Nobody needs to respond to a troll holding out a straw man but kurt did. I also responded that you don't understand Steve Kirsch and VSRF - which you didn't understand. You still don't understand cherry-picking.
Nobody needs to respond to a troll holding out a straw man but kurt did. I also responded that you don't understand Steve Kirsch and VSRF - which you didn't understand. You still don't understand cherry-picking.
You’re insulting a long-term follower? Steve’s team calling me names? I’m a “troll” for making observations, which after 4 exchanges now, you still can’t defend? So much for doing good.
You responded in many ways but never directly to my question. I don’t understand Steve and VSRF? How is that even relevant to the issue? Why don’t you speak to that instead of what you assume to be another’s “understanding?” You are deliberately avoiding the issue.
You're right; you have a long history in the comments of insulting the author and the commenters, often yelling at them while they reply you are a troll. Your comments were exactly like the gossip trolls, so like many others, I assumed you were one. Maybe you should consider there's a reason why so many people think you're trolling.
I'm sorry you have all this rancor against Steve Kirsch and the comment board; it would be great if you could get along a little better with everyone since, like you say you are a long time follower. Sasha Latypova has a great substack as you know - she gets along with VSRF and many others in the medical freedom movement, even if they sometimes prioritize different subjects of study.
kurt explained Steve Kirsch's attitude perfectly, I can't improve on his comment. I could add a suggestion to consider that if the comment board is wrong about assuming you are a troll just because of what you say, perhaps you could be wrong about Steve Kirsch being a secret agent for Big Pharma by picking out things he says. Something to think about.
Have you lost your mind? This is the kind of professionalism that comes from Steve’s camp? The passive aggressive, “I’m sorry you have all this rancor against Steve Kirsch?”
My comments are nothing like “gossip trolls,” whatever that is. Who is gossiping other than you? I asked why Steve takes a particular stance that I find troubling — I got nothing but personal insults, side-stepping and name calling. Who is the real gossip troll?
Way to silence discussion Wayne. Call people who disagree with you or Steve, or ask a sincere, direct question about something Steve has ACTUALLY said (which still, incredibly, remains unanswered!), a TROLL.
And then try to dox them. Ruin their reputation and try to censor them. You should add the term “conspiracy theorist.” Sound familiar? These are all deep state tactics.
A sincere author (including his henchmen) would encourage debate, refrain from calling its subscribers names, and refrain from trying to falsely ruin their reputations. When I see bullshit, I call it out. But you’d rather I simply follow, stay silent and be a sheep. Why does this all feel so familiar?
Nobody's doxing, when you make comments on a website anyone can look them up by using internet search functions. I can't help comments you posted and people's reaction to them. Yes, they fooled me, too.
If you really want an answer from Steve Kirsch on your sincere, direct question just use Steve Kirsch's Contact Page: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-to-contact-me which has an option for subscribers. He answers comments sometimes but I'm sure you know he's very busy and doesn't answer every comment addressed to him.
You can use the opportunity to file a complaint about me! Bonus.
Stop acting like a 2 year old. If this is a serious substack, then just answer my question instead of denying the things you've actually done and trying so hard to make a fool out of me.
Do you have any clue what "doxxing" means? What you did is exactly what it is. Deciding you want to bury someone by leaving the conversation and finding out as much professional or personal information about them and using it against them in a public forum. You even explained what you did. I guess the fake MFM movement gets what it pays for, right Wayne?
I am very active on many substacks and have been since Day 1--before Steve even came on the scene. That makes me guilty of something? I paid for Steve's substack until after about one year (and continuing) of standing in place, with Steve creating "funding groups," giving speeches and listening to the same set of talking points churned over and over again, I put my money elsewhere. I got tired of paying for unending, passive audience polls repeating the same hot points from 2021.
I don't care much for blathering accusations ---or anything else other than the truth. You can insult me all day long--usually when that happens, the person asking the question is right over the target.
I brought up a very legitimate issue which angered you/Steve and you are going for the jugular. That tells me you aren't serious people, and worse.
I love how you keep repeating that Steve's conversation with Sasha Latypova gives him legitimacy.
I'm not interested in wasting time making a "formal" complaint about you! You are a for-hire substack monitor. I posted my comment on the ...wait for it....comment page. Are you suggesting I only ask these important questions privately? And he probably won't get to it because "he's very busy." LOL.
Nobody needs to respond to a troll holding out a straw man but kurt did. I also responded that you don't understand Steve Kirsch and VSRF - which you didn't understand. You still don't understand cherry-picking.
You’re insulting a long-term follower? Steve’s team calling me names? I’m a “troll” for making observations, which after 4 exchanges now, you still can’t defend? So much for doing good.
You responded in many ways but never directly to my question. I don’t understand Steve and VSRF? How is that even relevant to the issue? Why don’t you speak to that instead of what you assume to be another’s “understanding?” You are deliberately avoiding the issue.
You're right; you have a long history in the comments of insulting the author and the commenters, often yelling at them while they reply you are a troll. Your comments were exactly like the gossip trolls, so like many others, I assumed you were one. Maybe you should consider there's a reason why so many people think you're trolling.
I'm sorry you have all this rancor against Steve Kirsch and the comment board; it would be great if you could get along a little better with everyone since, like you say you are a long time follower. Sasha Latypova has a great substack as you know - she gets along with VSRF and many others in the medical freedom movement, even if they sometimes prioritize different subjects of study.
kurt explained Steve Kirsch's attitude perfectly, I can't improve on his comment. I could add a suggestion to consider that if the comment board is wrong about assuming you are a troll just because of what you say, perhaps you could be wrong about Steve Kirsch being a secret agent for Big Pharma by picking out things he says. Something to think about.
Have you lost your mind? This is the kind of professionalism that comes from Steve’s camp? The passive aggressive, “I’m sorry you have all this rancor against Steve Kirsch?”
My comments are nothing like “gossip trolls,” whatever that is. Who is gossiping other than you? I asked why Steve takes a particular stance that I find troubling — I got nothing but personal insults, side-stepping and name calling. Who is the real gossip troll?
Way to silence discussion Wayne. Call people who disagree with you or Steve, or ask a sincere, direct question about something Steve has ACTUALLY said (which still, incredibly, remains unanswered!), a TROLL.
And then try to dox them. Ruin their reputation and try to censor them. You should add the term “conspiracy theorist.” Sound familiar? These are all deep state tactics.
A sincere author (including his henchmen) would encourage debate, refrain from calling its subscribers names, and refrain from trying to falsely ruin their reputations. When I see bullshit, I call it out. But you’d rather I simply follow, stay silent and be a sheep. Why does this all feel so familiar?
Nobody's doxing, when you make comments on a website anyone can look them up by using internet search functions. I can't help comments you posted and people's reaction to them. Yes, they fooled me, too.
If you really want an answer from Steve Kirsch on your sincere, direct question just use Steve Kirsch's Contact Page: https://kirschsubstack.com/p/how-to-contact-me which has an option for subscribers. He answers comments sometimes but I'm sure you know he's very busy and doesn't answer every comment addressed to him.
You can use the opportunity to file a complaint about me! Bonus.
Stop acting like a 2 year old. If this is a serious substack, then just answer my question instead of denying the things you've actually done and trying so hard to make a fool out of me.
Do you have any clue what "doxxing" means? What you did is exactly what it is. Deciding you want to bury someone by leaving the conversation and finding out as much professional or personal information about them and using it against them in a public forum. You even explained what you did. I guess the fake MFM movement gets what it pays for, right Wayne?
I am very active on many substacks and have been since Day 1--before Steve even came on the scene. That makes me guilty of something? I paid for Steve's substack until after about one year (and continuing) of standing in place, with Steve creating "funding groups," giving speeches and listening to the same set of talking points churned over and over again, I put my money elsewhere. I got tired of paying for unending, passive audience polls repeating the same hot points from 2021.
I don't care much for blathering accusations ---or anything else other than the truth. You can insult me all day long--usually when that happens, the person asking the question is right over the target.
I brought up a very legitimate issue which angered you/Steve and you are going for the jugular. That tells me you aren't serious people, and worse.
I love how you keep repeating that Steve's conversation with Sasha Latypova gives him legitimacy.
I'm not interested in wasting time making a "formal" complaint about you! You are a for-hire substack monitor. I posted my comment on the ...wait for it....comment page. Are you suggesting I only ask these important questions privately? And he probably won't get to it because "he's very busy." LOL.
We'll have to disagree on who's acting like a 2-year-old. Good luck.