Buy hey, nobody who works in public health actually cares how many people are killed by the lack of quality control on these vaccines. They are "safe and effective" even when they aren't.
I suspected this all along . The first batch of Covid vaccines were required to be kept at -70° C. I had many questions about this .
Did all of the facilities receiving the vaccines have refrigeration that would cool to -70° C?
How were the vaccine vials warmed, because you can’t inject something that is -70° C into the deltoid?
It had to be kept so cold, because movement would damage the mRNA technology. Nurses are typically taught to roll the veil between the hands to warm it. Did they do that? Was there settling out in the vials? Did some people get more concentrated mRNA product injected then others?
If it was so safe and effective, why wasn’t it given to all of the primary care doctors to administer?
Why was it given to your local grocery store to administer, or your local church, or big box store?
Why wasn’t it your primary care doctor ,Who knows you and your health situation, the one administered the shots?
The answer to the last question is … if the primary care doctors administered the shots and then the next day had to deal with the adverse reactions, there would be more outrage.
It was not a medical thing it was a political thing ! Doctors are trained to evaluate each individual and customize a health plan and look at side effects.
Well, now what about that!!!! Down memory lane and almost forgotten. It was a big deal to keep the vials at minus temperature. Who remembers that? And not to roll the vial to mix it, because it would become unstable. Who has the ability to transport such huge quantities of anything at such temperatures and how did the liquid injections get into the human tissue, without being unstable? And how did they know to keep the liquid … blah blah blah. They think we are useless maggots they can douse with toxic substances to eradicate us.
The only potential problem I see with Steve's analysis is inability to be sure certain batches weren't given to populations who were more/less likely to die anyway. As he mentions, by only looking at the under 60 age groups, you can be sure nursing home patients aren't included, but what about all the other classes of people who are more/less likely to die? I mean, if certain batches were given mostly to the poor, who have a higher mortality anyway, you'd expect that batch to look bad in this analysis. I'm not saying there isn't something here. I actually think the chances are good his conclusion is correct (i.e., there's no way the poor are 9x more likely to die in any given year). All I'm trying to do is be honest about the limitations. Maybe somebody has a better way to look at this.
Fauci’s lies killed people, broke families apart, ruined the U.S. economy, and helped the Dems steal an election. Why does he go free? Attorney Tom Renz has a very popular opinion about Fauci’s lies, and it's going viral on networks that still allow freedom of speech. Mind you, many of these lies were promulgated by mainstream media, the CDC, the NIH, the FDA, and of course incessant Pfizer advertisements played on every mainstream network ad nauseam.
The CDC faked 99% of the number of deaths attributed to the COVID virus, and didn’t report on vaccine deaths and injuries until we all already knew, but that doesn’t excuse Fauci.
If we don’t get justice over the dangerous covid jabs, does anyone think things will get better? Like a bully..,the sooner you stand up to them the sooner it ends.
Yeah, it could be in the quality control. Perhaps in the manufacturing, which is what I think Steve is suggesting, or in the delivery, which is what Mark Moore here suggests. But maybe the batch differences are deliberate. Two possibilities with that: They're experimenting on us, keeping track of the differing results. Or maybe they just made a bunch of these things placebo because that's cheaper to produce.
I believe Midwestern Doctor looked at this and found that the closer the jab recipients were to the manufacturing site, the more deadly the injection. Remember when they first started talking about the injections, how they had to be kept at extremely low temps to keep the mRNA from breaking down, or maybe it was to keep the mRNA enveloped in the lipid nanoparticles, temps well below zero Celsius? It's my suspicion that the injections were not kept at those low temps the further you get from the manufacturing site and the further you go out in time from date of manufacture. As a result, batches that are older or further away from the manufacturing site are less deadly because the nRNA has broken down or is no longer enclosed in the lipid nanoparticles. Fresh batch = very deadly. Old batch = less deadly.
It's an interesting hypothesis, for sure. Yet here in Big Pharma central, I can walk to Moderna HQ near a gleaming Pfizer high-rise, a stone's throw from Steve's alma mater MIT. Not sure where exactly the shots were manufactured though. Many people I know have had multiple injections without serious adverse events (SAE)....well, none they will admit to anyway.
That said, I do have an ongoing list of SAE and deaths but the shots are never questioned. New onset conditions/deaths are attributed to natural aging and/or anything but the shots. I'm stating the obvious to anyone reading this.
yes, I believe the data was from Europe, Belgium in particular. If you go to her substack, you could find the article. Might have been entitled What Makes Vaccines So Dangerous, but could have been a different one.
I would love to share this with my shot up friends and relatives. But, they don’t read it, they immediately look up your name on so-called “fact checkers” and report back that you are a misinformation spreader. They thereby relieve themselves of any fear that these shots might harm them.
This problem is hardly limited to mRNA shots but related generally to newly released drugs of all types. The reason is that research populations are small compared to real world patient numbers, so even a drug that passes all the pre-release statistical tests for reliability may produce unexpected side effects when actually given to a large number of real patients. As a result, the FDA regularly pulls drugs from the market. See my comment below for the link to an article at Brownstone.
I agree. I recently got my brother to get off statins. I see how one prescription leads to another. How fear is used to keep people coming back. A deadly industry.
With the new much lower "normal blood pressure" guidelines amid the cholesterol controversy, the medical/biopharmaceutical industrial complex assures that practically everyone will be placed on BP meds and statins. A steady supply of patients needing many doctor visits for monitoring and more prescriptions. Ka-ching!
I've tried to share some pieces with friends and family and they just go silent and presumably don't read it. No response, ever. Very disappointing and bizarre.
My injected elder siblings don't talk about it - at least not with me (conspiracy theorist The Science! denier that I am, R.N. for 40 years). OK, one will as she had a retinal clot requiring eyeball injections for 1+ year but she's got a very ill husband - who was forced last year as a cardiac transplant candidate to receive Covid, pneumonia and high dose flu shots at the same time, yes, all 3 shots together as outpatient - by the infectious disease M.D. on the transplant team at a world-renowned hospital. What a shocker, her husband quickly decompensated and was admitted to the hospital within 24 hours. Gee whiz, no M.D. at this famous institution questioned the policy of three "safe and effective vaccines" injected at the same time to a 65 y.o. patient with a failing heart!
When another sibling's spouse had new onset bouts of severe vertigo, nausea/vomiting & abdominal pain requiring 4 urgent care/E.R. visits in the last 2 years, the shots were never called into question. It was "anything but", one possible etiology was cannabis use.
Oh yeah, another sibling with new onset supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 2022 after hiking requiring medical intervention/medication. In 2021 when I tried to share research pertaining to my personal medical history which made me "hesitant" to submit to experimental injections? A hand went up in my face as she declared "No, I don't do my own research, I'll leave that to the experts. I only care about what Dr. Faux Chi says".
Eldest sibling in 2021 declared "The Science is Settled! (Tm)" and "I don't think my government would lie to me!" He went to Woodstock in 1969, lived thru Kennedy assassinations, etc and has had 6 - 8 shots. The last time Covid came up a year he declared that ivermectin does not work. This was after all siblings, their children, and everyone they knew had been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Totally. But at this point they will never admit it, they are in too deep. I have similar stories and am told tragic incidents by jabbed people who cannot even consider relating these severe health degradations to the current regimen of pharmaceutical deplorables. The continued rise in excess deaths does not touch them either. I have resigned myself to this continuing….
Steve is dah number one :).. I remember being online late at night and he dropped the New Zealand data. Those numbers have to be revisited and modelled. 8 hours later the data was scrubbed.
Your comment suggests to ALL of us that we should immediately download any research papers, data sets, expert commentary, and other information that might be repressed so that we have copies and can share that valuable information.
Yes they scrubbing research papers that were fraudulently made. I save videos with OBS.... They scrubbed the books on natural healing from the libraries...
How many are aware that Moderna's patent provides the best steps to take to deactivate and dissolve the nanotechnology in their Covid 19 shots??? Does anyone really believe that getting crooks to admit they're wrong or evil is a better strategy than providing the antidote???
Is our time better spent seeking a scapegoat or curing those who are sick?
The batches were still under research; there was not just one concentration of mRNA, there were several. That was part of the research, which concentration was “best.” I don’t remember the exact mcg in each dose, but I remember there were several.
Of course, I stopped with the harmful auto-immune causing vaccines more than 15 years ago when my daughter was injured by the tdap, so I wasn’t going to participate in the madness, but I don’t think we know the whole truth yet.
According to a very interesting article by a retired physician with wide experience, initial batches of many drugs are problematic. He wrote: "the number of patients placed on the new pharmaceutical is usually many times the number of research participants. As a result, bad reactions, including deaths, from the new product that were not seen during the research can emerge." Caveat emptor.
Dawn, I am of the opinion that these substances referred to as "covid vaccines" had been thoroughly researched several years longer than we were informed. Make no mistake the components and effects of each vial was completely known as well as who was injected with which vials. Their main cloak of hiding is "It was new and we didn't know much about it". Pure bull doo doo. Most sheep received distilled water which is typical with any so called "vaccine". It was a campaign to kill and make sick. Mission accomplished. Remember Bill Gates' words, "And there will be more pandemics." A similar campaign will appear soon.
It's those health staff who know the truth still promoting it as safe and effective , that I can't stomach
I suspected this all along . The first batch of Covid vaccines were required to be kept at -70° C. I had many questions about this .
Did all of the facilities receiving the vaccines have refrigeration that would cool to -70° C?
How were the vaccine vials warmed, because you can’t inject something that is -70° C into the deltoid?
It had to be kept so cold, because movement would damage the mRNA technology. Nurses are typically taught to roll the veil between the hands to warm it. Did they do that? Was there settling out in the vials? Did some people get more concentrated mRNA product injected then others?
If it was so safe and effective, why wasn’t it given to all of the primary care doctors to administer?
Why was it given to your local grocery store to administer, or your local church, or big box store?
Why wasn’t it your primary care doctor ,Who knows you and your health situation, the one administered the shots?
The answer to the last question is … if the primary care doctors administered the shots and then the next day had to deal with the adverse reactions, there would be more outrage.
It was not a medical thing it was a political thing ! Doctors are trained to evaluate each individual and customize a health plan and look at side effects.
Glad I didn’t take it !
Me too!
Well, now what about that!!!! Down memory lane and almost forgotten. It was a big deal to keep the vials at minus temperature. Who remembers that? And not to roll the vial to mix it, because it would become unstable. Who has the ability to transport such huge quantities of anything at such temperatures and how did the liquid injections get into the human tissue, without being unstable? And how did they know to keep the liquid … blah blah blah. They think we are useless maggots they can douse with toxic substances to eradicate us.
The only potential problem I see with Steve's analysis is inability to be sure certain batches weren't given to populations who were more/less likely to die anyway. As he mentions, by only looking at the under 60 age groups, you can be sure nursing home patients aren't included, but what about all the other classes of people who are more/less likely to die? I mean, if certain batches were given mostly to the poor, who have a higher mortality anyway, you'd expect that batch to look bad in this analysis. I'm not saying there isn't something here. I actually think the chances are good his conclusion is correct (i.e., there's no way the poor are 9x more likely to die in any given year). All I'm trying to do is be honest about the limitations. Maybe somebody has a better way to look at this.
I wanted to share the website: www.howbadismybatch.com
it ranks the batches by injury and mortality numbers from worst batch and then down the line.
Yeah, but nothings perfect, and you can't get cv19 if you're dead from the vaX, so there's that benefit you're not accounting for, so yeah.
Fauci’s lies killed people, broke families apart, ruined the U.S. economy, and helped the Dems steal an election. Why does he go free? Attorney Tom Renz has a very popular opinion about Fauci’s lies, and it's going viral on networks that still allow freedom of speech. Mind you, many of these lies were promulgated by mainstream media, the CDC, the NIH, the FDA, and of course incessant Pfizer advertisements played on every mainstream network ad nauseam.
The CDC faked 99% of the number of deaths attributed to the COVID virus, and didn’t report on vaccine deaths and injuries until we all already knew, but that doesn’t excuse Fauci.
If we don’t get justice over the dangerous covid jabs, does anyone think things will get better? Like a bully..,the sooner you stand up to them the sooner it ends.
I fully agree. Accountability is the only path forward.
Don't get jabbed. If jabbed, STOP.
Batches/lots be damned!
"Just when I thought I was out...They Pulled Me Back In."
The variation between batches is just insane. But of course they have no liability, so its business as usual.
And since this was the Czech data, this isn't "reporting differences" in VAERS. Batch differences is now proven to be a real thing.
Here's a thought. Get some samples from the "nice" batches, and the "deadly" batches. Run tests, and see what's different between them.
Oh wait, Health Canada is destroying the old batches. I wonder why?
At this rate, we won't need to train more doctors. Thinning the herd.
Yeah, it could be in the quality control. Perhaps in the manufacturing, which is what I think Steve is suggesting, or in the delivery, which is what Mark Moore here suggests. But maybe the batch differences are deliberate. Two possibilities with that: They're experimenting on us, keeping track of the differing results. Or maybe they just made a bunch of these things placebo because that's cheaper to produce.
I believe Midwestern Doctor looked at this and found that the closer the jab recipients were to the manufacturing site, the more deadly the injection. Remember when they first started talking about the injections, how they had to be kept at extremely low temps to keep the mRNA from breaking down, or maybe it was to keep the mRNA enveloped in the lipid nanoparticles, temps well below zero Celsius? It's my suspicion that the injections were not kept at those low temps the further you get from the manufacturing site and the further you go out in time from date of manufacture. As a result, batches that are older or further away from the manufacturing site are less deadly because the nRNA has broken down or is no longer enclosed in the lipid nanoparticles. Fresh batch = very deadly. Old batch = less deadly.
I can't find this on his substack. It is a good idea, and it might be your own. Someone should do this.
It's an interesting hypothesis, for sure. Yet here in Big Pharma central, I can walk to Moderna HQ near a gleaming Pfizer high-rise, a stone's throw from Steve's alma mater MIT. Not sure where exactly the shots were manufactured though. Many people I know have had multiple injections without serious adverse events (SAE)....well, none they will admit to anyway.
That said, I do have an ongoing list of SAE and deaths but the shots are never questioned. New onset conditions/deaths are attributed to natural aging and/or anything but the shots. I'm stating the obvious to anyone reading this.
What a fascinating observation. Did A Midwestern Doctor really have good data to assess that though, I wonder.
yes, I believe the data was from Europe, Belgium in particular. If you go to her substack, you could find the article. Might have been entitled What Makes Vaccines So Dangerous, but could have been a different one.
In modern societies where baby killing is now celebrated, are we really surprised that NOBODY CARES ABOUT THESE SHOTS KILLING PEOPLE???
It is because MSM and other prominent media are not covering Vaccine deaths.
I would love to share this with my shot up friends and relatives. But, they don’t read it, they immediately look up your name on so-called “fact checkers” and report back that you are a misinformation spreader. They thereby relieve themselves of any fear that these shots might harm them.
This problem is hardly limited to mRNA shots but related generally to newly released drugs of all types. The reason is that research populations are small compared to real world patient numbers, so even a drug that passes all the pre-release statistical tests for reliability may produce unexpected side effects when actually given to a large number of real patients. As a result, the FDA regularly pulls drugs from the market. See my comment below for the link to an article at Brownstone.
I agree. I recently got my brother to get off statins. I see how one prescription leads to another. How fear is used to keep people coming back. A deadly industry.
With the new much lower "normal blood pressure" guidelines amid the cholesterol controversy, the medical/biopharmaceutical industrial complex assures that practically everyone will be placed on BP meds and statins. A steady supply of patients needing many doctor visits for monitoring and more prescriptions. Ka-ching!
not surprised.
My jabbed sister stopped talking to me.
Snitches get, jabs.
I've tried to share some pieces with friends and family and they just go silent and presumably don't read it. No response, ever. Very disappointing and bizarre.
My injected elder siblings don't talk about it - at least not with me (conspiracy theorist The Science! denier that I am, R.N. for 40 years). OK, one will as she had a retinal clot requiring eyeball injections for 1+ year but she's got a very ill husband - who was forced last year as a cardiac transplant candidate to receive Covid, pneumonia and high dose flu shots at the same time, yes, all 3 shots together as outpatient - by the infectious disease M.D. on the transplant team at a world-renowned hospital. What a shocker, her husband quickly decompensated and was admitted to the hospital within 24 hours. Gee whiz, no M.D. at this famous institution questioned the policy of three "safe and effective vaccines" injected at the same time to a 65 y.o. patient with a failing heart!
When another sibling's spouse had new onset bouts of severe vertigo, nausea/vomiting & abdominal pain requiring 4 urgent care/E.R. visits in the last 2 years, the shots were never called into question. It was "anything but", one possible etiology was cannabis use.
Oh yeah, another sibling with new onset supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 2022 after hiking requiring medical intervention/medication. In 2021 when I tried to share research pertaining to my personal medical history which made me "hesitant" to submit to experimental injections? A hand went up in my face as she declared "No, I don't do my own research, I'll leave that to the experts. I only care about what Dr. Faux Chi says".
Eldest sibling in 2021 declared "The Science is Settled! (Tm)" and "I don't think my government would lie to me!" He went to Woodstock in 1969, lived thru Kennedy assassinations, etc and has had 6 - 8 shots. The last time Covid came up a year he declared that ivermectin does not work. This was after all siblings, their children, and everyone they knew had been infected with SARS-CoV-2.
Bizarre indeed.
Totally. But at this point they will never admit it, they are in too deep. I have similar stories and am told tragic incidents by jabbed people who cannot even consider relating these severe health degradations to the current regimen of pharmaceutical deplorables. The continued rise in excess deaths does not touch them either. I have resigned myself to this continuing….
Yes. This sad situation seems Too Big To Fail.
I concur. Your injected friends and relatives may also (via relentless propaganda) accuse you and Steve of being anti-science, conspiracy theorists.
Also, mild correction: Steve by his own admission has been pigeon-holed as a misinformation SUPERspreader. ;-)
Steve is dah number one :).. I remember being online late at night and he dropped the New Zealand data. Those numbers have to be revisited and modelled. 8 hours later the data was scrubbed.
Your comment suggests to ALL of us that we should immediately download any research papers, data sets, expert commentary, and other information that might be repressed so that we have copies and can share that valuable information.
Yes they scrubbing research papers that were fraudulently made. I save videos with OBS.... They scrubbed the books on natural healing from the libraries...
How many are aware that Moderna's patent provides the best steps to take to deactivate and dissolve the nanotechnology in their Covid 19 shots??? Does anyone really believe that getting crooks to admit they're wrong or evil is a better strategy than providing the antidote???
Is our time better spent seeking a scapegoat or curing those who are sick?
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/breaking-news-calcium-disodium-edta
True Steve, but here is the final verdict: https://makismd.substack.com/p/video-theory-on-what-is-in-the-covid
The batches were still under research; there was not just one concentration of mRNA, there were several. That was part of the research, which concentration was “best.” I don’t remember the exact mcg in each dose, but I remember there were several.
Of course, I stopped with the harmful auto-immune causing vaccines more than 15 years ago when my daughter was injured by the tdap, so I wasn’t going to participate in the madness, but I don’t think we know the whole truth yet.
According to a very interesting article by a retired physician with wide experience, initial batches of many drugs are problematic. He wrote: "the number of patients placed on the new pharmaceutical is usually many times the number of research participants. As a result, bad reactions, including deaths, from the new product that were not seen during the research can emerge." Caveat emptor.
brownstone.org/articles/a-retired-physicians-view-of-american-healthcare/
Dawn, I am of the opinion that these substances referred to as "covid vaccines" had been thoroughly researched several years longer than we were informed. Make no mistake the components and effects of each vial was completely known as well as who was injected with which vials. Their main cloak of hiding is "It was new and we didn't know much about it". Pure bull doo doo. Most sheep received distilled water which is typical with any so called "vaccine". It was a campaign to kill and make sick. Mission accomplished. Remember Bill Gates' words, "And there will be more pandemics." A similar campaign will appear soon.