Yes, it takes 10 to 15 years to make a vaccine that doesn't draw suspicion, but the basic idea is flawed anyway. The immune system is much more than antibodies, and it is not lack of aluminum or mercury that makes it underperform. Thinking that toxins that have no place in the human body would somehow make it healthier is a flawed idea a…
Yes, it takes 10 to 15 years to make a vaccine that doesn't draw suspicion, but the basic idea is flawed anyway. The immune system is much more than antibodies, and it is not lack of aluminum or mercury that makes it underperform. Thinking that toxins that have no place in the human body would somehow make it healthier is a flawed idea as well. But being ignorant to the ways of nature (nature being a form of technology anyway), there are arrogant idiots who think they can play God, messing with genes and altering the human body in ways it was not designed to perform, without even basic understanding of how it is supposed to work, this resulting in the current atrocities.
Well, considering that the child mortality rate during the 19th century was extremely high, I can see why people wanted to have some way to prevent the death of their children. When I was a child myself, a friend of mine had an old cemetery on her parents' property and one of the inscriptions from the 19th Century stuck with me: "She was the sunshine of our life until God took her from us." The little girl was 2 years old. Scientists were not trying to play God when they started developing vaccines, they were trying to stop children from dying. Isn't it quite possible that God gave these men the idea and help to develop vaccines, also?
The best vaccine is the one that cost the least time to make and makes the most profit and u need about 70 of them. Or 80 shots if ur really a sleazy low life SOB
God didn't take anyone, but lack of knowledge. It is possible that the original scientists were well intended, but the results speak for themselves. No healthy body dies from a little infection. There is no magic pill or shot that works as a substitute for a healthy lifestyle, meaning get the nutrients in and the toxins out, lots of sunshine, balancing your energy with enough sleep and the right amount of exercise, a positive attitude towards life and people etc. Just because someone seems to "never had any problem" from vaccines, it doesn't mean they didn't. One of the main purpose of vaccines is dumbing you down, lowering your IQ. Even smart people, high intellectual achievers, they could get ten times smarter if they got rid of the poison in their system.
No, God didn't take that child, but from where she was living, she was definitely in the top part of society. The manor where she lived was rich, and her parents were rich. These were people who owned probably 100 acres in Connecticut, in a very beautiful area. You can talk all you want about eating healthy, etc, but pathogens will exploit any body eventually. If you think that eating the right foods will keep you from being sick, go for it. And if you think vaccines didn't cut down on childhood deaths by a huge factor, then believe what you will, arguing with you is like arguing with a flat earther. Don't bother to waste your time replying because I'm done answering you.
I'm definitely not a flat earther, I don't know what upset you. Being rich is almost a guarantee for being a fool, as Jesus said. I'm all for freedom, if you want your vaccines, go for it, but I don't know why anybody who knows what they are would want them. Even supposing the idea is right and that the scientists aren't Mengele students, how do you know what is really inside that vaccine vial? Do you know how hard it is to prevent any contaminant reaching there? Do you know that if such a vial would be broken, the doctor has to seal the area and bring some guys looking like astronauts to decontaminate it? But you think it is somehow ok to inject it straight into your body? How are you on Steve's substack not knowing these things? You don't know what you don't know. You can be whatever you want to be, but please, don't be an ignorant.
Yes, it takes 10 to 15 years to make a vaccine that doesn't draw suspicion, but the basic idea is flawed anyway. The immune system is much more than antibodies, and it is not lack of aluminum or mercury that makes it underperform. Thinking that toxins that have no place in the human body would somehow make it healthier is a flawed idea as well. But being ignorant to the ways of nature (nature being a form of technology anyway), there are arrogant idiots who think they can play God, messing with genes and altering the human body in ways it was not designed to perform, without even basic understanding of how it is supposed to work, this resulting in the current atrocities.
Well, considering that the child mortality rate during the 19th century was extremely high, I can see why people wanted to have some way to prevent the death of their children. When I was a child myself, a friend of mine had an old cemetery on her parents' property and one of the inscriptions from the 19th Century stuck with me: "She was the sunshine of our life until God took her from us." The little girl was 2 years old. Scientists were not trying to play God when they started developing vaccines, they were trying to stop children from dying. Isn't it quite possible that God gave these men the idea and help to develop vaccines, also?
The best vaccine is the one that cost the least time to make and makes the most profit and u need about 70 of them. Or 80 shots if ur really a sleazy low life SOB
God didn't take anyone, but lack of knowledge. It is possible that the original scientists were well intended, but the results speak for themselves. No healthy body dies from a little infection. There is no magic pill or shot that works as a substitute for a healthy lifestyle, meaning get the nutrients in and the toxins out, lots of sunshine, balancing your energy with enough sleep and the right amount of exercise, a positive attitude towards life and people etc. Just because someone seems to "never had any problem" from vaccines, it doesn't mean they didn't. One of the main purpose of vaccines is dumbing you down, lowering your IQ. Even smart people, high intellectual achievers, they could get ten times smarter if they got rid of the poison in their system.
No, God didn't take that child, but from where she was living, she was definitely in the top part of society. The manor where she lived was rich, and her parents were rich. These were people who owned probably 100 acres in Connecticut, in a very beautiful area. You can talk all you want about eating healthy, etc, but pathogens will exploit any body eventually. If you think that eating the right foods will keep you from being sick, go for it. And if you think vaccines didn't cut down on childhood deaths by a huge factor, then believe what you will, arguing with you is like arguing with a flat earther. Don't bother to waste your time replying because I'm done answering you.
I'm definitely not a flat earther, I don't know what upset you. Being rich is almost a guarantee for being a fool, as Jesus said. I'm all for freedom, if you want your vaccines, go for it, but I don't know why anybody who knows what they are would want them. Even supposing the idea is right and that the scientists aren't Mengele students, how do you know what is really inside that vaccine vial? Do you know how hard it is to prevent any contaminant reaching there? Do you know that if such a vial would be broken, the doctor has to seal the area and bring some guys looking like astronauts to decontaminate it? But you think it is somehow ok to inject it straight into your body? How are you on Steve's substack not knowing these things? You don't know what you don't know. You can be whatever you want to be, but please, don't be an ignorant.