Buried in the documents that Pfizer wanted hidden from public view for 75 years there was a table that revealed that their vaccine actually had negative efficacy.
Since the Cleveland Clinic study two years ago, it has been obvious that the shots made people more likely to get Covid. Now the questions is why? Why were they so determined to push out these shots knowing they couldn’t be anything but harmful? And when? When are we going to see the arrest of the people who plotted and pushed them out, killing innocent people?
NOT A FULL LIST! Pfizer Publishes Complete List of the COVID Vaccine´s Side Effects and Recommends How Often to Get Boosted
Pfizer Covid Vaccine: Revealed More than 1000 Side Effects
Pfizer Announces How Often You Will Need to get the Covid Vaccine
It is possible that a situation between endemic and epidemic occurs, where Ómicron evolves. Therefore, an annual booster dose will be needed. In this context, a recent report from the pharmaceutical company reveals that it will have to continue vaccinating against Covid in the following campaigns. According to the investigation, one more dose per year will be necessary to be protected.
STEVE AND MERYL NASS HAVE REPORTED MORE. Any one of these will kill. Bells Palsey, Shingles, and Guillain Barre, TURBO, BREAST, PROSTATE, Colon Cancer, Stiff Person Syndrome, Autisim belong on the list.
Where on earth has the quick home-use blood test for mRNA spike gone?
As Dr. Cole stated, years ago when he said the test was about a year away, such a test would end this. The vast majority of the 'vaxxed' would see they are full of spike, and be able to compare with the zero spike in their unvaccinated friends, if they have such.
Not to get too paranoid, but has someone been payed-off to bury this?
Install on your smart phone, a MAC address detector for Bluetooth. MAC is Media access Control Computers use. The Covid Vaxxed, are emitting MAC addresses. Try it and see?
While I am (almost) as upset about the mRNA shots as you are Steve, don't we know that the standard interpretation of the data presented above is:
• Anti-N antibodies are produced only in response to infection (as opposed to anti-S antibodies which can be produced by vaccination or infection)
• On the final visit, for those who were formerly negative for anti-N antibodies, a higher percentage of the placebo group were positive for anti-N compared to the treatment group.
• Therefor a higher percentage of the placebo group got infected during the trial period. I.e. "the vaccine works".
Very very interesting perspective, I must say. On the other hand we know that the risks of breakthrough infection significantly increased with each dose of the spike mRNA gene therapy shots. Worse however was that the all-cause mortality by January 1, 2022 (a year later) was greater than 10 fold for the vaccinated over the unvaccinated at least as revealed by the ONS data for England. Indeed about 83.5% of the deaths from Jan 2021 to end of May 2022 were iatrogenic relating to the inappropriate use of the gene therapy shots as vaccines which incidentally included over 72,000 deaths in the UNVACCINATED. https://rumble.com/v51idm2-dr.-marian-laderoute-jun-01-2024-regina-saskatchewan.html
Sorry Steve, you lost me. 17% more deaths related to vaccine. Are you adding the 8.7 and 9%? What is the logic of adding the increased risk of infection and CFR?
So, not only did getting the jabs increase one's odds of death, accounting for all causes*, but weren't even effective for their purported purpose. And Pfizer knew, I'm sure the health agency bigwigs knew, and the president and veep (who required her campaign staff to be "fully up to date" on the jabs) either knew or were ignorant to the point of gross negligence. And they're still pushing the jabs. The hits just keep coming. How will this go down in history?
* 21 all cause deaths reported in the jab group vs 17 in the "placebo" group during the clinical trials, though one among those reported in the "placebo" group got a Moderna shot, so the jab/placebo ratio was likely much closer to 22 to 16, unless an exceptionally high percentage of the placebo group went similarly off protocol.
Steve, why did you reach out to me over all this on email and then do nothing about it thereafter? NB: excess deaths in Scottish care homes AFTER the ‘vaccine’ rollout were NEGATIVE for 2 years. The bigger crime is what happened and has now been CONFIRMED as occuring in cares home and even hospitals in 2020. PS- This is not evidence of a lab leak virus but something else as outlined definitively by @Denis Rancourt
The excess death rate is expected to be lower after a period of a higher excess death rate, for the simple reason people only die once. A lower percentage of excess deaths would be expected with the most vulnerable already taken out and the strongest remaining.
A continuing increase of the excess death rate, as occurred following the introduction of the jabs almost everywhere for the general population, is indeed a very strong signal.
Steve, the FDA did not fail in approving the Pfizer COVID jab. So what if it actually increased the likelihood of infection in test subjects? The FDA's purpose and mission is to promote pharmaceutical company profits. And by golly, it's not going to fail!
Not a surprise that their vaccines would show negative efficacy...when they are composed of toxic matter, which can injure or kill. The results are apparent with all the sudden deaths daily.
Since the Cleveland Clinic study two years ago, it has been obvious that the shots made people more likely to get Covid. Now the questions is why? Why were they so determined to push out these shots knowing they couldn’t be anything but harmful? And when? When are we going to see the arrest of the people who plotted and pushed them out, killing innocent people?
https://open.substack.com/pub/karenkingston/p/some-babies-will-experience-death?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=emsgc
NOT A FULL LIST! Pfizer Publishes Complete List of the COVID Vaccine´s Side Effects and Recommends How Often to Get Boosted
Pfizer Covid Vaccine: Revealed More than 1000 Side Effects
Pfizer Announces How Often You Will Need to get the Covid Vaccine
It is possible that a situation between endemic and epidemic occurs, where Ómicron evolves. Therefore, an annual booster dose will be needed. In this context, a recent report from the pharmaceutical company reveals that it will have to continue vaccinating against Covid in the following campaigns. According to the investigation, one more dose per year will be necessary to be protected.
https://thecostaricanews.com/pfizer-publishes-complete-list-of-the-covid-vaccines-side-effects-and-recommends-how-often-to-get-boosted/?fbclid=IwY2xjawHr5qBleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHcD2K4dV6YD2NEd-x22e8gUkZmfBjBaV5823MzeDFJ_5eCyUX-2izix22A_aem_YHbyRCzILEeuzhemt6HFHg
STEVE AND MERYL NASS HAVE REPORTED MORE. Any one of these will kill. Bells Palsey, Shingles, and Guillain Barre, TURBO, BREAST, PROSTATE, Colon Cancer, Stiff Person Syndrome, Autisim belong on the list.
Where on earth has the quick home-use blood test for mRNA spike gone?
As Dr. Cole stated, years ago when he said the test was about a year away, such a test would end this. The vast majority of the 'vaxxed' would see they are full of spike, and be able to compare with the zero spike in their unvaccinated friends, if they have such.
Not to get too paranoid, but has someone been payed-off to bury this?
Meanwhile, in the real world, it's a damn sight higher than 8.7%.
https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/fda-must-disclose-more-covid-19-vaccine-records-us-judge-rules-2024-12-06/
Install on your smart phone, a MAC address detector for Bluetooth. MAC is Media access Control Computers use. The Covid Vaxxed, are emitting MAC addresses. Try it and see?
While I am (almost) as upset about the mRNA shots as you are Steve, don't we know that the standard interpretation of the data presented above is:
• Anti-N antibodies are produced only in response to infection (as opposed to anti-S antibodies which can be produced by vaccination or infection)
• On the final visit, for those who were formerly negative for anti-N antibodies, a higher percentage of the placebo group were positive for anti-N compared to the treatment group.
• Therefor a higher percentage of the placebo group got infected during the trial period. I.e. "the vaccine works".
Very very interesting perspective, I must say. On the other hand we know that the risks of breakthrough infection significantly increased with each dose of the spike mRNA gene therapy shots. Worse however was that the all-cause mortality by January 1, 2022 (a year later) was greater than 10 fold for the vaccinated over the unvaccinated at least as revealed by the ONS data for England. Indeed about 83.5% of the deaths from Jan 2021 to end of May 2022 were iatrogenic relating to the inappropriate use of the gene therapy shots as vaccines which incidentally included over 72,000 deaths in the UNVACCINATED. https://rumble.com/v51idm2-dr.-marian-laderoute-jun-01-2024-regina-saskatchewan.html
Jan 20 can’t come soon enough
Sorry Steve, you lost me. 17% more deaths related to vaccine. Are you adding the 8.7 and 9%? What is the logic of adding the increased risk of infection and CFR?
So, not only did getting the jabs increase one's odds of death, accounting for all causes*, but weren't even effective for their purported purpose. And Pfizer knew, I'm sure the health agency bigwigs knew, and the president and veep (who required her campaign staff to be "fully up to date" on the jabs) either knew or were ignorant to the point of gross negligence. And they're still pushing the jabs. The hits just keep coming. How will this go down in history?
* 21 all cause deaths reported in the jab group vs 17 in the "placebo" group during the clinical trials, though one among those reported in the "placebo" group got a Moderna shot, so the jab/placebo ratio was likely much closer to 22 to 16, unless an exceptionally high percentage of the placebo group went similarly off protocol.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/86/224
Steve, why did you reach out to me over all this on email and then do nothing about it thereafter? NB: excess deaths in Scottish care homes AFTER the ‘vaccine’ rollout were NEGATIVE for 2 years. The bigger crime is what happened and has now been CONFIRMED as occuring in cares home and even hospitals in 2020. PS- This is not evidence of a lab leak virus but something else as outlined definitively by @Denis Rancourt
https://biologyphenom.substack.com/p/scottish-covid-19-inquiryclosing
The excess death rate is expected to be lower after a period of a higher excess death rate, for the simple reason people only die once. A lower percentage of excess deaths would be expected with the most vulnerable already taken out and the strongest remaining.
A continuing increase of the excess death rate, as occurred following the introduction of the jabs almost everywhere for the general population, is indeed a very strong signal.
Steve, the FDA did not fail in approving the Pfizer COVID jab. So what if it actually increased the likelihood of infection in test subjects? The FDA's purpose and mission is to promote pharmaceutical company profits. And by golly, it's not going to fail!
Okay, that's totally a fair point, but here's why you should still get your booster:
https://www.newworldhumor.com/p/7e18da16-44c1-4978-b5af-c1506b77d312
Not a surprise that their vaccines would show negative efficacy...when they are composed of toxic matter, which can injure or kill. The results are apparent with all the sudden deaths daily.