If vaccines cause autism, why did this never show up before. Vaccines have been around since the 1920s at least. I never knew anyone who was autistic growing up in the 1950s and 1960s, why now? Have there been societal changes that could be affecting this? Is it because children are getting too many vaccines? Has the formulation changed,…
If vaccines cause autism, why did this never show up before. Vaccines have been around since the 1920s at least. I never knew anyone who was autistic growing up in the 1950s and 1960s, why now? Have there been societal changes that could be affecting this? Is it because children are getting too many vaccines? Has the formulation changed, even before the doom covid shots? Our son had maybe 16 shots in total, from his infancy through his teen years and he never had any problems. I'm not saying that they don't, but I'm not convinced that they do or that they are the only factor. And, what is the alternative, to let children get sick again? Childhood illnesses are not benign, mumps can sterilize boys if caught at the right age, measles can kill, Roald Dahl's daughter died of measles. Whopping cough and diphtheria are serious illnesses that can kill. Rather than get rid of vaccines, maybe a better idea would be to make them safer. Several generations of people have grown up with no knowledge of these illnesses, so they have no idea of how serious they can be. German measles can cause deformities in unborn children. During the 1920s over 200,000 children died during a diphtheria epidemic. My own father almost died of diphtheria as a baby, it was only my grandfather holding him up by his feet and beating his back until the mucus plug came out that saved him. Shouldn't this subject be looked at objectively, without hysteria and emotion? And before everyone jumps on me for having a heretical opinion, I am not and have never been associated with any pharmaceutical company, nor has anyone in my family. And yes, I have been accused of being a shill for those companies, which I basically despise myself.
I don't think there's any good evidence vaccines played a role in mitigating those diseases. They were very much on the wane and all but gone when their respective vaccines were introduced. The book Turtles All the Way Down may elaborate on this. (I have yet to read it, but such is my understanding from the reviews. Make sure you get the real one, not the book with the same title intended to confuse.)
I believe formulations have changed. And that's more the case with the inactive ingredients (which people point towards more as the culprit) than the active ones. The schedule surely has. I'm an old guy and only got a few of these, but kids today are supposed to get like several dozen.
That's a good question to ask - whether or not other societal changes may be contributing. But that's another question that won't be investigated adequately. Clearly we're doing something wrong. There has been this massive increase in allergies as well as autism (and other chronic diseases). But people are very averse to thinking they're wrong. (I don't get that. I'm always happy to find out I was wrong about something. It's an opportunity to improve.) No one wants to ask a question where the answer might be painful. e.g. Fauci presided over all this mess, so by any reasonable objective measure he's a colossal failure. But if you believe him to be a hero you get to believe we have heroes at the helm. And isn't that pleasant?
It is not that easy to create a vaccine that doesn't kill or maim on the spot, it is a fine (dark) art to create damage over time. Also, the rates of those diseases are much lower now because of better nutrition and sanitation, not vaccines. They still affect the poor and uneducated, living near garbage dumps etc., as they did before, but you don't get to hear about it.
Of course it's hard to make a decent, safe vaccine, that's why it takes 10 to 15 years to do it. We avoided the covid vaxx because we remembered, way, way back when they were trying gene therapy to help people with genetic diseases. They thought they could alter the DNA in a person and somehow, almost magically, it could be injected into them and all the cells of the body would transform. They tried it on a retarded teen and a man with ALS. Both died almost before the needle was out of their arms. When they came out with this mRNA stuff we knew to avoid it like the plague. And we may be seeing much higher rates of those 'childhood illnesses' and other diseases like TB now that we have an invasion over our borders, including the Canadian border.
Yes, it takes 10 to 15 years to make a vaccine that doesn't draw suspicion, but the basic idea is flawed anyway. The immune system is much more than antibodies, and it is not lack of aluminum or mercury that makes it underperform. Thinking that toxins that have no place in the human body would somehow make it healthier is a flawed idea as well. But being ignorant to the ways of nature (nature being a form of technology anyway), there are arrogant idiots who think they can play God, messing with genes and altering the human body in ways it was not designed to perform, without even basic understanding of how it is supposed to work, this resulting in the current atrocities.
Well, considering that the child mortality rate during the 19th century was extremely high, I can see why people wanted to have some way to prevent the death of their children. When I was a child myself, a friend of mine had an old cemetery on her parents' property and one of the inscriptions from the 19th Century stuck with me: "She was the sunshine of our life until God took her from us." The little girl was 2 years old. Scientists were not trying to play God when they started developing vaccines, they were trying to stop children from dying. Isn't it quite possible that God gave these men the idea and help to develop vaccines, also?
The best vaccine is the one that cost the least time to make and makes the most profit and u need about 70 of them. Or 80 shots if ur really a sleazy low life SOB
God didn't take anyone, but lack of knowledge. It is possible that the original scientists were well intended, but the results speak for themselves. No healthy body dies from a little infection. There is no magic pill or shot that works as a substitute for a healthy lifestyle, meaning get the nutrients in and the toxins out, lots of sunshine, balancing your energy with enough sleep and the right amount of exercise, a positive attitude towards life and people etc. Just because someone seems to "never had any problem" from vaccines, it doesn't mean they didn't. One of the main purpose of vaccines is dumbing you down, lowering your IQ. Even smart people, high intellectual achievers, they could get ten times smarter if they got rid of the poison in their system.
No, God didn't take that child, but from where she was living, she was definitely in the top part of society. The manor where she lived was rich, and her parents were rich. These were people who owned probably 100 acres in Connecticut, in a very beautiful area. You can talk all you want about eating healthy, etc, but pathogens will exploit any body eventually. If you think that eating the right foods will keep you from being sick, go for it. And if you think vaccines didn't cut down on childhood deaths by a huge factor, then believe what you will, arguing with you is like arguing with a flat earther. Don't bother to waste your time replying because I'm done answering you.
I'm definitely not a flat earther, I don't know what upset you. Being rich is almost a guarantee for being a fool, as Jesus said. I'm all for freedom, if you want your vaccines, go for it, but I don't know why anybody who knows what they are would want them. Even supposing the idea is right and that the scientists aren't Mengele students, how do you know what is really inside that vaccine vial? Do you know how hard it is to prevent any contaminant reaching there? Do you know that if such a vial would be broken, the doctor has to seal the area and bring some guys looking like astronauts to decontaminate it? But you think it is somehow ok to inject it straight into your body? How are you on Steve's substack not knowing these things? You don't know what you don't know. You can be whatever you want to be, but please, don't be an ignorant.
If vaccines cause autism, why did this never show up before. Vaccines have been around since the 1920s at least. I never knew anyone who was autistic growing up in the 1950s and 1960s, why now? Have there been societal changes that could be affecting this? Is it because children are getting too many vaccines? Has the formulation changed, even before the doom covid shots? Our son had maybe 16 shots in total, from his infancy through his teen years and he never had any problems. I'm not saying that they don't, but I'm not convinced that they do or that they are the only factor. And, what is the alternative, to let children get sick again? Childhood illnesses are not benign, mumps can sterilize boys if caught at the right age, measles can kill, Roald Dahl's daughter died of measles. Whopping cough and diphtheria are serious illnesses that can kill. Rather than get rid of vaccines, maybe a better idea would be to make them safer. Several generations of people have grown up with no knowledge of these illnesses, so they have no idea of how serious they can be. German measles can cause deformities in unborn children. During the 1920s over 200,000 children died during a diphtheria epidemic. My own father almost died of diphtheria as a baby, it was only my grandfather holding him up by his feet and beating his back until the mucus plug came out that saved him. Shouldn't this subject be looked at objectively, without hysteria and emotion? And before everyone jumps on me for having a heretical opinion, I am not and have never been associated with any pharmaceutical company, nor has anyone in my family. And yes, I have been accused of being a shill for those companies, which I basically despise myself.
I don't think there's any good evidence vaccines played a role in mitigating those diseases. They were very much on the wane and all but gone when their respective vaccines were introduced. The book Turtles All the Way Down may elaborate on this. (I have yet to read it, but such is my understanding from the reviews. Make sure you get the real one, not the book with the same title intended to confuse.)
I believe formulations have changed. And that's more the case with the inactive ingredients (which people point towards more as the culprit) than the active ones. The schedule surely has. I'm an old guy and only got a few of these, but kids today are supposed to get like several dozen.
That's a good question to ask - whether or not other societal changes may be contributing. But that's another question that won't be investigated adequately. Clearly we're doing something wrong. There has been this massive increase in allergies as well as autism (and other chronic diseases). But people are very averse to thinking they're wrong. (I don't get that. I'm always happy to find out I was wrong about something. It's an opportunity to improve.) No one wants to ask a question where the answer might be painful. e.g. Fauci presided over all this mess, so by any reasonable objective measure he's a colossal failure. But if you believe him to be a hero you get to believe we have heroes at the helm. And isn't that pleasant?
It is not that easy to create a vaccine that doesn't kill or maim on the spot, it is a fine (dark) art to create damage over time. Also, the rates of those diseases are much lower now because of better nutrition and sanitation, not vaccines. They still affect the poor and uneducated, living near garbage dumps etc., as they did before, but you don't get to hear about it.
Of course it's hard to make a decent, safe vaccine, that's why it takes 10 to 15 years to do it. We avoided the covid vaxx because we remembered, way, way back when they were trying gene therapy to help people with genetic diseases. They thought they could alter the DNA in a person and somehow, almost magically, it could be injected into them and all the cells of the body would transform. They tried it on a retarded teen and a man with ALS. Both died almost before the needle was out of their arms. When they came out with this mRNA stuff we knew to avoid it like the plague. And we may be seeing much higher rates of those 'childhood illnesses' and other diseases like TB now that we have an invasion over our borders, including the Canadian border.
Yes, it takes 10 to 15 years to make a vaccine that doesn't draw suspicion, but the basic idea is flawed anyway. The immune system is much more than antibodies, and it is not lack of aluminum or mercury that makes it underperform. Thinking that toxins that have no place in the human body would somehow make it healthier is a flawed idea as well. But being ignorant to the ways of nature (nature being a form of technology anyway), there are arrogant idiots who think they can play God, messing with genes and altering the human body in ways it was not designed to perform, without even basic understanding of how it is supposed to work, this resulting in the current atrocities.
Well, considering that the child mortality rate during the 19th century was extremely high, I can see why people wanted to have some way to prevent the death of their children. When I was a child myself, a friend of mine had an old cemetery on her parents' property and one of the inscriptions from the 19th Century stuck with me: "She was the sunshine of our life until God took her from us." The little girl was 2 years old. Scientists were not trying to play God when they started developing vaccines, they were trying to stop children from dying. Isn't it quite possible that God gave these men the idea and help to develop vaccines, also?
The best vaccine is the one that cost the least time to make and makes the most profit and u need about 70 of them. Or 80 shots if ur really a sleazy low life SOB
God didn't take anyone, but lack of knowledge. It is possible that the original scientists were well intended, but the results speak for themselves. No healthy body dies from a little infection. There is no magic pill or shot that works as a substitute for a healthy lifestyle, meaning get the nutrients in and the toxins out, lots of sunshine, balancing your energy with enough sleep and the right amount of exercise, a positive attitude towards life and people etc. Just because someone seems to "never had any problem" from vaccines, it doesn't mean they didn't. One of the main purpose of vaccines is dumbing you down, lowering your IQ. Even smart people, high intellectual achievers, they could get ten times smarter if they got rid of the poison in their system.
No, God didn't take that child, but from where she was living, she was definitely in the top part of society. The manor where she lived was rich, and her parents were rich. These were people who owned probably 100 acres in Connecticut, in a very beautiful area. You can talk all you want about eating healthy, etc, but pathogens will exploit any body eventually. If you think that eating the right foods will keep you from being sick, go for it. And if you think vaccines didn't cut down on childhood deaths by a huge factor, then believe what you will, arguing with you is like arguing with a flat earther. Don't bother to waste your time replying because I'm done answering you.
I'm definitely not a flat earther, I don't know what upset you. Being rich is almost a guarantee for being a fool, as Jesus said. I'm all for freedom, if you want your vaccines, go for it, but I don't know why anybody who knows what they are would want them. Even supposing the idea is right and that the scientists aren't Mengele students, how do you know what is really inside that vaccine vial? Do you know how hard it is to prevent any contaminant reaching there? Do you know that if such a vial would be broken, the doctor has to seal the area and bring some guys looking like astronauts to decontaminate it? But you think it is somehow ok to inject it straight into your body? How are you on Steve's substack not knowing these things? You don't know what you don't know. You can be whatever you want to be, but please, don't be an ignorant.