123 Comments
User's avatar
WayneBGood's avatar

ACM = All Cause Mortality - article updated to show that.

Expand full comment
MattB's avatar

Acronyms are a bitch. Thanks for the clarification!

Expand full comment
rombios's avatar

2nded

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

ha! I was really getting a kick at the back and forth of folks asking and others answering and the fact it actually does not show up first on a Google search!

Now I have another one for ya' Wayne!

try to get Steve to be nice to the non-statistically oriented(ie MOST readers) for the significance of scientific notation of the P value.

(For those who read this, really low values are preferred because they show HOW significant the finding is. The closer to zero the better, meaning this fact is TRUE, man!

So, a P value number like 1.4 e -14 actually means: 0.000000000000014 THUS, it is zero! The statement it represents really is TRUE.

and anything that reads e-xx this can be said for. . .)

Expand full comment
xxXL's avatar

I don't think "true" is an applicable expression when using the p-value statistical method. If I understand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value correctly, a lower p-value does not prove a hypothesis - it only allows stronger rejection of the null-hypothesis, ie. in this case the statement that getting the Moderna jab does not result in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab. This is not the same as proving that getting the Moderna jab results in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

so, do you really think that such proofing of this term is the most explanatory or ,

just further confuses those statistically-handicapped? <== rhetorical

Expand full comment
xxXL's avatar
Jan 23Edited

Truth cannot be known. It can be a feeling though.

Expand full comment
Bill Jones's avatar

Thank you. Yes, I've always said to also put the numbers listed out to help those who may not be familiar with math.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

heck, at least at one point in the whole newsletter. . . like the idea when you use an acronym for the first time, show the full name next to it. . . just once.

Expand full comment
Arlene Johnson's avatar

Here is something I saved about Pfizer's mRNA shot, because my daughter got it and the Moderna, and she died of renal cell carcinoma:

2023/8/2

https://rumble.com/v1zhb3m-dr.-found-intentionally-blank-package-insert-in-a-box-of-mrna-vaccine-produ.html

SV40 Promoters and Enhancers Contaminate Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine - DNA from Manufacturing Process Raises Longer Term Cancer Concerns with Multiple Injections

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/sv40-promoters-and-enhancers-contaminate

Pfizer's biodefense contractors use simian DNA tumor virus SV40 (promoter and enhancer sequences) to upregulate the synthesis of the genetic code. No GMP (good manufacturing practices) here! But hey, it's FDA-approved (or at least the legal equivalent thereof)!

You're a cow, so get vaccinated! (vacc(a) cow)

Expand full comment
Zippy Dufus's avatar

I've examined the data dictionary, Mr. Kirsch's python script, and the data itself and do not see the vaccine batch number anywhere.

The (leaked) New Zealand data that Mr. Kirsch had acquired from DBA Barry Young had batch numbers. I consider this the smoking gun.

I'm sure that all western government kept careful records which include the vaccine batch number.

So this is very suspicious and makes the accuracy of this data questionable.

Disclaimer: I'm just an IT worker like Barry Young and I am 𝙣̲𝙤̲𝙩̲ a highly-credentialed statistician or any other type of scientist.

But I do hold Steve Kirsch in high regard and closely follow his work.

Expand full comment
Deep Dive's avatar

Steve, I'm not sure what test you performed, but a chi-squared test for Independence on those "alive and dead" numbers produces a chi-squared statistic of 62.9 and a p-value of 2.2 e-15.

The expected value for Pifzer alive was 369,065

The expected value for Pfizer dead was 1571.8

The expected value for Moderna alive was 43,478

The expected value for Moderna dead was 185.17

The observed values were far enough from those expected ones for strong statistical significance.

Expand full comment
Hans Berger's avatar

What is the official source of the czech data?

Expand full comment
WayneBGood's avatar

The Czech government. They're not hiding it.

Expand full comment
Mckeekitty's avatar

The jabs are bad news. Period.

Expand full comment
biologyphenom's avatar

Hey Steve, you emailed me about Scottish COVID inquiry and i replied and you were never heard from again. Maybe stop obessing over the COVID ‘vaccine’ and ask why it was ever approved in the first place as there was no lab leak. https://substack.com/@scottishcovidinquiry/note/c-87357605

Expand full comment
Garry Blankenship's avatar

Thank you WayneBGood. I searched foe ACM and found arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Our relatively new world cup of anacronyms runnith over. No discredit to Steve for being so emersed in this travesty, he assumes we can all keep up. I'm optimistic that accountability is near.

Expand full comment
Mickeyd's avatar

Is the graph correct it seems to end prior to 2000 how does this apply to cv dates?

Expand full comment
JeffP's avatar

I suspect the numbers at the bottom of the graph represent Birth Year of the patients in the Data (not calendar year.)

Expand full comment
John Graf's avatar

The malevolent intent is clear. And there will be no earthly justice for this, ever. Those who rule the world did this to humanity.

Expand full comment
Arnold Gore's avatar

Does ACM rederto Cardio Myopathy perhaps?

Expand full comment
Gracie H's avatar

Arnold, Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy.

Expand full comment
wayne's avatar

This title/headline should read

"Official Czech Republic record level data released Nov 2024 confirms Moderna is nearly 50% deadlier than Pfizer"

Expand full comment
Karl Elshoff's avatar

Or something a little more catchy like 'Czech The Data'

Expand full comment
Grumpy's avatar

If you don't understand Steve's sloppy graph, then just download the data and the python code and figure it out. :-)

Expand full comment
Transcriber B's avatar

Thank you, Steve Kirsch, for your excellent report here. Which does not surprise me, alas.

Expand full comment
Gigi Grace's avatar

Moderna’s vaccine facility has opened in Victoria, the first mRNA manufacturing site in the Southern Hemisphere. Despite ongoing concerns and emerging information about the potential dangers of Moderna’s products, this development is being pushed forward right in front of us.

Expand full comment
Robyn S's avatar

It's Victoria. Enough said. If you're still living there since it became Danistan, then obviously you can put up with all this covid rubbish! I know/knew plenty of people who even MOVED to Melbourne and surrounds during covid: for a job, to retire etc. They didn't mind wearing masks. They weren't really bothered by it all. I found that quite unnerving.

But really, Australia gets a new Moderna facility because

1. most countries probably wouldn't want the bad publicity associated with it and

2. most Aussies are a lame bunch. They roll over no problem! They've gone SOFT. We're still a convict nation, it's just that most people aren't yanking at their chains now. They're used to them...

And people are STILL getting covid jabs these days. In fact, I know people in their 30s and 40s who are doing this, not just those who are middle-aged and old! People who SHOULD be otherwise fairly fit and healthy. Not anymore, anyway...

So there are some people that just cannot be saved no matter what you tell them. They are sold, hook, line and sinker to Big Pharma and they are desperate to stay 'up to date' with their jabs! No wonder there's a Moderna facility here. We've certainly got enough twits lining up for it. The only upside is that if these idiots keep up with their regime, this Moderna facility will have a lot less people to sell their wares to soon enough. And the worst part is that I won't shed any tears over it. I have come to accept that this is what people are like. Some people are just born stupid and make stupid choices over and over and over. They might be your family, your friend, your co-worker, your boss, a stranger on the street; or the staff who makes your coffee each morning. These people are EVERYWHERE. They might not be outspoken about their choices. They might even be nice enough people (on the surface). They might even have some degrees on their wall and/or sound sane about many other topics. But they're still seeing their GPs about all and sundry, they're still signing up for jabs galore, they still can't make the connection between jabs and illness/death - and they never will. They will keep making poor (lifestyle) decisions until the day they die. THIS is why manufacturing facilities like Moderna's new Victorian one are in existence. To support the irrationality of the masses. To support the bottom line of Big Pharma. To keep stupid people sick. To earn $$ from them before they pass. It's just another business model - and there are plenty of people who are keen on it.

Yes, I know it's crazy. But I've also come to realise that most humans are in fact a little bit crazy! This is why a business model based on irrationality works so well!

Ah well, we'll see how long the facility lasts, shall we?! ;-)

Expand full comment
H8SBAD's avatar

Thanks for this.How are you defining “non Covid periods?”

Expand full comment