the gaslighting is another crime in itself; having "emergency approved" the experimental vaccine, they're now neglecting the victims' suffering, thus preventing develpment of treatment for such ailments. it's horrific
It's insulting with the gaslighting when we all are touched with this. 15 near to you-so very sad. With the SV40 & endotoxins, there will be more ("There will be blood.").
Re DTP for those unaware:
Rfk jr has been talking about this for decades. Here more recently:
My real world is similar, but probably smaller sample size. Out of about 200 people I know of who took the shots, 3 died, and at least a dozen are dealing with life changing injuries.
All-cause mortality figures went through the roof, starting in 2021, in the U.S. (and I think in other countries heavily vaxxed with mRNA spikeshots). See Ed Dowd's work.
Adverse effects of mRNA spikeshots were not evenly distributed across the U.S. states. There were clearly "hot lots" and they were concentrated in "Red States." Among spikeshot-vaxxed people I know (all living in Blue States) no one has had any apparent adverse effects. I also heard early on that 30% of spikeshots given in some places were placebo shots. I also read that researchers in an Eastern European country collected mRNA spikeshot vials in their country and testing showed no mRNA in 30% of the vials; the country protested to the European Parliament that their population had been "cheated" of protection.
Yes, there was and as far as I know is a spike in all cause mortality. That spike has commonly been around 10 percent as I recall. However a ten percent spike is not obviously noticed by individuals, as most do not attend even annual funerals as an example.
There has not been a drop in all cause mortality to negative or reduced numbers, which would be expected following a spike.
I do not know of any studies about all cause mortality particular to an area of vaccines that had a very high percentage of adverse events. I could not find out if the :bad batch" was simply an area outside of the big hospitals where adverse events were suppressed or not. Or even if that was part of the reason, which I suspected, as we know there was repression of adverse event reporting in the major hospitals like Kaiser, as an example.
Definitely hot lots. But I live in deep blue WA state, and I know dozens and dozens injured or dead. I donтАЩt believe red states were targeted. I keep a list on my phone and the deaths are up to 38!
Again, should there not be a far greater increase in all cause mortality in your area. Would you normally know of say 34 deaths, indicating for you that all cause mortality increased over 10 percent, or are you seeing an increase of 50 percent or more?
I live in the Real World and this is what I have observed:
15 people dead. From the jabs.
All nominally healthy. Then not.
Including one turbo cancer, two dead fetuses, one teenage athlete.
Just one guy dead from the
Actual Advertised Contagion.
He was old and sick.
Fat as Jabba the Hutt.
Meds and dumb luck kept him going.
Until it didn't.
Last I heard of jab sickness of this magnitude, it was kids who got the MMR and/or DTaP.
Back in the 1980s.
Killed them or left them brain damaged/autistic.
Vax peddlers are in no way required to create safe or effective jab substances.
Thanks Ronnie Reagan. :|
the gaslighting is another crime in itself; having "emergency approved" the experimental vaccine, they're now neglecting the victims' suffering, thus preventing develpment of treatment for such ailments. it's horrific
It's insulting with the gaslighting when we all are touched with this. 15 near to you-so very sad. With the SV40 & endotoxins, there will be more ("There will be blood.").
Re DTP for those unaware:
Rfk jr has been talking about this for decades. Here more recently:
https://substack.com/@truthturtle/note/c-83252475?utm_source=notes-share-action
NIH
DTP was associated with increased child mortality, particularly for girls.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29616207/
My real world is similar, but probably smaller sample size. Out of about 200 people I know of who took the shots, 3 died, and at least a dozen are dealing with life changing injuries.
Very sad. Yet should not the mortality numbers be through the roof if this was common?
All-cause mortality figures went through the roof, starting in 2021, in the U.S. (and I think in other countries heavily vaxxed with mRNA spikeshots). See Ed Dowd's work.
Adverse effects of mRNA spikeshots were not evenly distributed across the U.S. states. There were clearly "hot lots" and they were concentrated in "Red States." Among spikeshot-vaxxed people I know (all living in Blue States) no one has had any apparent adverse effects. I also heard early on that 30% of spikeshots given in some places were placebo shots. I also read that researchers in an Eastern European country collected mRNA spikeshot vials in their country and testing showed no mRNA in 30% of the vials; the country protested to the European Parliament that their population had been "cheated" of protection.
Yes, there was and as far as I know is a spike in all cause mortality. That spike has commonly been around 10 percent as I recall. However a ten percent spike is not obviously noticed by individuals, as most do not attend even annual funerals as an example.
There has not been a drop in all cause mortality to negative or reduced numbers, which would be expected following a spike.
I do not know of any studies about all cause mortality particular to an area of vaccines that had a very high percentage of adverse events. I could not find out if the :bad batch" was simply an area outside of the big hospitals where adverse events were suppressed or not. Or even if that was part of the reason, which I suspected, as we know there was repression of adverse event reporting in the major hospitals like Kaiser, as an example.
Definitely hot lots. But I live in deep blue WA state, and I know dozens and dozens injured or dead. I donтАЩt believe red states were targeted. I keep a list on my phone and the deaths are up to 38!
Again, should there not be a far greater increase in all cause mortality in your area. Would you normally know of say 34 deaths, indicating for you that all cause mortality increased over 10 percent, or are you seeing an increase of 50 percent or more?