439 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

Possibly. The timing you presented certainly fits. That the vaccine was made from male DNA is suggestive as well.

But Karl Denninger believes, as do I, that there are powerful interests and influences pushing this. You have the "woke" rad feminist thing saying that women should be like men and others saying that gender is nothing more than a social construct. That women making themselves attractive in the feminine sense is playing into the patriarchy and what not. A lot of this garbage is being pushed in the public schools these days. Then you have the clinics and medical professionals salivating over the $300K to $500K they will get per kid who transitions. There was an administrator at one hospital who admitted that "transitioning" of kids was a cash cow for the institution. All of this coincides with the rise of "woke" in general during the times.

Another point that supports your argument is the rise of "woke" that actually started in 2013. 2013 was a sort of inflection year in that the incoming fall freshmen that year began demanding trigger warnings, safe spaces, cool-off rooms, you name it. This represented an emotional hyper sensitivity that is common to those with chronic Mercury poisoning (Mercury is sometimes used as preservatives in vaccines) as well as other metals. Call it the "mad hatter" phenomenon from 150 years ago (also due to Mercury). I also believe this kind of hyper sensitivity may also be due to chronic inflammation, which is also common to adjuvants used in vaccines.

In short, I think the female to male thing is both.

Expand full comment