I offered Professor Anders Hviid $25,000 if he would defend his autism study and supply us with the underlying data he used so we can validate it. He refused! What is he so afraid of? The truth?
An intensely ballyhooed study by Andersson et al., published in Annals of Internal Medicine - a journal of the American College of Physicians, claims to find no association between aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and chronic childhood disorders in Denmark.
The slavish, pharma-funded mainstream media, ever eager to defend industry orthodoxies, have triumphantly hailed this study as proof of aluminum’s safety without even a cursory examination of the study’s fatal deficiencies or the financial conflicts of its authors. But a closer look reveals a study so deeply flawed it functions not as science but as a deceitful propaganda stunt by the pharmaceutical industry.
The architects of this study meticulously designed it not to find harm.
From the outset, Andersson et al. excluded the very children most likely to reveal injuries associated with high exposures to aluminum adjuvants in childhood vaccines.
The exclusion included all children who died before age two, those diagnosed early with respiratory conditions, and an astonishing 34,547 children, 2.8% of the study population, whose vaccination records showed the highest aluminum exposure levels.
These choices suggest an intention to exclude the children at highest risk of harm. The authors, without explanation, deemed these high exposures “implausible,” even though those implausibly high exposures are routine for American children who follow the recommended immunization schedule. At very least, the study findings therefore cannot be generalized to children in the U.S. By systematically stripping the dataset of high-risk individuals, the researchers leave behind a survivor cohort to analyze. The name for this logical fallacy is “healthy subject bias.”
Furthermore, the authors inappropriately treated general practitioner visits before age two as a confounder, without assessing whether these GP visits reflected early aluminum-related illness or were predictive of later diagnoses. This introduced “collider bias”, a distortion that can suppress real associations even to the extent of making aluminum appear protective. It’s like studying whether smoking causes lung cancer while adjusting for coughing or for yellowed fingers, symptoms associated with smoking.
These sleights of hand magnify the potential for allowing the authors to reach their absurd suggestion that higher aluminum exposure is somehow protective against asthma, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. These findings clash with mountains of contrary literature documenting the neurotoxicity of aluminum and its association with autoimmune and allergic diseases. (Daley, et al. 2023) If the medical establishment truly believed these data, they would be recommending aluminum injections to children as a prophylaxis against neurological and autoimmune diseases.
Andersson and his team initially had a zero-exposure cohort within the study group. But instead of evaluating this non-vaccination group separately and treating these children as the control, they lumped these kids into the least-exposed cohort, diluting any signal of harm. More broadly, their analysis assumed a linear dose-response, ignoring evidence from Crépeaux et al. (2017) demonstrating that low doses of aluminum can produce non-linear neurotoxic effects in animal models.
While adjusting for birth year can be appropriate in some study designs to account for secular trends, it is not a neutral act in this case. Aluminum exposure from vaccines increased over time, as did rates of chronic childhood disorders. Yet the authors failed to explore whether this correlation might reflect a causal relationship. They did not test this hypothesis but conveniently avoided doing so through this statistical artifice.
Furthermore, the authors almost exclusively relied on diagnoses from hospital inpatient registers. This gimmick allowed the authors to exclude the vast majority of affected children whose autism and food allergies would most likely be diagnosed and managed outside of hospital settings. This potentially biases the data toward undercounting true cases, particularly among children with milder presentations or less frequent hospital contact.
There were additional problems with this data source. A 2017 analysis by Holt et al. identified substantial misclassification in the Danish National Health Service Registry, the same source used by Andersson et al. to assess vaccine exposure, finding that children’s medical records often documented vaccinations that were absent from the registry. This casts further doubt on the accuracy of exposure classification in the study. In other words, it’s highly likely that many of the children that the authors classified as not receiving aluminum-containing vaccines actually did.
Despite all the deceptive devices the authors used to conceal the signals of harm, Andersson et al.’s own supplementary data are a devastating indictment of aluminum-containing vaccines. These data, which they were forced to publish because of public criticism of their analysis, directly contradict the study’s conclusions. The data show a statistically significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome per 1 mg increase in aluminum exposure among children born between 2007 and 2018. Compared to the moderate exposure group, for every 10,000 children in the highest aluminum exposure cohort, there were 9.7 more cases of neurodevelopmental disorder, 4.5 more cases of autistic disorder, and 8.7 more cases of the broader category of autism spectrum disorder. Yet, the authors gloss over these harms to children by claiming they “did not find evidence” for an increased risk.
To reassure readers that infants’ vaccine aluminum exposure is “well below” an established “minimal risk level,” Andersson et al. cite Mitkus et al. (2011). But that FDA analysis was based on ingested soluble aluminum in adult rodents, making its findings irrelevant to injected particulate aluminum in human infants. To cite this study as proof of safety is scientifically indefensible.
Three of the study’s authors are affiliated with Denmark’s Statens Serum Institut (SSI), a government-owned vaccine company that develops a number of aluminum-containing vaccines. SSI also procures and supplies vaccines for the Danish national vaccination program — a clear institutional conflict, given its role in supporting vaccine manufacturing and promoting vaccine uptake. Yet two of the three authors nevertheless declared no conflicts of interest. The senior author, Anders Hviid, reported funding from sources including the Novo Nordisk Foundation, which is directly linked to the pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk and maintains a substantial investment footprint in the industry. Such affiliations call into question the study’s independence and underscore the need for raising international standards of gold standard science outlined in the Trump administration’s recent executive order requiring transparency, reproducibility, and data sharing.
The study, in fact, offers the opposite of transparency. For example, there is no table showing how many of the children in each aluminum exposure cohort were diagnosed with each outcome. Consequently, there is no way to independently evaluate the calculations made, leaving readers to place faith in the authors’ opaque modeling decisions at the expense of scientific reproducibility.
Finally, the Annals of Internal Medicine failed to share raw data that is essential for transparency and reproducibility. The disclosures on the Andersson study say “owing to data privacy regulations in Denmark, the raw data cannot be shared.”
This study does not just suffer from mere methodological limitations. Its design flaws are defining. The only thing this study proves is the thorough corruption of the scientific journals that publish such garbage-in, garbage-out exercises in statistical manipulation.
The Annals of Internal Medicine should immediately retract this badly flawed study.
Yet studies like Andersson et al. showed they had the data to make this comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, but instead excluded and lumped data that made their insights opaque. These authors squandered an important opportunity to restore trust by animating an international scientific process to develop safer vaccines. By excluding unvaccinated children from meaningful analysis, obscuring raw data, and relying on hidden statistical assumptions, this study exemplifies the kind of institutional obfuscation that continues to erode public trust. What’s needed is not more statistical modeling designed to bury signals of harm, but independent research grounded in full transparency, methodological integrity, and the courage to confront inconvenient truths.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is (the 26'th) Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
can you point me to the reference for the claim that in the raw data, the RR was 1.45? was it in the supplementary material? of which paper? thanks. looks like they indulged in classic p-hacking to find the best adjustments
He doesn't want to debate with you in the same way I don't want to debate whether Greenland exists, or whether the earth is flat with flat earther. Its becuase he is a serious scientist with better things to do.
Really? That is gas lighting on a relatively bizarre scale.
A debate is necessary in every aspect of science, especially when the EVIDENCE proves the psychopathic propagandistic narrative to be entirely false.
Being a "Dr." anymore should be a cause of embarrassment, or at least humility, amongst the 'educated' since the lot of you have been proven to be entirely suspect and not-to-be-believed.
Doctors and pharmacists are now lumped in with lawyers, politicians, tow truck yards, and the FBI.
The ONLY way forward is for 'educated people' to talk these things entirely through, all the evidence honestly put forward for review, allowing the cards to fall where they will.
Dyn-o-mite! I’m carbon dating myself. That’s what everybody said when I was in college. It pre-dates “Awesome.”
I saw Dr. McCullough’s post on the errors in epidemiological data analysis that lead to a conclusion of “no connection” when one is present. How fortuitous that Dr. McCullough took a little vacation from cardiology to lend his expertise to autism studies. It took the so-called pandemic to get us here, but if good comes out of evil, let’s take it!
Dr. Wakefield’s work was seminal. He was way ahead of everybody on the gut-brain connection when he and coworkers isolated the MMR strain of measles in the gut of cognitively impaired children.
His recommendation to split up the MMR doses over time was actually right on target as well. It is one step from caning the product entirely.
Who nominates Nobel Laureats? It’s time for this work ... Wakefield and perhaps two coauthors ... to be recognized for its brilliance, precision and profound importance.
Steve do you know? Who can write up the nomination?
Yesterday I became aware of this story - main actors are the WHO and the Gates Foundation including the ideology of birth control without consent - and it fits to an agenda where "health" means death:
Ethical questions surround vaccine to reduce fertility
"The prestigious journal Nature Medicine, in its February issue reported that the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is to do a clinical trial of a tetanus toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with a pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). *) It is to be studied on 120 women in India.
This “vaccine” against pregnancy was developed by Dr G.P. Talwar in 1972. The idea is to produce antibodies to the pregnancy hormone, such that the women would not be able to carry a normal pregnancy. Women who were pregnant would abort and those not pregnant would be rendered infertile. The report is indeed disturbing. A few months earlier an article entitled “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World” was published by Oller and colleagues in the Open Access Library Journal.
The Oller report described young women in Kenya who were vaccinated with this “Talwar vaccine” on the pretext of preventing maternal and neonatal (baby) tetanus. Many of the samples of the tetanus vaccine that tested positive for hCG was sourced from the Serum Institute of India.
The vaccine programme was promoted by the WHO and the Kenyan government, funded by the Gates Foundation. Mothers-to-be were encouraged to take the vaccine to prevent tetanus in their unborn babies, without being told that the vaccine would prevent the baby from ever being born. ..."
—-
Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug.
"The idea to try to revolutionize birth control came to Gursaran Pran Talwar during a trip in 1972 to the holy city of Varanasi on the banks of the Ganges. There, in the crowded streets, the Indian biochemist bumped into groups of emaciated women herding their large broods of children."
I can answer one of your questions: the researchers went to Denmark because as a socialist country it has a centralized medical registry. In other words, all medical records of all citizens are held in a centralized repository of the state - including records of adoptees, prisoners, and broken families. The result is you can do large population studies there that you can't do anywhere else. The CIA used Denmark to study the inheritability of schizophrenia by looking at the centralized medical records of twins that had been separated.
This is the real issue Steve. Autism and vaccine metals. Metals in vaccines are responsible for almost all disease and the processes of the allopathic system have been purposely set up to hide the danger of metals to human health.
The Melisa test as a bio marker of human health is a great research paper by the inventor of the Melisa test. If used in a certain way it can prove metals in vaccines cause autism.
Covid and the mrna vaccines aren’t the issue here but the distraction.
The real prize for us is the autism debate and the danger of metals to human health
The biggest fear of the pharmaceutical industry is the recognition of the health effects of metals as its what they’ve made all their money off.
Their future plans and profits depend entirely on the role of metals in human health being suppressed. And the allopathic system is set up to hide harm caused by metals and funnel the susceptible in a certain direction.
The work of Prof Vera Stejskal is very important. She developed the Melisa test when she worked at Astra Zeneca. Their factory workers were getting strange symptoms which would completely resolve if they took time off work but world return after being back in the workplace for a while.
Astra Zeneca now use this test regularly on their factory staff. It’s a standardised diagnostic test to see if you are currently suffering from a type 4 allergy to metals.
While Vera passes away in 2017, her daughter Linda still works at Melisa diagnostics. They are experts on biological responses to metals
The face of evil. Anders Hviid has committed one of the biggest crimes against humanity in history. I do wonder what he got paid and whether he still thinks it was worth it.
As a long time US Department of Transportation official you should look at automobile accident data.
Fatalities and injuries due to automobile accidents are going up even though miles driven are down. IMPOSSIBLE!!
Another data set that maybe of interest are the number of groceries being delivered. Where I live in Northern Virginia (NOVA), it must be 20 times what I observed a couple of years ago. I could see a significant increase in groceries delivered due to convenience or technology but nothing explains what I'm seeing now.
So many people lost their jobs during covid that auto repossessions went of scale. For those that could afford them used and new cars went up in price by 30% or more. This is a partial explanation. The other is some people are psycotic and so terrified of covid that they won't leave their homes and have everything delivered.
I know people aren't leaving their homes because deliveries from grocery stores are at least 100 times what they used to be. Steve ought to investigate this also.
A guy called Cliff High invented the term vaxxident. The concept is those that got the covid shot have brain damage and are unable to drive correctly. I know an FAA manager as well. Vaccinated private pilots are having medical missuses causing them to crash.
Did you come across the Shaw study? I am going by memory but he ascertains that AL acts as a fractal inflammagen basically interrupting cellular function from the atomic level, to the molecular, to the cellular, organismal, etc. Aluminum poisons it all.
Dr Offit has the temerity to actually tell physicians that aluminum is a biologically necessary ion! We all know that's BS as proven by Exley. (I have his book thank you). Aluminum has no biological role in any living system on earth.
What really bothers me is that much of the cookware is now aluminum, adding to the enormous burden we are already suffering from.
And they still use Thimerosal even though they lie and say that it's no longer in vaccines. Remember congressman Burton's huge investigation and the Simpsonwood meeting where the ACIP members conspired to hide damning evidence that vaccines cause autism and other neurological issues.
These people are all MONSTERS. If we ever get our country back we should round the members up and throw em in jail.
Next thing we will hear is doctors telling us narcotics and fentanyl are safe and and pose no adverse effects because Narcan and Naloxone are readily available.
Great effort Steve. These emperors are naked - and it is an ugly, ugly sight. This clown is not a 'scientist'. He is a criminal propagandist. Criminal because the stabs do case autism and all sorts of other problems, which are injuring and killing people and he supports it. Criminal because he is paid by Pharma to lie and cook up data. Criminal because he won't share the data - when that happens you know that the 'study' is 100% bullshit. See Rona, Globaloneywarming for more info.
A friend of mine had a beautiful dog, a massive bull masstif. He was such a sweet dog, a teddy bear. He suffered from impromptu seisures and used to sort-of come and ask for help when they started. And eventually one night he had a seisure and died alone at night. I was in charge of him that day and the sadness and pain I felt to realise I was sleeping while he was dying alone has never left me.
The vet said these big dogs are prone to seisures. I no longer believe in these b/s explanations, especially having spent time working in Asia where dogs roam freely without an owner and don't have seisures (unless they have a brain injury or perhaps brain parasites). Of course, these street dogs are not bull masstifs but we have so many domesticated animals with all sorts of 'common' problems that are not that common when they are free and wild under much harsher conditions and don't get injected with vaccines or fed with their Chinese-toxin laced canned food.
The thing Ray is that big dogs just don't have long life spans. The only dog big dog that I knew that could make it to 14 was The Great Pyrenees. I was always a roti or German Shepard owner. I don't hate small dogs but never had one. My German shepherd died of liver cancer month after his vaccines. I will never talk to the veterinarian again.
Awesome questions and approaches to reveal the flaws and lead us towards truth instead of misdirection and deceit. You have a courageous spirit and sharp insight. Thank you for all your hard work. I hope we can bring good science, integrity, and respect for human life back as top priorities of Medicine.
RFK Jr. also wrote this:
RFK Jr.:
An intensely ballyhooed study by Andersson et al., published in Annals of Internal Medicine - a journal of the American College of Physicians, claims to find no association between aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines and chronic childhood disorders in Denmark.
The slavish, pharma-funded mainstream media, ever eager to defend industry orthodoxies, have triumphantly hailed this study as proof of aluminum’s safety without even a cursory examination of the study’s fatal deficiencies or the financial conflicts of its authors. But a closer look reveals a study so deeply flawed it functions not as science but as a deceitful propaganda stunt by the pharmaceutical industry.
The architects of this study meticulously designed it not to find harm.
From the outset, Andersson et al. excluded the very children most likely to reveal injuries associated with high exposures to aluminum adjuvants in childhood vaccines.
The exclusion included all children who died before age two, those diagnosed early with respiratory conditions, and an astonishing 34,547 children, 2.8% of the study population, whose vaccination records showed the highest aluminum exposure levels.
These choices suggest an intention to exclude the children at highest risk of harm. The authors, without explanation, deemed these high exposures “implausible,” even though those implausibly high exposures are routine for American children who follow the recommended immunization schedule. At very least, the study findings therefore cannot be generalized to children in the U.S. By systematically stripping the dataset of high-risk individuals, the researchers leave behind a survivor cohort to analyze. The name for this logical fallacy is “healthy subject bias.”
Furthermore, the authors inappropriately treated general practitioner visits before age two as a confounder, without assessing whether these GP visits reflected early aluminum-related illness or were predictive of later diagnoses. This introduced “collider bias”, a distortion that can suppress real associations even to the extent of making aluminum appear protective. It’s like studying whether smoking causes lung cancer while adjusting for coughing or for yellowed fingers, symptoms associated with smoking.
These sleights of hand magnify the potential for allowing the authors to reach their absurd suggestion that higher aluminum exposure is somehow protective against asthma, allergies, and neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism. These findings clash with mountains of contrary literature documenting the neurotoxicity of aluminum and its association with autoimmune and allergic diseases. (Daley, et al. 2023) If the medical establishment truly believed these data, they would be recommending aluminum injections to children as a prophylaxis against neurological and autoimmune diseases.
Andersson and his team initially had a zero-exposure cohort within the study group. But instead of evaluating this non-vaccination group separately and treating these children as the control, they lumped these kids into the least-exposed cohort, diluting any signal of harm. More broadly, their analysis assumed a linear dose-response, ignoring evidence from Crépeaux et al. (2017) demonstrating that low doses of aluminum can produce non-linear neurotoxic effects in animal models.
While adjusting for birth year can be appropriate in some study designs to account for secular trends, it is not a neutral act in this case. Aluminum exposure from vaccines increased over time, as did rates of chronic childhood disorders. Yet the authors failed to explore whether this correlation might reflect a causal relationship. They did not test this hypothesis but conveniently avoided doing so through this statistical artifice.
Furthermore, the authors almost exclusively relied on diagnoses from hospital inpatient registers. This gimmick allowed the authors to exclude the vast majority of affected children whose autism and food allergies would most likely be diagnosed and managed outside of hospital settings. This potentially biases the data toward undercounting true cases, particularly among children with milder presentations or less frequent hospital contact.
There were additional problems with this data source. A 2017 analysis by Holt et al. identified substantial misclassification in the Danish National Health Service Registry, the same source used by Andersson et al. to assess vaccine exposure, finding that children’s medical records often documented vaccinations that were absent from the registry. This casts further doubt on the accuracy of exposure classification in the study. In other words, it’s highly likely that many of the children that the authors classified as not receiving aluminum-containing vaccines actually did.
Despite all the deceptive devices the authors used to conceal the signals of harm, Andersson et al.’s own supplementary data are a devastating indictment of aluminum-containing vaccines. These data, which they were forced to publish because of public criticism of their analysis, directly contradict the study’s conclusions. The data show a statistically significant 67% increased risk of Asperger’s syndrome per 1 mg increase in aluminum exposure among children born between 2007 and 2018. Compared to the moderate exposure group, for every 10,000 children in the highest aluminum exposure cohort, there were 9.7 more cases of neurodevelopmental disorder, 4.5 more cases of autistic disorder, and 8.7 more cases of the broader category of autism spectrum disorder. Yet, the authors gloss over these harms to children by claiming they “did not find evidence” for an increased risk.
To reassure readers that infants’ vaccine aluminum exposure is “well below” an established “minimal risk level,” Andersson et al. cite Mitkus et al. (2011). But that FDA analysis was based on ingested soluble aluminum in adult rodents, making its findings irrelevant to injected particulate aluminum in human infants. To cite this study as proof of safety is scientifically indefensible.
Three of the study’s authors are affiliated with Denmark’s Statens Serum Institut (SSI), a government-owned vaccine company that develops a number of aluminum-containing vaccines. SSI also procures and supplies vaccines for the Danish national vaccination program — a clear institutional conflict, given its role in supporting vaccine manufacturing and promoting vaccine uptake. Yet two of the three authors nevertheless declared no conflicts of interest. The senior author, Anders Hviid, reported funding from sources including the Novo Nordisk Foundation, which is directly linked to the pharmaceutical giant Novo Nordisk and maintains a substantial investment footprint in the industry. Such affiliations call into question the study’s independence and underscore the need for raising international standards of gold standard science outlined in the Trump administration’s recent executive order requiring transparency, reproducibility, and data sharing.
The study, in fact, offers the opposite of transparency. For example, there is no table showing how many of the children in each aluminum exposure cohort were diagnosed with each outcome. Consequently, there is no way to independently evaluate the calculations made, leaving readers to place faith in the authors’ opaque modeling decisions at the expense of scientific reproducibility.
Finally, the Annals of Internal Medicine failed to share raw data that is essential for transparency and reproducibility. The disclosures on the Andersson study say “owing to data privacy regulations in Denmark, the raw data cannot be shared.”
This study does not just suffer from mere methodological limitations. Its design flaws are defining. The only thing this study proves is the thorough corruption of the scientific journals that publish such garbage-in, garbage-out exercises in statistical manipulation.
The Annals of Internal Medicine should immediately retract this badly flawed study.
Yet studies like Andersson et al. showed they had the data to make this comparison between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, but instead excluded and lumped data that made their insights opaque. These authors squandered an important opportunity to restore trust by animating an international scientific process to develop safer vaccines. By excluding unvaccinated children from meaningful analysis, obscuring raw data, and relying on hidden statistical assumptions, this study exemplifies the kind of institutional obfuscation that continues to erode public trust. What’s needed is not more statistical modeling designed to bury signals of harm, but independent research grounded in full transparency, methodological integrity, and the courage to confront inconvenient truths.
Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is (the 26'th) Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
can you point me to the reference for the claim that in the raw data, the RR was 1.45? was it in the supplementary material? of which paper? thanks. looks like they indulged in classic p-hacking to find the best adjustments
He doesn't want to debate with you in the same way I don't want to debate whether Greenland exists, or whether the earth is flat with flat earther. Its becuase he is a serious scientist with better things to do.
For better information, go to ....https://drbannonsblog.aprendo.co.uk/drbannonsblog_wp/
Really? That is gas lighting on a relatively bizarre scale.
A debate is necessary in every aspect of science, especially when the EVIDENCE proves the psychopathic propagandistic narrative to be entirely false.
Being a "Dr." anymore should be a cause of embarrassment, or at least humility, amongst the 'educated' since the lot of you have been proven to be entirely suspect and not-to-be-believed.
Doctors and pharmacists are now lumped in with lawyers, politicians, tow truck yards, and the FBI.
The ONLY way forward is for 'educated people' to talk these things entirely through, all the evidence honestly put forward for review, allowing the cards to fall where they will.
Dyn-o-mite! I’m carbon dating myself. That’s what everybody said when I was in college. It pre-dates “Awesome.”
I saw Dr. McCullough’s post on the errors in epidemiological data analysis that lead to a conclusion of “no connection” when one is present. How fortuitous that Dr. McCullough took a little vacation from cardiology to lend his expertise to autism studies. It took the so-called pandemic to get us here, but if good comes out of evil, let’s take it!
Dr. Wakefield’s work was seminal. He was way ahead of everybody on the gut-brain connection when he and coworkers isolated the MMR strain of measles in the gut of cognitively impaired children.
His recommendation to split up the MMR doses over time was actually right on target as well. It is one step from caning the product entirely.
Who nominates Nobel Laureats? It’s time for this work ... Wakefield and perhaps two coauthors ... to be recognized for its brilliance, precision and profound importance.
Steve do you know? Who can write up the nomination?
Here's a bunch of other studies on vaccines being linked to autism, in case anyone wants them -> https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1ma3W_ULhncp-QX6N1gabD_8isBApQazO?usp=drive_link
Yesterday I became aware of this story - main actors are the WHO and the Gates Foundation including the ideology of birth control without consent - and it fits to an agenda where "health" means death:
Ethical questions surround vaccine to reduce fertility
https://sundayguardianlive.com/news/ethical-questions-surround-vaccine-reduce-fertility
May 28, 2018
"The prestigious journal Nature Medicine, in its February issue reported that the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) is to do a clinical trial of a tetanus toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with a pregnancy hormone, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). *) It is to be studied on 120 women in India.
This “vaccine” against pregnancy was developed by Dr G.P. Talwar in 1972. The idea is to produce antibodies to the pregnancy hormone, such that the women would not be able to carry a normal pregnancy. Women who were pregnant would abort and those not pregnant would be rendered infertile. The report is indeed disturbing. A few months earlier an article entitled “HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World” was published by Oller and colleagues in the Open Access Library Journal.
The Oller report described young women in Kenya who were vaccinated with this “Talwar vaccine” on the pretext of preventing maternal and neonatal (baby) tetanus. Many of the samples of the tetanus vaccine that tested positive for hCG was sourced from the Serum Institute of India.
The vaccine programme was promoted by the WHO and the Kenyan government, funded by the Gates Foundation. Mothers-to-be were encouraged to take the vaccine to prevent tetanus in their unborn babies, without being told that the vaccine would prevent the baby from ever being born. ..."
—-
Tetanus vaccine may be laced with anti-fertility drug.
International / developing countries.
Vaccine Wkly. 1995 May 29 - Jun 5
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12346214/
—-
HCG Found in WHO Tetanus Vaccine in Kenya Raises Concern in the Developing World
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320641479_HCG_Found_in_WHO_Tetanus_Vaccine_in_Kenya_Raises_Concern_in_the_Developing_World
DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1103937
Oct. 2017 - "The Oller Report" - download .pdf
—-
*)
A shot at contraception: In India, a nonagenarian renews testing of a birth control vaccine
https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0218-118
Jayaraman, K. A shot at contraception:
In India, a nonagenarian renews testing of a birth control vaccine. Nat Med 24, 118–120 (2018).
https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0218-118
07.02.2018
"The idea to try to revolutionize birth control came to Gursaran Pran Talwar during a trip in 1972 to the holy city of Varanasi on the banks of the Ganges. There, in the crowded streets, the Indian biochemist bumped into groups of emaciated women herding their large broods of children."
—-
And a film in this regard:
Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda
https://infertilitymovie.org/a-diabolical-agenda/
https://infertilitymovie.org/about-film/
Released 10.06.2022 - Dr. Andy Wakefield - with the transcript in six languages.
—-
The so-called "vaccine hesitancy" does have a very good reason - and the reason is life itself.
The interview you did with Kim Iversen on 5/31/23 was outstanding. It's probably the best interview you've done so far! https://rumble.com/v2r9qiy-new-research-claims-all-vaccines-are-unsafe-dissecting-rfk-jrs-past-authori.html
I can answer one of your questions: the researchers went to Denmark because as a socialist country it has a centralized medical registry. In other words, all medical records of all citizens are held in a centralized repository of the state - including records of adoptees, prisoners, and broken families. The result is you can do large population studies there that you can't do anywhere else. The CIA used Denmark to study the inheritability of schizophrenia by looking at the centralized medical records of twins that had been separated.
This is the real issue Steve. Autism and vaccine metals. Metals in vaccines are responsible for almost all disease and the processes of the allopathic system have been purposely set up to hide the danger of metals to human health.
The Melisa test as a bio marker of human health is a great research paper by the inventor of the Melisa test. If used in a certain way it can prove metals in vaccines cause autism.
Covid and the mrna vaccines aren’t the issue here but the distraction.
The real prize for us is the autism debate and the danger of metals to human health
The biggest fear of the pharmaceutical industry is the recognition of the health effects of metals as its what they’ve made all their money off.
Their future plans and profits depend entirely on the role of metals in human health being suppressed. And the allopathic system is set up to hide harm caused by metals and funnel the susceptible in a certain direction.
The work of Prof Vera Stejskal is very important. She developed the Melisa test when she worked at Astra Zeneca. Their factory workers were getting strange symptoms which would completely resolve if they took time off work but world return after being back in the workplace for a while.
Astra Zeneca now use this test regularly on their factory staff. It’s a standardised diagnostic test to see if you are currently suffering from a type 4 allergy to metals.
While Vera passes away in 2017, her daughter Linda still works at Melisa diagnostics. They are experts on biological responses to metals
The face of evil. Anders Hviid has committed one of the biggest crimes against humanity in history. I do wonder what he got paid and whether he still thinks it was worth it.
Steve,
As a long time US Department of Transportation official you should look at automobile accident data.
Fatalities and injuries due to automobile accidents are going up even though miles driven are down. IMPOSSIBLE!!
Another data set that maybe of interest are the number of groceries being delivered. Where I live in Northern Virginia (NOVA), it must be 20 times what I observed a couple of years ago. I could see a significant increase in groceries delivered due to convenience or technology but nothing explains what I'm seeing now.
So many people lost their jobs during covid that auto repossessions went of scale. For those that could afford them used and new cars went up in price by 30% or more. This is a partial explanation. The other is some people are psycotic and so terrified of covid that they won't leave their homes and have everything delivered.
I know people aren't leaving their homes because deliveries from grocery stores are at least 100 times what they used to be. Steve ought to investigate this also.
I have been driving defensely all my life but especially in recent years for sure.
A guy called Cliff High invented the term vaxxident. The concept is those that got the covid shot have brain damage and are unable to drive correctly. I know an FAA manager as well. Vaccinated private pilots are having medical missuses causing them to crash.
Hi Nick,
Did you come across the Shaw study? I am going by memory but he ascertains that AL acts as a fractal inflammagen basically interrupting cellular function from the atomic level, to the molecular, to the cellular, organismal, etc. Aluminum poisons it all.
Dr Offit has the temerity to actually tell physicians that aluminum is a biologically necessary ion! We all know that's BS as proven by Exley. (I have his book thank you). Aluminum has no biological role in any living system on earth.
What really bothers me is that much of the cookware is now aluminum, adding to the enormous burden we are already suffering from.
And they still use Thimerosal even though they lie and say that it's no longer in vaccines. Remember congressman Burton's huge investigation and the Simpsonwood meeting where the ACIP members conspired to hide damning evidence that vaccines cause autism and other neurological issues.
These people are all MONSTERS. If we ever get our country back we should round the members up and throw em in jail.
Thank you for the links brother.
Next thing we will hear is doctors telling us narcotics and fentanyl are safe and and pose no adverse effects because Narcan and Naloxone are readily available.
Great effort Steve. These emperors are naked - and it is an ugly, ugly sight. This clown is not a 'scientist'. He is a criminal propagandist. Criminal because the stabs do case autism and all sorts of other problems, which are injuring and killing people and he supports it. Criminal because he is paid by Pharma to lie and cook up data. Criminal because he won't share the data - when that happens you know that the 'study' is 100% bullshit. See Rona, Globaloneywarming for more info.
A friend of mine had a beautiful dog, a massive bull masstif. He was such a sweet dog, a teddy bear. He suffered from impromptu seisures and used to sort-of come and ask for help when they started. And eventually one night he had a seisure and died alone at night. I was in charge of him that day and the sadness and pain I felt to realise I was sleeping while he was dying alone has never left me.
The vet said these big dogs are prone to seisures. I no longer believe in these b/s explanations, especially having spent time working in Asia where dogs roam freely without an owner and don't have seisures (unless they have a brain injury or perhaps brain parasites). Of course, these street dogs are not bull masstifs but we have so many domesticated animals with all sorts of 'common' problems that are not that common when they are free and wild under much harsher conditions and don't get injected with vaccines or fed with their Chinese-toxin laced canned food.
The thing Ray is that big dogs just don't have long life spans. The only dog big dog that I knew that could make it to 14 was The Great Pyrenees. I was always a roti or German Shepard owner. I don't hate small dogs but never had one. My German shepherd died of liver cancer month after his vaccines. I will never talk to the veterinarian again.
I keep getting text messages from the vet’s office reminding me that my dog is due for vaccinations!!!
Don't do it.
Awesome questions and approaches to reveal the flaws and lead us towards truth instead of misdirection and deceit. You have a courageous spirit and sharp insight. Thank you for all your hard work. I hope we can bring good science, integrity, and respect for human life back as top priorities of Medicine.