It's good that you believe so strongly in your cause, Steve Kirsch. But it's not good that you harass people. It's not good that you call people who disagree with you corrupt. It's not good that you attack people instead of data.
It's good that you believe so strongly in your cause, Steve Kirsch. But it's not good that you harass people. It's not good that you call people who disagree with you corrupt. It's not good that you attack people instead of data.
If someone refuse to engage on what is obviously a cover up then corrupt is a reasonable word. The evil of vaccines and big pharma in general is so diabolical and so much harm caused to so many that any honest scientist would be aware of this and wish to help in the investigation.
If Anders Hviid won't engage in this, the worst is presumed. Time is long past for pussy footing about with all this.
I have to agree on this. There is a big difference between someone who simply disagrees and someone clearly engaged in cover up.
My brother disagrees with me on covid vaxxes and also on my newfound desire to not take the safety or efficacy of the other vaxxes on blind authority anymore. I think he's misinformed by the very corporate interests he hypocritically used to hate pre-covid, intellectually lazy perhaps, a bit of a coward (as he has made it clear a big part of his refusal to engage with facts outside the narrative is based on not wanting to face what he may have unintentionally done to hurt his health, even if it means others will be conned or even mandated to similarly hurt themselves while those who damaged him count their money), but he is not corrupt or evil. Just in denial.
But if vaxxes, both covid and other, have had their risks downplayed or covered up, every person involved in that is corrupt. Not because they honestly disagree but because they don't, they know they are lying and hurting people and they don't care about anything but maintaining that sweet profitable con and avoiding consequences by any means necessary. And this guy sounds like he's a part of that.
Do you have anyone in your immediate family who suffers with autism? If you do, you would fully understand why it is so frustrating to know you have proof against the man-made cause of austim and yet you HAVE harass people who refuse to reveal the truth.
Steve has always been very civil since I have been reading his work. It is astonishing to me that he is able to keep his cool to the extent he does when faced with obvious obfuscation. Why won't Prof Hviid show Steve the data? Why? Corruption is a factual statement if a person is making claims about truth but withholds data used to make that claim. Neither do I think trying to get the data when kids are being injured and dying and we all urgently need to know the cause is harassment. Don't you want to know why autism has gone through the roof since the 90s? Again I am amazed that Steve is able to be as cool as he habitually is. Steve does not "believe in a cause" he believes in the truth. He argues that science can reveal it. Do you believe in truth? Do you know what science is about? Think hard. Finally Steve is 100% data driven as anybody who has read his work will immediately know. The personal attacks are directed against him. He sometimes gets emotional. Who wouldn't when kids are being injured and dying and we urgently need to know why
Listen Carlos , John Ai bot or troll. Go away. Steve never harassed anyone. Go back to your mom's basement. I do not agree with Steve on some things buts thats how life works.
It's good that you believe so strongly in your cause, Steve Kirsch. But it's not good that you harass people. It's not good that you call people who disagree with you corrupt. It's not good that you attack people instead of data.
Please be civil.
If someone refuse to engage on what is obviously a cover up then corrupt is a reasonable word. The evil of vaccines and big pharma in general is so diabolical and so much harm caused to so many that any honest scientist would be aware of this and wish to help in the investigation.
If Anders Hviid won't engage in this, the worst is presumed. Time is long past for pussy footing about with all this.
I have to agree on this. There is a big difference between someone who simply disagrees and someone clearly engaged in cover up.
My brother disagrees with me on covid vaxxes and also on my newfound desire to not take the safety or efficacy of the other vaxxes on blind authority anymore. I think he's misinformed by the very corporate interests he hypocritically used to hate pre-covid, intellectually lazy perhaps, a bit of a coward (as he has made it clear a big part of his refusal to engage with facts outside the narrative is based on not wanting to face what he may have unintentionally done to hurt his health, even if it means others will be conned or even mandated to similarly hurt themselves while those who damaged him count their money), but he is not corrupt or evil. Just in denial.
But if vaxxes, both covid and other, have had their risks downplayed or covered up, every person involved in that is corrupt. Not because they honestly disagree but because they don't, they know they are lying and hurting people and they don't care about anything but maintaining that sweet profitable con and avoiding consequences by any means necessary. And this guy sounds like he's a part of that.
Very well said.
Do you have anyone in your immediate family who suffers with autism? If you do, you would fully understand why it is so frustrating to know you have proof against the man-made cause of austim and yet you HAVE harass people who refuse to reveal the truth.
No, I don't know anyone autistic. A business friend has an autistic son, but I have only met the son once.
I am sure those who have autistic family members are desperate to know the cause. It's a terrible thing. I am not sure that vaccines are the cause.
Steve has always been very civil since I have been reading his work. It is astonishing to me that he is able to keep his cool to the extent he does when faced with obvious obfuscation. Why won't Prof Hviid show Steve the data? Why? Corruption is a factual statement if a person is making claims about truth but withholds data used to make that claim. Neither do I think trying to get the data when kids are being injured and dying and we all urgently need to know the cause is harassment. Don't you want to know why autism has gone through the roof since the 90s? Again I am amazed that Steve is able to be as cool as he habitually is. Steve does not "believe in a cause" he believes in the truth. He argues that science can reveal it. Do you believe in truth? Do you know what science is about? Think hard. Finally Steve is 100% data driven as anybody who has read his work will immediately know. The personal attacks are directed against him. He sometimes gets emotional. Who wouldn't when kids are being injured and dying and we urgently need to know why
You must like corruption.
No, I don't like corruption. But an accusation of corruption is a serious one, and should not be made lightly like Steve Kirsch did here.
You haven't convinced me that you don't like corruption.
It was not made "lightly". Kids are being injured and dying. We need to know why
Listen Carlos , John Ai bot or troll. Go away. Steve never harassed anyone. Go back to your mom's basement. I do not agree with Steve on some things buts thats how life works.
I agree with Steve on absolutely everything he says
It is blatant corruption, not only needs to be called out, this idiot-quack needs to be flogged publicly.
I spent 3 yrs being called names by asshats like you, threatened, vilified. Flock off.
Why don't you go troll somewhere else.