Can we be honest? You and your "no virus" friends (pack of trolls) are here on this substack to stir up emotions and disrupt conversations dealing with the very real Toxic Death Shot with your usual off topic inanities that viruses don't exist and your "let's start a civil war".
Steve mentioned recently that his substack has come under …
Can we be honest? You and your "no virus" friends (pack of trolls) are here on this substack to stir up emotions and disrupt conversations dealing with the very real Toxic Death Shot with your usual off topic inanities that viruses don't exist and your "let's start a civil war".
Steve mentioned recently that his substack has come under attack from trolls and had to put up defenses to it. Well, it looks like you and your little band of psyops flacks have slipped through. On the bright side, it is evident that the many good people on this site, led by Steve Kirsch, scare you guys with the unholy truth about criminal medical complex. And that is good.
I suggest you go back and read the string of emails provided by Christine Massey in response to SK's substack article several months ago, when it was a question of organizing a debate with the so-called "no virus" camp. It is very clear which camp was bullying, insulting and trolling the other.
I thought it was hilarious when you PsyOp Trolls tried to hit up Steve for money to finance your "No Virus" Thesis lab experiments last summer. I mean, if you are all geniuses, it is interesting that no one wants to fund your brilliant insights. And if you are so smart, why can't you raise the money yourself through your great scientific background and colleagues in the field?
Or the better explanation is you get paid anonymously by someone to disrupt websites like this because your pay master doesn't like the truth. I tend to go with the latter.
The string of emails I pointed you to suggests nothing of the sort. On the wider question of why no-one is interested in funding an experiment to invalidate germ theory or host a serious debate between virus/no virus camps, it is obvious who stands to lose in the bigger picture and those people should be our common enemy. As for me, I was a paid subscriber here throughout most of last year, so not the typical profile of a paid troll. Moreover, I have no definitive view on the virus question but would have enjoyed a proper debate. Unfortunately, one side chickened out. Apart from that, you need, generally speaking, to stop viewing people whose ideas you do not share as trolls and refrain from making accusations against me personally which I consider insulting and defamatory.
The Master Troll emerges feeling confident after cutting a pasting a dozen previously manufactured posts on this thread. Not that you deserve an answer (you don't) but I have been studying the human carnage the covid death shots have wreaked on this planet for almost 2 years.
This substack has been an important source of information and one that I have learned the most from. Like many others I also followed the work of other brave souls that lay out the overwhelming evidence that the covid shots have killed, maimed and sterilized many millions of people around the globe and will continue to do so in the years ahead. I've also seen it up close and firsthand in my own family.
Ed Dowd makes a stunning case for this using hard actuarial death and disability statistics. Others like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr Malone many others have written extensively on this and done studies on the toxicity of the vaxes.
You on the other hand playing an amateurish good cop bad cop routine are just another grifting troll. And my nose is pretty good on that.
I am asking without any hostility. You mentioned the toxicity of these injections. I have no objection to that. However, I can see that nanotechnology is toxic.
Since it was used everywhere during this "pandemic," that is what is causing the damage, not the virus. The virus is irrelevant to me,
So how do you explain the toxicity mechanisms of this injection?
The toxicity of the spike protein was demonstrated conclusively in experiments conduct at the Salk Institute. Their research was published in late April, 2001. In addition, because the nucleotide uridine was replaced in the mRNA inoculation with pseudouridine, the gene therapy mRNA last much longer in the body than the natural viral spike protein. Because the sequence is not natural, the mechanisms to destroy it don't exist in the body. That was intentional in the design of the gene therapy mRNA. In addition, free RNA and DNA in the blood stream occurs as a consequence and free RNA of any type and free DNA are toxic and are thromogenic. RNAases and DNAases are present in the bloodstream at all times and destroy any free RNA or DNA within minutes. The limpid nanoparticles are used to protect the spike protein in the jab from these enzymes.
They want so badly for you to look the other way than you should....
No, it's not Spike Protein. It's the toxicity of graphene/nanotechnology.
Not just in these injections, but in masks, tests, flu vaccines, drugs, etc.
The mysterious "Covid" has all the symptoms of graphene/nanotechnology toxicity and yes, graphene/nanotechnology has been used.
You can talk endlessly about Spike Protein, but why wouldn't you want to look at the poison in masks, tests, injections, food, air, respirator filters, etc.?
Unfortunately, the norm is that when someone does not have substantive arguments, instead of conceding the point to the opposing side, such a person begins to turn the cat on its head, change the subject or make personal taunts.
Can we be honest? You and your "no virus" friends (pack of trolls) are here on this substack to stir up emotions and disrupt conversations dealing with the very real Toxic Death Shot with your usual off topic inanities that viruses don't exist and your "let's start a civil war".
Steve mentioned recently that his substack has come under attack from trolls and had to put up defenses to it. Well, it looks like you and your little band of psyops flacks have slipped through. On the bright side, it is evident that the many good people on this site, led by Steve Kirsch, scare you guys with the unholy truth about criminal medical complex. And that is good.
I suggest you go back and read the string of emails provided by Christine Massey in response to SK's substack article several months ago, when it was a question of organizing a debate with the so-called "no virus" camp. It is very clear which camp was bullying, insulting and trolling the other.
I thought it was hilarious when you PsyOp Trolls tried to hit up Steve for money to finance your "No Virus" Thesis lab experiments last summer. I mean, if you are all geniuses, it is interesting that no one wants to fund your brilliant insights. And if you are so smart, why can't you raise the money yourself through your great scientific background and colleagues in the field?
Or the better explanation is you get paid anonymously by someone to disrupt websites like this because your pay master doesn't like the truth. I tend to go with the latter.
you're the troll idiot
The string of emails I pointed you to suggests nothing of the sort. On the wider question of why no-one is interested in funding an experiment to invalidate germ theory or host a serious debate between virus/no virus camps, it is obvious who stands to lose in the bigger picture and those people should be our common enemy. As for me, I was a paid subscriber here throughout most of last year, so not the typical profile of a paid troll. Moreover, I have no definitive view on the virus question but would have enjoyed a proper debate. Unfortunately, one side chickened out. Apart from that, you need, generally speaking, to stop viewing people whose ideas you do not share as trolls and refrain from making accusations against me personally which I consider insulting and defamatory.
Please tell me why the very real Toxic Death Shot is toxic?
Can you explain it? I'm not talking about the adverse effects it causes; I'm simply asking about your understanding of the mechanism of toxicity.
That is, I agree that it is extremely toxic. But I would like to know from you why you think/know that it is toxic.
The Master Troll emerges feeling confident after cutting a pasting a dozen previously manufactured posts on this thread. Not that you deserve an answer (you don't) but I have been studying the human carnage the covid death shots have wreaked on this planet for almost 2 years.
This substack has been an important source of information and one that I have learned the most from. Like many others I also followed the work of other brave souls that lay out the overwhelming evidence that the covid shots have killed, maimed and sterilized many millions of people around the globe and will continue to do so in the years ahead. I've also seen it up close and firsthand in my own family.
Ed Dowd makes a stunning case for this using hard actuarial death and disability statistics. Others like Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr Malone many others have written extensively on this and done studies on the toxicity of the vaxes.
You on the other hand playing an amateurish good cop bad cop routine are just another grifting troll. And my nose is pretty good on that.
This was not my question.
I am asking without any hostility. You mentioned the toxicity of these injections. I have no objection to that. However, I can see that nanotechnology is toxic.
Since it was used everywhere during this "pandemic," that is what is causing the damage, not the virus. The virus is irrelevant to me,
So how do you explain the toxicity mechanisms of this injection?
The toxicity of the spike protein was demonstrated conclusively in experiments conduct at the Salk Institute. Their research was published in late April, 2001. In addition, because the nucleotide uridine was replaced in the mRNA inoculation with pseudouridine, the gene therapy mRNA last much longer in the body than the natural viral spike protein. Because the sequence is not natural, the mechanisms to destroy it don't exist in the body. That was intentional in the design of the gene therapy mRNA. In addition, free RNA and DNA in the blood stream occurs as a consequence and free RNA of any type and free DNA are toxic and are thromogenic. RNAases and DNAases are present in the bloodstream at all times and destroy any free RNA or DNA within minutes. The limpid nanoparticles are used to protect the spike protein in the jab from these enzymes.
They want so badly for you to look the other way than you should....
No, it's not Spike Protein. It's the toxicity of graphene/nanotechnology.
Not just in these injections, but in masks, tests, flu vaccines, drugs, etc.
The mysterious "Covid" has all the symptoms of graphene/nanotechnology toxicity and yes, graphene/nanotechnology has been used.
You can talk endlessly about Spike Protein, but why wouldn't you want to look at the poison in masks, tests, injections, food, air, respirator filters, etc.?
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
https://outraged.substack.com/p/is-it-a-virus-or-is-it-graphene-toxicity
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-courious-case-of-covid-19-graphene
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-based-fraud
Sorry Troll. Game is over.
Unfortunately, the norm is that when someone does not have substantive arguments, instead of conceding the point to the opposing side, such a person begins to turn the cat on its head, change the subject or make personal taunts.