle, David Fisman, and others are mentioned. I’ve mentioned both of these people in prior Substacks: (See my Pyle and Fisman articles for more about them).
Check out paragraph 193
See page number 59 for paragraph 193.
This is how police intimidation works (police intimidating other police). Suffice it to say, the notification of arrest for Professor Glen Pyle is still pending and was not withdrawn.
The fact that the university would be involved in obstruction of justice is troubling, to say the least.
Summary
More later, but I wanted to let you know as soon as the complaint was made public. It’s a great read.
Also, if you aren’t yet a paid subscriber and appreciate the work I do here, hit this link. It helps support the work we do and it supports Substack as well which is critically important since other platforms censor articles like this (I’m banned for life on Medium for example). Thanks!
Please share
Be sure to smash that Share button and share to all your platforms including Facebook, etc. A lawsuit is not misinformation.
if someone wants to make a list of the key paragraphs, just reply to this that you will do it. When done, post it here or use contact me link. that way, only one person has to do it.
so for example, you'd create lines like this:
193. Notice of arrest issued for Professor Glen Pyle. University tries to intimidate police.
This would save me a lot of time and I will give you full credit in the body of the article. Plus, what a great public service!
Thank you Steve for highlighting this. I can't believe what Dr. Bridle is going through. It's appalling treatment from his employer and scientific colleagues, who seem to be okay with him being on the receiving end of censorship, slurs, etc.
Whoever owns the website has the registrant in Reykjavik with the name and contact details "redacted for privacy"...isn't that ironic? They want privacy but are perfectly okay with tearing down a good man. I can't believe that site is still not down.