I guess we'll have to read the paper to see how they came up with their "estimates." Even if the method is logical, it's based on BS since all "Covid death" data is untrustworthy. For that reason alone, without even reading it, I feel pretty confident throwing it onto the mountain of other worthless "studies" on "Covid" and the clot shot…
I guess we'll have to read the paper to see how they came up with their "estimates." Even if the method is logical, it's based on BS since all "Covid death" data is untrustworthy. For that reason alone, without even reading it, I feel pretty confident throwing it onto the mountain of other worthless "studies" on "Covid" and the clot shots. The fact that there are so many academics out there making a good living creating junk science is a sad testimony to the state of our society. Even the English is crappy in the excerpts Steve shows. How's that possible with a serious scientific study? I'm no literary guru, but I'd be damn sure any paper I published was clear and concise. Sadly, just about any dingbat can get a paper or book published these days. Imagine what humanity could do if we directed our energy productively.
I had never heard the story behind that retracted paper, but it doesn't surprise me. I think there was another one, which was also designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine, where the subjects were given it both late, and in toxic amounts.
I say, let the liars lie. The powers that enable them will eventually be discredited, and we sure as hell don't want Big Brother telling us what's true. We need less government, not more. In this new "wild west" information environment, we'll just have to learn to do our own homework and elect leaders who enable independent thought and action.
I guess we'll have to read the paper to see how they came up with their "estimates." Even if the method is logical, it's based on BS since all "Covid death" data is untrustworthy. For that reason alone, without even reading it, I feel pretty confident throwing it onto the mountain of other worthless "studies" on "Covid" and the clot shots. The fact that there are so many academics out there making a good living creating junk science is a sad testimony to the state of our society. Even the English is crappy in the excerpts Steve shows. How's that possible with a serious scientific study? I'm no literary guru, but I'd be damn sure any paper I published was clear and concise. Sadly, just about any dingbat can get a paper or book published these days. Imagine what humanity could do if we directed our energy productively.
I had never heard the story behind that retracted paper, but it doesn't surprise me. I think there was another one, which was also designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine, where the subjects were given it both late, and in toxic amounts.
I say, let the liars lie. The powers that enable them will eventually be discredited, and we sure as hell don't want Big Brother telling us what's true. We need less government, not more. In this new "wild west" information environment, we'll just have to learn to do our own homework and elect leaders who enable independent thought and action.
Thanks. I will check that out. I like Nass. Her opinions are always very well researched.