Yet a pristine passport of an alleged hijacker was found amidst the rubble. I would imagine paper ignites in super intense heat before concrete and steel. And wouldn’t Building 7 have suffered catastrophic damage nearer this intense heat? Which would likely make the building fail first on the abutting side to the crippled Towers? Yet it fell straight down…hmmm. And you’d think Tower 1, struck at a roughly 45 degree angle by a 767, might list and fall toward that angle, but yet fell straight down. Hmmmm.
I've looked at the video you guys suggested, and yes, it is a mystery. I had not heard of the building seven collapse.
again, your comment about the Tower 1 falling to the side when hit ignores my contribution: the concrete floors pounding straight down after jet fuel heat weakened the support metal.
my eyes are opened...but slick presentations do not sway me; they make me raise my guard.
so who planted the explosives? Bush had been president a short time, even master-criminal Bill Clin-ton wouldn't be party to something like that. how is it possible that so many sources were 'aware' that #7 was about to blow?
like the JFK conspiracy nonsense, reverse engineering the event presents an impossibly complicated co-ordinated plan. "Okay. We want to take out building seven. Hmm. I know, let's have two hijacked airliners crash into the big boys to cover our professionally detonated attack on seven! Haw haw. Then we'll lie about it despite the obvious evidence of a loud explosion! We'll get those number seven people for not allowing me to use the men's room!"
everything ignites if the nearby heat is hot enough. the nearby heat was super intense.
Yet a pristine passport of an alleged hijacker was found amidst the rubble. I would imagine paper ignites in super intense heat before concrete and steel. And wouldn’t Building 7 have suffered catastrophic damage nearer this intense heat? Which would likely make the building fail first on the abutting side to the crippled Towers? Yet it fell straight down…hmmm. And you’d think Tower 1, struck at a roughly 45 degree angle by a 767, might list and fall toward that angle, but yet fell straight down. Hmmmm.
I've looked at the video you guys suggested, and yes, it is a mystery. I had not heard of the building seven collapse.
again, your comment about the Tower 1 falling to the side when hit ignores my contribution: the concrete floors pounding straight down after jet fuel heat weakened the support metal.
my eyes are opened...but slick presentations do not sway me; they make me raise my guard.
so who planted the explosives? Bush had been president a short time, even master-criminal Bill Clin-ton wouldn't be party to something like that. how is it possible that so many sources were 'aware' that #7 was about to blow?
like the JFK conspiracy nonsense, reverse engineering the event presents an impossibly complicated co-ordinated plan. "Okay. We want to take out building seven. Hmm. I know, let's have two hijacked airliners crash into the big boys to cover our professionally detonated attack on seven! Haw haw. Then we'll lie about it despite the obvious evidence of a loud explosion! We'll get those number seven people for not allowing me to use the men's room!"
thanks, guys, for the eye opener.
You mean you just now became familiar with WTC 7?
Stuck by no plane, collapsed into its on foundation 8 hours after the attacks with only a few small fires on the 5th and 7th floor......
Plant explosives?
How about these guys?
They even admit what they are doing is secret and illegal.... Check it out!
https://www.gelitin.net/projects/b-thing/