Betsy, it's obvious that AN is a stalker, like Dr. Jekyll. Medical doctors can be like that, esp. when they belong to a state trade cartel used by them to inflate revenues and to marginalize medics outside the cartel.
Since democrats, too, are malevolent stalkers, it's a good idea to poke holes in their faith.
Consider, for example, the problem of how to establish a democracy democratically. Must one do that through voting or not through voting? If democratically through voting, the founding fanatics will need a government to organize a plebiscite and to impose the results, but this organizing government itself isn't necessarily democratic. (Was it established by plebiscite?) This method of establishing democracy leads to the problem of infinite regress.
If voting is unnecessary to establish a democracy democratically, then why do we need voting to pick politicians? The founding fanatics themselves were not chosen by a popularity contest, so they ought to be happy with a system of chosing legislators, executives, and judges without voting.
Allison, I wonder if you ever considered speaking with Kory or Marik about early treatment. Perhaps they would surprise you. You are in the position to help many people. There are many people doing noticeably better when they begin early treatment with IVM. It has worked on 6/6 high risk people I know. Maybe it's not a coincidence and worth trying.
Thank you for your response. The monoclonals are fine, but I'm afraid I have to disagree about the IVM. There are over 70 studies so if one happened to be fraudulent, it wouldn't negate the others. What I neglected to tell you was that I personally know of 6 high-risk individuals that took IVM when they got COVID and they all recovered well, including my 94 yr old father, with no residual problems. I was in a position to closely observe this. I am also far more interested in what treating physicians have to say, rather than the academics. RCTs are great when the protocols are good. However, I am rather partial to the population studies, where it doesn't take a week or more after symptoms begin to start treatment. It is hard to argue with the success in Peru and Uttar Pradesh - but like I said, I've seen it work, up close and personal.
She is just a Twitter shill that lies and apparently doesn't like you. Acknowledging anything about her is not wort your time.
Agreed…ignore the trolls, they’re a waste of thought and time and energy
I also wonder if she is a lure and taking names for pharma. Go after Steve's followers, make their life hell too.
Betsy, it's obvious that AN is a stalker, like Dr. Jekyll. Medical doctors can be like that, esp. when they belong to a state trade cartel used by them to inflate revenues and to marginalize medics outside the cartel.
Since democrats, too, are malevolent stalkers, it's a good idea to poke holes in their faith.
Consider, for example, the problem of how to establish a democracy democratically. Must one do that through voting or not through voting? If democratically through voting, the founding fanatics will need a government to organize a plebiscite and to impose the results, but this organizing government itself isn't necessarily democratic. (Was it established by plebiscite?) This method of establishing democracy leads to the problem of infinite regress.
If voting is unnecessary to establish a democracy democratically, then why do we need voting to pick politicians? The founding fanatics themselves were not chosen by a popularity contest, so they ought to be happy with a system of chosing legislators, executives, and judges without voting.
"Steve Kirsch and others making $$ on Substack"
How does that compare to having one's experimental injections subsidized by the state? Probably not so good, huh?
i see that you're posting stuff up and down the comment section, just like a cultish stalker would. Funny that.
Allison, I wonder if you ever considered speaking with Kory or Marik about early treatment. Perhaps they would surprise you. You are in the position to help many people. There are many people doing noticeably better when they begin early treatment with IVM. It has worked on 6/6 high risk people I know. Maybe it's not a coincidence and worth trying.
Thank you for your response. The monoclonals are fine, but I'm afraid I have to disagree about the IVM. There are over 70 studies so if one happened to be fraudulent, it wouldn't negate the others. What I neglected to tell you was that I personally know of 6 high-risk individuals that took IVM when they got COVID and they all recovered well, including my 94 yr old father, with no residual problems. I was in a position to closely observe this. I am also far more interested in what treating physicians have to say, rather than the academics. RCTs are great when the protocols are good. However, I am rather partial to the population studies, where it doesn't take a week or more after symptoms begin to start treatment. It is hard to argue with the success in Peru and Uttar Pradesh - but like I said, I've seen it work, up close and personal.
So then, please address the questions and concerns of the ppl. The science, as it were.