I have. I've also considered the science & data ignored in those reports, but produced by others in the field who have been essentially silenced into submission. I have read extensively on the topic, including published books by people like Blank, Marino/Becker, Kane etc warning about the dangers & how conflicted the regulators/associati…
I have. I've also considered the science & data ignored in those reports, but produced by others in the field who have been essentially silenced into submission. I have read extensively on the topic, including published books by people like Blank, Marino/Becker, Kane etc warning about the dangers & how conflicted the regulators/associations are.
It is very telling to me that you use terms like "dunning kruger", because that is a way to discredit any opposition, typically of industry tactics & so called skeptics. Unfortunately what you people either haven't realised, or refuse to acknowledge is that we don't live in a pure science driven world. It has become subservient to corporate & commercial interests. That is what science is about today.
I have. I've also considered the science & data ignored in those reports, but produced by others in the field who have been essentially silenced into submission. I have read extensively on the topic, including published books by people like Blank, Marino/Becker, Kane etc warning about the dangers & how conflicted the regulators/associations are.
It is very telling to me that you use terms like "dunning kruger", because that is a way to discredit any opposition, typically of industry tactics & so called skeptics. Unfortunately what you people either haven't realised, or refuse to acknowledge is that we don't live in a pure science driven world. It has become subservient to corporate & commercial interests. That is what science is about today.