For those of you who haven't had time to watch the whole thing: unanimous vote to approve the Moderna vaccine EUA 6 to 11 and 12 - 17. Tomorrow is Moderna 6 month to 5 year; Pfizer 6 mo to 4 yrs.
These so-called and, as originally conceived "independent regulatory agencies" have become grotesque, dangerous parodies of themselves, and totally captured by the industries they were designed to regulate. Breaks my heart. Rude awakening. I've been a practicing physician for 55 years.
The vaccinated now have far greater risks than the unvaccinated. Sage Hanna keeps promoting the conclusions of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who has been warning that this would happen for many months! He says things are only going to get worse, the more people who are boosted. Here's a good, concise (four-minute) summary of his thoughts.
Bill, yesterday on the FLCCC webinar Paul Marik, Pierre Kory and Jim Thorpe discussed vaccine shedding. Its a real phenomena but they did not know enough say when it occurs. Shortly after vaccinated?? So what are the implications? There was one question about sex between a vaccinated and unvaccinated? Who knows?
I don't know. I've heard of virus shedding, but now vaccine shedding? My science education stopped in 11th grade with Mrs. Barnett's chemistry class, but I'm seeing convincing observations that the vaccinated are getting the virus more often ... along with pretty much every scary medical condition in the Med School Disease Diagnosis text books. By now I think I know enough science to no longer trust the science.
Was there any discussion at this meeting as to whether children even need this vaccine? Given their almost zero risk of adverse effects from the virus? It doesn't sound so.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
This is not communism, it's Capitalism ~ it's about money and profit. China is also a capitalist country, despite the title of their party. (The way our major parties are called Democratic and Republican even though they're neither!) Authoritarian measures, such as censorship or punishment, can be used to enforce any ideology, system or policy. Authoritarianism can enforce capitalism just as much as any other system.
This is the result of giving the free market too much free reign. Eventually enough money coalesces on a power center and it develops a gravitational pull and eventually gets strong enough to suck everything in like a black hole. At least under communism you get the option of a safer vaccine - look up the COVID vaccines they use in Cuba. Only uses part of the spike protein.
"Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price system, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, ..."
I view capitalism as operating in a "free" society where people can privately own businesses, property, per the definition above.
We are losing small businesses (competition is a characteristic of capitalism; that is being destroyed by the big monopolies that have formed; Amazon grew during pandemic while everyone else went under. (Medical/Hospitals/Physicians now are incorporated, Food is being incorporated (Big Ag), the internet is controlled by a few giants who run everyone else off; Zuckerberg, Bezos, Google). Power companies are conglomerates (First Energy bought all the little companies in the Eastern US. Maybe the newest term would be "Corporatism."
As Judge Jeannine says, "that's all I have to say"
I agree that Corporatism is a good term to use, especially if it helps to avoid debates as to what capitalism is and is not. There are different views about that among economists. In this country, we have been indoctrinated for decades to equate capitalism with freedom, even though most working people are more exploited than free. And even though the system is rigged against a level playing field and fair competition. Whenever a system is based on consolidation of wealth and resources, whether by private individuals or the state, it will by definition be inequitable. And when people rise up against that inequity, they can be met with either conciliation (as with FDR) or authoritarianism, as in our current political climate.
Capitalism is not the only form of a market economy. It’s a particular type of market where you are allowed to profit off of another’s labor and make money through the sheer gravitational pull of the money you already have. Consensual slavery basically.
God have mercy towards children!... but his judgment on this priesthood of science idolaters. We need to call them what they are, they are bowing down to a faulty religion called science. This is the fruit of 125 years of enlightenment progressivism without God at the center.
I just re-read an article I wrote last July. The article summarizes "the most comprehensive study done to date" of COVID Mortality risks to children in the UK in the first 12 months of the pandemic. The researchers examined the medical records of EVERY hospitalized child in the UK during this time span. The researchers from prestigious medical institutions concluded that 25 UK children (0 to 18) had died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. However, of these 25 Covid victims, 19 had severe or "life-limiting" co-morbid medical conditions. This means only six (6) "healthy" children in the UK died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. That would be one death of a healthy child every two months. The UK has approximately 12 million children in this age range. This means the mortality risk to "healthy" children from Covid was 6/12 million = 0.0001 percent. Or: Roughly 1 in 2 million healthy children had died from Covid.
In my article, I also point out that the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) from COVID during this time span was about half that of influenza. (It's actually much lower as the number of "cases" that determines the IFR was a big under-count.)
A child's chances of dying "from" Covid are far lower than the odd's a random child (or any person) will be struck by lightning in a one-year period of time (roughly 1-in-700,000 odds).
So children, healthy or not, are more likely to die from influenza than Covid. and healthy children are more likely to be hit by lightning than they are to die from Covid.
So forget all the mumbo jumbo in this hearing. Healthy children don't need a Covid vaccine if they literally have a 0.000 percent of dying from this disease.
Plus, everyone now knows the "vaccines" don't prevent infection or spread so the vaccinated children don't even "protect" their older grandparents from being infected.
Needless to say the findings of the UK study were completely ignored by the mainstream media and I know no media picked up my article published by uncoverDC.com. But I still think both make the ONLY points one needs to make about the "necessity" of vaccinating children against Covid. There is no necessity because there is no mortality risk for the 99.5 percent of children who do not live with severe or "life-limiting" pre-existing medical conditions.
... I guess one might digest the above-referenced UK study and my article on same and conclude that children who DO live with extreme medical conditions SHOULD be vaccinated. As these children, per the study, were about 3X more likely to die "from" Covid than healthy children (six deaths among the the "healthy" child cohort and 19 among the cohort with severe or chronic or "life-limiting" pre-existing conditions.)
However, I would hesitate to vaccinate even these "higher-risk" children. My argument would be these children already have suppressed or weakened immune systems and we now seem to be learning the Covid jabs make such people MORE susceptible to contracting other illnesses that could kill them due to their "natural immunity" perhaps being compromised. In short, people who already have compromised immune systems should also perhaps be very wary of taking a shot that might compromise their immune systems even more.
* It was hard for me to quantify exactly how many children do suffer from chronic or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I think in my article I found one reference that said about 3-in-1000 children (1-in-333) children live with such severe medical conditions. This seems about right to me. Here I thought of my high school graduating class of 140 students. I knew every one of these students and went to school with most of them for years. I don't remember one classmate in my class who had what I would consider an "chronic" or "life-limiting" medical condition. These are medical conditions that keep people from participating in normal activities. Many can't even go to school, or miss many weeks of school in a given year because of their hardships. They all require specialized care. That is, every person in my graduating class would have been considered "healthy" by my definition. I would have noticed if a classmate had "severe" or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I didn't notice this in any of my classmates.
Basically, there might be 0.4 percent of children who live with such extreme medical conditions. 99.6 percent of children do not. These children definitely should NOT be vaccinated, and I'd argue that the 0.4 percent should pray hard over whether to get these vaccines or not.
Is there any evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” cause cancer and would they fall under California’s Proposition 65? Do any of the COVID-19 vaccine ingredients expose recipients to potential cancer causing agents ?
The evidence I've seen so far is that the spikeshots dysregulate the immune system so that it no longer effectively quashes many incipient cancers. Many spikeshot-ed people are developing rapidly progressing previously unusual cancers. Also, many people whose cancers had been "cured" or put into remission have had aggressive recurrences. Unfortunately, I don't think these issues fall under CA Prop 65.
What's the emergency? I'm serious, shouldn't they have to prove an emergency for that age group to declare a use authorization? Bunch of murdering frauds.
The day before the FDA did this approval, the teenage daughter of a Democrat Representative from Illinois died. She had previously been vaccinated and her father strongly supported vaccinating his children (he posted about doing it)
Casten's office did not add any information about her cause of death. The Chicago-Tribune reports that Downers Grove police said they were called to a home in the area Monday, "for an unresponsive seventeen year old female," where "first responders determined that the subject was deceased."
I really wonder what will make the politicians who committed to this change their tune.
That’s a very good question… what WILL make them change their tunes? Are they truly that clueless or do they not give a crap about their own children?! 🔥🔥🔥. Passing their own babies through the fire… 😞😞😞😢🙏🏽
Outrageous!! I only listened to the segment containing public comments, and I am dumbfounded by the ignorance of most of the speakers who are parents and have actually been preventing their own children from living their lives solely because there is no vaccine for them??? They were spouting numbers of children who died of covid; one person said 500 have died, and another said 1500 have died. Would someone please, PLEASE tell me where these pitiful parents obtained such information?
A John Hopkins study of 48000 children found no deaths from Covid of a healthy child. These findings are supported by data from Germany, Sweden and the UK.
Thank you very much! I remember the Johns Hopkins study that no healthy children have died from covid, but I was not aware of the NYT crap nor its retraction.
I live in a senior residence where I am the only resident who refused the Vaccine (only permitted because I moved in before the Vax was available ). I have been shunned, asked to wait for the next elevator, called an idiot ,thrown off committees, told I really am not welcome in the dining room etc. They are really terrified and I see no hope of change. The risk of the shot (especially to the young) is never acknowledged. I feel like a Jew in Germany in the 30's.
Thank you for sharing Eleanor. Although as a college student I've yet to experience such blatant discrimination, I relate to your feelings about '30s Germany. Will be praying for your strength here in the northeast. Stay strong. God bless
Good for you in your refusal and adhering to your stance! It must be hard being solo there...I feel like that much of the time in my own home, but not to such an extreme as it sounds for you. I grew up as the black sheep and scape goat as a kid in my family. It is familiar to me. I also know you can't NOT stand for truth. It is inherent in one when they feel/ know it. Self betrayal is not an option. My thoughts and prayers are with you and remember if you are feeling really excluded and down...someone is sending good wishes. We all need more of those. Pullin' for ya!
THIS IS A TIME SENSITIVE MESSAGE
URGENT:
Deadline to request an opportunity to speak to the Vaccine Advisory Committee is 3pm Pacific Tuesday, June 21, 2022.
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/this-is-not-science
Send an email. Request an opportunity to speak. DO NOT PROCRASTINATE.
Call me directly at 310-619-3055 if you have any questions.
James Roguski
PLEASE SHARE THIS FAR AND WIDE
Isn’t Moderna not recommended under 30 year olds in most European countries? And here it’s ok for little ones ???
ya that's a pretty good sign that our agencies have been captured.
These so-called and, as originally conceived "independent regulatory agencies" have become grotesque, dangerous parodies of themselves, and totally captured by the industries they were designed to regulate. Breaks my heart. Rude awakening. I've been a practicing physician for 55 years.
The vaccinated now have far greater risks than the unvaccinated. Sage Hanna keeps promoting the conclusions of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, who has been warning that this would happen for many months! He says things are only going to get worse, the more people who are boosted. Here's a good, concise (four-minute) summary of his thoughts.
https://sagehana.substack.com/p/geert-vanden-bossche-in-four-minutes?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&s=r
Bill, yesterday on the FLCCC webinar Paul Marik, Pierre Kory and Jim Thorpe discussed vaccine shedding. Its a real phenomena but they did not know enough say when it occurs. Shortly after vaccinated?? So what are the implications? There was one question about sex between a vaccinated and unvaccinated? Who knows?
I don't know. I've heard of virus shedding, but now vaccine shedding? My science education stopped in 11th grade with Mrs. Barnett's chemistry class, but I'm seeing convincing observations that the vaccinated are getting the virus more often ... along with pretty much every scary medical condition in the Med School Disease Diagnosis text books. By now I think I know enough science to no longer trust the science.
Was there any discussion at this meeting as to whether children even need this vaccine? Given their almost zero risk of adverse effects from the virus? It doesn't sound so.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
Yet that vital information did not factor into the discussion at the meeting, apparently?
Yep. That's my main point. What should have been the main point didn't even factor into the discussion or hearing.
No one in good health under 60 needs that crap.
No one in good health over 60 needs it either! I can vouch for that many times over!
I don't see how they can continue to pull off this charade. People are seeing through it and starting to say no. Have we now reached full-on communism? This is how China works. Despite evidence and fact, they just punish people who speak out. There is no stopping these people, they don't have any moral fiber or conscience. Under normal circumstances and in a free country, the voices of qualified people are recognized (Dr Malone, Harvey Rische, Peter McCullough,....). Another Dr speaks out https://www.theepochtimes.com/covid-vaccinations-for-children-is-criminal-must-stop_4529512.html?utm_source=Goodevening&utm_campaign=gv-2022-06-14&utm_medium=email&est=p9cr023vLybHFEvn%2Frs9eJW3RsZyPmaZ0ut4%2BZEwJjUPC2Dzlm1LLOdcu18wYb4%3D
This is not communism, it's Capitalism ~ it's about money and profit. China is also a capitalist country, despite the title of their party. (The way our major parties are called Democratic and Republican even though they're neither!) Authoritarian measures, such as censorship or punishment, can be used to enforce any ideology, system or policy. Authoritarianism can enforce capitalism just as much as any other system.
No this is corruption. The free market isn't choosing these shitty mRNA shots, they are being coerced into people.
This is the result of giving the free market too much free reign. Eventually enough money coalesces on a power center and it develops a gravitational pull and eventually gets strong enough to suck everything in like a black hole. At least under communism you get the option of a safer vaccine - look up the COVID vaccines they use in Cuba. Only uses part of the spike protein.
Agreed. Profit over people is always a recipe for exploitation, corruption, and general disaster.
And nothing corrupts like the profit motive. This is the government doing the bidding of Big Pharma, from which both profit financially.
"Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and their operation for profit. Central characteristics of capitalism include capital accumulation, competitive markets, price system, private property, property rights recognition, voluntary exchange, ..."
I view capitalism as operating in a "free" society where people can privately own businesses, property, per the definition above.
We are losing small businesses (competition is a characteristic of capitalism; that is being destroyed by the big monopolies that have formed; Amazon grew during pandemic while everyone else went under. (Medical/Hospitals/Physicians now are incorporated, Food is being incorporated (Big Ag), the internet is controlled by a few giants who run everyone else off; Zuckerberg, Bezos, Google). Power companies are conglomerates (First Energy bought all the little companies in the Eastern US. Maybe the newest term would be "Corporatism."
As Judge Jeannine says, "that's all I have to say"
I agree that Corporatism is a good term to use, especially if it helps to avoid debates as to what capitalism is and is not. There are different views about that among economists. In this country, we have been indoctrinated for decades to equate capitalism with freedom, even though most working people are more exploited than free. And even though the system is rigged against a level playing field and fair competition. Whenever a system is based on consolidation of wealth and resources, whether by private individuals or the state, it will by definition be inequitable. And when people rise up against that inequity, they can be met with either conciliation (as with FDR) or authoritarianism, as in our current political climate.
Capitalism is not the only form of a market economy. It’s a particular type of market where you are allowed to profit off of another’s labor and make money through the sheer gravitational pull of the money you already have. Consensual slavery basically.
God have mercy towards children!... but his judgment on this priesthood of science idolaters. We need to call them what they are, they are bowing down to a faulty religion called science. This is the fruit of 125 years of enlightenment progressivism without God at the center.
I just re-read an article I wrote last July. The article summarizes "the most comprehensive study done to date" of COVID Mortality risks to children in the UK in the first 12 months of the pandemic. The researchers examined the medical records of EVERY hospitalized child in the UK during this time span. The researchers from prestigious medical institutions concluded that 25 UK children (0 to 18) had died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. However, of these 25 Covid victims, 19 had severe or "life-limiting" co-morbid medical conditions. This means only six (6) "healthy" children in the UK died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. That would be one death of a healthy child every two months. The UK has approximately 12 million children in this age range. This means the mortality risk to "healthy" children from Covid was 6/12 million = 0.0001 percent. Or: Roughly 1 in 2 million healthy children had died from Covid.
In my article, I also point out that the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) from COVID during this time span was about half that of influenza. (It's actually much lower as the number of "cases" that determines the IFR was a big under-count.)
A child's chances of dying "from" Covid are far lower than the odd's a random child (or any person) will be struck by lightning in a one-year period of time (roughly 1-in-700,000 odds).
So children, healthy or not, are more likely to die from influenza than Covid. and healthy children are more likely to be hit by lightning than they are to die from Covid.
So forget all the mumbo jumbo in this hearing. Healthy children don't need a Covid vaccine if they literally have a 0.000 percent of dying from this disease.
Plus, everyone now knows the "vaccines" don't prevent infection or spread so the vaccinated children don't even "protect" their older grandparents from being infected.
Needless to say the findings of the UK study were completely ignored by the mainstream media and I know no media picked up my article published by uncoverDC.com. But I still think both make the ONLY points one needs to make about the "necessity" of vaccinating children against Covid. There is no necessity because there is no mortality risk for the 99.5 percent of children who do not live with severe or "life-limiting" pre-existing medical conditions.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
... I guess one might digest the above-referenced UK study and my article on same and conclude that children who DO live with extreme medical conditions SHOULD be vaccinated. As these children, per the study, were about 3X more likely to die "from" Covid than healthy children (six deaths among the the "healthy" child cohort and 19 among the cohort with severe or chronic or "life-limiting" pre-existing conditions.)
However, I would hesitate to vaccinate even these "higher-risk" children. My argument would be these children already have suppressed or weakened immune systems and we now seem to be learning the Covid jabs make such people MORE susceptible to contracting other illnesses that could kill them due to their "natural immunity" perhaps being compromised. In short, people who already have compromised immune systems should also perhaps be very wary of taking a shot that might compromise their immune systems even more.
* It was hard for me to quantify exactly how many children do suffer from chronic or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I think in my article I found one reference that said about 3-in-1000 children (1-in-333) children live with such severe medical conditions. This seems about right to me. Here I thought of my high school graduating class of 140 students. I knew every one of these students and went to school with most of them for years. I don't remember one classmate in my class who had what I would consider an "chronic" or "life-limiting" medical condition. These are medical conditions that keep people from participating in normal activities. Many can't even go to school, or miss many weeks of school in a given year because of their hardships. They all require specialized care. That is, every person in my graduating class would have been considered "healthy" by my definition. I would have noticed if a classmate had "severe" or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I didn't notice this in any of my classmates.
Basically, there might be 0.4 percent of children who live with such extreme medical conditions. 99.6 percent of children do not. These children definitely should NOT be vaccinated, and I'd argue that the 0.4 percent should pray hard over whether to get these vaccines or not.
If I were Dolly Parton I would be fucking pissed that my charity money went to Moderna.
God bless the children!🙏🙏🙏
Is there any evidence that COVID-19 “vaccines” cause cancer and would they fall under California’s Proposition 65? Do any of the COVID-19 vaccine ingredients expose recipients to potential cancer causing agents ?
The evidence I've seen so far is that the spikeshots dysregulate the immune system so that it no longer effectively quashes many incipient cancers. Many spikeshot-ed people are developing rapidly progressing previously unusual cancers. Also, many people whose cancers had been "cured" or put into remission have had aggressive recurrences. Unfortunately, I don't think these issues fall under CA Prop 65.
One of the doctors has been doing research into this (Dr. Ryan Cole). I believe your answer is yes
If you could compose an “elevator speech” for friends and family to clue them into what just transpired, what would you say?
EUA?
What's the emergency? I'm serious, shouldn't they have to prove an emergency for that age group to declare a use authorization? Bunch of murdering frauds.
The day before the FDA did this approval, the teenage daughter of a Democrat Representative from Illinois died. She had previously been vaccinated and her father strongly supported vaccinating his children (he posted about doing it)
https://i.imgur.com/GEOmZ0o.png
https://i.redd.it/06pe5pkhbl591.jpg
https://people.com/politics/rep-sean-casten-17-year-old-daughter-has-died/
Casten's office did not add any information about her cause of death. The Chicago-Tribune reports that Downers Grove police said they were called to a home in the area Monday, "for an unresponsive seventeen year old female," where "first responders determined that the subject was deceased."
I really wonder what will make the politicians who committed to this change their tune.
Must have been that deadly new disease called SADS.
Some ancient gods required child sacrifice. I have no idea what might be in the minds of today’s chosen one.
I believe it was the worship of Molech… Passing their babies through the fire 🔥
🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️😢 I wonder what it will take for these Democrats and rino Republicans to finally say ENOUGH!!!
You may be closer to the truth than you realize…
OMG. Heartbreaking loss of a child. RIP and condolences to that family. (We'll see if the family is able to face the truth...)
That’s a very good question… what WILL make them change their tunes? Are they truly that clueless or do they not give a crap about their own children?! 🔥🔥🔥. Passing their own babies through the fire… 😞😞😞😢🙏🏽
Outrageous!! I only listened to the segment containing public comments, and I am dumbfounded by the ignorance of most of the speakers who are parents and have actually been preventing their own children from living their lives solely because there is no vaccine for them??? They were spouting numbers of children who died of covid; one person said 500 have died, and another said 1500 have died. Would someone please, PLEASE tell me where these pitiful parents obtained such information?
A John Hopkins study of 48000 children found no deaths from Covid of a healthy child. These findings are supported by data from Germany, Sweden and the UK.
Parents who believe children are dying from Covid likely get their information from the MSM and don't consider they're being fed propaganda, despite the lies being acknowledged by those same propaganda sources:https://www.foxnews.com/media/new-york-times-correction-children-covid-died
Thank you very much! I remember the Johns Hopkins study that no healthy children have died from covid, but I was not aware of the NYT crap nor its retraction.
I live in a senior residence where I am the only resident who refused the Vaccine (only permitted because I moved in before the Vax was available ). I have been shunned, asked to wait for the next elevator, called an idiot ,thrown off committees, told I really am not welcome in the dining room etc. They are really terrified and I see no hope of change. The risk of the shot (especially to the young) is never acknowledged. I feel like a Jew in Germany in the 30's.
Without my faith I don't know what l'd do.
Based on what I know I should shun vaccinated people but I can’t be bothered to be that petty.
Thank you for sharing Eleanor. Although as a college student I've yet to experience such blatant discrimination, I relate to your feelings about '30s Germany. Will be praying for your strength here in the northeast. Stay strong. God bless
Sorry about your situation. Amazing what fear and low IQ can do to people. Common sense out the window.
Know that we love and stand by you. Blessings from Brooklyn, NYC.
Amazing how easily a formerly decent population can be turned on a dime to embrace discrimination. Stay strong!
God bless you.
Stay strong!
Exactly! Eleanor, Stay strong, indeed. When I grow up I want to be just like you!
Good for you in your refusal and adhering to your stance! It must be hard being solo there...I feel like that much of the time in my own home, but not to such an extreme as it sounds for you. I grew up as the black sheep and scape goat as a kid in my family. It is familiar to me. I also know you can't NOT stand for truth. It is inherent in one when they feel/ know it. Self betrayal is not an option. My thoughts and prayers are with you and remember if you are feeling really excluded and down...someone is sending good wishes. We all need more of those. Pullin' for ya!
But alas, these poor kids.....