Actually, you just need 1 example to refute a theory, but we have several. There is almost no surge in excess mortality in high % vax states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, etc. If you remove the deaths *attributed* to Delta/covid, the SSA chart would essentially look flat. If a hypothesis was correct, it would be true all over the US.
Actually, you just need 1 example to refute a theory, but we have several. There is almost no surge in excess mortality in high % vax states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, etc. If you remove the deaths *attributed* to Delta/covid, the SSA chart would essentially look flat. If a hypothesis was correct, it would be true all over the US.
"you just need 1 example to refute a theory" is definitely not true- even your favorite theory will have many exceptions, you know that. But much more importantly, "CDC data" is neither trustworthy nor scientifically sound. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials (a.k.a. "the gold standard in medical research") are infinitely superior, though obviously not perfect.
Actually, you just need 1 example to refute a theory, but we have several. There is almost no surge in excess mortality in high % vax states like New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, etc. If you remove the deaths *attributed* to Delta/covid, the SSA chart would essentially look flat. If a hypothesis was correct, it would be true all over the US.
"you just need 1 example to refute a theory" is definitely not true- even your favorite theory will have many exceptions, you know that. But much more importantly, "CDC data" is neither trustworthy nor scientifically sound. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials (a.k.a. "the gold standard in medical research") are infinitely superior, though obviously not perfect.