I have to agree. If the pharmaceutical companies suddenly needed to manufacture billions of doses of their new wonder drugs, where did they manufacture them? Why weren't loads of new facilities built? Where was the huge recruitment campaign to employ all these newly required workers?
Whether that is true or not the points ^ above are what -everyone- in the first world had access to - either before the injection was unleashed on the public or shortly thereafter with the release of the Pfizer trial adverse event data - and yet they still eagerly lined up and took it in droves.
The problems associated with the COVID injections were as clear as day, easily accessible, self-evident, went against any and all rational thought, could not stand up to ANY scrutiny, and yet it still didn't_matter.
Everyone also had full evidence that Bldg 7 was rigged with demolition charges and therefore 911 was an inside job. They still signed up to fund killing "rag heads" with their tax dollars and enlistment. We're a nation of well propagandized lemmings.
oh yeah? I read in The New Yorker about the process: the floors of the towers were each 3 feet thick concrete, so when the metal beams softened down came a cascade of 3', 6', 9'...21', etc of concrete.
it is nonsense that a planted bomb caused that level of destruction; it was the burning jet fuel melting the metal.
you say no? well, a week after the event a crane pulled up an I-bar from below ground wreckage which was still glowing red. a week later! you say some stack of dynamite caused that level of heat?
I heard someone of your opinion point to the burning furniture and bedding in the adjacent building, but when things get hot enough they burst into flames.
I can only recommend multiple sources when trying to get at the truth of something. you won't find many people agreeing that the attack was a false flag operation and that the Arabs were not involved.
Jet Fuel is kerosene...and the danger with that is all the coleman lanterns that melt and collaspe from jet fuel/kerosene at campsites all over the world.
and the week later the glowing red molten steel was not from kerosene.
Kerosene will not melt steel to that degree.
People have speculated what it may be, no one knows for sure because we are not privvy to the secrecy of the USA Government but it seems as though there was in fact molten steel one week later.
I have heard people say a small nuke, thermite, energy weapons...etc...etc... who knows for sure what caused molten steel to persist a week after the initial attack..
The only thing that is for sure is the official timeline can easily be impugned...does this mean inside job....not necessarily but with all that has come out in the past 22 years I simply cannot conclude that 19 Middle Eastern Men Hijacking planes crashing into buildings is legit. It is not, the story simply does not hold weight.
Who benefitted from crashing planes into buildings?
Certainly not Muslims, Middle Easteners, bin Laden, Taliban...etc....etc..... They were warred upon and cut off from the rest of the world, thus there was no benefit to them....but in america 9/11 just like covid means $$$$$$$$ and greedy people rush in to fill the void to help complete the faux covid narratives that have been planned, constructed and funded into place years before..... and 9/11 was no different as is all the wars....they are more likely to be orchestrated then just happenstance.
but what about James Woods' experience one week before? he says he took that flight and sitting near him were four Arab types motionless, expressionless and wordless...apparently in rehearsal.
benefit to Moslems? they have a cult of death, you know. they see 76 virgins for them to despoil in heaven as a benefit, apparently.
at this point I take my limited knowledge and exit stage right.
I highly doubt it, this is a perception americans in the USA have.
I am sure if the USA government did not have a policy on foreign intervention and have never committed one middle eastern coup nor involved the USA in the affairs of others who did not invite them to do so we would not have such a notion or narrative about muslims/islam/arabs.
Yes I remember the James Woods incident. It was part of the barrage of info soon after the attacks. With that said James Woods is Hollywood, he is an actor and I have learned since that time I trust nothing Hollywood or Strangers that Tell A Vision.....quickest way to be decieved is to allow this crap to 'ENTER your mind (MENT) and conTAIN it.
there are two worlds to Moslems: dar al Islam, meaning Land of Peace, meaning every country run by Moslems.
then there is dar al Harb, which is Land of War, meaning every country not ruled by Moslems.
Wahab's 'Moslem Reformation' in the early 1720s made Islam much more anti-West and called for Mohammad's murderous approach to spreading Islam.
they'll sit in your living room and raid your refrigerator, because they think they're superior. the radicals think they'll have 72 virgins waiting their childish pleasure in heaven if they die killing you or me.
have you read Gertrude Bell's biography? I have. she was so respected by Arabs she was welcome in every tent and was honored with a nickname indicating she was a man. she gave advice on tribal rivalries to T.E. Lawrence.
have you read about efforts to put a railroad into north Africa in the late 1880s? I have. the Arabs in numerous cases smiled so warmly and said words of such friendliness...only to attack and kill the whites with no warning at the right moment, or leave them to die of exposure with poison food and water. real fun.
you are sadly a typical naive American if you think Islam is benign. how many dippy people know a friendly falafel cook and can't imagine the murderous goals espoused by the Koran?
if over 50% of them say sometimes bombing children is justified, how sure are you that you understand them?
oh-James Woods is brilliant; he's not a mouth-breathing deadhead like so many celebrities.
anyway, your belief that they'd be happy if we hadn't done this or that is wrong, and smacks of leftist nonsense like 'walls don't work,' and 'torture doesn't work' and 'America's the bad guy.'
Moslems aren't good Christians.
thanks for the civil exchange. I've said my two cents worth.
Well I would be more in fear of the parasitic 1% of the 1% than i am any Muslim.
Fact is no entity in the history of mankind has killed more people, destroyed more lives than the USA Government who is bankrolled by the 1 % of the 1%.
After WWII the USA was on good terms with all muslim countries, it certainly was not like it is now.
It was not until the Brits asked the USA help for overthrowing Mohammed Mossadegh the FIRST democratically elected leader in the history of IRAN in 1953 that things became unglued. Up to that point the USA/america was not in the eye of the so called radical middle easteners. Lets not forget the Brutal Shah was installed...and when iranians could no longer tolerate the Shah they rose up, the Shah got the heck out of Iran so the revolutionairies turned their attention to where the coup in 1953 was planned (US Embassy) and took Hostages.
One other thing.
The CIA knew the revolutionaires were gonna take the Embassy so they forewarned their CIA operatives to leave the embassy but not the common everyday Embassy workers who were left to be paraded and abused for 444 days.
Knowing the historyl i simply cannot blame muslims, 72 virgins...etc...etc.... when i know the crimes of the western government in destabilizing the middle east.
By the way most christians I know are absolute hypocrites.
you think the Shah was bad. you think Christians are hypocrites. you think America is the bad guy.
same ol same ol.
the Arab nomads padded their camels back and forth across the surface of the earth, not knowing or able to utilize the oil beneath their feet. it was a mistake to award them credit for it being 'their' land...the west should have told them to pound sand.
their wealth today is a source of major human ruin; they study life through the prism of the Koran and are thus irrational spunbrains; they treat women like animals; they still believe in slavery...
et cetera: your leftist view is jaundiced. there's an added penny for you, now let us continue our lives without more efforts to enlighten the other guy...anyone who credits Islam and condemns Christianity believes nothing in common we can agree on.
What is the largest singular instance of mass murder in the history of mankind and what was the predominant relgion of the group of people who committed this historical factual largest singular instance of mass murder, killing tens of thousands of innocnet men, women and children in a split second?
When you come up with the answer I predict you will then defend the largest singular instance of mass murder in the history of mankind like a good christian.
Of course I think the Shah was bad...what authoritative figures does zero bad?
Do you like people who do bad things to other people? I don't, in fact there is no degree of 'bad' to me that is acceptable...how about you?
You mean christians deceived into participating in "USURY" "WAR" "PHARMAKEIA" are not hypocrites? Could have fooled me!
Did Jesus not turn over the money changers table (USURY) in the temple mount and get killed for it or am i missing something?
Americans? I never said they were bad. My words were the 'USA Government'
America and the USA Government are not one in the same obviously.
America/Americans existed long before the establishment of the USA Political State in 1789.......right?
Besides an american also includes SOUTH americans and CENTRAL americans....or do you think only USA citizens of the political state are americans?
As for what the arabs not being to utilize the oil beneath their feet and that it was a mistake to award...etc...etc...
I feel like I have heard this story before to some degree....and i have!
Sounds like my lineage (creek tribe) that was forced march by US Troops from southern Georgia and northern Florida swampy homelands to the Oklahoma Dust Bowl (800 Miles) only to get snookered off their land so J Paul Getty and Boys could drill the oil beneath the displaced native tribes feet....right?! same thing....no different.....
That type of mindset is adored by the parasitic class....
You agree with their orchestrated versions of history that are in fact lies and more importantly crimes. This perpetuates the lies and allows the crimes to persist.
Islam treats women like slaves?
I do not think you know what a slave is, because if you did you would realize that YOU TOO (as I) are a Debt "Slave"
I do not care what form the slavery takes, slavery is slavery. You act like you are not a slave...I must laugh.........Either you are 100% free or you are not free! There is no 99% free.....
So what % of freedom do you have Peter?....seriously, answer that question for me!
As far as my leftist view you could not be more wrong.
I do not dwell in the left right paradigm at all...something about the immorality of both sides that I just cannot stomach paying any attention to the left/right idiocy for in the end it leads the people of america to the same place it currently resides....in a shit hole ruled by a few, trillions in debt impossibe to pay off, with a warfare machine scattered all over the earth (700+ Foreign Military Bases) and a welfare machine at home destroying centuries of hard work by our deceased bloodlines......
I credited nothing about Islam. I merely gave you some history with respect to the first of what has been many coups pulled off by the USA Government in the middle east and rather than repudiate, rebuke or impugn what i said about 1953, Iran, Mohhamed Mossadegh, 444 Days, the CIA and the Brits, installing the Shah you attack me. Call me leftist, say my view is jaundiced and then say I credit islam????
These types of attacks and conversation says more about you, your lack of knowledge, history and the ability to control your emotions to the point you have to attack me, assume things you cannot back up and make stuff up out of the thin air as evident by " leftist view is jaundiced"
Come on Peter, be kind...talk, discuss, debate, lets have 'intercourse' not discourse....Ha!
I'd hope it's clear where I got my information, that it all makes perfect sense, and that The New Yorker is famous for its left wing bias (and brilliant writing) so it's hardly some conservative conspiracy or something. I am not conversant with your info, but again, why you guys can't understand extreme ambient heat igniting nearby objects is strange to me.
as we approach the sun, everything around us will burn up, including the most 'flame resistant' materials we've ever made.
Yet a pristine passport of an alleged hijacker was found amidst the rubble. I would imagine paper ignites in super intense heat before concrete and steel. And wouldnтАЩt Building 7 have suffered catastrophic damage nearer this intense heat? Which would likely make the building fail first on the abutting side to the crippled Towers? Yet it fell straight downтАжhmmm. And youтАЩd think Tower 1, struck at a roughly 45 degree angle by a 767, might list and fall toward that angle, but yet fell straight down. Hmmmm.
I've looked at the video you guys suggested, and yes, it is a mystery. I had not heard of the building seven collapse.
again, your comment about the Tower 1 falling to the side when hit ignores my contribution: the concrete floors pounding straight down after jet fuel heat weakened the support metal.
my eyes are opened...but slick presentations do not sway me; they make me raise my guard.
so who planted the explosives? Bush had been president a short time, even master-criminal Bill Clin-ton wouldn't be party to something like that. how is it possible that so many sources were 'aware' that #7 was about to blow?
like the JFK conspiracy nonsense, reverse engineering the event presents an impossibly complicated co-ordinated plan. "Okay. We want to take out building seven. Hmm. I know, let's have two hijacked airliners crash into the big boys to cover our professionally detonated attack on seven! Haw haw. Then we'll lie about it despite the obvious evidence of a loud explosion! We'll get those number seven people for not allowing me to use the men's room!"
The Shots were not RUSHED. They were made before the virus was released to the planet.
Was it released? Or maybe just a toxic spray or pesticide sprayed around. Will we ever know?
I have to agree. If the pharmaceutical companies suddenly needed to manufacture billions of doses of their new wonder drugs, where did they manufacture them? Why weren't loads of new facilities built? Where was the huge recruitment campaign to employ all these newly required workers?
Whether that is true or not the points ^ above are what -everyone- in the first world had access to - either before the injection was unleashed on the public or shortly thereafter with the release of the Pfizer trial adverse event data - and yet they still eagerly lined up and took it in droves.
The problems associated with the COVID injections were as clear as day, easily accessible, self-evident, went against any and all rational thought, could not stand up to ANY scrutiny, and yet it still didn't_matter.
Here is why:
https://tritorch.com/covidhypnosis
Everyone also had full evidence that Bldg 7 was rigged with demolition charges and therefore 911 was an inside job. They still signed up to fund killing "rag heads" with their tax dollars and enlistment. We're a nation of well propagandized lemmings.
oh yeah? I read in The New Yorker about the process: the floors of the towers were each 3 feet thick concrete, so when the metal beams softened down came a cascade of 3', 6', 9'...21', etc of concrete.
it is nonsense that a planted bomb caused that level of destruction; it was the burning jet fuel melting the metal.
you say no? well, a week after the event a crane pulled up an I-bar from below ground wreckage which was still glowing red. a week later! you say some stack of dynamite caused that level of heat?
I heard someone of your opinion point to the burning furniture and bedding in the adjacent building, but when things get hot enough they burst into flames.
I can only recommend multiple sources when trying to get at the truth of something. you won't find many people agreeing that the attack was a false flag operation and that the Arabs were not involved.
Jet Fuel is kerosene...and the danger with that is all the coleman lanterns that melt and collaspe from jet fuel/kerosene at campsites all over the world.
and the week later the glowing red molten steel was not from kerosene.
Kerosene will not melt steel to that degree.
People have speculated what it may be, no one knows for sure because we are not privvy to the secrecy of the USA Government but it seems as though there was in fact molten steel one week later.
I have heard people say a small nuke, thermite, energy weapons...etc...etc... who knows for sure what caused molten steel to persist a week after the initial attack..
The only thing that is for sure is the official timeline can easily be impugned...does this mean inside job....not necessarily but with all that has come out in the past 22 years I simply cannot conclude that 19 Middle Eastern Men Hijacking planes crashing into buildings is legit. It is not, the story simply does not hold weight.
Who benefitted from crashing planes into buildings?
Certainly not Muslims, Middle Easteners, bin Laden, Taliban...etc....etc..... They were warred upon and cut off from the rest of the world, thus there was no benefit to them....but in america 9/11 just like covid means $$$$$$$$ and greedy people rush in to fill the void to help complete the faux covid narratives that have been planned, constructed and funded into place years before..... and 9/11 was no different as is all the wars....they are more likely to be orchestrated then just happenstance.
I'm with you on the kerosene.
but what about James Woods' experience one week before? he says he took that flight and sitting near him were four Arab types motionless, expressionless and wordless...apparently in rehearsal.
benefit to Moslems? they have a cult of death, you know. they see 76 virgins for them to despoil in heaven as a benefit, apparently.
at this point I take my limited knowledge and exit stage right.
Death Cult?
I highly doubt it, this is a perception americans in the USA have.
I am sure if the USA government did not have a policy on foreign intervention and have never committed one middle eastern coup nor involved the USA in the affairs of others who did not invite them to do so we would not have such a notion or narrative about muslims/islam/arabs.
Yes I remember the James Woods incident. It was part of the barrage of info soon after the attacks. With that said James Woods is Hollywood, he is an actor and I have learned since that time I trust nothing Hollywood or Strangers that Tell A Vision.....quickest way to be decieved is to allow this crap to 'ENTER your mind (MENT) and conTAIN it.
there are two worlds to Moslems: dar al Islam, meaning Land of Peace, meaning every country run by Moslems.
then there is dar al Harb, which is Land of War, meaning every country not ruled by Moslems.
Wahab's 'Moslem Reformation' in the early 1720s made Islam much more anti-West and called for Mohammad's murderous approach to spreading Islam.
they'll sit in your living room and raid your refrigerator, because they think they're superior. the radicals think they'll have 72 virgins waiting their childish pleasure in heaven if they die killing you or me.
have you read Gertrude Bell's biography? I have. she was so respected by Arabs she was welcome in every tent and was honored with a nickname indicating she was a man. she gave advice on tribal rivalries to T.E. Lawrence.
have you read about efforts to put a railroad into north Africa in the late 1880s? I have. the Arabs in numerous cases smiled so warmly and said words of such friendliness...only to attack and kill the whites with no warning at the right moment, or leave them to die of exposure with poison food and water. real fun.
you are sadly a typical naive American if you think Islam is benign. how many dippy people know a friendly falafel cook and can't imagine the murderous goals espoused by the Koran?
if over 50% of them say sometimes bombing children is justified, how sure are you that you understand them?
oh-James Woods is brilliant; he's not a mouth-breathing deadhead like so many celebrities.
anyway, your belief that they'd be happy if we hadn't done this or that is wrong, and smacks of leftist nonsense like 'walls don't work,' and 'torture doesn't work' and 'America's the bad guy.'
Moslems aren't good Christians.
thanks for the civil exchange. I've said my two cents worth.
Well I would be more in fear of the parasitic 1% of the 1% than i am any Muslim.
Fact is no entity in the history of mankind has killed more people, destroyed more lives than the USA Government who is bankrolled by the 1 % of the 1%.
After WWII the USA was on good terms with all muslim countries, it certainly was not like it is now.
It was not until the Brits asked the USA help for overthrowing Mohammed Mossadegh the FIRST democratically elected leader in the history of IRAN in 1953 that things became unglued. Up to that point the USA/america was not in the eye of the so called radical middle easteners. Lets not forget the Brutal Shah was installed...and when iranians could no longer tolerate the Shah they rose up, the Shah got the heck out of Iran so the revolutionairies turned their attention to where the coup in 1953 was planned (US Embassy) and took Hostages.
One other thing.
The CIA knew the revolutionaires were gonna take the Embassy so they forewarned their CIA operatives to leave the embassy but not the common everyday Embassy workers who were left to be paraded and abused for 444 days.
Knowing the historyl i simply cannot blame muslims, 72 virgins...etc...etc.... when i know the crimes of the western government in destabilizing the middle east.
By the way most christians I know are absolute hypocrites.
you think the Shah was bad. you think Christians are hypocrites. you think America is the bad guy.
same ol same ol.
the Arab nomads padded their camels back and forth across the surface of the earth, not knowing or able to utilize the oil beneath their feet. it was a mistake to award them credit for it being 'their' land...the west should have told them to pound sand.
their wealth today is a source of major human ruin; they study life through the prism of the Koran and are thus irrational spunbrains; they treat women like animals; they still believe in slavery...
et cetera: your leftist view is jaundiced. there's an added penny for you, now let us continue our lives without more efforts to enlighten the other guy...anyone who credits Islam and condemns Christianity believes nothing in common we can agree on.
Peter I have one more question for you.
What is the largest singular instance of mass murder in the history of mankind and what was the predominant relgion of the group of people who committed this historical factual largest singular instance of mass murder, killing tens of thousands of innocnet men, women and children in a split second?
When you come up with the answer I predict you will then defend the largest singular instance of mass murder in the history of mankind like a good christian.
You mean the Shah was not bad?
So you support the Shah's 26 year reign Peter?
Of course I think the Shah was bad...what authoritative figures does zero bad?
Do you like people who do bad things to other people? I don't, in fact there is no degree of 'bad' to me that is acceptable...how about you?
You mean christians deceived into participating in "USURY" "WAR" "PHARMAKEIA" are not hypocrites? Could have fooled me!
Did Jesus not turn over the money changers table (USURY) in the temple mount and get killed for it or am i missing something?
Americans? I never said they were bad. My words were the 'USA Government'
America and the USA Government are not one in the same obviously.
America/Americans existed long before the establishment of the USA Political State in 1789.......right?
Besides an american also includes SOUTH americans and CENTRAL americans....or do you think only USA citizens of the political state are americans?
As for what the arabs not being to utilize the oil beneath their feet and that it was a mistake to award...etc...etc...
I feel like I have heard this story before to some degree....and i have!
Sounds like my lineage (creek tribe) that was forced march by US Troops from southern Georgia and northern Florida swampy homelands to the Oklahoma Dust Bowl (800 Miles) only to get snookered off their land so J Paul Getty and Boys could drill the oil beneath the displaced native tribes feet....right?! same thing....no different.....
That type of mindset is adored by the parasitic class....
You agree with their orchestrated versions of history that are in fact lies and more importantly crimes. This perpetuates the lies and allows the crimes to persist.
Islam treats women like slaves?
I do not think you know what a slave is, because if you did you would realize that YOU TOO (as I) are a Debt "Slave"
I do not care what form the slavery takes, slavery is slavery. You act like you are not a slave...I must laugh.........Either you are 100% free or you are not free! There is no 99% free.....
So what % of freedom do you have Peter?....seriously, answer that question for me!
As far as my leftist view you could not be more wrong.
I do not dwell in the left right paradigm at all...something about the immorality of both sides that I just cannot stomach paying any attention to the left/right idiocy for in the end it leads the people of america to the same place it currently resides....in a shit hole ruled by a few, trillions in debt impossibe to pay off, with a warfare machine scattered all over the earth (700+ Foreign Military Bases) and a welfare machine at home destroying centuries of hard work by our deceased bloodlines......
I credited nothing about Islam. I merely gave you some history with respect to the first of what has been many coups pulled off by the USA Government in the middle east and rather than repudiate, rebuke or impugn what i said about 1953, Iran, Mohhamed Mossadegh, 444 Days, the CIA and the Brits, installing the Shah you attack me. Call me leftist, say my view is jaundiced and then say I credit islam????
These types of attacks and conversation says more about you, your lack of knowledge, history and the ability to control your emotions to the point you have to attack me, assume things you cannot back up and make stuff up out of the thin air as evident by " leftist view is jaundiced"
Come on Peter, be kind...talk, discuss, debate, lets have 'intercourse' not discourse....Ha!
What are you smokin??
(cough cough) that's immaterial.
I'd hope it's clear where I got my information, that it all makes perfect sense, and that The New Yorker is famous for its left wing bias (and brilliant writing) so it's hardly some conservative conspiracy or something. I am not conversant with your info, but again, why you guys can't understand extreme ambient heat igniting nearby objects is strange to me.
as we approach the sun, everything around us will burn up, including the most 'flame resistant' materials we've ever made.
speaking of which...got a match?
Bldg. 7 was not struck by anything.
everything ignites if the nearby heat is hot enough. the nearby heat was super intense.
Yet a pristine passport of an alleged hijacker was found amidst the rubble. I would imagine paper ignites in super intense heat before concrete and steel. And wouldnтАЩt Building 7 have suffered catastrophic damage nearer this intense heat? Which would likely make the building fail first on the abutting side to the crippled Towers? Yet it fell straight downтАжhmmm. And youтАЩd think Tower 1, struck at a roughly 45 degree angle by a 767, might list and fall toward that angle, but yet fell straight down. Hmmmm.
I've looked at the video you guys suggested, and yes, it is a mystery. I had not heard of the building seven collapse.
again, your comment about the Tower 1 falling to the side when hit ignores my contribution: the concrete floors pounding straight down after jet fuel heat weakened the support metal.
my eyes are opened...but slick presentations do not sway me; they make me raise my guard.
so who planted the explosives? Bush had been president a short time, even master-criminal Bill Clin-ton wouldn't be party to something like that. how is it possible that so many sources were 'aware' that #7 was about to blow?
like the JFK conspiracy nonsense, reverse engineering the event presents an impossibly complicated co-ordinated plan. "Okay. We want to take out building seven. Hmm. I know, let's have two hijacked airliners crash into the big boys to cover our professionally detonated attack on seven! Haw haw. Then we'll lie about it despite the obvious evidence of a loud explosion! We'll get those number seven people for not allowing me to use the men's room!"
thanks, guys, for the eye opener.
You mean you just now became familiar with WTC 7?
Stuck by no plane, collapsed into its on foundation 8 hours after the attacks with only a few small fires on the 5th and 7th floor......
Plant explosives?
How about these guys?
They even admit what they are doing is secret and illegal.... Check it out!
https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/
Jet fuel in bld 7? The 700ft Solomon Building? No plane hit that building.
if something made it hot enough, it would combust.
Not what happened. Here's a great way to get up to speed https://www.ae911truth.org/