Vaccines are riskier than getting COVID
Vaccines are riskier than getting COVID
The cure is worse than the disease. Seneff and Dopp provide Independent confirmation of what I've been saying that the vaccines are nonsensical and mandating a nonsensical vaccine is even worse.
I just got a new paper from Stephanie Seneff and Kathy Dopp.
Others have analyzed it here: Joel Hirschhorn and Penny Butler.
From the abstract:
As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated person is at risk of a COVID-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk.
You can read the full paper here.
It’s not published in a peer reviewed journal since it doesn’t support the narrative, but I get over 150,000 views on most of my articles, so please let us know in the comments if you find any errors.
What an under-statement.. with graphene, AIDS, nano-bots, parasites and spike proteins identified in the 4 mRNA, un-labelled injections.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, Never More Brilliant, Lays The Utter Truth Out -Autopsies Prove Vax BioWeapon Caused Autoimmune Attacks And Death. (Based on 70 autopsies done by Germany's top pathologist, Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt).
Video: Graphene Oxide: A Toxic Substance in the Vial of the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine? By Ricardo Delgado and Prof Michel Chossudovsky Global Research, January 19, 2022.
Austrian graphene Research Scientist/Med. Dr. Andreas Noack was MURDERED after he released his evidence of graphene in the 4 mRNA injections, and describing it as ''razor blades in the blood that will kill all who get it''.
Brighteon. Dr. Jane Ruby Show. On today’s episode of the Dr. Jane Ruby Show, Dr. Jane reveals the incredible evidence flowing in on the emerging cancer diagnoses in the jabbed, now overwhelmed by the exploding cancers in the boosted. 2.15.22.
I always like hearing from the other side of the argument so I brought up the paper in FB vaccine Talk group. Discrediting the source is the usual go to ..
here's part of the conversation after we had been discussing NNT calculation method etc ..
-------------------------
VT(Vaccine Talk member): Apologies I will try to find the source I meant which discusses why NNTV is something of a moving target because it depends on the prevalence of the disease. In any case, Seneff is not an epidemiologist, virologist, vaccine researcher, or infectious disease expert. She's an antivaxx computer scientist with a very long track record of misrepresenting data. The odds that she of all people is suddenly right about this when thousands of other experts are wrong are extraordinarily slim. https://respectfulinsolence.com/.../seneff-blaming.../
ME: sounds to me like she is just posing a question "I cannot claim to have proven that glyphosate is causing the weakened immune system and lung damage that sets up a susceptibility to an acute response to COVID-19. Science is a process of inquiry and we must keep inquiring. However, the circumstantial evidence is compelling and more research is needed."
VT: "Just asking questions" is a well-known tactic to spread misinformation in the guise of innocent enquiry. https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions
--------------------------------------------------------
Seriously, I don't even know how to respond to that, lol. So no more asking questions, people!