I think you highlighted the problem very well. There is so little information available because it's an unprecedented sitiuation ... mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have never been used before and we don't know very well what the spike is doing to either the blood donors themselves or to their blood donations. So perhaps in the circumstances a "safe…
I think you highlighted the problem very well. There is so little information available because it's an unprecedented sitiuation ... mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have never been used before and we don't know very well what the spike is doing to either the blood donors themselves or to their blood donations. So perhaps in the circumstances a "safety first" policy would be best until more data is available, and use unvaccinated blood (if requested) because it MIGHT be safer, not because it definitely IS.
I think you highlighted the problem very well. There is so little information available because it's an unprecedented sitiuation ... mRNA/DNA 'vaccines' have never been used before and we don't know very well what the spike is doing to either the blood donors themselves or to their blood donations. So perhaps in the circumstances a "safety first" policy would be best until more data is available, and use unvaccinated blood (if requested) because it MIGHT be safer, not because it definitely IS.