Share this comment
I don't think "true" is an applicable expression when using the p-value statistical method. If I understand en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P… correctly, a lower p-value does not prove a hypothesis - it only allows stronger rejection of the null-hypothesis, ie. in this case the statement that getting the Moderna jab does not result in a higher ACM…
I don't think "true" is an applicable expression when using the p-value statistical method. If I understand https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-value correctly, a lower p-value does not prove a hypothesis - it only allows stronger rejection of the null-hypothesis, ie. in this case the statement that getting the Moderna jab does not result in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab. This is not the same as proving that getting the Moderna jab results in a higher ACM than getting the Pfizer jab.
so, do you really think that such proofing of this term is the most explanatory or ,
just further confuses those statistically-handicapped? <== rhetorical
Truth cannot be known. It can be a feeling though.