I just finished a Zoom interview here in New Zealand and the most important topic was the Baby Will story. If you haven't heard about it, here's the synopsis and where to find more info.
I am a long-time blood bank director. Directed donations are discouraged primarily for reason three in your list...they do not want a long list of people coming in and saying "I only want blood from these people". It is already hard enough to make this all work.
According to Roguski, they have recruited a large pool of potential donors. An infant surgery does not take all that much replacement blood, so it is entirely possible that there will be a match in their pool. Or not. The blood bank will be thrilled (I expect) to have that many donations because blood is always in short supply and only one or two units from the volunteers will likely be useful.
Matching is pretty arbitrary: Units are ABO/Rh typed and then pretty randomly selected (usually by expiration date) to be crossmatched. A major side crossmatch is all generally done which makes sure that there are no antibodies in the baby's blood that will clot the incoming transfusion. (A minor side crossmatch, seldom done but considered when volumes are equally small, checks the reverse.) Most matches get through first time. If not, one moves on. So if there are one or two good matches from the group they have assembled, that would be a win for the community and for them.
There is a further layer to put on this. Red cells (which is all they really need to transfuse) are just sacks of hemoglobin with a membrane. They do not contain organelles (like a nucleus) and I expect would not contain spike protein either...no place to attach since the red cell has just a simple unit membrane. So they could give packed, washed RBCs and accomplish all they wish from almost everyone's perspective. Why this is not discussed anywhere I find elusive. And this, of course, beggars the question as to whether someone vaccinated, let us say one year ago, would have any spike protein floating around in any case. Most would think not.
This seems like much ado that does not need to be there just to make a point. As I said, most blood banks will refuse directed donations not only because they likely do not match but also because they establish donation and use predicates that will cause most units to be wasted. If desired, they surely could use this as a major blood drive and "just happen" to use a unit from the drive if it happens to be compatible. Or they could just use washed, packed RBCs from the regular pool...likely will not be any more dangerous for Baby Will.
Happy to answer more questions if some folks have them.
Question—I’m not Covid-vaxxed but have had Lyme and babesia. Aftee antibiotics and antimalarials i tested negative for babesia. Babesia tests are supposedly more reliable than other Lyme tests. But I read anyone who has had babesia can never donate n blood—is this true? Is it rational? I would be glad to donate to an unvaxxed blood bank.
I knew a woman a few yrs ago who had Lyme for 20 yrs and had really suffered. She finally had just found a doctor who prescribed HCQ for her. She took it for 2 weeks and was tested - it came back absolutely negative for Lyme. H C Q kills the spirochetes which cause Lyme.
You can get H C Q from Frontline Doctors if you can't find a doctor to prescribe it. I think Ivermectin may also work. Here is a database which may have some good info on this:
If you can't find a dr to prescribe ivermectin, you can use the "horse paste" it IS perfectly safe for humans, husband and I have both used it several times. Husband was a virologist/immunologist for many years in Public Health Dept of PA. He has 55 yrs research behind him. You can get iver mectin at Tractor Supply by mail or at store or on Amazon. Look up dosages which are measured by a person's weight. If you have questions or need more info, reply to this message. This is NOT medical advice, I am not a doctor, just telling you what worked for a friend of mine.
Glad your friend got that treatment, I hope it helped? I have had Lyme since the early 1990s … took many years to get diagnosed and treated, and I never became completely symptom-free, but it improved. I have some human IVM around in case of Covid, unsure if I still have active Lyme or not, will look into the HCQ and IVM. Thanks!
Yes it completely cured her! She felt terrific. H C Q does cure it! As I stated in my comment to you, she tested 100% negative for Lyme, where she had had it for 20 yrs and tested positive all that time. Negative for it means she was cured! Her doctor told her H C Q will cure it - it did. Best of luck!!!
This is one of those "precautionary" steps. Babesiosis can be seriously life threatening so it is taken seriously. There used to be a lifetime ban on those who said they had ever had the disease, but with better testing re-entry into the donor pool is now allowed by some. These are the latest rules/guidelines: https://americasblood.org/news/final-babesia-guidance-published-by-fda/. So you may very well be able to participate if you have no residual. Your blood bank will be delighted to work with you, I am sure.
Dr K. If only a very small amount of blood is required,is not autologous transfusion possible? Why has no one thought of looking for spike proteins in the blood of previously persons to be able to definitely rule out that issue. ?
The baby has very little blood volume, it is true. Never done an autologous transfusion on an infant -- you could hardly take any blood and it is hard to deal with tiny amounts in a banking situation. But in this case there is a further complication: it takes a fair amount of blood to prime the heart/lung machine irrespective of the size of the patient.
On the other issue, there have been a few studies on the persistence of spike protein but they are still all over the map in terms of what you can take from them. Remember that spikes are made both by the virus and the spikeshot, so that further complicates things.
As opposed to HIV and similar viruses, I am not aware of any published reports of covid being transmitted through blood. This does not mean it has not been -- whatever is in the blood has a chance of getting to the recipient. I am certain that large numbers of donors have had other coronaviruses in proximity to their donations and some of those would have certainly moved on to the recipient -- we do not test for every last virus or bacterium or whatever. This is why blood transfusion is one of those things one does not do unless it is really, really needed.
But most patients do OK with their transfusions -- usually if you are being transfused you have far larger issues with which to deal and having tissue oxygenation is more important than the other potential transfusion issues. We monitor each transfusion to see if we are seeing effects from covid and everything else. There is clearly an under-study of spikeshot effects because of the politics, but that will come out (if any) as the suppression of that whole area falls away bit by bit I expect.
I think you highlighted the problem very well. There is so little information available because it's an unprecedented sitiuation ... mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have never been used before and we don't know very well what the spike is doing to either the blood donors themselves or to their blood donations. So perhaps in the circumstances a "safety first" policy would be best until more data is available, and use unvaccinated blood (if requested) because it MIGHT be safer, not because it definitely IS.
What ever is in the vaccines needs to stay OUT of the general blood supply! It should be up to each individual person to decide what goes into their body PERIOD.
This document is really only the tip of the ice berg, let those who choose to be pure blood stay that way.
You lost me at "I expect" . Indicating a lack of definitive knowledge. That would be too tall of a hurdle for me if that was my Bamm Bamm. Someone must have said this before me, a 4 month old is not eligible for these injections. Without definitive evidence that the blood would not exposed the child to any component of the injections they should not be used in light of the acknowledged availability of pure blood.
You mentioned the problem of "Directed donations" and that's fair enough and makes perfect sense. BUT the current situation is unprecedented so in my opinion previous guidelines can't fully apply. Let's face it, the effect of the mRNA and DNA "vaccines" on people themselves isn't fully known, (although for some it's clearly bad) so it stands to reason it's effect on people's blood is also somewhat unclear. And that's the reality we're going to have to come to terms with
Packed RBCs are still cells with lipid membranes are they not? Just because they don’t have the organelles to translate the mRNA does not mean that the mRNA hasn’t entered the cell. We know with Pseudouridine this mRNA is extremely stable. We know mRNA is in the bloodstream. Offering a recommendation, “try some packed RBCs instead“ without actually studying whether or not the mRNA is in the RBCs is the exact failure (or intentional malfeasance) of the pharmaceutical company and other bad actors that got us into this mess in the first place.
Just because you are explaining the status quo, does not mean that the status quo is the correct approach. I realize it’s complicated, but isn’t that the ingenuity of humans… To solve complex problems? Looks like others have taken the first step. Maybe you should contact them to learn their approach.
Considering the mRNA need the cationic lipid nanoparticles to help them get into a cell, if the mRNA is already uptake by RCB, the lipid nanoparticle that carried it will have fused with the RBC's cell membrane already, and the mRNA will stay inside the RBC forever until the red blood cell goes apoptosis and won't be able to transfect other cells as its cationic lipid shell is gone, unless it is repackaged into extracellular vesicles like exosomes which has much weaker transfection ability...based on what I understand.
Interesting, but that's a lot of faith-based science for a rube like me. Still would rather pay a few mils in extra taxes for an unvaxxed blood bank option.
The donor service still requires that the local blood banks or hospitals accept the donor blood. They (the donor service) is not {yet} a blood bank that can receive donations.
We know that there is graphene and other things in the vax, as demonstrated by a Spanish scientist and IIRC others as well. Graphene causes thousands of tiny cuts in arteries, which cause strokes and other injuries that kill people; hence all this "died suddenly" news. Knowing this, why don't blood banks screen people that have been vaxed? They can still use their blood for folks who don't mind vaxed blood. That way, there would be larger pool of unvaxed blood for those who request it. I know if it were me, I wouldn't want vaxed blood. Thank you.
I am not a Jehovah's WItness, but I had a close friend who was. They do not accept blood transfusions ever, for religious reasons. They are often mocked by health professionals who think they are idiots not to accept a transfusion when "needed," but I had in the past read about this desire to avoid transfusion leading some methods to be developed to minimize need for transfusion - but Plan B could be in fact, to refuse a transfusion. In some cases, turns out you didn't need the transfusion anyway, or - maybe one would prefer to die vs. living with a disabling vax injury that no one believes, and you can't get help with. I don't know for sure what I would do - but - from things I have seen / read during the pandemic, I don't think I would ever go to a hospital. I am an older person, and I think if I die, I die, and I will do it at home without being tortured, abused, and just treated horribly in what passes for hospital care today. Keep the transfusion. I don't think I need vaxxed blood or that it will help me in the long run.
Interesting. Seems like having Mormon neighbors (food storage!) on one side and JW's on the other (no transfusions) is not a bad zombie appocalypse/prepper plan. :)
Agreed! they can keep their vaxxed blood. Thankyou.
Like my father back in the day saying he would "wait and see" before using thalidomide on his patients, I will likewise "wait and see" before taking vaxxed blood.
The problem is of course that it's not always possible to "wait and see". Let say someone had a fall or accident at home and was taken by ambulance into hospital where they said an emergency operation is required. It's not feasible to then say "no thanks, I'll go home for a few months, or years, while they decide whether the blood bank is safe or not". You'd pretty much have to go with whatever they offered
Yes, Pete, that is of course a worry. I am getting a bracelet made which will basically say "no thanks". It depends of course on the degree, category and rate of blood loss, but in animals anyway, if haemolysis has developed slowly, the system copes with quite low haematocrit. And in many cases there are alternatives such as plasma expanders if drop in volume is the problem. And then we need to support efforts to create access to unvaxxed blood products. I think I saw a list of initiatives on James Roguski's substack. Ideally we should aim our own hospitals where we can be confident the interests of the patient reign supreme.
It's a very individual choice, but I would rather pass away quickly due to blood loss than walk around not knowing what has gone into me. But that will be different for everyone. My mother worked briefly in a blood bank years ago. She never said why, but never wanted to accept blood products after that! that was decades back, so technology may have improved. However, my trust in the system is lower now.
I don't want to scaremonger, but I don't want anyone walking blindly into this the way many walked blindly into getting jabbed. If enough people start refusing blood they will have to start sorting donors as well as developing screening tests. PHARMA knows exactly what is in there. So they know for what and how to test.
The one confounding aspect is whether - and to what degree - an unvaccinated person can get the spike protein from a vaccinated person via "shedding", (through bodily fluids etc) without having had a jab themselves. It may be that not all unvaccinated blood would be as "good" as hoped. But that's for another day I guess, a separate unvaxxed blood supply would at least be a start. I don't think they will agree to it though, for fear of implicitly admitting there MAY be a problem with (some) vaccinated donors
I believe that AI parasites (nanoscale biotech) is also in the unvaxxed blood. Maybe from shedding but definitely from chemtrails and contaminated water/food/air/clothing/medications/skin products/cleaning supplies. The safe blood banks still need a way to analyze all blood (live blood microscopy) and chelate and/or filter out metals/toxins/PEG/GO/hydrogels. Much more work than what’s being done at current blood banks.
Here’s what I don’t understand: There are 8 blood types and only 1 or 2 of them are rare. So finding a match shouldn’t be difficult. In fact, isn’t it likely that one of the baby’s parents are a match? And aren’t patients generally allowed to bank their own blood before an operation? Would it be that much of a stretch for one of the baby’s parents or relatives to donate the blood needed? I understand why a blood bank wouldn’t want to create precedents of this sort, but blood from a known donor is always safer than blood from an anonymous donor.
There is actually a higher risk of developing Graft vs Host disease (deadly if not mitigated appropriately) from a related donor than an unrelated donor. There are hundreds of other antigens on RBCs than just ABORh. 50% of Baby Will's antigens come from each parent, so there is a high likelihood he would have mismatches from either parent. The risk of GVH can be mitigated by treating the blood with radiation to render the remaining donor lymphocytes (in the transfused blood) unable to replicate inside the new "foreign" home ie: baby Will. And ALL blood donations are tested for the same transfusion transmitted diseases, whether the blood is from a directed (known) donor or from the voluntarily donated blood from the community. Just a little blood bank FYI from a BB nerd, but I appreciate your thoughtful questions! :)
I just found this on " graft vs host disease"... please explain in terms of your comment that "there is a higher risk from related vs unrelated".... I would think the parents should be able to match better than a foreigner.
Doctors try to avoid GvHD by genetically "matching" donors to recipients, often by recruiting a sibling or other family member with a similar genetic makeup.
Hello Susan. The article you referenced is correct when selecting a donor for STEM CELL transplantation to replace a diseased bone marrow. The easiest pool to find a match from is siblings because they share the same parents. However, irradiation can't be used in Stem Cell transplants to prevent GVH disease because it would prevent the stem cells from being able to replicate themselves in their new bone marrow home, which is the purpose of stem cell transplants for blood cancers like Lymphoma. This is different than transfusions of RBCs, which are used to replace blood lost in surgery, trauma or during chemotherapy. Parents may be a match for ABORh blood types with their children, but may be a big mismatch for other antigens displayed on White Blood cells (immune system cells) which are still present at low levels in Red Blood cell products. So the difference is the type of cellular blood product being used (RBCs vs Stem cells), how closely the donor needs to be matched to the antigens present on the recipient's cell and whether GVH disease can be mitigated by irradiation. Hope this helps. Please feel free to ask further questions if this isn't clear from my explanation. And I'm sure I included TMI, but I enjoy sharing my nerdiness with others. Thanks!
👏👏💯 agree re the packed & washed RBCs not being discussed as a mutually satisfactory option, is interesting. Re the spike protein lingering after a year... my understanding is that it hasn't been gold standard RCT tracked beyond 9mths but in blood analysis by various independent Drs and health professionals around the world, the spike is still being produced 18mths after the last shot AND possibly beyond, as 18mths was when it was stopped being tracked, not stopped being produced. So precautionary principles apply, in that nobody actually knows when it stops at this point in time.
Considering the mRNA need the cationic lipid nanoparticles to help them get into a cell, if the mRNA is already uptake by RCB, the lipid nanoparticle that carried it will have fused with the RBC's cell membrane already, and the mRNA will stay inside the RBC forever until the red blood cell goes apoptosis and won't be able to transfect other cells as its cationic lipid shell is gone, unless it is repackaged into extracellular vesicles like exosomes which has much weaker transfection ability...based on what I understand.
I believe that is true. I know someone that took the J&J covid shot in 4/21 and never took a booster after that and had a grand mal seizure so violent the person broke both his shoulders during the seizure from hyper-kinetic arm shaking. So, the doctors ran this person through a myriad of tests, brain scans, brain MRIs, epilepsy tests, and no cause could be found. The blood work was normal, no past history of seizures so the doctors just said "Cause Unknown".
Yet, not once, did any of these many doctors mention the vaccine as a possible cause. They are either stupid or corrupt or both, but I have good reasons to believe that the Vax was the direct cause. And it was in this person's system 17 months later.
This is a catastrophe for people thinking they are out of the woods if they didn't have any medical issues with the Toxic Shots after a few months. No! Sorry! It is still there, wreaking havoc on your body. Right now, I am researching what can be done to cleanse the system of these toxins to lower the chance of adverse events in later years.
Is the blood bank industry as criminally corrupt as Big Pharma, and the rest of our health care system? When I was receiving thousands of dollars per quarter to use buying the dumb whores known as physicians when I worked for GSK, as a bioengineer, I noticed how dumb, and poorly trained in healing many physicians were. It was quite shocking.
GSK knowingly criminally killed 400,000 people with its billion dollar a year deadly diabetes blockbuster Avandia. I stay far away from the whores known as physicians because they know little about human health. Big Pharma quite literally owns their minds.
The reason it was so easy to roll out a global genocide usng a eugenics bioweapon is because physicians are whores of Big Pharma as are governments. Big Pharma essentially owns the medical schools.
In its way, it’s quite impressive, the evil edifice they have built. And of course the death cult known as the health care industry is just the tip of the needle. Every institution has been corrupted. Every man, woman and child bombarded with disinfo and poison. Responsibility for our own health is one of the few weapons/defences we possess. The formula is simple. Don’t poison yourself and your kids. Don’t carry extra weight, especially around the mid-section. Move, stretch, adopt a mindfulness practice. And when you do fall “ill” treat it first with fasting and lots of fluids. Let the body do it’s thing. Imagine the world where everyone was taught those simple things.
Some people live for exercise. For example, my ex was one. She was able to, for the most part, keep her addition to exercise in check by starting an exercise studio. When she didn't get to exercise, she was a butt. Others live to hike, ski, swim, and so on.
In the end, it boils down to personalities. That is, the mind.
Some may have had exercise drilled into them and just continued on. But many abandoned it. Consider all the hogwash schools push. In reality, much of the exercise they claim would help kids learn to stay healthy has no real play in reality. In fact, it, often, is laughable compared to what a farm kid does on a regular day.
In the end, success at keeping weight down, or taking it off boils down to mindset. Many strike out for help from exercise studios and such when they would be better served by finding someone to help them change how they think. A qualified hypnotist being a good possibility.
Did you not notice that people have been injected with what amounts to a bioweapon?
Do you want to do the blood examinations? If not then blood must be segregated to avoid contamination.
You refuse because you, like the whole medical industry, are too invested, through your initial buy-in, and now will not let go. But you won't save your reputation. It is already lost.
Listen to the good Japanese doctor explain it, the jig is up, it's now only a matter of time for it to unravel:
Agreed! It's about parental rights to make medical decisions for their own baby, NOT the doctors!!! I don't even have children and I'm furious! NO PARENT'S CUSTODIAL RIGHTS SHOULD EVER BE QUESTIONED OVER A MEDICAL DECISION! I feel so badly for those poor parents - not only is their child's life at risk, now they have to deal with these corrupt, idiot, spineless doctors/hospital system.
Parens patrie has long been a problem. People who think themselves smarter than all those around them, and with granted power trusted to them, impose their will without accountability for their erroneous demands.
I was of the mind that the spikes are not in the vax, but the sequence to produce synthetic spikes to train T cells to attack are built inside the body in reaction to that genetic sequence. This morning in a senate discussion Dr. Cole mentioned that spikes have been found in the tissues and the blood a month later. Might help to know how long the spikes keep producing and how long they stay in the body at maximum before we know. Because giving a vax to the baby could cause the baby to produce spikes and that would mean it would be risky.
Duke University surgeons are refusing a 14-year-old girl a kidney transplant because she has not received the Covid shotShe has already had Covid and recovered
[McCullough] said if the risk were high, it would have been noticed by now (I’m not sure I agree with that; there is a lot of willful blindness for anything associated with the vaccine).
From Open VAERS as of Nov 18:
42,048 deaths for all vaccines over 30 years.
32,370 from Covid vaccine. 76%
268,309 injuries for all over 30 years.
184,290 from Covid vaccine. 68%
No one in the willful blindness coalition has noticed that mRNA deaths are 76% of all vaccine deaths over 30 years and 68% of all vaccine injuries over 30 years. This is criminal, or it should be.
And since these reports are not anonymous there’s no excuse for the government not to be verifying this info. Other than pharmaceutical contributions of course.
their worst fears have been realised. Baby Will has been denied access to unvaxxed blood should he require a transfusion post or during his upcoming heart surgery. It's a very dark day for NZ and maybe globally.
Can he go somewhere civilized for the surgery, such as Florida or Eastern Europe? Would another place do what’s needed? How about a privately paid doctor team, if they can raise the money?
Following Tenor47's question further - why can't the blood itself be examined for the spike? I believe that Dr. Bhakdi and others describe that the spike protein may intrude into all systems and also the blood cells themselves. Does anyone know of any researchers comparing actual blood cells to see differences among the 4 possible scenarios (vaxxed with history of Covid, vaxxed with no history of Covid, unvaxxed with history of Covid, unvaxxed with no history of Covid? Steve Kirsch do you know?
Just in..........Baby Will Court Case, Auckland High Court - 6th Dec 2022.
Thank you to Counterspin Media for diligently covering it live today outside the High Court and massive love 🫶 to all the other independent media outlets & supporters of Baby Will and his family's right to choose, you're presence is HUGELY important!
Here's a good summary of what today:
"Sue did a brilliant job in court today.
She had solid scientific and legal evidence supporting the use of unv*xx*d blood and showed compassion and wisdom.
The crown lawyer had zero evidence to show that v*cc*n*t*d blood is safe. In fact, he had zero evidence of anything.
Blood Bank said that spike and m*NA remain in the blood for 14 days (we know that it is upwards of 60 days) and that they do not have a stand-down period for donation following v*cc*n*ti*n and that they do not enquire as to whether or not a donor is v*xx*d.
Blood Bank's main argument against the unv*xx*d donor blood was that it was inconvenient for Blood Bank.
Court ran from 11 - 4 with 2 breaks. The judge has now stepped out to reach his decision which he will likely give without reasoning at first, as there is a need for speed for the baby.
He implied he will return with the reasoning behind his decision afterwards.
We have an excellent chance unless the judge is being paid off.
I am a long-time blood bank director. Directed donations are discouraged primarily for reason three in your list...they do not want a long list of people coming in and saying "I only want blood from these people". It is already hard enough to make this all work.
According to Roguski, they have recruited a large pool of potential donors. An infant surgery does not take all that much replacement blood, so it is entirely possible that there will be a match in their pool. Or not. The blood bank will be thrilled (I expect) to have that many donations because blood is always in short supply and only one or two units from the volunteers will likely be useful.
Matching is pretty arbitrary: Units are ABO/Rh typed and then pretty randomly selected (usually by expiration date) to be crossmatched. A major side crossmatch is all generally done which makes sure that there are no antibodies in the baby's blood that will clot the incoming transfusion. (A minor side crossmatch, seldom done but considered when volumes are equally small, checks the reverse.) Most matches get through first time. If not, one moves on. So if there are one or two good matches from the group they have assembled, that would be a win for the community and for them.
There is a further layer to put on this. Red cells (which is all they really need to transfuse) are just sacks of hemoglobin with a membrane. They do not contain organelles (like a nucleus) and I expect would not contain spike protein either...no place to attach since the red cell has just a simple unit membrane. So they could give packed, washed RBCs and accomplish all they wish from almost everyone's perspective. Why this is not discussed anywhere I find elusive. And this, of course, beggars the question as to whether someone vaccinated, let us say one year ago, would have any spike protein floating around in any case. Most would think not.
This seems like much ado that does not need to be there just to make a point. As I said, most blood banks will refuse directed donations not only because they likely do not match but also because they establish donation and use predicates that will cause most units to be wasted. If desired, they surely could use this as a major blood drive and "just happen" to use a unit from the drive if it happens to be compatible. Or they could just use washed, packed RBCs from the regular pool...likely will not be any more dangerous for Baby Will.
Happy to answer more questions if some folks have them.
Question—I’m not Covid-vaxxed but have had Lyme and babesia. Aftee antibiotics and antimalarials i tested negative for babesia. Babesia tests are supposedly more reliable than other Lyme tests. But I read anyone who has had babesia can never donate n blood—is this true? Is it rational? I would be glad to donate to an unvaxxed blood bank.
I knew a woman a few yrs ago who had Lyme for 20 yrs and had really suffered. She finally had just found a doctor who prescribed HCQ for her. She took it for 2 weeks and was tested - it came back absolutely negative for Lyme. H C Q kills the spirochetes which cause Lyme.
https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-basics/lyme-disease/about-lyme/
You can get H C Q from Frontline Doctors if you can't find a doctor to prescribe it. I think Ivermectin may also work. Here is a database which may have some good info on this:
https://lymediseaseassociation.org/covid-19-and-lyme/ivermectin-studies-for-covid/
If you can't find a dr to prescribe ivermectin, you can use the "horse paste" it IS perfectly safe for humans, husband and I have both used it several times. Husband was a virologist/immunologist for many years in Public Health Dept of PA. He has 55 yrs research behind him. You can get iver mectin at Tractor Supply by mail or at store or on Amazon. Look up dosages which are measured by a person's weight. If you have questions or need more info, reply to this message. This is NOT medical advice, I am not a doctor, just telling you what worked for a friend of mine.
Hope this helps and good luck!
Glad your friend got that treatment, I hope it helped? I have had Lyme since the early 1990s … took many years to get diagnosed and treated, and I never became completely symptom-free, but it improved. I have some human IVM around in case of Covid, unsure if I still have active Lyme or not, will look into the HCQ and IVM. Thanks!
Yes it completely cured her! She felt terrific. H C Q does cure it! As I stated in my comment to you, she tested 100% negative for Lyme, where she had had it for 20 yrs and tested positive all that time. Negative for it means she was cured! Her doctor told her H C Q will cure it - it did. Best of luck!!!
Thanks!
My absolute pleasure!
This is one of those "precautionary" steps. Babesiosis can be seriously life threatening so it is taken seriously. There used to be a lifetime ban on those who said they had ever had the disease, but with better testing re-entry into the donor pool is now allowed by some. These are the latest rules/guidelines: https://americasblood.org/news/final-babesia-guidance-published-by-fda/. So you may very well be able to participate if you have no residual. Your blood bank will be delighted to work with you, I am sure.
Awesome, thanks!
Dr K. If only a very small amount of blood is required,is not autologous transfusion possible? Why has no one thought of looking for spike proteins in the blood of previously persons to be able to definitely rule out that issue. ?
Patrick Power
Patrick,
The baby has very little blood volume, it is true. Never done an autologous transfusion on an infant -- you could hardly take any blood and it is hard to deal with tiny amounts in a banking situation. But in this case there is a further complication: it takes a fair amount of blood to prime the heart/lung machine irrespective of the size of the patient.
On the other issue, there have been a few studies on the persistence of spike protein but they are still all over the map in terms of what you can take from them. Remember that spikes are made both by the virus and the spikeshot, so that further complicates things.
As opposed to HIV and similar viruses, I am not aware of any published reports of covid being transmitted through blood. This does not mean it has not been -- whatever is in the blood has a chance of getting to the recipient. I am certain that large numbers of donors have had other coronaviruses in proximity to their donations and some of those would have certainly moved on to the recipient -- we do not test for every last virus or bacterium or whatever. This is why blood transfusion is one of those things one does not do unless it is really, really needed.
But most patients do OK with their transfusions -- usually if you are being transfused you have far larger issues with which to deal and having tissue oxygenation is more important than the other potential transfusion issues. We monitor each transfusion to see if we are seeing effects from covid and everything else. There is clearly an under-study of spikeshot effects because of the politics, but that will come out (if any) as the suppression of that whole area falls away bit by bit I expect.
I think you highlighted the problem very well. There is so little information available because it's an unprecedented sitiuation ... mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have never been used before and we don't know very well what the spike is doing to either the blood donors themselves or to their blood donations. So perhaps in the circumstances a "safety first" policy would be best until more data is available, and use unvaccinated blood (if requested) because it MIGHT be safer, not because it definitely IS.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52
What ever is in the vaccines needs to stay OUT of the general blood supply! It should be up to each individual person to decide what goes into their body PERIOD.
This document is really only the tip of the ice berg, let those who choose to be pure blood stay that way.
Reported for spam.
You lost me at "I expect" . Indicating a lack of definitive knowledge. That would be too tall of a hurdle for me if that was my Bamm Bamm. Someone must have said this before me, a 4 month old is not eligible for these injections. Without definitive evidence that the blood would not exposed the child to any component of the injections they should not be used in light of the acknowledged availability of pure blood.
Geez, I didn’t even think of 4-month-old’s jab ineligibility! Great point.
Will Savage-Reeves is a 4-month old boy in New Zealand, as special kind of a twisted dictatorship.
You mentioned the problem of "Directed donations" and that's fair enough and makes perfect sense. BUT the current situation is unprecedented so in my opinion previous guidelines can't fully apply. Let's face it, the effect of the mRNA and DNA "vaccines" on people themselves isn't fully known, (although for some it's clearly bad) so it stands to reason it's effect on people's blood is also somewhat unclear. And that's the reality we're going to have to come to terms with
Thanks for this. I guess the issue is that if they do the packed RBCs are they still admitting that the vaccine causes blood clot issues?
As I understand, but I may be incompletely informed, packed and washed RBCs is standard. Packed for certain.
Packed RBCs are still cells with lipid membranes are they not? Just because they don’t have the organelles to translate the mRNA does not mean that the mRNA hasn’t entered the cell. We know with Pseudouridine this mRNA is extremely stable. We know mRNA is in the bloodstream. Offering a recommendation, “try some packed RBCs instead“ without actually studying whether or not the mRNA is in the RBCs is the exact failure (or intentional malfeasance) of the pharmaceutical company and other bad actors that got us into this mess in the first place.
Just because you are explaining the status quo, does not mean that the status quo is the correct approach. I realize it’s complicated, but isn’t that the ingenuity of humans… To solve complex problems? Looks like others have taken the first step. Maybe you should contact them to learn their approach.
https://www.theepochtimes.com/nonprofit-blood-donation-service-starts-matching-unvaccinated-patients-with-donors_4899313.html
Considering the mRNA need the cationic lipid nanoparticles to help them get into a cell, if the mRNA is already uptake by RCB, the lipid nanoparticle that carried it will have fused with the RBC's cell membrane already, and the mRNA will stay inside the RBC forever until the red blood cell goes apoptosis and won't be able to transfect other cells as its cationic lipid shell is gone, unless it is repackaged into extracellular vesicles like exosomes which has much weaker transfection ability...based on what I understand.
Interesting, but that's a lot of faith-based science for a rube like me. Still would rather pay a few mils in extra taxes for an unvaxxed blood bank option.
Good thread! Tx
And absolutely spot on re human ingenuity! That is one of the parts of being human that separates us from mere animals.
On that note, in case you have not already read this: https://unlimitedhangout.com/2022/06/investigative-reports/the-revenge-of-the-malthusians-and-the-science-of-limits/
The donor service still requires that the local blood banks or hospitals accept the donor blood. They (the donor service) is not {yet} a blood bank that can receive donations.
We know that there is graphene and other things in the vax, as demonstrated by a Spanish scientist and IIRC others as well. Graphene causes thousands of tiny cuts in arteries, which cause strokes and other injuries that kill people; hence all this "died suddenly" news. Knowing this, why don't blood banks screen people that have been vaxed? They can still use their blood for folks who don't mind vaxed blood. That way, there would be larger pool of unvaxed blood for those who request it. I know if it were me, I wouldn't want vaxed blood. Thank you.
Agree, but what's your "Plan B" if you ever need it?
I am not a Jehovah's WItness, but I had a close friend who was. They do not accept blood transfusions ever, for religious reasons. They are often mocked by health professionals who think they are idiots not to accept a transfusion when "needed," but I had in the past read about this desire to avoid transfusion leading some methods to be developed to minimize need for transfusion - but Plan B could be in fact, to refuse a transfusion. In some cases, turns out you didn't need the transfusion anyway, or - maybe one would prefer to die vs. living with a disabling vax injury that no one believes, and you can't get help with. I don't know for sure what I would do - but - from things I have seen / read during the pandemic, I don't think I would ever go to a hospital. I am an older person, and I think if I die, I die, and I will do it at home without being tortured, abused, and just treated horribly in what passes for hospital care today. Keep the transfusion. I don't think I need vaxxed blood or that it will help me in the long run.
Interesting. Seems like having Mormon neighbors (food storage!) on one side and JW's on the other (no transfusions) is not a bad zombie appocalypse/prepper plan. :)
Agreed! they can keep their vaxxed blood. Thankyou.
Like my father back in the day saying he would "wait and see" before using thalidomide on his patients, I will likewise "wait and see" before taking vaxxed blood.
The problem is of course that it's not always possible to "wait and see". Let say someone had a fall or accident at home and was taken by ambulance into hospital where they said an emergency operation is required. It's not feasible to then say "no thanks, I'll go home for a few months, or years, while they decide whether the blood bank is safe or not". You'd pretty much have to go with whatever they offered
Yes, Pete, that is of course a worry. I am getting a bracelet made which will basically say "no thanks". It depends of course on the degree, category and rate of blood loss, but in animals anyway, if haemolysis has developed slowly, the system copes with quite low haematocrit. And in many cases there are alternatives such as plasma expanders if drop in volume is the problem. And then we need to support efforts to create access to unvaxxed blood products. I think I saw a list of initiatives on James Roguski's substack. Ideally we should aim our own hospitals where we can be confident the interests of the patient reign supreme.
It's a very individual choice, but I would rather pass away quickly due to blood loss than walk around not knowing what has gone into me. But that will be different for everyone. My mother worked briefly in a blood bank years ago. She never said why, but never wanted to accept blood products after that! that was decades back, so technology may have improved. However, my trust in the system is lower now.
I don't want to scaremonger, but I don't want anyone walking blindly into this the way many walked blindly into getting jabbed. If enough people start refusing blood they will have to start sorting donors as well as developing screening tests. PHARMA knows exactly what is in there. So they know for what and how to test.
The one confounding aspect is whether - and to what degree - an unvaccinated person can get the spike protein from a vaccinated person via "shedding", (through bodily fluids etc) without having had a jab themselves. It may be that not all unvaccinated blood would be as "good" as hoped. But that's for another day I guess, a separate unvaxxed blood supply would at least be a start. I don't think they will agree to it though, for fear of implicitly admitting there MAY be a problem with (some) vaccinated donors
Kudos to your father!
Great insight, but you missed the elephant in the room. There is a reason SafeBlood Banks are starting up.
I believe that AI parasites (nanoscale biotech) is also in the unvaxxed blood. Maybe from shedding but definitely from chemtrails and contaminated water/food/air/clothing/medications/skin products/cleaning supplies. The safe blood banks still need a way to analyze all blood (live blood microscopy) and chelate and/or filter out metals/toxins/PEG/GO/hydrogels. Much more work than what’s being done at current blood banks.
Dr. K,
Here’s what I don’t understand: There are 8 blood types and only 1 or 2 of them are rare. So finding a match shouldn’t be difficult. In fact, isn’t it likely that one of the baby’s parents are a match? And aren’t patients generally allowed to bank their own blood before an operation? Would it be that much of a stretch for one of the baby’s parents or relatives to donate the blood needed? I understand why a blood bank wouldn’t want to create precedents of this sort, but blood from a known donor is always safer than blood from an anonymous donor.
There is actually a higher risk of developing Graft vs Host disease (deadly if not mitigated appropriately) from a related donor than an unrelated donor. There are hundreds of other antigens on RBCs than just ABORh. 50% of Baby Will's antigens come from each parent, so there is a high likelihood he would have mismatches from either parent. The risk of GVH can be mitigated by treating the blood with radiation to render the remaining donor lymphocytes (in the transfused blood) unable to replicate inside the new "foreign" home ie: baby Will. And ALL blood donations are tested for the same transfusion transmitted diseases, whether the blood is from a directed (known) donor or from the voluntarily donated blood from the community. Just a little blood bank FYI from a BB nerd, but I appreciate your thoughtful questions! :)
https://www.verywellhealth.com/graft-vs-host-disease-overview-5077111?utm_campaign=15823081179-bc16abb1234b67&utm_source=googleawpaid&utm_medium=con&utm_content=573641057935&utm_term=g-graft%20vs%20host&gclid=CjwKCAiAp7GcBhA0EiwA9U0mtvDUk_2Wu6_BCRElC6OM7F96ZJ1uSY2kWuLOfl4ZNcfEUAtgMXdqSRoCtdoQAvD_BwE.
I just found this on " graft vs host disease"... please explain in terms of your comment that "there is a higher risk from related vs unrelated".... I would think the parents should be able to match better than a foreigner.
Doctors try to avoid GvHD by genetically "matching" donors to recipients, often by recruiting a sibling or other family member with a similar genetic makeup.
Hello Susan. The article you referenced is correct when selecting a donor for STEM CELL transplantation to replace a diseased bone marrow. The easiest pool to find a match from is siblings because they share the same parents. However, irradiation can't be used in Stem Cell transplants to prevent GVH disease because it would prevent the stem cells from being able to replicate themselves in their new bone marrow home, which is the purpose of stem cell transplants for blood cancers like Lymphoma. This is different than transfusions of RBCs, which are used to replace blood lost in surgery, trauma or during chemotherapy. Parents may be a match for ABORh blood types with their children, but may be a big mismatch for other antigens displayed on White Blood cells (immune system cells) which are still present at low levels in Red Blood cell products. So the difference is the type of cellular blood product being used (RBCs vs Stem cells), how closely the donor needs to be matched to the antigens present on the recipient's cell and whether GVH disease can be mitigated by irradiation. Hope this helps. Please feel free to ask further questions if this isn't clear from my explanation. And I'm sure I included TMI, but I enjoy sharing my nerdiness with others. Thanks!
👏👏💯 agree re the packed & washed RBCs not being discussed as a mutually satisfactory option, is interesting. Re the spike protein lingering after a year... my understanding is that it hasn't been gold standard RCT tracked beyond 9mths but in blood analysis by various independent Drs and health professionals around the world, the spike is still being produced 18mths after the last shot AND possibly beyond, as 18mths was when it was stopped being tracked, not stopped being produced. So precautionary principles apply, in that nobody actually knows when it stops at this point in time.
Considering the mRNA need the cationic lipid nanoparticles to help them get into a cell, if the mRNA is already uptake by RCB, the lipid nanoparticle that carried it will have fused with the RBC's cell membrane already, and the mRNA will stay inside the RBC forever until the red blood cell goes apoptosis and won't be able to transfect other cells as its cationic lipid shell is gone, unless it is repackaged into extracellular vesicles like exosomes which has much weaker transfection ability...based on what I understand.
I believe that is true. I know someone that took the J&J covid shot in 4/21 and never took a booster after that and had a grand mal seizure so violent the person broke both his shoulders during the seizure from hyper-kinetic arm shaking. So, the doctors ran this person through a myriad of tests, brain scans, brain MRIs, epilepsy tests, and no cause could be found. The blood work was normal, no past history of seizures so the doctors just said "Cause Unknown".
Yet, not once, did any of these many doctors mention the vaccine as a possible cause. They are either stupid or corrupt or both, but I have good reasons to believe that the Vax was the direct cause. And it was in this person's system 17 months later.
This is a catastrophe for people thinking they are out of the woods if they didn't have any medical issues with the Toxic Shots after a few months. No! Sorry! It is still there, wreaking havoc on your body. Right now, I am researching what can be done to cleanse the system of these toxins to lower the chance of adverse events in later years.
Is the blood bank industry as criminally corrupt as Big Pharma, and the rest of our health care system? When I was receiving thousands of dollars per quarter to use buying the dumb whores known as physicians when I worked for GSK, as a bioengineer, I noticed how dumb, and poorly trained in healing many physicians were. It was quite shocking.
GSK knowingly criminally killed 400,000 people with its billion dollar a year deadly diabetes blockbuster Avandia. I stay far away from the whores known as physicians because they know little about human health. Big Pharma quite literally owns their minds.
The reason it was so easy to roll out a global genocide usng a eugenics bioweapon is because physicians are whores of Big Pharma as are governments. Big Pharma essentially owns the medical schools.
Exactamundo. Well Said!!!
10,000 "likes" for you!!! I LOVE your comment, you speak truth, sir. HUGE respect for you.
say it loud and proud dennis!!!!!
Well said.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2022/11/14/vaccination-industry-in-a-nutshell/
Yep. Sadly, more true than not in my experience.
In its way, it’s quite impressive, the evil edifice they have built. And of course the death cult known as the health care industry is just the tip of the needle. Every institution has been corrupted. Every man, woman and child bombarded with disinfo and poison. Responsibility for our own health is one of the few weapons/defences we possess. The formula is simple. Don’t poison yourself and your kids. Don’t carry extra weight, especially around the mid-section. Move, stretch, adopt a mindfulness practice. And when you do fall “ill” treat it first with fasting and lots of fluids. Let the body do it’s thing. Imagine the world where everyone was taught those simple things.
So easily said, but not as easily done.
Some people live for exercise. For example, my ex was one. She was able to, for the most part, keep her addition to exercise in check by starting an exercise studio. When she didn't get to exercise, she was a butt. Others live to hike, ski, swim, and so on.
In the end, it boils down to personalities. That is, the mind.
Some may have had exercise drilled into them and just continued on. But many abandoned it. Consider all the hogwash schools push. In reality, much of the exercise they claim would help kids learn to stay healthy has no real play in reality. In fact, it, often, is laughable compared to what a farm kid does on a regular day.
In the end, success at keeping weight down, or taking it off boils down to mindset. Many strike out for help from exercise studios and such when they would be better served by finding someone to help them change how they think. A qualified hypnotist being a good possibility.
I imagine it frequently and try to tell people life is ultimately very simple once you understand the basics
Thank you for this intel. Always helps to have suspicions confirmed!
Got any pureblood requests from Lolita Island/ our pedophile elite yet?
Where do you think its all going?
I bet they stocked up on pureblood even before the plandemic launched.
Did you not notice that people have been injected with what amounts to a bioweapon?
Do you want to do the blood examinations? If not then blood must be segregated to avoid contamination.
You refuse because you, like the whole medical industry, are too invested, through your initial buy-in, and now will not let go. But you won't save your reputation. It is already lost.
Listen to the good Japanese doctor explain it, the jig is up, it's now only a matter of time for it to unravel:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/PHix17vJq7QJ/
Great video. The dam is breaking.
and they will all drown. called KARMA
Thanks for sharing this link.
Very interesting.
“It is already hard enough to make this all work.”
Tough cookies. Do the right thing.
“This seems like much ado that does not need to be there just to make a point.”
Screw that. It’s NOT ENOUGH ADO about an EXTREMELY significant point.
Agreed! It's about parental rights to make medical decisions for their own baby, NOT the doctors!!! I don't even have children and I'm furious! NO PARENT'S CUSTODIAL RIGHTS SHOULD EVER BE QUESTIONED OVER A MEDICAL DECISION! I feel so badly for those poor parents - not only is their child's life at risk, now they have to deal with these corrupt, idiot, spineless doctors/hospital system.
Parens patrie has long been a problem. People who think themselves smarter than all those around them, and with granted power trusted to them, impose their will without accountability for their erroneous demands.
right on mzlizzi!
Any updates on baby Will?
I have just see this article. Washington State, poor baby passed after surgery of clot. Was given vaccine blood. So very sad.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/newborn-baby-in-washington-state
I would never allow a covid19 vaccine blood transfusion to be used for myself or my husband.
And I refuse to be part of a trial to see what happens with the long term results of such transfusions.
We are vaccine free and should be allowed to choose vaccine free blood. Simple!
I was of the mind that the spikes are not in the vax, but the sequence to produce synthetic spikes to train T cells to attack are built inside the body in reaction to that genetic sequence. This morning in a senate discussion Dr. Cole mentioned that spikes have been found in the tissues and the blood a month later. Might help to know how long the spikes keep producing and how long they stay in the body at maximum before we know. Because giving a vax to the baby could cause the baby to produce spikes and that would mean it would be risky.
There's quite a lot of evidence that mRNA injection products are in the blood. This is heart wrenching information about the Baby Will story.
Duke University surgeons are refusing a 14-year-old girl a kidney transplant because she has not received the Covid shotShe has already had Covid and recovered
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/duke-university-surgeons-are-refusing?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=363080&post_id=89048480&isFreemail=true&utm_medium=email
[McCullough] said if the risk were high, it would have been noticed by now (I’m not sure I agree with that; there is a lot of willful blindness for anything associated with the vaccine).
From Open VAERS as of Nov 18:
42,048 deaths for all vaccines over 30 years.
32,370 from Covid vaccine. 76%
268,309 injuries for all over 30 years.
184,290 from Covid vaccine. 68%
No one in the willful blindness coalition has noticed that mRNA deaths are 76% of all vaccine deaths over 30 years and 68% of all vaccine injuries over 30 years. This is criminal, or it should be.
And since these reports are not anonymous there’s no excuse for the government not to be verifying this info. Other than pharmaceutical contributions of course.
Update from NZ....(so called justice system)
their worst fears have been realised. Baby Will has been denied access to unvaxxed blood should he require a transfusion post or during his upcoming heart surgery. It's a very dark day for NZ and maybe globally.
Can he go somewhere civilized for the surgery, such as Florida or Eastern Europe? Would another place do what’s needed? How about a privately paid doctor team, if they can raise the money?
babies are affected by their mothers breast milk and these sicko FN doctors say jabbed blood is safe.....
Following Tenor47's question further - why can't the blood itself be examined for the spike? I believe that Dr. Bhakdi and others describe that the spike protein may intrude into all systems and also the blood cells themselves. Does anyone know of any researchers comparing actual blood cells to see differences among the 4 possible scenarios (vaxxed with history of Covid, vaxxed with no history of Covid, unvaxxed with history of Covid, unvaxxed with no history of Covid? Steve Kirsch do you know?
Has anyone studied vaccinated blood? Seems like the spike protein would be evident (right?) and we could know for sure......
Is there a way to locate a comment by author?
Just in..........Baby Will Court Case, Auckland High Court - 6th Dec 2022.
Thank you to Counterspin Media for diligently covering it live today outside the High Court and massive love 🫶 to all the other independent media outlets & supporters of Baby Will and his family's right to choose, you're presence is HUGELY important!
Here's a good summary of what today:
"Sue did a brilliant job in court today.
She had solid scientific and legal evidence supporting the use of unv*xx*d blood and showed compassion and wisdom.
The crown lawyer had zero evidence to show that v*cc*n*t*d blood is safe. In fact, he had zero evidence of anything.
Blood Bank said that spike and m*NA remain in the blood for 14 days (we know that it is upwards of 60 days) and that they do not have a stand-down period for donation following v*cc*n*ti*n and that they do not enquire as to whether or not a donor is v*xx*d.
Blood Bank's main argument against the unv*xx*d donor blood was that it was inconvenient for Blood Bank.
Court ran from 11 - 4 with 2 breaks. The judge has now stepped out to reach his decision which he will likely give without reasoning at first, as there is a need for speed for the baby.
He implied he will return with the reasoning behind his decision afterwards.
We have an excellent chance unless the judge is being paid off.
What do you do when your child needs water and try to insist upon water that hasn’t been drawn from a well that is highly suspect for poison?
That'll just make everyone afraid to use the well. We can't have that!
And the preference seems to be to make them afraid to NOT use the well.