I had never heard the story behind that retracted paper, but it doesn't surprise me. I think there was another one, which was also designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine, where the subjects were given it both late, and in toxic amounts.
I say, let the liars lie. The powers that enable them will eventually be discredited, and we sure as …
I had never heard the story behind that retracted paper, but it doesn't surprise me. I think there was another one, which was also designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine, where the subjects were given it both late, and in toxic amounts.
I say, let the liars lie. The powers that enable them will eventually be discredited, and we sure as hell don't want Big Brother telling us what's true. We need less government, not more. In this new "wild west" information environment, we'll just have to learn to do our own homework and elect leaders who enable independent thought and action.
I had never heard the story behind that retracted paper, but it doesn't surprise me. I think there was another one, which was also designed to discredit hydroxychloroquine, where the subjects were given it both late, and in toxic amounts.
I say, let the liars lie. The powers that enable them will eventually be discredited, and we sure as hell don't want Big Brother telling us what's true. We need less government, not more. In this new "wild west" information environment, we'll just have to learn to do our own homework and elect leaders who enable independent thought and action.
Thanks. I will check that out. I like Nass. Her opinions are always very well researched.