Unfortunately, professionals in the electrical engineering sector are like professionals in other sectors, protective of their own industry & arrogant. Entities like the IEEE or WHO or the regulators like to pretend they are using the best "science" available or that they are using a "weight of evidence" approach, all the while denigrati…
Unfortunately, professionals in the electrical engineering sector are like professionals in other sectors, protective of their own industry & arrogant. Entities like the IEEE or WHO or the regulators like to pretend they are using the best "science" available or that they are using a "weight of evidence" approach, all the while denigrating legitimate science that shows harms. They produce voluminous materials, based on "meta-analyses", reviews, & the like, twisting the data to produce the conclusions they want. Honestly, it saddens me greatly, when someone with your intelligence, equates normal cosmic radiation or sunlight with the artificial radiation of digitally pulsed signals the earth is becoming increasingly saturated with.
re: " it saddens me greatly, when someone with your intelligence, equates normal cosmic radiation or sunlight with the artificial radiation of digitally pulsed signals "
Denying that EM energy produced by once source is 'magic', while the other is entirely different? What world to you live in anyway? This is fantasy ...
re: "Unfortunately, professionals in the electrical engineering sector are like professionals in other sectors, "
Blah, blah, blah. Look at the reports and the data. Too easy for Dunning-Krugers to hand-wave away inconvenient facts like you just did, not addressing the facts, research and data.
I have. I've also considered the science & data ignored in those reports, but produced by others in the field who have been essentially silenced into submission. I have read extensively on the topic, including published books by people like Blank, Marino/Becker, Kane etc warning about the dangers & how conflicted the regulators/associations are.
It is very telling to me that you use terms like "dunning kruger", because that is a way to discredit any opposition, typically of industry tactics & so called skeptics. Unfortunately what you people either haven't realised, or refuse to acknowledge is that we don't live in a pure science driven world. It has become subservient to corporate & commercial interests. That is what science is about today.
Unfortunately, professionals in the electrical engineering sector are like professionals in other sectors, protective of their own industry & arrogant. Entities like the IEEE or WHO or the regulators like to pretend they are using the best "science" available or that they are using a "weight of evidence" approach, all the while denigrating legitimate science that shows harms. They produce voluminous materials, based on "meta-analyses", reviews, & the like, twisting the data to produce the conclusions they want. Honestly, it saddens me greatly, when someone with your intelligence, equates normal cosmic radiation or sunlight with the artificial radiation of digitally pulsed signals the earth is becoming increasingly saturated with.
re: " it saddens me greatly, when someone with your intelligence, equates normal cosmic radiation or sunlight with the artificial radiation of digitally pulsed signals "
Denying that EM energy produced by once source is 'magic', while the other is entirely different? What world to you live in anyway? This is fantasy ...
re: "Entities like the IEEE"
Broad hand wave again. Do you know who constitutes the voting members of the IEEE, or not?
re: "Unfortunately, professionals in the electrical engineering sector are like professionals in other sectors, "
Blah, blah, blah. Look at the reports and the data. Too easy for Dunning-Krugers to hand-wave away inconvenient facts like you just did, not addressing the facts, research and data.
I have. I've also considered the science & data ignored in those reports, but produced by others in the field who have been essentially silenced into submission. I have read extensively on the topic, including published books by people like Blank, Marino/Becker, Kane etc warning about the dangers & how conflicted the regulators/associations are.
It is very telling to me that you use terms like "dunning kruger", because that is a way to discredit any opposition, typically of industry tactics & so called skeptics. Unfortunately what you people either haven't realised, or refuse to acknowledge is that we don't live in a pure science driven world. It has become subservient to corporate & commercial interests. That is what science is about today.