If someone refuse to engage on what is obviously a cover up then corrupt is a reasonable word. The evil of vaccines and big pharma in general is so diabolical and so much harm caused to so many that any honest scientist would be aware of this and wish to help in the investigation.
If Anders Hviid won't engage in this, the worst is presumed. Time is long past for pussy footing about with all this.
If someone refuse to engage on what is obviously a cover up then corrupt is a reasonable word. The evil of vaccines and big pharma in general is so diabolical and so much harm caused to so many that any honest scientist would be aware of this and wish to help in the investigation.
If Anders Hviid won't engage in this, the worst is presumed. Time is long past for pussy footing about with all this.
I have to agree on this. There is a big difference between someone who simply disagrees and someone clearly engaged in cover up.
My brother disagrees with me on covid vaxxes and also on my newfound desire to not take the safety or efficacy of the other vaxxes on blind authority anymore. I think he's misinformed by the very corporate interests he hypocritically used to hate pre-covid, intellectually lazy perhaps, a bit of a coward (as he has made it clear a big part of his refusal to engage with facts outside the narrative is based on not wanting to face what he may have unintentionally done to hurt his health, even if it means others will be conned or even mandated to similarly hurt themselves while those who damaged him count their money), but he is not corrupt or evil. Just in denial.
But if vaxxes, both covid and other, have had their risks downplayed or covered up, every person involved in that is corrupt. Not because they honestly disagree but because they don't, they know they are lying and hurting people and they don't care about anything but maintaining that sweet profitable con and avoiding consequences by any means necessary. And this guy sounds like he's a part of that.
If someone refuse to engage on what is obviously a cover up then corrupt is a reasonable word. The evil of vaccines and big pharma in general is so diabolical and so much harm caused to so many that any honest scientist would be aware of this and wish to help in the investigation.
If Anders Hviid won't engage in this, the worst is presumed. Time is long past for pussy footing about with all this.
I have to agree on this. There is a big difference between someone who simply disagrees and someone clearly engaged in cover up.
My brother disagrees with me on covid vaxxes and also on my newfound desire to not take the safety or efficacy of the other vaxxes on blind authority anymore. I think he's misinformed by the very corporate interests he hypocritically used to hate pre-covid, intellectually lazy perhaps, a bit of a coward (as he has made it clear a big part of his refusal to engage with facts outside the narrative is based on not wanting to face what he may have unintentionally done to hurt his health, even if it means others will be conned or even mandated to similarly hurt themselves while those who damaged him count their money), but he is not corrupt or evil. Just in denial.
But if vaxxes, both covid and other, have had their risks downplayed or covered up, every person involved in that is corrupt. Not because they honestly disagree but because they don't, they know they are lying and hurting people and they don't care about anything but maintaining that sweet profitable con and avoiding consequences by any means necessary. And this guy sounds like he's a part of that.
Very well said.