I just re-read an article I wrote last July. The article summarizes "the most comprehensive study done to date" of COVID Mortality risks to children in the UK in the first 12 months of the pandemic. The researchers examined the medical records of EVERY hospitalized child in the UK during this time span. The researchers from prestigious m…
I just re-read an article I wrote last July. The article summarizes "the most comprehensive study done to date" of COVID Mortality risks to children in the UK in the first 12 months of the pandemic. The researchers examined the medical records of EVERY hospitalized child in the UK during this time span. The researchers from prestigious medical institutions concluded that 25 UK children (0 to 18) had died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. However, of these 25 Covid victims, 19 had severe or "life-limiting" co-morbid medical conditions. This means only six (6) "healthy" children in the UK died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. That would be one death of a healthy child every two months. The UK has approximately 12 million children in this age range. This means the mortality risk to "healthy" children from Covid was 6/12 million = 0.0001 percent. Or: Roughly 1 in 2 million healthy children had died from Covid.
In my article, I also point out that the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) from COVID during this time span was about half that of influenza. (It's actually much lower as the number of "cases" that determines the IFR was a big under-count.)
A child's chances of dying "from" Covid are far lower than the odd's a random child (or any person) will be struck by lightning in a one-year period of time (roughly 1-in-700,000 odds).
So children, healthy or not, are more likely to die from influenza than Covid. and healthy children are more likely to be hit by lightning than they are to die from Covid.
So forget all the mumbo jumbo in this hearing. Healthy children don't need a Covid vaccine if they literally have a 0.000 percent of dying from this disease.
Plus, everyone now knows the "vaccines" don't prevent infection or spread so the vaccinated children don't even "protect" their older grandparents from being infected.
Needless to say the findings of the UK study were completely ignored by the mainstream media and I know no media picked up my article published by uncoverDC.com. But I still think both make the ONLY points one needs to make about the "necessity" of vaccinating children against Covid. There is no necessity because there is no mortality risk for the 99.5 percent of children who do not live with severe or "life-limiting" pre-existing medical conditions.
... I guess one might digest the above-referenced UK study and my article on same and conclude that children who DO live with extreme medical conditions SHOULD be vaccinated. As these children, per the study, were about 3X more likely to die "from" Covid than healthy children (six deaths among the the "healthy" child cohort and 19 among the cohort with severe or chronic or "life-limiting" pre-existing conditions.)
However, I would hesitate to vaccinate even these "higher-risk" children. My argument would be these children already have suppressed or weakened immune systems and we now seem to be learning the Covid jabs make such people MORE susceptible to contracting other illnesses that could kill them due to their "natural immunity" perhaps being compromised. In short, people who already have compromised immune systems should also perhaps be very wary of taking a shot that might compromise their immune systems even more.
* It was hard for me to quantify exactly how many children do suffer from chronic or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I think in my article I found one reference that said about 3-in-1000 children (1-in-333) children live with such severe medical conditions. This seems about right to me. Here I thought of my high school graduating class of 140 students. I knew every one of these students and went to school with most of them for years. I don't remember one classmate in my class who had what I would consider an "chronic" or "life-limiting" medical condition. These are medical conditions that keep people from participating in normal activities. Many can't even go to school, or miss many weeks of school in a given year because of their hardships. They all require specialized care. That is, every person in my graduating class would have been considered "healthy" by my definition. I would have noticed if a classmate had "severe" or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I didn't notice this in any of my classmates.
Basically, there might be 0.4 percent of children who live with such extreme medical conditions. 99.6 percent of children do not. These children definitely should NOT be vaccinated, and I'd argue that the 0.4 percent should pray hard over whether to get these vaccines or not.
I just re-read an article I wrote last July. The article summarizes "the most comprehensive study done to date" of COVID Mortality risks to children in the UK in the first 12 months of the pandemic. The researchers examined the medical records of EVERY hospitalized child in the UK during this time span. The researchers from prestigious medical institutions concluded that 25 UK children (0 to 18) had died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. However, of these 25 Covid victims, 19 had severe or "life-limiting" co-morbid medical conditions. This means only six (6) "healthy" children in the UK died "from" Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. That would be one death of a healthy child every two months. The UK has approximately 12 million children in this age range. This means the mortality risk to "healthy" children from Covid was 6/12 million = 0.0001 percent. Or: Roughly 1 in 2 million healthy children had died from Covid.
In my article, I also point out that the Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) from COVID during this time span was about half that of influenza. (It's actually much lower as the number of "cases" that determines the IFR was a big under-count.)
A child's chances of dying "from" Covid are far lower than the odd's a random child (or any person) will be struck by lightning in a one-year period of time (roughly 1-in-700,000 odds).
So children, healthy or not, are more likely to die from influenza than Covid. and healthy children are more likely to be hit by lightning than they are to die from Covid.
So forget all the mumbo jumbo in this hearing. Healthy children don't need a Covid vaccine if they literally have a 0.000 percent of dying from this disease.
Plus, everyone now knows the "vaccines" don't prevent infection or spread so the vaccinated children don't even "protect" their older grandparents from being infected.
Needless to say the findings of the UK study were completely ignored by the mainstream media and I know no media picked up my article published by uncoverDC.com. But I still think both make the ONLY points one needs to make about the "necessity" of vaccinating children against Covid. There is no necessity because there is no mortality risk for the 99.5 percent of children who do not live with severe or "life-limiting" pre-existing medical conditions.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
... I guess one might digest the above-referenced UK study and my article on same and conclude that children who DO live with extreme medical conditions SHOULD be vaccinated. As these children, per the study, were about 3X more likely to die "from" Covid than healthy children (six deaths among the the "healthy" child cohort and 19 among the cohort with severe or chronic or "life-limiting" pre-existing conditions.)
However, I would hesitate to vaccinate even these "higher-risk" children. My argument would be these children already have suppressed or weakened immune systems and we now seem to be learning the Covid jabs make such people MORE susceptible to contracting other illnesses that could kill them due to their "natural immunity" perhaps being compromised. In short, people who already have compromised immune systems should also perhaps be very wary of taking a shot that might compromise their immune systems even more.
* It was hard for me to quantify exactly how many children do suffer from chronic or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I think in my article I found one reference that said about 3-in-1000 children (1-in-333) children live with such severe medical conditions. This seems about right to me. Here I thought of my high school graduating class of 140 students. I knew every one of these students and went to school with most of them for years. I don't remember one classmate in my class who had what I would consider an "chronic" or "life-limiting" medical condition. These are medical conditions that keep people from participating in normal activities. Many can't even go to school, or miss many weeks of school in a given year because of their hardships. They all require specialized care. That is, every person in my graduating class would have been considered "healthy" by my definition. I would have noticed if a classmate had "severe" or "life-limiting" medical conditions. I didn't notice this in any of my classmates.
Basically, there might be 0.4 percent of children who live with such extreme medical conditions. 99.6 percent of children do not. These children definitely should NOT be vaccinated, and I'd argue that the 0.4 percent should pray hard over whether to get these vaccines or not.