I am asking without any hostility. You mentioned the toxicity of these injections. I have no objection to that. However, I can see that nanotechnology is toxic.
Since it was used everywhere during this "pandemic," that is what is causing the damage, not the virus. The virus is irrelevant to me,
So how do you explain the toxicity mechanisms of this injection?
I am asking without any hostility. You mentioned the toxicity of these injections. I have no objection to that. However, I can see that nanotechnology is toxic.
Since it was used everywhere during this "pandemic," that is what is causing the damage, not the virus. The virus is irrelevant to me,
So how do you explain the toxicity mechanisms of this injection?
The toxicity of the spike protein was demonstrated conclusively in experiments conduct at the Salk Institute. Their research was published in late April, 2001. In addition, because the nucleotide uridine was replaced in the mRNA inoculation with pseudouridine, the gene therapy mRNA last much longer in the body than the natural viral spike protein. Because the sequence is not natural, the mechanisms to destroy it don't exist in the body. That was intentional in the design of the gene therapy mRNA. In addition, free RNA and DNA in the blood stream occurs as a consequence and free RNA of any type and free DNA are toxic and are thromogenic. RNAases and DNAases are present in the bloodstream at all times and destroy any free RNA or DNA within minutes. The limpid nanoparticles are used to protect the spike protein in the jab from these enzymes.
They want so badly for you to look the other way than you should....
No, it's not Spike Protein. It's the toxicity of graphene/nanotechnology.
Not just in these injections, but in masks, tests, flu vaccines, drugs, etc.
The mysterious "Covid" has all the symptoms of graphene/nanotechnology toxicity and yes, graphene/nanotechnology has been used.
You can talk endlessly about Spike Protein, but why wouldn't you want to look at the poison in masks, tests, injections, food, air, respirator filters, etc.?
Unfortunately, the norm is that when someone does not have substantive arguments, instead of conceding the point to the opposing side, such a person begins to turn the cat on its head, change the subject or make personal taunts.
This was not my question.
I am asking without any hostility. You mentioned the toxicity of these injections. I have no objection to that. However, I can see that nanotechnology is toxic.
Since it was used everywhere during this "pandemic," that is what is causing the damage, not the virus. The virus is irrelevant to me,
So how do you explain the toxicity mechanisms of this injection?
The toxicity of the spike protein was demonstrated conclusively in experiments conduct at the Salk Institute. Their research was published in late April, 2001. In addition, because the nucleotide uridine was replaced in the mRNA inoculation with pseudouridine, the gene therapy mRNA last much longer in the body than the natural viral spike protein. Because the sequence is not natural, the mechanisms to destroy it don't exist in the body. That was intentional in the design of the gene therapy mRNA. In addition, free RNA and DNA in the blood stream occurs as a consequence and free RNA of any type and free DNA are toxic and are thromogenic. RNAases and DNAases are present in the bloodstream at all times and destroy any free RNA or DNA within minutes. The limpid nanoparticles are used to protect the spike protein in the jab from these enzymes.
They want so badly for you to look the other way than you should....
No, it's not Spike Protein. It's the toxicity of graphene/nanotechnology.
Not just in these injections, but in masks, tests, flu vaccines, drugs, etc.
The mysterious "Covid" has all the symptoms of graphene/nanotechnology toxicity and yes, graphene/nanotechnology has been used.
You can talk endlessly about Spike Protein, but why wouldn't you want to look at the poison in masks, tests, injections, food, air, respirator filters, etc.?
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphenenanotechnology-in-masks-and
https://outraged.substack.com/p/can-toxic-substances-be-mandated
https://outraged.substack.com/p/causes-of-injuries-and-deaths-from
https://outraged.substack.com/p/is-it-a-virus-or-is-it-graphene-toxicity
https://outraged.substack.com/p/a-courious-case-of-covid-19-graphene
https://outraged.substack.com/p/graphene-based-fraud
Sorry Troll. Game is over.
Unfortunately, the norm is that when someone does not have substantive arguments, instead of conceding the point to the opposing side, such a person begins to turn the cat on its head, change the subject or make personal taunts.