Share this comment
This makes sense. Xenoestrogen would make boys want to be girls, but would not make girls want to be boy. Male to female transgenders have been around forever, and have gradually increased over the past 4 decades or so. Guys have become gradually softer and less masculine since at least the mid 80's. These trends parallel the increased u…
This makes sense. Xenoestrogen would make boys want to be girls, but would not make girls want to be boy. Male to female transgenders have been around forever, and have gradually increased over the past 4 decades or so. Guys have become gradually softer and less masculine since at least the mid 80's. These trends parallel the increased use of Xenoestrogens, particularly as pest control in modern agriculture. The irony here is that the Xenoestrogens were originally developed as an environmentally benign replacement for the "old" pesticides that actually killed the bugs. The Xenoestrogens merely stop their reproduction.
The female to male thing is something that seems to have come up out of nowhere since around 2016. I had never even heard of it until about this time. This means it has to be a different cause than Xenoestrogens. However, I think the female to male thing is mostly driven by ideology (rad feminists) and greed (on the part of the medical establishment).
Excess estrogen is a cause of homosexuality in women, which may cause (and is caused by) gender dysphoria.
As a mom of two teens, one diagnosed with PANS (mostly recovered), I'm part of the Autism/PANS community. Which means I have been a part of large group forums of Autism/PANS kids for about 15 years. The gender dysphoria/trans issue is not primarily ideology, greed or social pressure. It is a vaccine issue. My kids are ok but so many are not ok...There is 0 doubt...
Steve's survey indicates it's not mostly driven by ideology or greed, and more by changes in biology caused by the vaccine schedule. Though I agree those are secondary factors.
Possibly. The timing you presented certainly fits. That the vaccine was made from male DNA is suggestive as well.
But Karl Denninger believes, as do I, that there are powerful interests and influences pushing this. You have the "woke" rad feminist thing saying that women should be like men and others saying that gender is nothing more than a social construct. That women making themselves attractive in the feminine sense is playing into the patriarchy and what not. A lot of this garbage is being pushed in the public schools these days. Then you have the clinics and medical professionals salivating over the $300K to $500K they will get per kid who transitions. There was an administrator at one hospital who admitted that "transitioning" of kids was a cash cow for the institution. All of this coincides with the rise of "woke" in general during the times.
Another point that supports your argument is the rise of "woke" that actually started in 2013. 2013 was a sort of inflection year in that the incoming fall freshmen that year began demanding trigger warnings, safe spaces, cool-off rooms, you name it. This represented an emotional hyper sensitivity that is common to those with chronic Mercury poisoning (Mercury is sometimes used as preservatives in vaccines) as well as other metals. Call it the "mad hatter" phenomenon from 150 years ago (also due to Mercury). I also believe this kind of hyper sensitivity may also be due to chronic inflammation, which is also common to adjuvants used in vaccines.
In short, I think the female to male thing is both.