Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
Even the experts occasionally acknowledge that there is "little risk" to children, but even this is a disingenuous statement. The real mortality risk to children should be described as "infintesimable" or "microscopic" or "virtually non-existent" ... or 0.000 percent.
https://uncoverdc.com/2021/07/30/for-majority-of-uk-children-covid-mortality-is-0-000/
Yet that vital information did not factor into the discussion at the meeting, apparently?
Yep. That's my main point. What should have been the main point didn't even factor into the discussion or hearing.