Was there any discussion at this meeting as to whether children even need this vaccine? Given their almost zero risk of adverse effects from the virus? It doesn't sound so.
Was there any discussion at this meeting as to whether children even need this vaccine? Given their almost zero risk of adverse effects from the virus? It doesn't sound so.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
Was there any discussion at this meeting as to whether children even need this vaccine? Given their almost zero risk of adverse effects from the virus? It doesn't sound so.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
Yet that vital information did not factor into the discussion at the meeting, apparently?
Yep. That's my main point. What should have been the main point didn't even factor into the discussion or hearing.
No one in good health under 60 needs that crap.
No one in good health over 60 needs it either! I can vouch for that many times over!