For the first time in human history, a national government has voluntarily released record level data for vaccine. Epidemiologists worldwide IGNORE this data. But it doesn't stop me.
ha! I was really getting a kick at the back and forth of folks asking and others answering and the fact it actually does not show up first on a Google search!
Now I have another one for ya' Wayne!
try to get Steve to be nice to the non-statistically oriented(ie MOST readers) for the significance of scientific notation of the P value.
(For those who read this, really low values are preferred because they show HOW significant the finding is. The closer to zero the better, meaning this fact is TRUE, man!
So, a P value number like 1.4 e -14 actually means: 0.000000000000014 THUS, it is zero! The statement it represents really is TRUE.
and anything that reads e-xx this can be said for. . .)
I don't think "true" is an applicable expression when using the p-value statistical method. If I understand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value correctly, a lower p-value does not prove a hypothesis - it only allows stronger rejection of the null-hypothesis, ie. in this case the statement that getting the Moderna jab does not result in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab. This is not the same as proving that getting the Moderna jab results in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab.
The longer the medical community stays silent or at the most makes a sigh…the more likely our enemies within will conspire to do the exact same thing. This is the reason why all who have been and still are involved in this monstrous attempt at depopulation run amok as well the very reason they did it before the 2020 election…to have an administration which would support the cover up and hide the very greed of those in big pharma and the FDA and CDC to make a killing…aka $$$$$…off the vac…and least we say also a pardon protection for the crimes against humanity!
My understanding is that 'all cause mortality' (ACM) is rarely measured when it comes to vaccines. When it has 'live attenuated virus' vaccines are sometimes found to have some ability to reduce this important statistic (such as those against chickenpox, measles, mumps, rubella, polio and TB) but vaccines using inactivated viruses (hepatitis A and rabies) or toxiod products (diptheria and tetanus) probably do not. I don't believe any randomised controlled trials of mmRNA (modified messenger RNA) vaccines have been conducted (which have the necessary power to measure ACM).
steve, I am really having trouble making any sense of this chart. The dates seem way off on the X axis, and none it it is clear to me--what am I missing?
Who cares! They are both gene therapy bio-weapons by the self-proclaimed scumbag elites to create population reduction! All these scumbags in the NIH(CIA), FDA, CDC, WHO, WEF need to be in jail for treason against the world's countries! Unfortunately for them, treason does not come with a jail sentence...it's time!
It turns out - injectable BioWeapons kill you - if you let them stick you with their needles. And those who don't die, are always injured, it seems, just in subtle and inobvious ways, in some cases.
Thank you sincerely for all the priceless work you’re doing and sharing as it needs to be seen and heard. May you receive all the greatest blessings every day!
I wondered about that, too. Myocarditis in young people? It happened to a former student that I knew, he died at age 25 after taking the last booster. Tragic and very sad.
ACM = All Cause Mortality - article updated to show that.
Acronyms are a bitch. Thanks for the clarification!
2nded
ha! I was really getting a kick at the back and forth of folks asking and others answering and the fact it actually does not show up first on a Google search!
Now I have another one for ya' Wayne!
try to get Steve to be nice to the non-statistically oriented(ie MOST readers) for the significance of scientific notation of the P value.
(For those who read this, really low values are preferred because they show HOW significant the finding is. The closer to zero the better, meaning this fact is TRUE, man!
So, a P value number like 1.4 e -14 actually means: 0.000000000000014 THUS, it is zero! The statement it represents really is TRUE.
and anything that reads e-xx this can be said for. . .)
I don't think "true" is an applicable expression when using the p-value statistical method. If I understand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value correctly, a lower p-value does not prove a hypothesis - it only allows stronger rejection of the null-hypothesis, ie. in this case the statement that getting the Moderna jab does not result in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab. This is not the same as proving that getting the Moderna jab results in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab.
Thank you. Yes, I've always said to also put the numbers listed out to help those who may not be familiar with math.
Thank you, Steve Kirsch, for your excellent report here. Which does not surprise me, alas.
Thanks for this.How are you defining “non Covid periods?”
Found acm is all cause mortality!! Too bad it was t in the txt. Not everyone is clued into acronyms!!
GOD's blessings to you SK, a true TRUTH Warrior ...
The longer the medical community stays silent or at the most makes a sigh…the more likely our enemies within will conspire to do the exact same thing. This is the reason why all who have been and still are involved in this monstrous attempt at depopulation run amok as well the very reason they did it before the 2020 election…to have an administration which would support the cover up and hide the very greed of those in big pharma and the FDA and CDC to make a killing…aka $$$$$…off the vac…and least we say also a pardon protection for the crimes against humanity!
My understanding is that 'all cause mortality' (ACM) is rarely measured when it comes to vaccines. When it has 'live attenuated virus' vaccines are sometimes found to have some ability to reduce this important statistic (such as those against chickenpox, measles, mumps, rubella, polio and TB) but vaccines using inactivated viruses (hepatitis A and rabies) or toxiod products (diptheria and tetanus) probably do not. I don't believe any randomised controlled trials of mmRNA (modified messenger RNA) vaccines have been conducted (which have the necessary power to measure ACM).
And I see today Moderna is now being paid to manufacture the bird flu “ vax”.
I assume this is Bidens last ditched attempt to stave off Moderna’s bankruptcy
steve, I am really having trouble making any sense of this chart. The dates seem way off on the X axis, and none it it is clear to me--what am I missing?
Who cares! They are both gene therapy bio-weapons by the self-proclaimed scumbag elites to create population reduction! All these scumbags in the NIH(CIA), FDA, CDC, WHO, WEF need to be in jail for treason against the world's countries! Unfortunately for them, treason does not come with a jail sentence...it's time!
So, Steve. On pins and needles here.
Whatever happened to the million $$ bet with Wils??! on hold?
It turns out - injectable BioWeapons kill you - if you let them stick you with their needles. And those who don't die, are always injured, it seems, just in subtle and inobvious ways, in some cases.
COVID VAX KILLS
Thank you sincerely for all the priceless work you’re doing and sharing as it needs to be seen and heard. May you receive all the greatest blessings every day!
I don't understand the graph. What are decades before COVID doing on the graph's x axis? Is it labeled incorrectly?
I came here to see if anyone else was confused by the lack of clarity on the graph.
Happy that it's not just me then.
just a guess: those represent the year a human was born.
Sometimes Steve just doesn't bother with such things like labels on the abscissa and ordinate axes!
Like your professor used to say, "the proof is in the book".
If it is birth years, why is there such a spike in 25-30 year olds?
I wondered about that, too. Myocarditis in young people? It happened to a former student that I knew, he died at age 25 after taking the last booster. Tragic and very sad.
The graph shows a dramatic uptick between the years 1995 and 2000. I presume the x axis is years? I can’t follow the conclusion from the graph.
I wish I could pass this on to my friends in Czechia but I can't make heads or tails of it. :-(