"you just need 1 example to refute a theory" is definitely not true- even your favorite theory will have many exceptions, you know that. But much more importantly, "CDC data" is neither trustworthy nor scientifically sound. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials (a.k.a. "the gold standard in medical research") are infinitely superior, though obviously not perfect.
"you just need 1 example to refute a theory" is definitely not true- even your favorite theory will have many exceptions, you know that. But much more importantly, "CDC data" is neither trustworthy nor scientifically sound. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials (a.k.a. "the gold standard in medical research") are infinitely superior, though obviously not perfect.
"you just need 1 example to refute a theory" is definitely not true- even your favorite theory will have many exceptions, you know that. But much more importantly, "CDC data" is neither trustworthy nor scientifically sound. Randomized, double-blind clinical trials (a.k.a. "the gold standard in medical research") are infinitely superior, though obviously not perfect.