We'd like to talk to her about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, masks, and early treatments, but it seems like she does not want to be questioned live on anything she says. I wonder why?
I've read the remarks below Steve and cannot add to them. I reckon she's been paid by Big pharma to follow the narrative. She probably doesn't give a toss about parents kids, she's only here to make the money. That's why you have to pay to ask her questions. As my late mom used to say, don't judge a book by it's cover. The smiling face is not what it appears to be. She's been bought.
I don’t think she really has a thorough understanding of the current situation/data. She just parrots what ‘official’ sources disseminate. I would suggest it isn’t worth your time to debate her.
I can’t stand her substack . Does she get paid by big pharma ? I can’t believe the comments of parents , some anxiously awaiting their young healthy child to get a jab they don’t need and willing to even lie about the age to get it. Sick covid cult
Steve I am wondering if there is data to support that vaccinated actually have a greater chance of getting COVID and/or actually having a worse symptomatic response? It seems that in the last two weeks I’ve heard of a lot of COVID cases and all of them are in the triple vaxxed friend group—but my unvaccinated acquaintances thus far have not been getting the virus and/or show lesser symptoms than their vaxxed partners…. Thank you!
Dec 18, 2021·edited Dec 18, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch
Two possibilities, and this is true of all academics and authorities that peddle the same narrative. One is that she (they) is (are) aware of all she does not know and doesn't want to be called out. The other is that she is so certain that she is right that anyone who challenges her position must be misinformed or brainwashed; she is therefore unwilling to waste her precious time and energy engaging. The former is indicative of a much greater understanding of the science. One year ago I would have guessed that that were the case. These days I would bet on the latter. Folks like her have doubled down so many times that they have forgotten about the assumptions, inherent error and shortcomings of the methodology behind the studies that support their foundational opinions. To make matters worse they are surrounded by group think that not only reflects their scientific position but also validates their idea that all who disagree must be completely out to lunch.
Her page is literally the bane of my existence (and why I started mine on fb, which is thoroughly shadowbanned). I've had so many people say "well, you're an epidemiologist, but this other page says this other scary thing, so I'm going to listen to her". Even though everything I post on my page is thoroughly cited with actual data, literature, and occasionally a really cool substack like this one, or Aaron Kheriaty, or maybe some epidemiologists on twitter.
Dec 18, 2021·edited Dec 19, 2021Liked by Steve Kirsch
I picked one post at random and the comments broke my heart. A whole bunch of women clamoring to get their infants and toddlers jabbed. I can't even....
May I suggest if you want to comment on YLE, you pose as a "big fan" of her work and suggest it is important to expose misinformation purveyors such as Kirsch and his groupies. Why not challenge him and his team to a debate and expose their misinformation??? Otherwise, you'll get attacked by her minions.
“The antibody response after boosting is fundamentally different than it was before. It's not just raising the level of the existing antibodies, it's doing a lot more than that. Calling the third shot a booster is oversimplifying.”
This was a vague part of her last post from a “study” from a “lab”. I could not access.
I just paid $50 to be able to comment but need some time to ask.
The questions on her posts make me sad. “Do fully vaccinated adults need to wear masks and distance outdoors if it’s so transmissible?” Just fucking sad.
We need strategy to skillfully interact.with her supporters.we must focus on how we can manage virus practically and why freedom is important...we needs great minds coming forward in this group..like yesterday
I will be pleasantly astonished if you succeed in securing an honest debate with the vaccine orthodoxy, much less change their minds. Too many careers and too much money are at stake. My humble suggestion is that they must be disrupted Silicon Valley style.
I've read the remarks below Steve and cannot add to them. I reckon she's been paid by Big pharma to follow the narrative. She probably doesn't give a toss about parents kids, she's only here to make the money. That's why you have to pay to ask her questions. As my late mom used to say, don't judge a book by it's cover. The smiling face is not what it appears to be. She's been bought.
I don’t think she really has a thorough understanding of the current situation/data. She just parrots what ‘official’ sources disseminate. I would suggest it isn’t worth your time to debate her.
Her latest post is really indicative:
https://yourlocalepidemiologist.substack.com/p/why-did-the-pfizer-young-kids-trial
I can’t stand her substack . Does she get paid by big pharma ? I can’t believe the comments of parents , some anxiously awaiting their young healthy child to get a jab they don’t need and willing to even lie about the age to get it. Sick covid cult
Steve I am wondering if there is data to support that vaccinated actually have a greater chance of getting COVID and/or actually having a worse symptomatic response? It seems that in the last two weeks I’ve heard of a lot of COVID cases and all of them are in the triple vaxxed friend group—but my unvaccinated acquaintances thus far have not been getting the virus and/or show lesser symptoms than their vaxxed partners…. Thank you!
Two possibilities, and this is true of all academics and authorities that peddle the same narrative. One is that she (they) is (are) aware of all she does not know and doesn't want to be called out. The other is that she is so certain that she is right that anyone who challenges her position must be misinformed or brainwashed; she is therefore unwilling to waste her precious time and energy engaging. The former is indicative of a much greater understanding of the science. One year ago I would have guessed that that were the case. These days I would bet on the latter. Folks like her have doubled down so many times that they have forgotten about the assumptions, inherent error and shortcomings of the methodology behind the studies that support their foundational opinions. To make matters worse they are surrounded by group think that not only reflects their scientific position but also validates their idea that all who disagree must be completely out to lunch.
Keep at it Steve. Great work you are doing.
An excellent summary of the science that shows masks don't work: https://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/
Her page is literally the bane of my existence (and why I started mine on fb, which is thoroughly shadowbanned). I've had so many people say "well, you're an epidemiologist, but this other page says this other scary thing, so I'm going to listen to her". Even though everything I post on my page is thoroughly cited with actual data, literature, and occasionally a really cool substack like this one, or Aaron Kheriaty, or maybe some epidemiologists on twitter.
I picked one post at random and the comments broke my heart. A whole bunch of women clamoring to get their infants and toddlers jabbed. I can't even....
Smart move by her, putting the ability to comment behind a paywall. This way she keeps her comment section "clean" and even makes $ doing it...
May I suggest if you want to comment on YLE, you pose as a "big fan" of her work and suggest it is important to expose misinformation purveyors such as Kirsch and his groupies. Why not challenge him and his team to a debate and expose their misinformation??? Otherwise, you'll get attacked by her minions.
Need to pay to comment ... won't do that so won't be able to bombard her with facts like Eric
“The antibody response after boosting is fundamentally different than it was before. It's not just raising the level of the existing antibodies, it's doing a lot more than that. Calling the third shot a booster is oversimplifying.”
This was a vague part of her last post from a “study” from a “lab”. I could not access.
This sounds like some serious horseshit.
I just paid $50 to be able to comment but need some time to ask.
The questions on her posts make me sad. “Do fully vaccinated adults need to wear masks and distance outdoors if it’s so transmissible?” Just fucking sad.
We need strategy to skillfully interact.with her supporters.we must focus on how we can manage virus practically and why freedom is important...we needs great minds coming forward in this group..like yesterday
..
None of the corrupt bloggers pushing the mandate want to discuss the science. They get paid for pushing the Big Lie.
I will be pleasantly astonished if you succeed in securing an honest debate with the vaccine orthodoxy, much less change their minds. Too many careers and too much money are at stake. My humble suggestion is that they must be disrupted Silicon Valley style.