I just read about the latest CDC studies for ages 5 to 11 in The NY Times. The Times said the studies showed the vaccines are safe. That's complete bullshit. Here's what the data actually said.
It’s almost for certain worse than your very conservative and reasonable analysis says. My experience tells me the first wave of negative effects is dwarfed by the effects emerging in three to six months. I don’t know too if it ends there. I suspect not. B.C., where I live, is seeing huge upticks in all cause mortality. It’s increasing too.
It's the underlying individual 'Health' Status of the recipient that will determine the overall systemic effects of administration of any number of Vaccines to the individual. So they will always state 'Benefit Outweigh Risk'. As naturally one would hope there are more Health individuals amongst the general population. The difficulty lies in the absolute fact that 'Generationally' we are getting weaker and weaker as a Species due in part to all external environmental exposure, over reliance on processed foods, drugs ( which include multiple vaccines from infancy) coupled with poorer air quality, poor nutrition, high stress etc etc. The sector of Society with any form of underlying irregularities of the immune system, immunocompromised or immunodeficient are the sector currently suffering Serious, sometimes Fatal Adverse Health Outcome from administration of this newly formulated, ill tested , dangerous experimental 'Covid-19 Vaccine'. Sadly until we start demanding what mechanisms are currently in place and fully implemented accross the world to sucessfully identify this 'Contraindicated' sector prior to administration, sadly the 'Status Quo' will continue. Primary immunodeficiency is Genetically associated.
Secondary immunodeficiency is acquired through direct injury to the CNS. Central Nervous System and Brain.
Those already injured will sadly be written off as an acceptable level of 'Collateral Damage'.
I know, I'm the parent of a Birth Injured, and subsequently severely Vaccine Injured child who developed Regressive Autism (Sspe Subacute Sclerosis Pan Encephalitis post MMR Vaccine) on receipt of the full expansive programme of childhood vaccines. Accumulative Vaccine Viral/Toxin associated neurological infection and accumulative toxic injury.
Which lead to the 'Exasperation' of an already underlying Medical condition. Autism is now fully recognised as an 'Immune Mediated Disorder'.
And currently effects up to 4.2% of infants born according to a recently published UK Government Report on school age children in Northern Ireland. That's 1 in 25 children born.
For confirmation, check out 'The Hannah Polling Case'.
Sadly, Serious Adverse Reaction to Immunization is not a 'Rare' occurance as continually reported in the mainstream media.
I'm sorry to hear about your child, Valerie. All the best. (One of my children was seriously injured in a car accident six years ago. It too will be lifelong.)
Thank you Stephen for your kind words. I wish you and your family well. Each day brings with it a new set of challenges, stay true to your heart. Really all any of us can do when faced with such challenging circumstance , is our personal best. And don't forget to take time out for yourself too at times , thank you & take care. V
Do they establish a "background" death rate in those who are unjabbed by observing how many children per day die of all causes, including car crashes and drownings? And clearly they include all of the deaths from all of the OTHER jabs, to establish their "background". The ONLY correct metric is to establish a random cohort of kids who did not take the jabs (true controls) and count how many of THOSE kids died in the same timeframe during which the jabbed kids were followed. And following them for less than 2 years tells us almost nothing.
Immune disorders are PROGRESSIVE. They work like a delayed incendiary device- providing the culprit with an alibi when the "fire" later begins to rage. The vast majority of those who've been maimed and murdered by the injections will not know they have a SERIOUS problem for months, or even years after the "triggering" event.
I am a winery and vineyard owner with lots of followers and a high school swim coach, so my reach is pretty extensive. I talked to a furious mom last night on covid (she is very enlightened on this whole covid saga), but what she revealed last night to me is taking this covid thing up another level. Her 18 year old son definitely got covid in March, then forged a signature to get the covid shot in May (because his girlfriend wanted him to get the shot). Last night, asymptomatic, he tested positive again. His mom had him get tested because his sister came in town and got covid. I had an extensive interview with the mom (she has not gotten the shot). The son got covid, got the shot against her will, and now has covid again. My sister has had covid and has gone around helping those with covid, at least 10 thus far, and of course, never gets sick from it. I can see lasting immunity from those who have gotten it (I got it too and treated it with nutrients and got rid of the vid in 3 days). Of course I have seen triple vaxxed get the vid, but this is a first. So the question is obvious and here it goes: Could the stupid shot actually damage the immunity of someone who had previously gotten covid to the point where they can get covid over and over again? Thanks, Jim
Please clarify what it means when you say all these various people "got Covid." I hear this bizarre expression (i.e., using very loose language) from people everywhere now, even from those who are supposedly enlightened about the scam (including the fact that the so-called "virus" has never been actually isolated and thus identified, i.e., via scanning electron microscopy). Accordingly, there cannot be any “new” disease derived from said non-existent virus. Remember that something can only be unique and thus given a new name as a new disease (e.g., Covid) if it derives from a new type of pathogen proven to cause disease and in turn produce unique symptoms. So what were the symptoms of these people who you say "got Covid"? And was the so-called "virus" actually identified in these people? Thanks for your reply in advance.
Hi Michigan Rob, yes, the person I am talking about is a teen that tested positive in the spring and tested positive this weekend. The test for positivity this weekend was an at home test. His test in the spring came at a healthcare facility. Before it became mainstream, I had trouble with the amplification of the PCR test, so it really becomes hard to know who had it and who hasn't.
The Goldberg, et al. "hybrid immunity" study found that rates of infection for recovered + vaccinated were a hair lower than for recovered alone, at 4-8 months (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1). That would suggest the reinfection of your contact's son is unusual.
However, that was before Omicron. It could be that a lot of the "reinfections" we are hearing about w/ Omicron are cases just like that - infection + vaccine + Omicron. Either having high residual antibodies is not good when it comes to Omicron, or the vaccine causes the immune system to deprioritize the full spectrum immune response (against all the epitopes associated with the virus) in favor of the spike. In either case, the recovered+vaccinated looked like they weren't being disfavored before but now that the spike is more mutated, the damage becomes clear.
And then there's general immune suppression, anecdotally this is well supported. Again, this was hidden before by the "anti-spike immunity" but the spike is too different now.
Thank you Brian. Clicking on it....Cheers, Jim These two years have been completely insane. I haven't lost course, however. Just disappointed and ticked off, but much better educated on immunology!!!!
Me too, though I have gone a step further and looked directly at the published evidence for discovering a new virus. When one is ready to go down that rabbit hole, I declare it will be interesting for anyone intellectually inclined. However, you do have to buckle up and learn the abstruse terminology of virology, once you do you can explore the evidence directly and run it by your logic filters and understanding of the basic scientific method. My conclusion after these 2 years where I had nothing more important to do...is that the entire field of virology is a pseudoscience. They have never found a virus directly in an "infected" person, and say they can only produce them by culturing them on chemically treated foreign tissue culture...and oh so much more...
Hi Janine, I have seen some discussions as to what you are alluding to. I haven't increased my "pay grade / education level" to that level yet, but I am getting there. I'm glad you have been able to get there. It is fascinating study.
Yes, this seems likely not only because the shot tampers with immune systems, but also because it reactivates a variety of dormant viruses in the recipient, such as Epstien-Barr and Herpes. So the possibilities are that either 1) natural immunity was damaged; 2) previous covid remnants were reactivated; or 3) one of the covid infections was misidentified due to faulty testing. Hopefully some of problem 3 resolves if the EUA on PCR testing is truly allowed to expire today.
The study shows that by cherry-picking from the right states, from the right hospitals, and from the right patients, we can demonstrate whatever we want. The purpose of the study was to find subjects and data that would support the conclusion that was wanted. In other words, the first thing we did was to write the conclusion. Then we selected the class of patients that we thought would best support this conclusion. We found just 6 hospitals that we believed would have the highest concentrations of this class of patients. When we collected data we found that, lo and behold, our patient selection methodoligy was pretty good, and did not contradict our predetermined conclusion.
Although we didn't mention it in the study, we also discovered in the data we collected that covid is what is causing obesity in children. Yes. Covid is the root cause of all obesity in U.S. children.
On a more serious note, there is a fact that is always overlooked in all these studies. The definition of "having covid" is based on an unreliable test that is impossible to validate, because nobody has ever isolated a sample of this so-called virus. Nobody has ever found it. Nobody has characterized it. Nobody has sequenced it from a real sample. Nobody has proved transmission of a single person to another person. In short, there is no evidence of the existence of covid.
Take 100 patients believed to be sick with covid. Take 100 patients believed to be healthy without covid. Do a double-blind "test" for covid on all these patients. Hand the test results to a covid "expert." Can he/she identify from the test results who are the sick ones?
Of course not. What does that tell you?
The dominant test kit today is the one from Abbott. To verify the reliability of the test they sampled just 500 patients all of whom were symptomatic with something...believed to probably be covid. Interesting that the ONLY people they "verified" the test with were people who were known to be sick. Then with an EUA issued, they release 100m test kits out to the terrified public so they can test themselves with these kits.
So what does it mean when a healthy person gets a positive result? Well, I dunno, because nobody ever checked. And if negative? Uhh, I dunno, because nobody ever checked. It just baffles me how seemingly intelligent people take this stuff seriously.
But you need to have someone look at some of these analyses to see if they are bulletproof before putting them out. Don't give the enemy anything to hold on to.
Your underreporting factor of 41 is most likely accurate overall, but that cannot be assumed for individual events. Child deaths are probably not going to be underreported as much as onset of asthma or appendicitis, or death in an older person.
We would expect 50 background deaths in 3 million kids age 5-11 over 46 days, true. Almost all of those deaths will be in kids who were either deathly ill for at least two months before hand, killed in an accident, or murdered. That actually works in "our" favor. If a kid is fairly healthy when he or she gets a shot and dies within a a few months of "natural" causes, I'd say that's an extremely strong sign it was the "vaccine".
You can't assume there would be 50 background deaths in these kids. Many kids in a cohort of 3 million who are likely to die in a 46 day window will be dying of cancer or some other very serious disease. If they have competent doctors, they won't be getting a shot.
I get what you are saying about the background deaths. If there are 50 background deaths within 30 days of a kid's 1st or 2nd shot, there SHOULD be 50 VAERS reports, even if 45 of them say the cause of death was (preexisting) cancer or a car accident. Of course THAT letter of the law is followed about as often as people carefully read end user license agreements for software installs.
Lets assume for the sake of argument the underreporting factor is 41. If there are 2 reports, we can't just assume there are 2 reports times 41 URF = 82 deaths. There's a LARGE element of randomness when the number of reports is low. There's a decent chance that the actual number of deaths was 40 or less in this hypothetical case - I'm guessing about a 30% chance, but my probability and stats classes were a long time ago.
And of course the CDC holds the cards. They decide when to let a case go through to the public database. They occasionally remove duplicate reports, they refuse to update details of cases to reflect people dying after an initial report has been filed, and so on.
I just watched Dr. Malone on JRE and I thought it was very interesting that when Joe asked him why children are particularly susceptible to myocarditis and other heart issues from the vaccine, Dr. Malone posited that it could be simply that heart issues are so rare in children generally that we see it in the vaccine injury statistics. In adults, heart issues are so common that it isn't nearly as obvious when the vaccine causes them. Very very interesting.
Your comment jogged my memory. A similar hypothesis was posited by a now-forgotten source that the vaxxed who subjected their circulatory systems to elevated cardiac stress (high energy sports like soccer), had had their arteries literally slashed by the microscopic razor blade edges of the graphene oxide crystals found in the clot shots.
On the outset, It gives weight to Trump's accusation of "fake news". (Sorry haters, I know, I know) It doesn't matter where the info comes from, just the very fact that so many complain of under reporting and correlated events not being reported let alone considered, I still question the validity of any data being correct, ever, let alone 'cult' media contriving their own facts.
"Another part of the MedDRA, which is available only in Expert Mode, is the ability to work with Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs). These are groups of Lower-Level Terms that have been deemed (by teams of physicians) to be part of "standard" medical concepts. Symptoms in a SMQ are defined as either "narrow" (symptoms that strongly indicate the SMQ) or "broad" (symptoms that may help to identify the SMQ but do not necessarily indicate the condition). There are only about 200 SMQs, which is far fewer than the number of symptoms in the MedDRA.
"For example, the Dementia SMQ has 110 narrow symptoms and 485 broad symptoms. This means that any of the 110 narrow symptoms (Creutzfeld-Jacob disease, Korsakov's syndrome, Senility, etc.) will strongly suggest that the patient has dementia, whereas the 485 broad symptoms could indicate dementia, but not necessarily.
"You can search for all VAERS cases that match a SMQ (either broadly or narrowly). Similarly, you can make tables or graphs of the SMQs (either broadly or narrowly) from your search results.
"It makes no sense to choose both a SMQ and a symptom term, because the search engine finds cases that match ALL requests. Therefore, if you choose a SMQ (which implies a particular set of symptom terms) and you also choose a symptom term, then only cases that satisfy both requests will be selected. If the chosen symptom term is not in the SMQ's list, then no VAERS cases will be found, whereas if the chosen symptom term is in the SMQ's list, then the selection of the SMQ is effectively ignored."
So, in completing the VAERS entry for this individual, the provider determined that the events fit certain symptom conditions, with some being broad fits for those symptoms and others being much narrower fits.
Also, the reason why this incident is not marked as "Life Threatening" is because the administration of the vaccine did not result in an immediate illness that immediately threatened the life of the child. This is question 21 of the VAERS form, as the option "Life threatening illness (immediate risk of death from the event)." The brief writeup for the vaccine administration given for the entry does not indicate in the narrative that the administration resulted in an immediate illness that immediately threatened the life of the child. She was vaccinated on Thursday evening. Got better, then went home Saturday. Sometime after 9PM on Sunday, three days afterwards, she stopped breathing. They attempted resuscitation on the way to the ER and pronounced that morning. This narrative would not indicate an immediate life threatening illness resulting from administration of the shot.
The question has been asked whether any members of Congress have opposed Biden's vaccine mandates. The answer is yes. 47 Republican senators and 136 House members filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to block enforcement of President Biden's OSHA vaccine mandate (OSHA).
Just like they did with Hitler and the millions he murdered. They basically ignored the truth.
It’s almost for certain worse than your very conservative and reasonable analysis says. My experience tells me the first wave of negative effects is dwarfed by the effects emerging in three to six months. I don’t know too if it ends there. I suspect not. B.C., where I live, is seeing huge upticks in all cause mortality. It’s increasing too.
It's the underlying individual 'Health' Status of the recipient that will determine the overall systemic effects of administration of any number of Vaccines to the individual. So they will always state 'Benefit Outweigh Risk'. As naturally one would hope there are more Health individuals amongst the general population. The difficulty lies in the absolute fact that 'Generationally' we are getting weaker and weaker as a Species due in part to all external environmental exposure, over reliance on processed foods, drugs ( which include multiple vaccines from infancy) coupled with poorer air quality, poor nutrition, high stress etc etc. The sector of Society with any form of underlying irregularities of the immune system, immunocompromised or immunodeficient are the sector currently suffering Serious, sometimes Fatal Adverse Health Outcome from administration of this newly formulated, ill tested , dangerous experimental 'Covid-19 Vaccine'. Sadly until we start demanding what mechanisms are currently in place and fully implemented accross the world to sucessfully identify this 'Contraindicated' sector prior to administration, sadly the 'Status Quo' will continue. Primary immunodeficiency is Genetically associated.
Secondary immunodeficiency is acquired through direct injury to the CNS. Central Nervous System and Brain.
Those already injured will sadly be written off as an acceptable level of 'Collateral Damage'.
I know, I'm the parent of a Birth Injured, and subsequently severely Vaccine Injured child who developed Regressive Autism (Sspe Subacute Sclerosis Pan Encephalitis post MMR Vaccine) on receipt of the full expansive programme of childhood vaccines. Accumulative Vaccine Viral/Toxin associated neurological infection and accumulative toxic injury.
Which lead to the 'Exasperation' of an already underlying Medical condition. Autism is now fully recognised as an 'Immune Mediated Disorder'.
And currently effects up to 4.2% of infants born according to a recently published UK Government Report on school age children in Northern Ireland. That's 1 in 25 children born.
For confirmation, check out 'The Hannah Polling Case'.
Sadly, Serious Adverse Reaction to Immunization is not a 'Rare' occurance as continually reported in the mainstream media.
I'm sorry to hear about your child, Valerie. All the best. (One of my children was seriously injured in a car accident six years ago. It too will be lifelong.)
Thank you Stephen for your kind words. I wish you and your family well. Each day brings with it a new set of challenges, stay true to your heart. Really all any of us can do when faced with such challenging circumstance , is our personal best. And don't forget to take time out for yourself too at times , thank you & take care. V
Your hyperlinked URF paper won’t load, but CDC site loads easily.
i just tried it. worked. fine. what URL did it try and what was the message?
It works for me now. Was worried “they” were blocking it somehow.
Do they establish a "background" death rate in those who are unjabbed by observing how many children per day die of all causes, including car crashes and drownings? And clearly they include all of the deaths from all of the OTHER jabs, to establish their "background". The ONLY correct metric is to establish a random cohort of kids who did not take the jabs (true controls) and count how many of THOSE kids died in the same timeframe during which the jabbed kids were followed. And following them for less than 2 years tells us almost nothing.
Immune disorders are PROGRESSIVE. They work like a delayed incendiary device- providing the culprit with an alibi when the "fire" later begins to rage. The vast majority of those who've been maimed and murdered by the injections will not know they have a SERIOUS problem for months, or even years after the "triggering" event.
I am a winery and vineyard owner with lots of followers and a high school swim coach, so my reach is pretty extensive. I talked to a furious mom last night on covid (she is very enlightened on this whole covid saga), but what she revealed last night to me is taking this covid thing up another level. Her 18 year old son definitely got covid in March, then forged a signature to get the covid shot in May (because his girlfriend wanted him to get the shot). Last night, asymptomatic, he tested positive again. His mom had him get tested because his sister came in town and got covid. I had an extensive interview with the mom (she has not gotten the shot). The son got covid, got the shot against her will, and now has covid again. My sister has had covid and has gone around helping those with covid, at least 10 thus far, and of course, never gets sick from it. I can see lasting immunity from those who have gotten it (I got it too and treated it with nutrients and got rid of the vid in 3 days). Of course I have seen triple vaxxed get the vid, but this is a first. So the question is obvious and here it goes: Could the stupid shot actually damage the immunity of someone who had previously gotten covid to the point where they can get covid over and over again? Thanks, Jim
Please clarify what it means when you say all these various people "got Covid." I hear this bizarre expression (i.e., using very loose language) from people everywhere now, even from those who are supposedly enlightened about the scam (including the fact that the so-called "virus" has never been actually isolated and thus identified, i.e., via scanning electron microscopy). Accordingly, there cannot be any “new” disease derived from said non-existent virus. Remember that something can only be unique and thus given a new name as a new disease (e.g., Covid) if it derives from a new type of pathogen proven to cause disease and in turn produce unique symptoms. So what were the symptoms of these people who you say "got Covid"? And was the so-called "virus" actually identified in these people? Thanks for your reply in advance.
Hi Michigan Rob, yes, the person I am talking about is a teen that tested positive in the spring and tested positive this weekend. The test for positivity this weekend was an at home test. His test in the spring came at a healthcare facility. Before it became mainstream, I had trouble with the amplification of the PCR test, so it really becomes hard to know who had it and who hasn't.
The Goldberg, et al. "hybrid immunity" study found that rates of infection for recovered + vaccinated were a hair lower than for recovered alone, at 4-8 months (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1). That would suggest the reinfection of your contact's son is unusual.
However, that was before Omicron. It could be that a lot of the "reinfections" we are hearing about w/ Omicron are cases just like that - infection + vaccine + Omicron. Either having high residual antibodies is not good when it comes to Omicron, or the vaccine causes the immune system to deprioritize the full spectrum immune response (against all the epitopes associated with the virus) in favor of the spike. In either case, the recovered+vaccinated looked like they weren't being disfavored before but now that the spike is more mutated, the damage becomes clear.
And then there's general immune suppression, anecdotally this is well supported. Again, this was hidden before by the "anti-spike immunity" but the spike is too different now.
Both possibilities discussed at https://unglossed.substack.com/p/neg
Thank you Brian. Clicking on it....Cheers, Jim These two years have been completely insane. I haven't lost course, however. Just disappointed and ticked off, but much better educated on immunology!!!!
Me too, though I have gone a step further and looked directly at the published evidence for discovering a new virus. When one is ready to go down that rabbit hole, I declare it will be interesting for anyone intellectually inclined. However, you do have to buckle up and learn the abstruse terminology of virology, once you do you can explore the evidence directly and run it by your logic filters and understanding of the basic scientific method. My conclusion after these 2 years where I had nothing more important to do...is that the entire field of virology is a pseudoscience. They have never found a virus directly in an "infected" person, and say they can only produce them by culturing them on chemically treated foreign tissue culture...and oh so much more...
Hi Janine, I have seen some discussions as to what you are alluding to. I haven't increased my "pay grade / education level" to that level yet, but I am getting there. I'm glad you have been able to get there. It is fascinating study.
Yes, this seems likely not only because the shot tampers with immune systems, but also because it reactivates a variety of dormant viruses in the recipient, such as Epstien-Barr and Herpes. So the possibilities are that either 1) natural immunity was damaged; 2) previous covid remnants were reactivated; or 3) one of the covid infections was misidentified due to faulty testing. Hopefully some of problem 3 resolves if the EUA on PCR testing is truly allowed to expire today.
You smart wonderful Newfies! Caper here ,YQY.
Thank you, YYR for taking time to send me your thoughts, for I greatly appreciate it. Cheers, Jim
The study shows that by cherry-picking from the right states, from the right hospitals, and from the right patients, we can demonstrate whatever we want. The purpose of the study was to find subjects and data that would support the conclusion that was wanted. In other words, the first thing we did was to write the conclusion. Then we selected the class of patients that we thought would best support this conclusion. We found just 6 hospitals that we believed would have the highest concentrations of this class of patients. When we collected data we found that, lo and behold, our patient selection methodoligy was pretty good, and did not contradict our predetermined conclusion.
Although we didn't mention it in the study, we also discovered in the data we collected that covid is what is causing obesity in children. Yes. Covid is the root cause of all obesity in U.S. children.
On a more serious note, there is a fact that is always overlooked in all these studies. The definition of "having covid" is based on an unreliable test that is impossible to validate, because nobody has ever isolated a sample of this so-called virus. Nobody has ever found it. Nobody has characterized it. Nobody has sequenced it from a real sample. Nobody has proved transmission of a single person to another person. In short, there is no evidence of the existence of covid.
Take 100 patients believed to be sick with covid. Take 100 patients believed to be healthy without covid. Do a double-blind "test" for covid on all these patients. Hand the test results to a covid "expert." Can he/she identify from the test results who are the sick ones?
Of course not. What does that tell you?
The dominant test kit today is the one from Abbott. To verify the reliability of the test they sampled just 500 patients all of whom were symptomatic with something...believed to probably be covid. Interesting that the ONLY people they "verified" the test with were people who were known to be sick. Then with an EUA issued, they release 100m test kits out to the terrified public so they can test themselves with these kits.
So what does it mean when a healthy person gets a positive result? Well, I dunno, because nobody ever checked. And if negative? Uhh, I dunno, because nobody ever checked. It just baffles me how seemingly intelligent people take this stuff seriously.
In simple terms. They intend to poison the children. The fascists have exposed themselves and their intent.
Robert F Kennedy Jr says they need the kids to get full authorization for the clot shots. The kids are collateral damage. https://twitter.com/WestwoodParking/status/1474969006750633986?s=20
This was always an agenda of destruction. Must-hear Interview with Dr. Palmer https://www.bitchute.com/video/vt0ItgQryFfm/
https://rumble.com/vrqaan-the-joe-rogan-experience-1757-dr.-robert-malone-md.html
Rogan and Malone. Excellent interview.
Unimaginably good!!! Joe has become a voice for the greater good! I will listen again many times.
Jan. 31, 2021 Epoch Times: Fauci: Hospitals are 'overcounting' COVID 19 Cases in Children - https://www.theepochtimes.com/fauci-hospitals-are-overcounting-covid-19-cases-in-children_4187345.html?utm_source=newsnoe&utm_campaign=breaking-2021-12-31-4&utm_medium=email&est=P%2F49yv7WtUyvlWivGSADwS%2FYmAGZlB61B0av%2FoDBOz8gh5dGlowmt5tmu3uW2LZ0RQ%3D%3D- Photo of Fauci shows him definitely wearing a pale shade of lipstick...guess he's getting too pale himself
Makeup tips from "Rachel" Levine.
I'm behind you 500%.
But you need to have someone look at some of these analyses to see if they are bulletproof before putting them out. Don't give the enemy anything to hold on to.
Your underreporting factor of 41 is most likely accurate overall, but that cannot be assumed for individual events. Child deaths are probably not going to be underreported as much as onset of asthma or appendicitis, or death in an older person.
We would expect 50 background deaths in 3 million kids age 5-11 over 46 days, true. Almost all of those deaths will be in kids who were either deathly ill for at least two months before hand, killed in an accident, or murdered. That actually works in "our" favor. If a kid is fairly healthy when he or she gets a shot and dies within a a few months of "natural" causes, I'd say that's an extremely strong sign it was the "vaccine".
You can't assume there would be 50 background deaths in these kids. Many kids in a cohort of 3 million who are likely to die in a 46 day window will be dying of cancer or some other very serious disease. If they have competent doctors, they won't be getting a shot.
I get what you are saying about the background deaths. If there are 50 background deaths within 30 days of a kid's 1st or 2nd shot, there SHOULD be 50 VAERS reports, even if 45 of them say the cause of death was (preexisting) cancer or a car accident. Of course THAT letter of the law is followed about as often as people carefully read end user license agreements for software installs.
Lets assume for the sake of argument the underreporting factor is 41. If there are 2 reports, we can't just assume there are 2 reports times 41 URF = 82 deaths. There's a LARGE element of randomness when the number of reports is low. There's a decent chance that the actual number of deaths was 40 or less in this hypothetical case - I'm guessing about a 30% chance, but my probability and stats classes were a long time ago.
And of course the CDC holds the cards. They decide when to let a case go through to the public database. They occasionally remove duplicate reports, they refuse to update details of cases to reflect people dying after an initial report has been filed, and so on.
Keep up the good fight.
the 41*2 is the best estimate. nothing is for sure. these are all estimates.
I just watched Dr. Malone on JRE and I thought it was very interesting that when Joe asked him why children are particularly susceptible to myocarditis and other heart issues from the vaccine, Dr. Malone posited that it could be simply that heart issues are so rare in children generally that we see it in the vaccine injury statistics. In adults, heart issues are so common that it isn't nearly as obvious when the vaccine causes them. Very very interesting.
i think there's more to it than just that. it is not just signal to noise thing
Plausible but this doesn't explain why [teenage] boys are apparently more susceptible than girls.
There is an androgen connection especially as it increases with puberty.
It seems to be more blood flow or similar. Same reasons soccer players are being hit harder than athletes in other sports.
Your comment jogged my memory. A similar hypothesis was posited by a now-forgotten source that the vaxxed who subjected their circulatory systems to elevated cardiac stress (high energy sports like soccer), had had their arteries literally slashed by the microscopic razor blade edges of the graphene oxide crystals found in the clot shots.
On the outset, It gives weight to Trump's accusation of "fake news". (Sorry haters, I know, I know) It doesn't matter where the info comes from, just the very fact that so many complain of under reporting and correlated events not being reported let alone considered, I still question the validity of any data being correct, ever, let alone 'cult' media contriving their own facts.
just so many lies needing to be uncovered...and thanks to all who have the voice do that!!!
The child died, but filled out as 'Life Threatening? No'????
Administered by: Private Purchased by: ?
Symptoms: Blood gases abnormal, Blood pH decreased, Carbon dioxide increased, Death, Intensive care, Pulse absent, Respiratory arrest, Resuscitation
SMQs:, Anaphylactic reaction (broad), Lactic acidosis (broad), Shock-associated circulatory or cardiac conditions (excl torsade de pointes) (narrow), Acute central respiratory depression (narrow), Guillain-Barre syndrome (broad), Hypersensitivity (broad), Respiratory failure (narrow), Infective pneumonia (broad)
Life Threatening? No
Birth Defect? No
Died? Yes
Date died: 2021-11-22
Days after onset: 0
I wonder what broad and narrow means.
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/help/helpExpertMedDRA.php
"Another part of the MedDRA, which is available only in Expert Mode, is the ability to work with Standardized MedDRA Queries (SMQs). These are groups of Lower-Level Terms that have been deemed (by teams of physicians) to be part of "standard" medical concepts. Symptoms in a SMQ are defined as either "narrow" (symptoms that strongly indicate the SMQ) or "broad" (symptoms that may help to identify the SMQ but do not necessarily indicate the condition). There are only about 200 SMQs, which is far fewer than the number of symptoms in the MedDRA.
"For example, the Dementia SMQ has 110 narrow symptoms and 485 broad symptoms. This means that any of the 110 narrow symptoms (Creutzfeld-Jacob disease, Korsakov's syndrome, Senility, etc.) will strongly suggest that the patient has dementia, whereas the 485 broad symptoms could indicate dementia, but not necessarily.
"You can search for all VAERS cases that match a SMQ (either broadly or narrowly). Similarly, you can make tables or graphs of the SMQs (either broadly or narrowly) from your search results.
"It makes no sense to choose both a SMQ and a symptom term, because the search engine finds cases that match ALL requests. Therefore, if you choose a SMQ (which implies a particular set of symptom terms) and you also choose a symptom term, then only cases that satisfy both requests will be selected. If the chosen symptom term is not in the SMQ's list, then no VAERS cases will be found, whereas if the chosen symptom term is in the SMQ's list, then the selection of the SMQ is effectively ignored."
So, in completing the VAERS entry for this individual, the provider determined that the events fit certain symptom conditions, with some being broad fits for those symptoms and others being much narrower fits.
Also, the reason why this incident is not marked as "Life Threatening" is because the administration of the vaccine did not result in an immediate illness that immediately threatened the life of the child. This is question 21 of the VAERS form, as the option "Life threatening illness (immediate risk of death from the event)." The brief writeup for the vaccine administration given for the entry does not indicate in the narrative that the administration resulted in an immediate illness that immediately threatened the life of the child. She was vaccinated on Thursday evening. Got better, then went home Saturday. Sometime after 9PM on Sunday, three days afterwards, she stopped breathing. They attempted resuscitation on the way to the ER and pronounced that morning. This narrative would not indicate an immediate life threatening illness resulting from administration of the shot.
not sure, maybe can ask the CDC
The question has been asked whether any members of Congress have opposed Biden's vaccine mandates. The answer is yes. 47 Republican senators and 136 House members filed an amicus brief asking the Supreme Court to block enforcement of President Biden's OSHA vaccine mandate (OSHA).
Congressional Republicans tell Supreme Court to block Biden's 'health police' vaccine mandate
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/supreme-court-stefanik-braun-covid-vaccine-mandate
Sounds like we need 20 more Senators to impeach the senile old fart and send Kamala an urgent message. Unlikely, but mathematically possible.
At least these clowns must put themselves on record voting for or against this measure. Congress makes laws, not Executive, not OSHA bureaucrats.